S.Amdt. 1238
What it does: Replaces “(F)” with new text
Sen. James E. Risch (R-ID)What it changes
1 change to S. 744
The Congressional Record cuts off the end of this amendment, so some changes may be missing.
Replaces “(F)” with new text
Struck: (F)
Inserted: (F) Exception.--Any employer who violates any provision of this section, including, but not limited to, failure to query the System to verify the identity and work authorized status of an individual or failure to comply with any requirement under subsection (d), shall not be subject to any civil or criminal penalty under this Act unless the Secretary demonstrates, by the appropriate evidentiary standard of proof, that the individual in question is not authorized to work in the United States. Nothing in this subparagraph may be construed to limit the safe harbor provision under section 3610(g)(2) of the Border Security, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Modernization Act or the good faith defenses under subsections (a)(5), (a)(6), and (d)(5).
Inserted: (G)
Original wording
On page 1392, line 13, strike “(F)” and insert the following:
Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.
As printed
SA 1238. Mr. RISCH (for himself and Mr. Crapo) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 744, to provide for comprehensive immigration reform and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:
On page 1392, line 13, strike “(F)” and insert the following:
“(F) Exception.--Any employer who violates any provision of this section, including, but not limited to, failure to query the System to verify the identity and work authorized status of an individual or failure to comply with any requirement under subsection (d), shall not be subject to any civil or criminal penalty under this Act unless the Secretary demonstrates, by the appropriate evidentiary standard of proof, that the individual in question is not authorized to work in the United States. Nothing in this subparagraph may be construed to limit the safe harbor provision under section 3610(g)(2) of the Border Security, Economic Opportunity and Immigration Modernization Act or the good faith defenses under subsections (a)(5), (a)(6), and (d)(5).
“(G)
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment submitted
June 12, 2013