S.Amdt. 682Senate118th Congress (2023-2025)
S.Amdt. 682
Sponsored by
Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD)
Submitted July 13, 2023
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
July 13, 2023
View full timeline
Floor
Senate amendment submitted
July 13, 2023
Floor
Senate amendment submitted
July 13, 2023
Text
Submitted
SA 682. Mr. ROUNDS (for himself, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Young, and Mr. Heinrich) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 2226, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2024 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At the appropriate place in title X, insert the following: Subtitle _--Additional Matters Relating to Artificial Intelligence SEC. __. REPORT ON AI REGULATION IN FINANCIAL SERVICES INDUSTRY. (a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, each of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection shall submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report on its gap in knowledge relating to artificial intelligence, including an analysis on-- (1) which tasks are most frequently being assisted or completed with artificial intelligence in the institutions the agency regulates; (2) current governance standards in place for artificial intelligence use at the agency and current standards in place for artificial intelligence oversight by the agency; (3) potentially additional regulatory authorities required by the agency to continue to successfully execute its mission; (4) where artificial intelligence may lead to overlapping regulatory issues between agencies that require clarification; (5) how the agency is currently using artificial intelligence, how the agency plans to use such artificial intelligence the next 3 years, and the expected impact, including fiscal and staffing, of those plans; and (6) what resources, monetary or other resources, if any, the agency requires to both adapt to the changes that artificial intelligence will bring to the regulatory landscape and to adequately adopt and oversee the use of artificial intelligence across its operations described in paragraph (5). (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section may be construed to require an agency to include confidential supervisory information or pre-decisional or deliberative non-public information in a report under this section. SEC. ___. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BUG BOUNTY PROGRAMS. (a) Program for Foundational Artificial Intelligence Products Being Incorporated by Department of Defense.-- (1) Development required.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chief Data and Artificial Intelligence Officer of the Department of Defense shall develop a bug bounty program for foundational artificial intelligence products being incorporated by the Department of Defense. (2) Collaboration.--In developing the program required by paragraph (1), the Chief may collaborate with the heads of other government agencies that have expertise in cybersecurity and artificial intelligence. (3) Implementation authorized.--The Chief may carry out the program developed pursuant to subsection (a). (4) Contracts.--The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that whenever the Department of Defense enters into any contract, the contract allows for participation in the bug bounty program developed pursuant to paragraph (1). (5) Rule of construction.--Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to require-- (A) the use of any foundational artificial intelligence product; or (B) the implementation of the program developed pursuant to paragraph (1) in order for the Department to incorporate a foundational artificial intelligence product. [[Page S2791]] (b) Briefing.--Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chief shall provide the congressional defense committees a briefing on-- (1) the development and implementation of bug bounty programs the Chief considers relevant to the matters covered by this section; and (2) long-term plans of the Chief with respect to such bug bounty programs. SEC. __. VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS STUDY FOR EMERGING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS. (a) Study Required.--Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Officer (CDAO) of the Department of Defense shall complete a study analyzing the vulnerabilities of, and capacity to assess, emerging artificial intelligence systems, as well as research needs for such systems. (b) Elements.--The study required by subsection (a) shall cover the following: (1) Research and development needs and transition pathways to advance explainable and interpretable artificial intelligence, including the capability to audit the underlying artificial intelligence algorithms and data models. (2) Assessing the potential risks of underlying artificial intelligence architectures and algorithms, including the following: (A) Individual foundation models, including the adequacy of existing testing, training, and auditing for such models to ensure models can be properly assessed over time. (B) The interactions of multiple artificial intelligence systems, and the ability to detect and assess new, complex, and emergent behavior amongst individual agents, as well as the collective impact, including how such changes may affect risk over time. (C) The impact of increased agency in artificial intelligence systems and how such increased agency may affect the ability to detect and assess new, complex, and emergent behavior, as well risk over time. (3) Assessing the robustness, survivability, and traceability of decision support systems that are integrated with artificial intelligence systems and used in a contested environment, including-- (A) potential benefits and risks of implementing such systems; and (B) other technical or operational constraints to ensure such decision support systems are able to adhere to the Department of Defense Ethical Principles for Artificial Intelligence. (4) Identification of existing artificial intelligence metrics, developmental, testing and audit capabilities, personnel, and infrastructure, including test and evaluation facilities, needed to enable ongoing identification and assessment under paragraphs (1) through (3), and other factors such as-- (A) implications for deterrence systems based on systems warfare; and (B) vulnerability to systems confrontation on the system and system-of-systems level. (5) Assessment of the sufficiency of current intellectual property and data rights regulations to address the clarity of government and industry data rights in an environment where commercial artificial intelligence algorithms are being trained on government-owned and controlled data sources. (6) Identification of gaps or research needs to sufficiently respond to the elements outlined in this subsection that are not currently, or not sufficiently, funded within the Department of Defense or other Federal agencies. (c) Coordination.