An amendment to prohibit funds from being used for a United Nations peacekeeping mission if an individual who is participating in that mission is under investigation for alleged human rights abuses, including sexual exploitation, and that individual has not been removed from that mission for the duration of that investigation.
What it does: Adds TITLE VIII--ADDITIONAL GENERAL PROVISIONS at the end of the billWhat it changes
1 change to H.R. 5672
We couldn't match these changes to the text of H.R. 5672, so they're shown as written.
Adds TITLE VIII--ADDITIONAL GENERAL PROVISIONS at the end of the bill
Adds a titleInserted: TITLE VIII--ADDITIONAL GENERAL PROVISIONS
Inserted: Sec. 801. None of the funds made available in this Act may be used to fund a United Nations peacekeeping mission if an individual who is participating in that mission is under investigation for alleged human rights abuses, including sexual exploitation, and that individual has not been removed from that mission for the duration of that investigation.
Original wording
At the end of the bill (before the short title), insert the following:
Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.
As printed
At the end of the bill (before the short title), insert the following:
TITLE VIII--ADDITIONAL GENERAL PROVISIONS
Sec. 801. None of the funds made available in this Act may be used to fund a United Nations peacekeeping mission if an individual who is participating in that mission is under investigation for alleged human rights abuses, including sexual exploitation, and that individual has not been removed from that mission for the duration of that investigation.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
House amendment offered
June 28, 2006
View full timeline
House amendment offered
June 28, 2006
House amendment offered/reported by : Amendment (A056) offered by Mr. McCaul (TX).(consideration: CR H4758-4759; text: CR H4757)
June 28, 2006 • 7:44 PM
Amendment (A056) offered by Mr. McCaul (TX). (consideration: CR H4758-4759; text: CR H4757)
June 28, 2006 • 7:44 PM
By unanimous consent, the McCaul (TX) amendment was withdrawn.
June 28, 2006 • 7:47 PM