What it changes

1 change to H.R. 4923

Adds a section

We couldn't match these changes to the text of H.R. 4923, so they're shown as written.

  1. Adds Sec. __. (a) Of the funds made available by title III under the heading "Atomic Energy Defense Activities--National Nuclear Security Administration--Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation", not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy shall submit to the congressional defense committees (as defined in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code) a report that includes an analysis of alternatives with respect to using the existing infrastructure at the Savannah River Site of the Department of Energy, including existing mixed oxide facilities, to conduct an alternative method for meeting the nuclear disposition requirements of the United States. Such report shall include-- at the end of the bill

    Adds a section

    Inserted: Sec. __. (a) Of the funds made available by title III under the heading "Atomic Energy Defense Activities--National Nuclear Security Administration--Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation", not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy shall submit to the congressional defense committees (as defined in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code) a report that includes an analysis of alternatives with respect to using the existing infrastructure at the Savannah River Site of the Department of Energy, including existing mixed oxide facilities, to conduct an alternative method for meeting the nuclear disposition requirements of the United States. Such report shall include--

    Inserted: (1) a full description of alternatives considered, including not less than two proposals described in subsection (b);

    Inserted: (2) a comparison of the costs and benefits of each such alternative, including an analysis of trade-offs among cost, schedule, and performance objectives;

    Inserted: (3) the identification of the cost and risk of critical technology elements associated with each such alternative, including technology maturity, integration risk, manufacturing feasibility, and demonstration needs;

    Inserted: (4) identification of the cost and risk of additional capital asset and infrastructure capabilities required to support production and certification of each alternative; and

    Inserted: (5) a life-cycle cost estimate for the alternative selected that details the overall cost, scope, and schedule planning assumptions.

    Inserted: (b) In order to obtain alternatives to analyze in the report under subsection (a), the Secretary of Energy shall issue a formal request for proposals for contractors to submit a formal proposal for effective plutonium disposition methods that are alternative to the mixed oxide process, giving consideration to existing capabilities and infrastructure at the Savannah River Site.

    Original wording

    At the end of the bill (before the short title), insert the following:

Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.

As printed

At the end of the bill (before the short title), insert the following:

Sec. __. (a) Of the funds made available by title III under the heading “Atomic Energy Defense Activities--National Nuclear Security Administration--Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation”, not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Energy shall submit to the congressional defense committees (as defined in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code) a report that includes an analysis of alternatives with respect to using the existing infrastructure at the Savannah River Site of the Department of Energy, including existing mixed oxide facilities, to conduct an alternative method for meeting the nuclear disposition requirements of the United States. Such report shall include--

(1) a full description of alternatives considered, including not less than two proposals described in subsection (b);

(2) a comparison of the costs and benefits of each such alternative, including an analysis of trade-offs among cost, schedule, and performance objectives;

(3) the identification of the cost and risk of critical technology elements associated with each such alternative, including technology maturity, integration risk, manufacturing feasibility, and demonstration needs;

(4) identification of the cost and risk of additional capital asset and infrastructure capabilities required to support production and certification of each alternative; and

(5) a life-cycle cost estimate for the alternative selected that details the overall cost, scope, and schedule planning assumptions.

(b) In order to obtain alternatives to analyze in the report under subsection (a), the Secretary of Energy shall issue a formal request for proposals for contractors to submit a formal proposal for effective plutonium disposition methods that are alternative to the mixed oxide process, giving consideration to existing capabilities and infrastructure at the Savannah River Site.

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

3 earlier actions
Floor Latest Action

House amendment offered

July 10, 2014

View full timeline
Floor

House amendment offered

July 10, 2014

Not Used

House amendment offered/reported by: Amendment (A054) offered by Mr. Garamendi.(consideration: CR H6072-6073; text: CR H6072)

July 10, 2014 • 4:46 PM

Floor

Amendment (A054) offered by Mr. Garamendi. (consideration: CR H6072-6073; text: CR H6072)

July 10, 2014 • 4:46 PM

Floor

Mr. Simpson raised a point of order against the Garamendi amendment (A054). Mr. Simpson stated that the provisions of the amendment seek to change existing law and constitute legislation in an appropriations bill. The Chair sustained the point of order.

July 10, 2014 • 4:54 PM