H.Amdt. 1475House114th Congress (2015-2017)

Amendment strengthens language requiring a feasibility study of Tulsa and West Tulsa levees; prioritizes the project if study classifies levee or levee system Class I or Class II.

What it does: 2 changes: strikes text, adds a section
Submitted September 28, 2016

What it changes

2 changes to H.R. 5303

Strikes textAdds a section

We couldn't match these changes to the text of H.R. 5303, so they're shown as written.

  1. Change 1: Strikes page 72, lines 19–21

    Removes page 72, lines 19–21 of the printed bill. See that page

    Original wording

    Page 72, strike lines 19 through 21.

  2. Change 2: Adds SEC. 2__. TULSA AND WEST TULSA, ARKANSAS RIVER, OKLAHOMA at the end of title II

    Adds a section

    Inserted: SEC. 2__. TULSA AND WEST TULSA, ARKANSAS RIVER, OKLAHOMA.

    Inserted: (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of modifying the projects for flood risk management, Tulsa and West Tulsa, Oklahoma, authorized by section 3 of the Act of August 18, 1941 (55 Stat. 645; chapter 377).

    Inserted: (2) Requirements.--

    Inserted: (A) In general.--In carrying out the study under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall address project deficiencies, uncertainties, and significant data gaps, including material, construction, and subsurface, which render the project at risk of overtopping, breaching, or system failure.

    Inserted: (B) Addressing deficiencies.--In addressing deficiencies under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall incorporate current design standards and efficiency improvements, including the replacement of mechanical and electrical components at pumping stations, if the incorporation does not significantly change the scope, function, or purpose of the project.

    Inserted: (3) Prioritization to address significant risks.--In any case in which a levee or levee system (as defined in section 9002 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 3301)) is classified as a Class I or II under the levee safety action classification tool developed by the Corps of Engineers, the Secretary shall expedite the project for budget consideration.

    Original wording

    At the end of title II, add the following:

Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.

As printed

Page 72, strike lines 19 through 21.

At the end of title II, add the following:

SEC. 2__. TULSA AND WEST TULSA, ARKANSAS RIVER, OKLAHOMA.

(1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of modifying the projects for flood risk management, Tulsa and West Tulsa, Oklahoma, authorized by section 3 of the Act of August 18, 1941 (55 Stat. 645; chapter 377).

(2) Requirements.--

(A) In general.--In carrying out the study under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall address project deficiencies, uncertainties, and significant data gaps, including material, construction, and subsurface, which render the project at risk of overtopping, breaching, or system failure.

(B) Addressing deficiencies.--In addressing deficiencies under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall incorporate current design standards and efficiency improvements, including the replacement of mechanical and electrical components at pumping stations, if the incorporation does not significantly change the scope, function, or purpose of the project.

(3) Prioritization to address significant risks.--In any case in which a levee or levee system (as defined in section 9002 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2007 (33 U.S.C. 3301)) is classified as a Class I or II under the levee safety action classification tool developed by the Corps of Engineers, the Secretary shall expedite the project for budget consideration.

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

5 earlier actions
Floor Latest Action

House amendment offered

September 28, 2016

View full timeline
Floor

House amendment offered

September 28, 2016

Not Used

House amendment offered/reported by : Amendment (A038) offered by Mr. Bridenstine.(consideration: CR H6048-6049; text: CR H6048-6049)

September 28, 2016 • 4:50 PM

Floor

House amendment agreed to: On agreeing to the Bridenstine amendment (A038) Agreed to by voice vote.

September 28, 2016 • 4:52 PM

Not Used

Amendment agreed to Committee of the Whole

September 28, 2016 • 4:52 PM

Floor

Amendment (A038) offered by Mr. Bridenstine. (consideration: CR H6048-6049; text: CR H6048-6049)

September 28, 2016 • 4:50 PM

Floor

On agreeing to the Bridenstine amendment (A038) Agreed to by voice vote.

September 28, 2016 • 4:52 PM