An amendment numbered 10 printed in Part B of House Report 112-111 to direct the PTO to prescribe a requirement that parties provide sufficient evidence to prove and rebut a claim of derivation.
What it does: Inserts “, including requiring parties to provide sufficient evidence to prove and rebut a claim o…” before the period
Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA)Description
Amendment requires the United States Patent Trade Office to provide rules for the exchange of relevant information during the derivation proceedings.
What it changes
1 change to H.R. 1249
Inserts “, including requiring parties to provide sufficient evidence to prove and rebut a claim o…” before the period
Inserted: , including requiring parties to provide sufficient evidence to prove and rebut a claim of derivation
Original wording
Page 16, line 3, insert before the period the following: “, including requiring parties to provide sufficient evidence to prove and rebut a claim of derivation”.
Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.
As printed
Page 16, line 3, insert before the period the following: “, including requiring parties to provide sufficient evidence to prove and rebut a claim of derivation”.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
House amendment offered
June 23, 2011
View full timeline
House amendment offered
June 23, 2011
House amendment offered/reported by: Amendment (A010) offered by Ms. Speier.(consideration: CR H4490-4491; text: CR H4490)
June 23, 2011 • 3:17 PM
House amendment agreed to: On agreeing to the Speier amendment (A010) Agreed to by voice vote.
June 23, 2011 • 3:22 PM
Amendment agreed to Committee of the Whole
June 23, 2011 • 3:22 PM
Amendment (A010) offered by Ms. Speier. (consideration: CR H4490-4491; text: CR H4490)
June 23, 2011 • 3:17 PM
On agreeing to the Speier amendment (A010) Agreed to by voice vote.
June 23, 2011 • 3:22 PM