--In carrying out the study required by subsection (a), the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Officer shall coordinate with the following: (1) The Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). (2) The Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Evaluation. (3) The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy. (4) The Director for Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) of the Department. (5) As the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Officer considers appropriate, the following: (A) The Secretary of Energy. (B) The Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. (C) The Director of the National Science Foundation. (D) The head of the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Office of the Office of Science and Technology Policy. (E) Members and representatives of industry. (F) Members and representatives of academia. (d) Interim Briefing.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Officer shall provide the congressional defense committees a briefing on the interim findings of the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Officer with respect to the study being conducted pursuant to subsection (a). (e) Final Report.-- (1) In general.--Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Officer shall submit to the congressional defense committees a final report on the findings of the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Officer with respect ot the study conducted pursuant to subsection (a). (2) Form.--The final report submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified for, but may include a classified annex. SEC. __. ROADMAP ON DATA SHARING AND COORDINATION RELATING TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS. (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall establish a 5-year strategic roadmap-- (1) to promote the coordination of artificial intelligence systems and any data related to training, use, or evaluation of artificial intelligence systems; and (2) to identify longstanding practices and institutional norms within each military department that contribute to decentralization of data systems and artificial intelligence technology acquisitions. (b) Elements.--The roadmap required by subsection (a) shall include the following elements: (1) A review of past efforts to promote centralization of data and data management strategies related to training, use, or evaluation of artificial intelligence systems and interoperability of artificial intelligence systems. (2) A description of how varying cultural norms among components of the Department of Defense contribute to decreased collaboration, interoperability, and joint decision-making within the Department with respect to artificial intelligence and associated data. (3) A strategy to promote a unified vision of the Department that does not impinge upon the unique identity of each component with respect to artificial intelligence and associated data. (4) Plans to prevent the necessity for post hoc technology integration programs, such as joint all-domain command and control (commonly referred to as ``JADC2''), with respect to newly acquired artificial intelligence systems. SEC. __. CHIEF DIGITAL AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE OFFICE RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION. (a) In General.--Chapter 81 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section: ``Sec. 1599k. Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office recruitment and retention ``(a) General Authority.--(1) The Secretary of Defense may-- ``(A) establish, as positions in the excepted service, such qualified positions in the Department of Defense as the Secretary determines necessary to carry out the responsibilities of the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office, including-- ``(i) positions held by staff of the headquarters of the Office; and ``(ii) positions held by elements of the military departments supporting the Office; ``(B) appoint an individual to a qualified position (after taking into consideration the availability of preference eligibles for appointment to the position); and ``(C) subject to the requirements of subsections (b) and (c), fix the compensation of an individual for service in a qualified position. ``(2) The authority of the Secretary under this subsection applies without regard to the provisions of any other law relating to the appointment, number, classification, or compensation of employees. ``(b) Basic Pay.--(1) In accordance with this section, the Secretary shall fix the rates of basic pay for any qualified position established under subsection (a)-- ``(A) in relation to the rates of pay provided for employees in comparable positions in the Department, in which the employee occupying the comparable position performs, manages, or supervises functions that execute a comparable mission of the Department; and ``(B) subject to the same limitations on maximum rates of pay established for such employees by law or regulation. ``(2) The Secretary may-- ``(A) consistent with section 5341 of title 5, adopt such provisions of that title to provide for prevailing rate systems of basic pay; and ``(B) apply those provisions to qualified positions for employees in or under which the Department may employ individuals described by section 5342(a)(2)(A) of such title. ``(c) Additional Compensation, Incentives, and Allowances.--(1) The Secretary may provide employees in qualified positions compensation (in addition to basic pay), including benefits, incentives, and allowances, consistent with, and not in excess of the level authorized for, comparable positions authorized by title 5. ``(2) An employee in a qualified position whose rate of basic pay is fixed under subsection (b)(1) shall be eligible for an allowance under section 5941 of title 5 on the same basis and to the same extent as if the employee was an employee covered by such section, including eligibility conditions, allowance rates, and all other terms and conditions in law or regulation. ``(d) Implementation Plan Required.