H.Amdt. 684House115th Congress (2017-2019)

An amendment numbered 24 printed in Part A of House Report 115-711 to permit a non-federal flood control project sponsor to pay, or contribute to, the difference between the cost of repairing a damaged flood control project and its projected economic benefits.

What it does: Adds SEC. __. COST AND BENEFIT FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT at the end of title I
Sponsored by Mike BostRep. Mike Bost (R-IL)
Submitted June 6, 2018

What it changes

1 change to H.R. 8

Adds a section

We couldn't match these changes to the text of H.R. 8, so they're shown as written.

  1. Adds SEC. __. COST AND BENEFIT FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT at the end of title I

    Adds a section

    Inserted: SEC. __. COST AND BENEFIT FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT.

    Inserted: (a) Cost Benefit and Special Conditions.--Section 5(a) of the Act of August 18, 1941 (55 Stat. 650, chapter 377; 33 U.S.C. 701n(a)), as amended by this Act, is further amended by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:

    Inserted: "(2) Cost and benefit feasibility assessment.--

    Inserted: "(A) Consideration of benefits.--In preparing a cost and benefit feasibility assessment for any emergency project described in paragraph (1), the Chief of Engineers shall consider the benefits to be gained by such project for the protection of--

    Inserted: "(I) residential establishments;

    Inserted: "(ii) commercial establishments, including the protection of inventory; and

    Inserted: "(iii) agricultural establishments, including the protection of crops.

    Inserted: "(B) Special conditions.--

    Inserted: "(i) The Chief of Engineers may carry out repair or restoration work described in paragraph (1) that does not produce benefits greater than cost, if the non-Federal sponsor agrees to pay, or contribute to, an amount sufficient to make the remaining costs of the project equal to the estimated value of the benefits of the repair or restoration work and the Secretary determines the damage to the structure was not as a result of negligent operation and maintenance, and that repair of the project could benefit other Corps project missions.

    Inserted: "(ii) Non-Federal payments pursuant to clause (i) shall be in addition to any non-Federal payments required by the Chief of Engineers which are applicable to the remaining costs of the repair or restoration work.".

    Inserted: (b) Continued Eligibility.--Nothwithstanding a non-Federal flood control work's status in the Rehabilitation and Inspection Program, any unconstructed emergency project for the non-Federal flood control work that was formulated during the three fiscal years preceding the fiscal year in which this Act was enacted but that was determined to not produce benefits greater than costs shall remain eligible for assistance under Section 5 of the Act of August 18, 1941 (55 Stat. 650, chapter 377; 33 U.S.C. 701n) until the last day of the third fiscal year following the fiscal year in which this Act was enacted if the non-Federal sponsor agrees, in accordance with section 5 as amended by subsection (a) of this section, to pay, or provide contributions equal to, an amount sufficient to make the remaining costs of the project equal to the estimated value of the benefits of the repair or restoration work and the Secretary determines the damage to the structure was not as a result of negligent operation and maintenance, and that repair of the project could benefit other Corps project missions.

    Original wording

    At the end of title I, add the following:

Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.

As printed

At the end of title I, add the following:

SEC. __. COST AND BENEFIT FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT.

(a) Cost Benefit and Special Conditions.--Section 5(a) of the Act of August 18, 1941 (55 Stat. 650, chapter 377; 33 U.S.C. 701n(a)), as amended by this Act, is further amended by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:

“(2) Cost and benefit feasibility assessment.--

“(A) Consideration of benefits.--In preparing a cost and benefit feasibility assessment for any emergency project described in paragraph (1), the Chief of Engineers shall consider the benefits to be gained by such project for the protection of--

“(I) residential establishments;

“(ii) commercial establishments, including the protection of inventory; and

“(iii) agricultural establishments, including the protection of crops.

“(B) Special conditions.--

“(i) The Chief of Engineers may carry out repair or restoration work described in paragraph (1) that does not produce benefits greater than cost, if the non-Federal sponsor agrees to pay, or contribute to, an amount sufficient to make the remaining costs of the project equal to the estimated value of the benefits of the repair or restoration work and the Secretary determines the damage to the structure was not as a result of negligent operation and maintenance, and that repair of the project could benefit other Corps project missions.

“(ii) Non-Federal payments pursuant to clause (i) shall be in addition to any non-Federal payments required by the Chief of Engineers which are applicable to the remaining costs of the repair or restoration work.”.

(b) Continued Eligibility.--Nothwithstanding a non-Federal flood control work's status in the Rehabilitation and Inspection Program, any unconstructed emergency project for the non-Federal flood control work that was formulated during the three fiscal years preceding the fiscal year in which this Act was enacted but that was determined to not produce benefits greater than costs shall remain eligible for assistance under Section 5 of the Act of August 18, 1941 (55 Stat. 650, chapter 377; 33 U.S.C. 701n) until the last day of the third fiscal year following the fiscal year in which this Act was enacted if the non-Federal sponsor agrees, in accordance with section 5 as amended by subsection (a) of this section, to pay, or provide contributions equal to, an amount sufficient to make the remaining costs of the project equal to the estimated value of the benefits of the repair or restoration work and the Secretary determines the damage to the structure was not as a result of negligent operation and maintenance, and that repair of the project could benefit other Corps project missions.

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

5 earlier actions
Floor Latest Action

House amendment offered

June 6, 2018

View full timeline
Floor

House amendment offered

June 6, 2018

Not Used

House amendment offered/reported by: Amendment (A024) offered by Mr. Bost.(consideration: CR H4825-4826; text: CR H4825)

June 6, 2018 • 4:43 PM

Not Used

Amendment agreed to Committee of the Whole

June 6, 2018 • 4:46 PM

Floor

House amendment agreed to: On agreeing to the Bost amendment (A024) Agreed to by voice vote.

June 6, 2018 • 4:46 PM

Floor

Amendment (A024) offered by Mr. Bost. (consideration: CR H4825-4826; text: CR H4825)

June 6, 2018 • 4:43 PM

Floor

On agreeing to the Bost amendment (A024) Agreed to by voice vote.

June 6, 2018 • 4:46 PM