S.Amdt. 2423
What it does: Inserts “: Provided further, That, notwithstanding the joint explanatory statement of the Committe…” before the period at the end
Sen. Sam Brownback (R-KS)What it changes
1 change to H.R. 2996
Inserts “: Provided further, That, notwithstanding the joint explanatory statement of the Committe…” before the period at the end
Inserted: : Provided further, That, notwithstanding the joint explanatory statement of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives accompanying the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 (Public Law 110-161; 121 Stat. 1844), $170,800 shall be made available to the city of Prescott for a wastewater treatment plant construction project and $129,200 shall be made available to the city of Wichita for a storm water technology pilot project: Provided further, That, notwithstanding the joint explanatory statement of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives accompanying the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111-8; 123 Stat. 524), the amount of $185,000 made available to the city of Manhattan for the sewer mainline extension project (as described in the table entitled 'Congressionally Designated Spending' contained in section 430 of that joint explanatory statement) shall be made available to the city of Manhattan for a water mainline extension project: Provided further, That, notwithstanding the joint explanatory statement of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives accompanying the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111-8; 123 Stat. 524), the amount of $290,000 made available to the Riley County Board of Commissioners for the Konza Sewer Main Extension project (as described in the table entitled 'Congressionally Designated Spending' contained in section 430 of that joint explanatory statement) shall be made available to the city of Manhattan for the Konza Water Main Extension project
Original wording
On page 190, line 10, insert before the period at the end the following: “: Provided further, That, notwithstanding the joint explanatory statement of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives accompanying the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 (Public Law 110-161; 121 Stat. 1844), $170,800 shall be made available to the city of Prescott for a wastewater treatment plant construction project and $129,200 shall be made available to the city of Wichita for a storm water technology pilot project: Provided further, That, notwithstanding the joint explanatory statement of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives accompanying the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111-8; 123 Stat. 524), the amount of $185,000 made available to the city of Manhattan for the sewer mainline extension project (as described in the table entitled ‘Congressionally Designated Spending' contained in section 430 of that joint explanatory statement) shall be made available to the city of Manhattan for a water mainline extension project: Provided further, That, notwithstanding the joint explanatory statement of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives accompanying the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111-8; 123 Stat. 524), the amount of $290,000 made available to the Riley County Board of Commissioners for the Konza Sewer Main Extension project (as described in the table entitled ‘Congressionally Designated Spending' contained in section 430 of that joint explanatory statement) shall be made available to the city of Manhattan for the Konza Water Main Extension project”.
Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.
As printed
SA 2423. Mr. BROWNBACK (for himself and Mr. Roberts) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2996, making appropriations for the Department of the Interior, environment, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:
On page 190, line 10, insert before the period at the end the following: “: Provided further, That, notwithstanding the joint explanatory statement of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives accompanying the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 (Public Law 110-161; 121 Stat. 1844), $170,800 shall be made available to the city of Prescott for a wastewater treatment plant construction project and $129,200 shall be made available to the city of Wichita for a storm water technology pilot project: Provided further, That, notwithstanding the joint explanatory statement of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives accompanying the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111-8; 123 Stat. 524), the amount of $185,000 made available to the city of Manhattan for the sewer mainline extension project (as described in the table entitled ‘Congressionally Designated Spending' contained in section 430 of that joint explanatory statement) shall be made available to the city of Manhattan for a water mainline extension project: Provided further, That, notwithstanding the joint explanatory statement of the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives accompanying the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111-8; 123 Stat. 524), the amount of $290,000 made available to the Riley County Board of Commissioners for the Konza Sewer Main Extension project (as described in the table entitled ‘Congressionally Designated Spending' contained in section 430 of that joint explanatory statement) shall be made available to the city of Manhattan for the Konza Water Main Extension project”.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment submitted
September 17, 2009