An amendment numbered 9 printed in the Congressional Record to add a section which lists the number of underwater mortgages in 43 states and the District of Columbia.
What it does: Adds SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS after section 1
Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney (D-NY)Description
Amendment sought to add a section which lists the number of underwater mortgages in 43 states and the District of Columbia.
What it changes
1 change to H.R. 830
We couldn't match these changes to the text of H.R. 830, so they're shown as written.
Adds SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS after section 1
Adds a sectionInserted: SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.
Inserted: The Congress finds that--
Inserted: (1) there are 35,610 underwater mortgages in Alabama;
Inserted: (2) 7,801 underwater mortgages in Alaska;
Inserted: (3) 648,387 underwater mortgages in Arizona;
Inserted: (4) 27,580 underwater mortgages in Arkansas;
Inserted: (5) 2,172,700 mortgages in California;
Inserted: (6) 221,097 underwater mortgages in Colorado;
Inserted: (7) 97,244 underwater mortgages in Connecticut;
Inserted: (8) 23,906 underwater mortgages in Delaware;
Inserted: (9) 2,029,128 underwater mortgages in Florida;
Inserted: (10) 449,971 underwater mortgages in Georgia;
Show 35 more inserted paragraphsShow less
Inserted: (11) 24,664 underwater mortgages in Hawaii;
Inserted: (12) 61,566 underwater mortgages in Idaho;
Inserted: (13) 431,050 underwater mortgages in Illinois;
Inserted: (14) 68,196 underwater mortgages in Indiana;
Inserted: (15) 28,976 underwater mortgages in Iowa;
Inserted: (16) 32,787 underwater mortgages in Kansas;
Inserted: (17) 24,880 underwater mortgages in Kentucky;
Inserted: (18) 298,554 underwater mortgages in Maryland;
Inserted: (19) 222,599 underwater mortgages in Massachusetts;
Inserted: (20) 519,716 underwater mortgages in Michigan;
Inserted: (21) 90,090 underwater mortgages in Minnesota;
Inserted: (22) 122,543 underwater mortgages in Missouri;
Inserted: (23) 8,650 underwater mortgages in Montana;
Inserted: (24) 21,388 underwater mortgages in Nebraska;
Inserted: (25) 390,192 underwater mortgages in Nevada;
Inserted: (26) 37,488 underwater mortgages in New Hampshire;
Inserted: (27) 286,293 underwater mortgages in New Jersey;
Inserted: (28) 29,375 underwater mortgages in New Mexico;
Inserted: (29) 129,633 underwater mortgages in New York;
Inserted: (30) 160,007 underwater mortgages in North Carolina;
Inserted: (31) 3,582 underwater mortgages in North Dakota;
Inserted: (32) 441,379 underwater mortgages in Ohio;
Inserted: (33) 24,411 underwater mortgages in Oklahoma;
Inserted: (34) 108,335 underwater mortgages in Oregon;
Inserted: (35) 132,805 underwater mortgages in Pennsylvania;
Inserted: (36) 45,511 underwater mortgages in Rhode Island;
Inserted: (37) 85,226 underwater mortgages in South Carolina;
Inserted: (38) 133,956 underwater mortgages in Tennessee;
Inserted: (39) 367,954 underwater mortgages in Texas;
Inserted: (40) 98,093 underwater mortgages in Utah;
Inserted: (41) 276,910 underwater mortgages in Virginia;
Inserted: (42) 209,577 underwater mortgages in Washington;
Inserted: (43) 15,240 underwater mortgages in Washington D.C.; (44) and 81,267 underwater mortgages in Wisconsin.
Inserted: (45) the aggregate number of mortgages estimated to be underwater in such States is 10,780,236; and
Inserted: (46) by voting to terminate the FHA Refinance Program under this Act without a suggested replacement, the Congress is voting to terminate a program that may have helped these underwater borrowers.
Original wording
After section 1, insert the following new section:
Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.
As printed
After section 1, insert the following new section:
SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.
The Congress finds that--
(1) there are 35,610 underwater mortgages in Alabama;
(2) 7,801 underwater mortgages in Alaska;
(3) 648,387 underwater mortgages in Arizona;
(4) 27,580 underwater mortgages in Arkansas;
(5) 2,172,700 mortgages in California;
(6) 221,097 underwater mortgages in Colorado;
(7) 97,244 underwater mortgages in Connecticut;
(8) 23,906 underwater mortgages in Delaware;
(9) 2,029,128 underwater mortgages in Florida;
(10) 449,971 underwater mortgages in Georgia;
(11) 24,664 underwater mortgages in Hawaii;
(12) 61,566 underwater mortgages in Idaho;
(13) 431,050 underwater mortgages in Illinois;
(14) 68,196 underwater mortgages in Indiana;
(15) 28,976 underwater mortgages in Iowa;
(16) 32,787 underwater mortgages in Kansas;
(17) 24,880 underwater mortgages in Kentucky;
(18) 298,554 underwater mortgages in Maryland;
(19) 222,599 underwater mortgages in Massachusetts;
(20) 519,716 underwater mortgages in Michigan;
(21) 90,090 underwater mortgages in Minnesota;
(22) 122,543 underwater mortgages in Missouri;
(23) 8,650 underwater mortgages in Montana;
(24) 21,388 underwater mortgages in Nebraska;
(25) 390,192 underwater mortgages in Nevada;
(26) 37,488 underwater mortgages in New Hampshire;
(27) 286,293 underwater mortgages in New Jersey;
(28) 29,375 underwater mortgages in New Mexico;
(29) 129,633 underwater mortgages in New York;
(30) 160,007 underwater mortgages in North Carolina;
(31) 3,582 underwater mortgages in North Dakota;
(32) 441,379 underwater mortgages in Ohio;
(33) 24,411 underwater mortgages in Oklahoma;
(34) 108,335 underwater mortgages in Oregon;
(35) 132,805 underwater mortgages in Pennsylvania;
(36) 45,511 underwater mortgages in Rhode Island;
(37) 85,226 underwater mortgages in South Carolina;
(38) 133,956 underwater mortgages in Tennessee;
(39) 367,954 underwater mortgages in Texas;
(40) 98,093 underwater mortgages in Utah;
(41) 276,910 underwater mortgages in Virginia;
(42) 209,577 underwater mortgages in Washington;
(43) 15,240 underwater mortgages in Washington D.C.; (44) and 81,267 underwater mortgages in Wisconsin.
(45) the aggregate number of mortgages estimated to be underwater in such States is 10,780,236; and
(46) by voting to terminate the FHA Refinance Program under this Act without a suggested replacement, the Congress is voting to terminate a program that may have helped these underwater borrowers.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
House amendment offered
March 10, 2011
View full timeline
House amendment offered
March 10, 2011
House amendment offered/reported by: Amendment (A001) offered by Mrs. Maloney.(consideration: CR H1686-1688; text: CR H1686-1687)
March 10, 2011 • 1:33 PM
Amendment (A001) offered by Mrs. Maloney. (consideration: CR H1686-1688; text: CR H1686-1687)
March 10, 2011 • 1:33 PM
Mr. Bachus raised a point of order against the Maloney amendment (A001). Mr. Bachus stated that the amendment was not germane and violated clause 7 of Rule XVI. The Chair sustained the point of order.
March 10, 2011 • 1:40 PM