To enhance the review of joint military requirements.
What it does: 3 changes: inserts text, replaces text in 2 placesWhat it changes
3 changes to S. 454
Change 1: Inserts new text on page 53, between lines 17 and 18
InsertsPrinted pageInserted: (c) Review of Joint Military Requirements.--
Inserted: (1) JROC submittal of recommended requirements to under secretary for atl.--Upon recommending a new joint military requirement, the Joint Requirements Oversight Council shall transmit the recommendation to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics for review and concurrence or non-concurrence in the recommendation.
Inserted: (2) Review of recommended requirements.--The Under Secretary for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall review each recommendation transmitted under paragraph (1) to determine whether or not the Joint Requirements Oversight Council has, in making such recommendation--
Inserted: (A) taken appropriate action to solicit and consider input from the commanders of the combatant commands in accordance with the requirements of section 181(e) of title 10, United States Code (as amended by section 105);
Inserted: (B) given appropriate consideration to trade-offs among cost, schedule, and performance in accordance with the requirements of section 181(b)(1)(C) of title 10, United States Code (as amended by subsection (b)); and
Inserted: (C) given appropriate consideration to issues of joint portfolio management, including alternative material and non-material solutions, as provided in Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction 3170.01G.
Inserted: (3) Non-concurrence of under secretary for atl.--If the Under Secretary for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics determines that the Joint Requirements Oversight Council has failed to take appropriate action in accordance with subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of paragraph (2) regarding a joint military requirement, the Under Secretary shall return the recommendation to the Council with specific recommendations as to matters to be considered by the Council to address any shortcoming identified by the Under Secretary in the course of the review under paragraph (2).
Inserted: (4) Notice on continuing disagreement on requirement.--If the Under Secretary for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the Joint Requirements Oversight Council are unable to reach agreement on a joint military requirement that has been returned to the Council by the Under Secretary under paragraph (4), the Under Secretary shall transmit notice of lack of agreement on the requirement to the Secretary of Defense.
Inserted: (5) Resolution of continuing disagreement.--Upon receiving notice under paragraph (4) of a lack of agreement on a joint military requirement, the Secretary of Defense shall make a final determination on whether or not to validate the requirement.
Original wording
On page 53, between lines 17 and 18, insert the following:
Change 2: Replaces “(c)” with “(d)”
[struck: (c)][inserted: (d)]Original wording
On page 53, line 18, strike “(c)” and insert “(d)”.
Change 3: Replaces “(d)” with “(e)”
[struck: (d)][inserted: (e)]Original wording
On page 54, line 12, strike “(d)” and insert “(e)”.
Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.
As printed
On page 53, between lines 17 and 18, insert the following:
(c) Review of Joint Military Requirements.--
(1) JROC submittal of recommended requirements to under secretary for atl.--Upon recommending a new joint military requirement, the Joint Requirements Oversight Council shall transmit the recommendation to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics for review and concurrence or non-concurrence in the recommendation.
(2) Review of recommended requirements.--The Under Secretary for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics shall review each recommendation transmitted under paragraph (1) to determine whether or not the Joint Requirements Oversight Council has, in making such recommendation--
(A) taken appropriate action to solicit and consider input from the commanders of the combatant commands in accordance with the requirements of section 181(e) of title 10, United States Code (as amended by section 105);
(B) given appropriate consideration to trade-offs among cost, schedule, and performance in accordance with the requirements of section 181(b)(1)(C) of title 10, United States Code (as amended by subsection (b)); and
(C) given appropriate consideration to issues of joint portfolio management, including alternative material and non-material solutions, as provided in Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction 3170.01G.
(3) Non-concurrence of under secretary for atl.--If the Under Secretary for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics determines that the Joint Requirements Oversight Council has failed to take appropriate action in accordance with subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) of paragraph (2) regarding a joint military requirement, the Under Secretary shall return the recommendation to the Council with specific recommendations as to matters to be considered by the Council to address any shortcoming identified by the Under Secretary in the course of the review under paragraph (2).
(4) Notice on continuing disagreement on requirement.--If the Under Secretary for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics and the Joint Requirements Oversight Council are unable to reach agreement on a joint military requirement that has been returned to the Council by the Under Secretary under paragraph (4), the Under Secretary shall transmit notice of lack of agreement on the requirement to the Secretary of Defense.
(5) Resolution of continuing disagreement.--Upon receiving notice under paragraph (4) of a lack of agreement on a joint military requirement, the Secretary of Defense shall make a final determination on whether or not to validate the requirement.
On page 53, line 18, strike “(c)” and insert “(d)”.
On page 54, line 12, strike “(d)” and insert “(e)”.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment submitted
May 6, 2009
View full timeline
Senate amendment submitted
May 6, 2009
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 1051 proposed by Senator Levin for Senator McCaskill.(consideration: CR S5219-5224; text: CR S5220)
May 6, 2009
Senate amendment agreed to: Amendment SA 1051 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
May 6, 2009
Amendment SA 1051 proposed by Senator Levin for Senator McCaskill. (consideration: CR S5219-5224; text: CR S5220) To enhance the review of joint military requirements.
May 6, 2009
Amendment SA 1051 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
May 6, 2009