An amendment numbered 6 printed in Part B of House Report 110-760 to express that it is the sense of Congress to encourage States that receive Federal funding to develop corrosion mitigation and prevention plans. The plans are encouraged to contain expected useful life of the bridge, details of corrosion mitigation and prevention methods in construction and maintenance of the bridge, certification and approval by a corrosion expert and corrosion training for all bridge inspectors.
What it does: Adds SEC. 7. SENSE OF CONGRESS at the end of the billDescription
Amendment expressed that it is the sense of Congress to encourage States that receive Federal funding to develop corrosion mitigation and prevention plans. The plans are encouraged to contain expected useful life of the bridge, details of corrosion mitigation and prevention methods in construction and maintenance of the bridge, and certification and approval by a corrosion expert and corrosion training for all bridge inspectors.
What it changes
1 change to H.R. 3999
We couldn't match these changes to the text of H.R. 3999, so they're shown as written.
Adds SEC. 7. SENSE OF CONGRESS at the end of the bill
Adds a sectionInserted: SEC. 7. SENSE OF CONGRESS.
Inserted: It is the sense of Congress that each State should prepare a corrosion mitigation and prevention plan, for a project for construction, replacement, or rehabilitation of a bridge, that includes the following:
Inserted: (1) An estimate of the expected useful life of the bridge.
Inserted: (2) An estimate of environmental exposure of the bridge, including marine, deicer application, industrial, rural, rainfall, temperature, freeze-thaw, and other factors that influence corrosion prevention and corrosion mitigation strategies.
Inserted: (3) An identification of the functional classification of the bridge.
Inserted: (4) Details of corrosion mitigation and prevention methods that will be used with respect to the bridge, taking into account--
Inserted: (A) material selection;
Inserted: (B) coating considerations;
Inserted: (C) cathodic protection considerations;
Inserted: (D) design considerations for corrosion; and
Inserted: (E) concrete requirements.
Inserted: (5) Details of a project maintenance program for the life of the bridge.
Show 2 more inserted paragraphsShow less
Inserted: (6) A certification that the plan was developed by the State or States and approved by a corrosion expert.
Inserted: (7) A certification that each individual conducting inspections of Federal-aid highway bridges in the State or States receives training from a corrosion expert.
Original wording
At the end of the bill, add the following:
Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.
As printed
At the end of the bill, add the following:
SEC. 7. SENSE OF CONGRESS.
It is the sense of Congress that each State should prepare a corrosion mitigation and prevention plan, for a project for construction, replacement, or rehabilitation of a bridge, that includes the following:
(1) An estimate of the expected useful life of the bridge.
(2) An estimate of environmental exposure of the bridge, including marine, deicer application, industrial, rural, rainfall, temperature, freeze-thaw, and other factors that influence corrosion prevention and corrosion mitigation strategies.
(3) An identification of the functional classification of the bridge.
(4) Details of corrosion mitigation and prevention methods that will be used with respect to the bridge, taking into account--
(A) material selection;
(B) coating considerations;
(C) cathodic protection considerations;
(D) design considerations for corrosion; and
(E) concrete requirements.
(5) Details of a project maintenance program for the life of the bridge.
(6) A certification that the plan was developed by the State or States and approved by a corrosion expert.
(7) A certification that each individual conducting inspections of Federal-aid highway bridges in the State or States receives training from a corrosion expert.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
House amendment offered
July 23, 2008
View full timeline
House amendment offered
July 23, 2008
House amendment agreed to: On agreeing to the Conaway amendment (A006) Agreed to by voice vote.
July 23, 2008 • 8:00 PM
Amendment agreed to Committee of the Whole
July 23, 2008 • 8:00 PM
House amendment offered/reported by : Amendment (A006) offered by Mr. Conaway.(consideration: CR H7031-7032; text: CR H7031)
July 23, 2008 • 7:51 PM
Amendment (A006) offered by Mr. Conaway. (consideration: CR H7031-7032; text: CR H7031)
July 23, 2008 • 7:51 PM
On agreeing to the Conaway amendment (A006) Agreed to by voice vote.
July 23, 2008 • 8:00 PM