--The authority granted in subsection (a) shall become effective 30 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense provides to the congressional defense committees a plan for implementation of such authority. The plan shall include the following: ``(1) An assessment of the current scope of the positions covered by the authority. ``(2) A plan for the use of the authority. ``(3) An assessment of the anticipated workforce needs of the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office across the future-years defense plan. ``(4) Other matters as appropriate. [[Page S2792]] ``(e) Collective Bargaining Agreements.--Nothing in subsection (a) may be construed to impair the continued effectiveness of a collective bargaining agreement with respect to an office, component, subcomponent, or equivalent of the Department that is a successor to an office, component, subcomponent, or equivalent of the Department covered by the agreement before the succession. ``(f) Training.--(1) The Secretary shall provide training to covered personnel on hiring and pay matters relating to authorities under this section. ``(2) For purposes of this subsection, covered personnel are employees of the Department who-- ``(A) carry out functions relating to-- ``(i) the management of human resources and the civilian workforce of the Department; or ``(ii) the writing of guidance for the implementation of authorities regarding hiring and pay under this section; or ``(B) are employed in supervisory positions or have responsibilities relating to the hiring of individuals for positions in the Department and to whom the Secretary intends to delegate authority under this section. ``(g) Required Regulations.--The Secretary, in coordination with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, shall prescribe regulations for the administration of this section. ``(h) Annual Report.--(1) Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this section and not less frequently than once each year thereafter until the date that is five years after the date of the enactment of this section, the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, in coordination with the Secretary, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a detailed report on the administration of this section during the most recent one- year period. ``(2) Each report submitted under paragraph (1) shall include, for the period covered by the report, the following: ``(A) A discussion of the process used in accepting applications, assessing candidates, ensuring adherence to veterans' preference, and selecting applicants for vacancies to be filled by an individual for a qualified position. ``(B) A description of the following: ``(i) How the Secretary plans to fulfill the critical need of the Department to recruit and retain employees in qualified positions. ``(ii) The measures that will be used to measure progress. ``(iii) Any actions taken during the reporting period to fulfill such critical need. ``(C) A discussion of how the planning and actions taken under subparagraph (B) are integrated into the strategic workforce planning of the Department. ``(D) The metrics on actions occurring during the reporting period, including the following: ``(i) The number of employees in qualified positions hired, disaggregated by occupation, grade, and level or pay band. ``(ii) The placement of employees in qualified positions, disaggregated by military department or other component within the Department. ``(iii) The total number of veterans hired. ``(iv) The number of separations of employees in qualified positions, disaggregated by occupation and grade and level or pay band. ``(v) The number of retirements of employees in qualified positions, disaggregated by occupation, grade, and level or pay band. ``(vi) The number and amounts of recruitment, relocation, and retention incentives paid to employees in qualified positions, disaggregated by occupation, grade, and level or pay band. ``(E) A description of the training provided to employees described in subsection (f)(2) on the use of authorities under this section. ``(i) Three-year Probationary Period.--The probationary period for all employees hired under the authority established in this section shall be 3 years. ``(j) Incumbents of Existing Competitive Service Positions.--(1) An individual occupying a position on the date of the enactment of this section that is selected to be converted to a position in the excepted service under this section shall have the right to refuse such conversion. ``(2) After the date on which an individual who refuses a converion under paragraph (1) stops serving in the position selected to be converted, the position may be converted to a position in the excepted service. ``(k) Definitions.--In this section: ``(1) Appropriate committees of congress.--The term `appropriate committees of Congress' means-- ``(A) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and ``(B) the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives. ``(2) Collective bargaining agreement.--The term `collective bargaining agreement' has the meaning given that term in section 7103(a)(8) of title 5. ``(3) Excepted service.--The term `excepted service' has the meaning given that term in section 2103 of title 5. ``(4) Preference eligible.--The term `preference eligible' has the meaning given that term in section 2108(3) of title 5. ``(5) Qualified position.--The term `qualified position' means a position, designated by the Secretary for the purpose of this section, in which the individual occupying such position performs, manages, or supervises functions that execute the responsibilities of the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office. ``(6) Senior executive service.--The term `Senior Executive Service' has the meaning given that term in section 2101a of title 5.''. (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 81 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new item: ``1599k. Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office recruitment and retention.''. ______