An amendment numbered 9 printed in part B of House Report 110-760 to allow a state performance plan to provide for increased inspection of a historic bridge rather than rehabilitation or replacement.
Description
Amendment allowed States the option to provide for more frequent and in-depth inspection of historic bridges in lieu of their replacement under the 5-year performance plan outlined in the bill.
Text
Offered
In section 2(c), before the closing quotation marks at the end of the matter proposed to be inserted as section 144(d)(5) of title 23, United States Code, insert the following:
“(C) Historic bridges.--
“(i) In general.--A 5-year performance plan of a State under subparagraph (A)(iii) may provide for more frequent, in-depth inspection of a historic bridge located in the State in lieu of replacement of the bridge if the Secretary determines that--
“(I) it is appropriate based on the age, design, traffic characteristics, and any known deficiency of the bridge; and
“(II) granting the exception will increase the overall safety of the State's bridge inventory.
“(ii) Historic bridge defined.--In this subparagraph, the term ‘historic bridge' means any bridge that is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
House amendment offered
July 23, 2008
View full timeline
House amendment offered
July 23, 2008
House amendment agreed to: On agreeing to the Shea-Porter amendment (A009) Agreed to by voice vote.
July 23, 2008 • 8:18 PM
Amendment agreed to Committee of the Whole
July 23, 2008 • 8:18 PM
House amendment offered/reported by : Amendment (A009) offered by Ms. Shea-Porter.(consideration: CR H7034-7035; text: CR H7034)
July 23, 2008 • 8:15 PM
Amendment (A009) offered by Ms. Shea-Porter. (consideration: CR H7034-7035; text: CR H7034)
July 23, 2008 • 8:15 PM
On agreeing to the Shea-Porter amendment (A009) Agreed to by voice vote.
July 23, 2008 • 8:18 PM