S.Amdt. 2990Senate119th Congress (2025-2027)
S.Amdt. 2990
Sponsored by
Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-IL)
Submitted July 23, 2025
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
July 23, 2025
Text
Submitted
SA 2990. Mr. DURBIN submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 2296, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2026 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At the at the end of subtitle F of title X, add the following: SEC. 1067. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW OF WAR. It is the sense of Congress, whose constitutional responsibility it is to ``define and punish . . . Offences against the Law of Nations'' and to ``make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces'', that-- (1) the law of war, embodied in both treaties to which the United States is party and customary international law, binds the United States and the United States Armed Forces; (2) consistent with the longstanding policy of the Department of Defense to comply with the law of war during all armed conflicts, the United States remains steadfastly committed to complying with its obligations under the law of war, including the fundamental principles of necessity, humanity, distinction, and proportionality; (3) in addition to being legally required, compliance with the law of war reinforces military effectiveness, helps maintain public support and political legitimacy, and can encourage reciprocal adherence by the adversary or adherence by adversaries in future conflicts; (4) obligations under the law of war include those that address the protection of civilians, including, among other things-- (A) prohibitions on attacks directed at civilians and civilian objects, indiscriminate attacks, and attacks expected to cause excessive harm to civilians relative to the anticipated military advantage; (B) the requirement to take all feasible precautions to avoid, or in any event minimize, harm to civilians; and (C) the presumption in cases of doubt as to whether a person is a civilian, that such person shall be considered a civilian; (5) the protection of civilians is fundamentally consistent with the effective, efficient, and decisive use of force in pursuit of United States national interests; (6) minimizing civilian casualties can further mission objectives, help maintain the [[Page S4678]] support of partner governments and vulnerable populations, and enhance the legitimacy and sustainability of United States operations critical to national security; and (7) the United States therefore routinely imposes certain heightened policy standards that are more protective than the requirements of the law of war that relate to the protection of civilians. ______