To end a scoring gimmick that allows changes in mandatory program spending that do not save money to offset increased spending.
What it does: Adds SEC. ___. BUDGET SCORING RULE RELATING TO CERTAIN CHANGES IN MANDATORY PROGRAM SPENDING at the end of subtitle A of title IVWhat it changes
1 change to S.Con.Res. 8 · shown in the resolution's text
Adds SEC. ___. BUDGET SCORING RULE RELATING TO CERTAIN CHANGES IN MANDATORY PROGRAM SPENDING at the end of subtitle A of title IV
Adds a sectionIn S.Con.Res. 8 · Placed on Calendar Senate
(e) Form of the Point of Order.--When the Senate is considering a conference report on, or an amendment between the Houses in relation to, a bill, upon a point of order being made by any Senator pursuant to this section, and such point of order being sustained, such material contained in such conference report or amendment shall be deemed stricken, and the Senate shall proceed to consider the question of whether the Senate shall recede from its amendment and concur with a further amendment, or concur in the House amendment with a further amendment, as the case may be, which further amendment shall consist of only that portion of the conference report or House amendment, as the case may be, not so stricken. Any such motion shall be debatable. In any case in which such point of order is sustained against a conference report (or Senate amendment derived from such conference report by operation of this subsection), no further amendment shall be in order.
Inserted: SEC. ___. BUDGET SCORING RULE RELATING TO CERTAIN CHANGES IN MANDATORY PROGRAM SPENDING.
Inserted: In the Senate, a bill, resolution, amendment, motion or conference report that includes a provision that reduces direct spending that would have been estimated as affecting direct spending or receipts under section 252 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 shall not be scored by the Chairman of the Senate Committee on the Budget as new negative budget authority if such provision does not result in net outlay savings over the total of the period of the current year, the budget year, and all fiscal years covered under the most recently adopted concurrent resolution on the budget.
Original wording
At the end of subtitle A of title IV, insert the following:
Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.
As printed
SA 295. Mr. CORKER submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the concurrent resolution S. Con. Res. 8, setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2014, revising the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal year 2013, and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2015 through 2023; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:
At the end of subtitle A of title IV, insert the following:
SEC. ___. BUDGET SCORING RULE RELATING TO CERTAIN CHANGES IN MANDATORY PROGRAM SPENDING.
In the Senate, a bill, resolution, amendment, motion or conference report that includes a provision that reduces direct spending that would have been estimated as affecting direct spending or receipts under section 252 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 shall not be scored by the Chairman of the Senate Committee on the Budget as new negative budget authority if such provision does not result in net outlay savings over the total of the period of the current year, the budget year, and all fiscal years covered under the most recently adopted concurrent resolution on the budget.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 295 proposed by Senator Murray for Senator Corker.(consideration: CR S2301, S2302; text: CR S2301)
March 23, 2013
View full timeline
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 295 proposed by Senator Murray for Senator Corker.(consideration: CR S2301, S2302; text: CR S2301)
March 23, 2013
Amendment SA 295 proposed by Senator Murray for Senator Corker. (consideration: CR S2301, S2302; text: CR S2301) To end a scoring gimmick that allows changes in mandatory program spending that do not save money to offset increased spending.
March 23, 2013
Proposed amendment SA 295 withdrawn in Senate. (consideration: CR S2302)
March 23, 2013
Senate amendment submitted
March 21, 2013