To clarify that communities that successfully appeal flood elevation determinations based on errors by the Federal Emergency Management Agency through the Scientific Resolution Panel are eligible for reimbursements for expenses incurred in such appeals.
What it does: Rewrites section 106(a)What it changes
1 change to S. 1926 · shown in the bill's text
Rewrites section 106(a)
ReplacesIn S. 1926 · Placed on Calendar Senate
(a) In General.--Section 1363(f) of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4104(f)) is amended
[struck: by striking the second sentence and inserting the following: "The Administrator may use such amounts from the National Flood Insurance Fund established under section 1310 as may be necessary to carry out this subsection.".][inserted: --]Inserted: (1) in the first sentence, by inserting after "as the case may be," the following: "or, in the case of an appeal that is resolved by submission of conflicting data to the Scientific Resolution Panel provided for in section 1363A, the community,"; and
Inserted: (2) by striking the second sentence and inserting the following: "The Administrator may use such amounts from the National Flood Insurance Fund established under section 1310 as may be necessary to carry out this subsection.".
Original wording
In section 106, strike subsection (a) and insert the following:
Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.
As printed
SA 2705. Mr. KING (for himself and Ms. Collins) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 1926, to delay the implementation of certain provisions of the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 and to reform the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:
In section 106, strike subsection (a) and insert the following:
(a) In General.--Section 1363(f) of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4104(f)) is amended--
(1) in the first sentence, by inserting after “as the case may be,” the following: “or, in the case of an appeal that is resolved by submission of conflicting data to the Scientific Resolution Panel provided for in section 1363A, the community,”; and
(2) by striking the second sentence and inserting the following: “The Administrator may use such amounts from the National Flood Insurance Fund established under section 1310 as may be necessary to carry out this subsection.”.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 2705 proposed by Senator King.(consideration: CR S565-566; text: CR S566)
January 29, 2014
View full timeline
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 2705 proposed by Senator King.(consideration: CR S565-566; text: CR S566)
January 29, 2014
Senate amendment agreed to: Amendment SA 2705 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
January 29, 2014
Senate amendment agreed to: Amendment SA 2705 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
January 29, 2014
Amendment SA 2705 proposed by Senator King. (consideration: CR S565-566; text: CR S566) To clarify that communities that successfully appeal flood elevation determinations based on errors by the Federal Emergency Management Agency through the Scientific Resolution Panel are eligible for reimbursements for expenses incurred in such appeals.
January 29, 2014
Amendment SA 2705 agreed to in Senate by Unanimous Consent.
January 29, 2014
Senate amendment submitted
January 28, 2014