S.Amdt. 237Senate114th Congress (2015-2017)2nd degree

S.Amdt. 237

What it does: Rewrites the text S.Amdt. 145 would insert
Submitted January 26, 2015

What it changes

1 change to S.Amdt. 145 · shown in S.Amdt. 145's text

Rewrites the amendment
  1. Rewrites the text S.Amdt. 145 would insert

    Rewrites S.Amdt. 145In place of the text S.Amdt. 145 would insert

    In S.Amdt. 145 as proposed

    Struck: SEC. ___. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING CLIMATE CHANGE.

    Struck: It is the sense of Congress that--

    Struck: (1) Congress is in agreement with the opinion of virtually the entire worldwide scientific community and a growing number of top national security experts, economists, and others that--

    Struck: (A) climate change is real;

    Show 4 more struck paragraphs

    Struck: (B) human activities contribute to climate change; and

    Struck: (C) climate change has already begun to cause problems in the United States and around the world;

    Struck: (2) the Energy Information Administration projects that fossil fuels could continue to produce 68 percent of the electricity in the United States through 2040; and

    Struck: (3) it is imperative that the United States invest in research and development for clean fossil fuel technology.

    Inserted: SEC. ____. SENSE OF CONGRESS ACKNOWLEDGING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDINGS OF THE KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT.

    Inserted: It is the sense of Congress that Congress is in agreement with the following findings of the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement issued by the Secretary of State for the Keystone XL Project (referred to in this section as the "FSEIS"):

    Inserted: (1) "The analyses of potential impacts associated with construction and normal operation of the proposed Project suggest that significant impacts to most resources are not expected along the proposed Project route" (FSEIS page 4.16-1, section 4.16).

    Inserted: (2) "The total annual GHG [greenhouse gas] emissions (direct and indirect) attributed to the No Action scenarios range from 28 to 42 percent greater than for the proposed Project" (FSEIS page ES-34, section ES.5.4.2).

    Inserted: (3) ". . . approval or denial of any one crude oil transport project, including the proposed Project, is unlikely to significantly impact the rate of extraction in the oil sands or the continued demand for heavy crude oil at refineries in the United States based on expected oil prices, oil-sands supply costs, transport costs, and supply-demand scenarios" (FSEIS page ES-16, section ES.4.1.1).

    Original wording

    In lieu of the matter proposed to be inserted, insert the following:

Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.

As printed

SA 237. Ms. MURKOWSKI submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 145 submitted by Mr. Manchin and intended to be proposed to the bill S. 1, to approve the Keystone XL Pipeline; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:

In lieu of the matter proposed to be inserted, insert the following:

SEC. ____. SENSE OF CONGRESS ACKNOWLEDGING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDINGS OF THE KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE PROJECT.

It is the sense of Congress that Congress is in agreement with the following findings of the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement issued by the Secretary of State for the Keystone XL Project (referred to in this section as the “FSEIS”):

(1) “The analyses of potential impacts associated with construction and normal operation of the proposed Project suggest that significant impacts to most resources are not expected along the proposed Project route” (FSEIS page 4.16-1, section 4.16).

(2) “The total annual GHG [greenhouse gas] emissions (direct and indirect) attributed to the No Action scenarios range from 28 to 42 percent greater than for the proposed Project” (FSEIS page ES-34, section ES.5.4.2).

(3) “. . . approval or denial of any one crude oil transport project, including the proposed Project, is unlikely to significantly impact the rate of extraction in the oil sands or the continued demand for heavy crude oil at refineries in the United States based on expected oil prices, oil-sands supply costs, transport costs, and supply-demand scenarios” (FSEIS page ES-16, section ES.4.1.1).

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

1 earlier action
Floor Latest Action

Senate amendment submitted

January 26, 2015

View full timeline
Floor

Senate amendment submitted

January 26, 2015

Floor

Senate amendment submitted

January 26, 2015