S.Amdt. 6176
What it does: Adds SEC. 1077. JUSTIFICATION FOR TRANSFER OR ELIMINATION OF FLYING MISSIONS at the end of subtitle G of title X
Sen. Michael F. Bennet (D-CO)What it changes
1 change to S.Amdt. 5499 · shown in S.Amdt. 5499's text
Adds SEC. 1077. JUSTIFICATION FOR TRANSFER OR ELIMINATION OF FLYING MISSIONS at the end of subtitle G of title X
Adds a sectionIn S.Amdt. 5499 as proposed
(2) as a recognition of Senator Inhofe's long history of engaging with, and advocating for, Africa, the Department of Defense Africa Center for Strategic Studies should be renamed the James M. Inhofe Center for Africa Strategic Studies.
Inserted: SEC. 1077. JUSTIFICATION FOR TRANSFER OR ELIMINATION OF FLYING MISSIONS.
Inserted: (a) In General.--Prior to the relocation or elimination of any flying mission, either with respect to an active or reserve component of a covered Armed Force, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the justification of the Secretary for the decision to relocate or eliminate such mission. Such report shall include each of the following:
Inserted: (1) A description of how the decision supports the national defense strategy, the national military strategy, the North American Aerospace Defense Command strategy, and other relevant strategies.
Inserted: (2) A specific analysis and metrics supporting such decision.
Inserted: (3) An analysis and metrics to show that the elimination or relocation of the flying mission would not negatively affect the homeland defense mission.
Inserted: (4) A plan for how the Department of Defense intends to fulfill or continue the mission requirements of the eliminated or relocated flying mission.
Inserted: (5) An assessment of the effect of the elimination or relocation on the national defense strategy, the national military strategy, the North American Aerospace Defense Command strategy, and the homeland defense mission.
Inserted: (6) An analysis and metrics to show that the elimination or relocation of the flying mission and its secondary and tertiary impacts would not degrade capabilities and readiness of the Joint Force.
Inserted: (7) An analysis and metrics to show that the elimination or relocation of the flying mission would not negatively affect the national military airspace system.
Inserted: (b) Covered Armed Force.--In this section, the term "covered Armed Force" means--
Inserted: (1) The Army.
Inserted: (2) The Navy.
Show 1 more inserted paragraphShow less
Inserted: (3) The Air Force.
Original wording
At the end of subtitle G of title X, insert the following:
Read automatically from the Congressional Record. Check the original before relying on it.
As printed
SA 6176. Mr. BENNET (for himself and Mr. Hickenlooper) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 5499 submitted by Mr. Reed (for himself and Mr. Inhofe) and intended to be proposed to the bill H.R. 7900, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2023 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows:
At the end of subtitle G of title X, insert the following:
SEC. 1077. JUSTIFICATION FOR TRANSFER OR ELIMINATION OF FLYING MISSIONS.
(a) In General.--Prior to the relocation or elimination of any flying mission, either with respect to an active or reserve component of a covered Armed Force, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report describing the justification of the Secretary for the decision to relocate or eliminate such mission. Such report shall include each of the following:
(1) A description of how the decision supports the national defense strategy, the national military strategy, the North American Aerospace Defense Command strategy, and other relevant strategies.
(2) A specific analysis and metrics supporting such decision.
(3) An analysis and metrics to show that the elimination or relocation of the flying mission would not negatively affect the homeland defense mission.
(4) A plan for how the Department of Defense intends to fulfill or continue the mission requirements of the eliminated or relocated flying mission.
(5) An assessment of the effect of the elimination or relocation on the national defense strategy, the national military strategy, the North American Aerospace Defense Command strategy, and the homeland defense mission.
(6) An analysis and metrics to show that the elimination or relocation of the flying mission and its secondary and tertiary impacts would not degrade capabilities and readiness of the Joint Force.
(7) An analysis and metrics to show that the elimination or relocation of the flying mission would not negatively affect the national military airspace system.
(b) Covered Armed Force.--In this section, the term “covered Armed Force” means--
(1) The Army.
(2) The Navy.
(3) The Air Force.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment submitted
September 29, 2022