To require a review of the methodologies used to determine the amounts of locality-based comparability payments and to require the President's Pay Agent to conduct a pilot program establishing alternative models for determining the amounts of those payments.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Amendment SA 3697, under the order of 10/9/2025, not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 46. Record Vote Number: 564.
October 9, 2025
View full timeline
Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Amendment SA 3697, under the order of 10/9/2025, not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 46. Record Vote Number: 564.
October 9, 2025
Senate amendment not agreed to: Amendment SA 3697, under the order of 10/9/2025, not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 46. Record Vote Number: 564.
October 9, 2025
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 3697 proposed by Senator Curtis to Amendment SA 3748.
October 9, 2025
Amendment SA 3697 proposed by Senator Curtis to Amendment SA 3748. (consideration: CR S7065-7066)
October 9, 2025
Amendment SA 3697, under the order of 10/9/2025, not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 51 - 46. Record Vote Number: 564.
October 9, 2025
Senate amendment submitted
September 2, 2025
Votes
1 roll call on this amendment
Text
Submitted
SA 3697. Mr. CURTIS submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 2296, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2026 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At the appropriate place, insert the following: SEC. ___. MODERNIZATION OF THE PAY COMPARABILITY SYSTEM. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Comparability payment.--The term ``comparability payment'' means a comparability payment payable under section 5304 or 5304a of title 5, United States Code. (2) General schedule position; pay disparity.--The terms ``General Schedule position'' and ``pay disparity'' have the meanings given those terms in section 5302 of title 5, United States Code. (3) Pay agent.--The term ``Pay Agent'' means the agent designated by the President under section 5304(d) of title 5, United States Code. [[Page S5634]] (b) Requirement.--The Pay Agent shall enter into a contract with the National Academy of Public Administration under which, not later than 380 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the National Academy of Public Administration, in consultation with the Pay Agent, the Secretary of Defense, the Federal Salary Council, and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, shall-- (1) conduct a review of the methodologies used to determine the amounts of comparability payments, which shall include-- (A) an assessment of the extent to which comparability payments align with cost-of-living and labor market data, as derived from-- (i) salary data from the National Compensation Survey and Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics programs administered by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor; (ii) the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor; (iii) regional price parity indices published by the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the Department of Commerce; (iv) the House Price Index published by the Federal Housing Finance Agency; (v) the National Housing Market Indicators produced by the Department of Housing and Urban Development; and (vi) other Federal indicators or reputable publicly available indicators, as determined appropriate by the Pay Agent; and (B) a specific analysis of-- (i) pay disparities in Utah; and (ii) regional pay disparities affecting the recruitment and retention of Federal employees in defense-related roles, using Utah as a case study for areas undergoing rapid economic growth; and (2) recommend alternative models for determining the amounts of comparability payments, including by-- (A) making adjustments based on broader economic indicators; (B) comparing the rates of pay payable under General Schedule positions with the rates of pay payable under positions in the Federal Government that are not General Schedule positions, such as rates of pay established under the AcqDemo Project of the Department of Defense carried out under section 1762 of title 10, United States Code; and (C) using regional housing market trends, with a particular focus on the markets in Salt Lake City, Ogden, Layton, Utah, and other similarly fast-growing areas, as determined by the Pay Agent. (c) Pilot Program.-- (1) In general.--Notwithstanding sections 5304 and 5304a of title 5, United States Code, after the National Academy of Public Administration completes the review described in subsection (b), the Pay Agent shall carry out a pilot program under which the Pay Agent, after consideration of the alternative models recommended under subsection (b)(2), uses alternative models to determine the amounts of comparability payments that shall be paid in Utah and each area in which a pay disparity described in subsection (b)(1)(B)(ii) exists. (2) Length of pilot program.--The pilot program under this subsection shall terminate on the date that is 3 years after the date on which the National Academy of Public Administration completes the review under subsection (b). (3) Notification.--Before implementing a pilot program under this subsection, the Pay Agent shall provide notice regarding, and an explanation of, that pilot program to Congress and the public. (d) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section may be construed to limit the authority of an agency under section 5305, 5753, or 5754 of title 5, United States Code, to establish special salary rates or offer recruitment, relocation, or retention bonuses while the Pay Agent is carrying out the requirements under subsection (b) or any pilot program under subsection (c). (e) Limitation.--Nothing in this section shall be construed as granting authority to use alternative models to determine the amounts of comparability payments after the termination of the pilot program under subsection (c)(2). ______