S.Amdt. 768
What it does: Inserts new text on page 7, between lines 8 and 9What it changes
1 change to S. 743
Inserts new text on page 7, between lines 8 and 9
InsertsPrinted pageInserted: (d) Requirement to Enact Remote Seller Liability Defense Laws.--
Inserted: (1) In general.--No State shall be authorized to require sellers to collect and remit sales and use taxes with respect to remote sales sourced to that State under subsection (a) or (b) unless such State has enacted a law which provides remote sellers protection, through an affirmative defense to an action brought by the State or any locality within the State, from liability with respect to sales and use taxes required to be collected and remitted to the State under the authority granted by this Act.
Inserted: (2) Exception.--A State or locality may overcome the affirmative defense described in paragraph (1) only if it carries its burden of establishing that--
Inserted: (A) it has directly notified the remote seller of the obligation to collect and remit sales and use taxes and such remote seller has received such notification;
Inserted: (B) it directly provided software from a certified software provider and appropriate training on using such software; and
Inserted: (C) the remote seller has failed to use the software provided by the State.
Original wording
On page 7, between lines 8 and 9, insert the following:
Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.
As printed
SA 768. Mr. LEE (for himself and Ms. Ayotte) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 743, to restore States' sovereign rights to enforce State and local sales and use tax laws, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:
On page 7, between lines 8 and 9, insert the following:
(d) Requirement to Enact Remote Seller Liability Defense Laws.--
(1) In general.--No State shall be authorized to require sellers to collect and remit sales and use taxes with respect to remote sales sourced to that State under subsection (a) or (b) unless such State has enacted a law which provides remote sellers protection, through an affirmative defense to an action brought by the State or any locality within the State, from liability with respect to sales and use taxes required to be collected and remitted to the State under the authority granted by this Act.
(2) Exception.--A State or locality may overcome the affirmative defense described in paragraph (1) only if it carries its burden of establishing that--
(A) it has directly notified the remote seller of the obligation to collect and remit sales and use taxes and such remote seller has received such notification;
(B) it directly provided software from a certified software provider and appropriate training on using such software; and
(C) the remote seller has failed to use the software provided by the State.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment submitted
April 24, 2013