Amendment reduces the cost threshhold from $100 million to $50 million for the requirement that all regulations must be approved by Congress.
What it does: Replaces “$100,000,000” with “$50,000,000”Description
An amendment No. 9 printed in Part B of House Report 113-187 to reduce the annual effect on the economy of the term "major rule" from $100 million or more to $50 million or more.
What it changes
1 change to H.R. 367 · shown in the bill's text
Replaces “$100,000,000” with “$50,000,000”
In H.R. 367 · Reported in House
"(2) The term 'major rule' means any rule, including an interim final rule, that the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of the Office of Management and Budget finds has resulted in or is likely to result in--
"(A) an annual effect on the economy of
[struck: $100,000,000][inserted: $50,000,000] or more;"(B) a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions; or
Original wording
Page 20, line 16, strike “$100,000,000” and insert “$50,000,000”.
Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
House amendment offered
August 1, 2013
View full timeline
House amendment offered
August 1, 2013
Amendment agreed to Committee of the Whole
August 1, 2013 • 8:40 PM
House amendment agreed to: On agreeing to the McKinley amendment (A009) Agreed to by voice vote.
August 1, 2013 • 8:40 PM
House amendment offered/reported by: Amendment (A009) offered by Mr. McKinley.(consideration: CR H5328-5329; text: CR H5328)
August 1, 2013 • 8:29 PM
Amendment (A009) offered by Mr. McKinley. (consideration: CR H5328-5329; text: CR H5328)
August 1, 2013 • 8:29 PM
On agreeing to the McKinley amendment (A009) Agreed to by voice vote.
August 1, 2013 • 8:40 PM