S.Amdt. 2057Senate112th Congress (2011-2013)

S.Amdt. 2057

What it does: Inserts “within a district” after “locality”
Sponsored by Tom UdallSen. Tom Udall (D-NM)
Submitted April 18, 2012

What it changes

1 change to S. 1789 · shown in the bill's text

Inserts text
  1. Inserts “within a district” after “locality”

    InsertsPage 32, line 2Printed page

    In S. 1789 · Reported to Senate

    "(A) the views presented by interested persons solicited under paragraph (3);

    "(B) the effect of the closing or consolidation on the affected community, including any disproportionate impact the closure or consolidation may have on a State, region, or locality[inserted: within a district];

    "(C) the effect of the closing or consolidation on the travel times and distances for affected customers to access services under the proposed closing or consolidation;

    Original wording

    On page 32, line 2, insert “within a district” after “locality”.

Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.

As printed

SA 2057. Mr. UDALL of New Mexico (for himself and Mr. Bingaman) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 1789, to improve, sustain, and transform the United States Postal Service; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

On page 32, line 2, insert “within a district” after “locality”.

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

Floor Latest Action

Senate amendment submitted

April 18, 2012