S.Amdt. 2656Senate115th Congress (2017-2019)2nd degree
S.Amdt. 2656
Sponsored by
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR)
Submitted June 11, 2018
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
June 11, 2018
Text
Submitted
SA 2656. Mr. MERKLEY submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 2282 submitted by Mr. Inhofe (for himself and Mr. McCain) and intended to be proposed to the bill H.R. 5515, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2019 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At the end of subtitle F of title XII, add the following: SEC. __. REPORT ON EFFORTS IN AFGHANISTAN. (a) Findings.--The Senate makes the following findings: (1) After more than 16 years, the conflict in Afghanistan continues to present a whole-of-government challenge to the United States. (2) More than $800,000,000,000, or by some estimates, trillions of taxpayer dollars have been spent on the conflict in Afghanistan. (3) More than 2,200 United States lives have been lost, and more than 20,000 Americans have been wounded in operations in Afghanistan. (4) The efforts and investment of the United States in Afghanistan have been undermined by endemic corruption, which is a strategic threat to United States interests that has cost United States taxpayers billions of dollars. Systemic corruption in Afghanistan continues to compromise the effectiveness of United States programs and has a negative impact on the ability of the United States to build trust and credibility with communities in Afghanistan. (5) The May 2018 Special Investigation General for Afghanistan Reconstruction report on the United States stabilization strategy and associated programs in Afghanistan made the following findings: (A) The United States Government greatly overestimated its ability to build and reform government institutions in Afghanistan as part of its stabilization strategy. (B) The stabilization strategy and the programs used to achieve such strategy were not properly tailored to the Afghan context. (C) The large sums of stabilization dollars the United States devoted to Afghanistan in search of quick gains often exacerbated conflicts, enabled corruption, and bolstered support for insurgents. (D) Since the coalition prioritized the most dangerous districts first, the coalition continuously struggled to clear the districts of insurgents, and as a result, the coalition did not make sufficient progress to convince Afghans in such districts that the government could protect them if they openly turned against the insurgents; [[Page S3637]] (E) Efforts by United States agencies to monitor and evaluate stabilization programs were generally poor. (F) Successes in stabilizing Afghan districts rarely lasted longer than the physical presence of coalition troops and civilians. (G) Stabilization was most successful in areas that were clearly under the physical control of government security forces, had a modicum of local governance in place prior to programming, were supported by coalition forces and civilians who recognized the value of close cooperation, and were continuously engaged by their government as programming ramped up. (b) Sense of Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that United States strategy on engagement in Afghanistan should approach the challenges described in subsection (a) with coordinated diplomatic, security, and development efforts that include-- (1) a view toward assisting the Afghan government and people, at every level, in transitioning towards sustainable independence and stability; (2) accountability for adherence to the rule of law and support for human rights; and (3) the goal of ending United States military presence in Afghanistan. (c) Report.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the heads of each Federal agency involved, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report detailing the United States whole-of-government efforts in Afghanistan. (2) Elements.--The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) The United States diplomatic strategy on Afghanistan, including-- (i) efforts to support and assist effective governance at the Federal level and foster cooperation and mutual accountability between the Government of Afghanistan and provincial and local leadership in Afghanistan; (ii) efforts to ensure that Afghan partners at all levels demonstrate accountability for-- (I) adhering to the rule of law; and (II) ensuring that women, children, and marginalized groups are protected and crimes or abuses against such groups are fully investigated and prosecuted; (iii) efforts to promote cooperation among the various ethnic communities of Afghanistan; (iv) efforts to support and encourage reconciliation between the Government of Afghanistan and insurgent groups such as the Taliban, while continuing to counter the destabilizing actions of terrorist groups; (v) efforts to support institutional reforms, especially those relating to anti-corruption, inclusive governance, electoral reforms, and financial transparency; (vi) efforts to encourage the neighbors of Afghanistan to cooperate in support of Afghan security and economic stability and promote regional investment in development and political solutions; and (vii) efforts to ensure that partner governments and organizations are actively working to support access by women to education, political representation, employment, medical care, housing, and other economic opportunities. (B) The United States defense and security strategy on Afghanistan, including-- (i) United States force levels in Afghanistan and the missions to which such forces are dedicated; (ii) prospects and a timeframe for completely transitioning responsibility for security to the Afghan National Defense and Security Forces; and (iii) assessments of law enforcement training efforts and measurable impact. (C) The United States development strategy in Afghanistan, including- (i) the ability of the Department of State and the United States Agency for International Development to deliver, monitor, and evaluate development assistance; (ii) the ability of the World Bank to deliver, monitor, and evaluate on-budget development assistance; (iii) estimates of the cost to United States and World Bank programs due to corruption, fraud, waste, and abuse in implementation and other stages of development projects, and including an assessment of preventative and punitive efforts taken by the Government of Afghanistan and others to consistently confront corruption, fraud, waste, and abuse; (iv) an assessment of the measurable impacts of United States-taxpayer funded development efforts since 2002; (v) the ability of the Government of Afghanistan and non- governmental institutions in Afghanistan to absorb development assistance at a pace that builds towards incremental independent sustainability; (vi) the social and political impacts of corruption in the Government of Afghanistan, and at local government levels, on the sustainability of planned or implemented development efforts, and an assessment of the means and prospects for preventing, investigating, and ensuring accountability for incidents of corruption; and (vii) the limitation on development efforts as a result of the unstable security conditions in Afghanistan. (3) Form.--The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex. (d) Appropriate Committees of Congress.--In this section, the term ``appropriate committees of Congress'' means-- (1) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on the Judiciary, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and (2) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on the Judiciary, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. ______