A bill to provide for a study to ensure that students are not adversely affected by changes to the needs analysis tables, and to require the Secretary of Education to consult with the Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance regarding such changes.

Mr. President, I am grateful to join my colleagues, Senators Evan Bayh, Ted Kennedy, and Barbara Mikulski in reintroducing the Call to Service Act of 2003. This important legislation significantly expands opportunities for citizens to serve their country as community volunteers and in homeland security functions.

This legislation expands legislation that I introduced with senator Bayh in 2001. A key component of the original McCain/Bayh proposal became law last year. To meet the changing personnel needs of today's military, the Defense Department will now have a new, shorter-term enlistment option. Individuals who volunteer to serve under this new program serve on active duty for 15 months after their initial military training and can complete the remainder of their obligation by choosing service on active duty, in the Selected Reserve or in the Individual Ready Reserve, which can be fulfilled by in a civilian national service program such as the Peace Corps or AmeriCorps). In return for service, the legislation provides loan up to $18,000, an educational allowance under the Montgomery GI Bill. I am encouraged by the excitement expressed by the Pentagon in meetings about the implementation of the program.

Two months after our legislation was introduced, President Bush made service programs a centerpiece of his 2002 State of the Union address. Unfortunately, since the speech, there has not been much followthrough on the part of this Administration.

From the time President Bush was the Governor of Texas, through his experience as President, he has proudly pointed out the successes of this program. Yet the Fiscal Year 2003 Omnibus Appropriations bill he sent to the Congress forced cuts in the program. Combined with a 50,000 cap placed on the number of AmeriCorps volunteers, AmeriCorps now faces a crisis.

My office has been inundated by phone calls from nervous AmeriCorps volunteers in recent days. They are all expressing the same fear that they will not have the opportunity to continue their service to our communities. Idealistic young men and women in this country got excited when they heard the President promise increased opportunities to serve. It is now time for the Congress and the President to expand opportunities to serve.

There is no shortage of causes that volunteers are eager to fix. We have failing schools, desperate for good teachers. Children in our poorest communities are growing up in need of mentors. Millions of elderly Americans desperately want to stay in their homes and out of nursing facilities, but cannot do so without help with the small tasks of daily life. More and more of our communities are being devastated by natural disasters. Many of the AmeriCorps volunteers work for chronically understaffed organizations such as Boys and Girls Clubs, Habitat for Humanity and the Red Cross. I have to ask why would anyone think we should do anything except increase AmeriCorps to provide opportunities for as many people as possible to serve?

Not only does the community as a whole suffer when AmeriCorps is cut, but those who are eager to serve are affected as well. Currently, over 490 individuals serve in Arizona. Many of Arizona's AmeriCorps volunteers take advantage of the educational opportunities that go along with their service. To date, over 2,100 Arizona residents have taken advantage of the $4,725 to help pay for college or pay back student loans. The fewer the number of slots available for AmeriCorps volunteers, the fewer the number of men and women who will be able to take advantage of this important opportunity.

I am grateful Senators Bond and Mikulski are working to ensure that the OMB ruling on the use of the education trust fund is used. This will ensure that the cut in the number of volunteers is less than originally feared. However make no mistake, there will be far fewer volunteers in 2003.

Our legislation seeks to increase the opportunity to serve in AmeriCorps. The Call to Service Act increases the number of people who volunteer for AmeriCorps by 25,000 per year until 175,000 people are serving in AmeriCorps each year for a five year period. This is a 125,000 increase in volunteers over the current 50,000 volunteers. Many of these new positions will be dedicated to homeland security. This legislation links AmeriCorps to Homeland Defense by directing the Corporation for National Service to work with the Department of Homeland Security to determine ways of promoting national security through service programs.

This legislation also expands eligibility for willing and able seniors to volunteer in a variety of capacities through Senior Corps, including senior companion programs, tutoring, providing long-term care, and serving as foster grandparents.

During my failed Presidential campaign in 2000, I had the opportunity to meet with students all across the country. I was deeply moved by the strong desire these young men and women expressed to serve their country. While I encourage military service to those I meet, I recognize this type of service is not for all. Our legislation increases the opportunities for these citizens.

The response to the terrorist attacks of 9/11 brought out the best in the citizens of the United States. Americans reached out to their friends, neighbors and those in their communities. Many examples of serving causes greater than their self interest abound. This dedication to volunteer service is still alive today. We cannot continue to wait to provide expanded opportunities for national service. Congress should no longer delay in taking action on legislation to provide opportunities for Americans to serve.

Mr. President, it is a privilege to join my colleagues, Senator Daschle, Senator Jeffords, Senator Edwards, Senator Reed, Senator Clinton, Senator Murray, Senator Bingaman and Senator Dodd, to introduce legislation to amend the Higher Education Act to require a feasibility and impact study on the recent changes in the state and local tax tables that are the basis for determining need-based aid for college students.

The bill will direct GAO to complete a study in consultation with the Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance within 90 days, well in advance of the 04-05 academic year when these changes would take effect. The advisory committee is a non-partisan board appointed by the President, which oversees college financial aid. Any future changes in the tables would have to be considered in consultation with the Advisory Committee.

When decisions are made that affect the cost of college, it is important for Congress to understand the factors that influenced that decision and the practical impact of those decisions on students. In light of the slumping economy, State budget crises, and rising college costs, the Department's proposed changes come at a very difficult time for students and their families. Raising the cost of tuition by a few hundred dollars may well mean that qualified students can no longer afford college. It is our responsibility to see that any such changes are made for sound reasons.

I also urge the Department of Education to work with Congress in the future in making these decisions, so that all of us in the House and Senate will have a reasonable opportunity to consider such changes before they are made.

I ask unanimous consent that the text of the bill be printed in the Record.

Mr. President, it is a privilege to join my colleagues in introducing legislation to reauthorize the Corporation for National Service. In 1993 the bipartisan National Service Act created a new program to give citizens of all ages the opportunity to serve their communities. Our goal now is to work with the administration to promote and expand service through the State commissions and the extensive system of national organizations that recruit, train and place volunteers and mentors. The legislation we are introducing, the Call to Service Act, will reauthorize the Corporation for National Service and keep these programs on track to achieve this goal.

Over 250,000 Americans have given a year of service in communities across the country, tutoring young people, connecting people to health care, and building stronger communities. Through the AmeriCorps model, we can give more young people the support they need to dedicate a year of their lives to service. These are active citizens, and our country will benefit immensely from the lessons we learn in serving others.

Community service knows no age limits. Thousands of older Americans volunteer to tutor young people or support others in living independently, or serve in local agencies. Senior citizens are a valuable resource in every community, and service gives them an effective way to continue to be involved

in the communities they helped to build. The Foster Grandparent, Senior Companion, and RSVP programs, enable seniors to contribute every day to their communities.

The Learn and Serve programs enable young men and women to learn early in their lives that serving others is important, and that service is a basic responsibility of citizenship. Children learn the value of community service, and build habits of service that last a lifetime. Service learning programs for elementary and secondary students provide hands-on experiences to supplement traditional school curriculums. The evidence is irrefutable. Service learning works. When students help others in their communities, they do better academically in school too.

In terms of cost effectiveness, the Federal Learn and Serve America program is an excellent investment. In the 2001-2002 school year more than 800,000 students across the country from grades K through 12 had the opportunity to serve their community, raise their academic achievement, and develop social skills. In Massachusetts, over 86,000 students of all ages currently participate in Learn and Serve programs.

Our bill strengthens our commitment to service by increasing the number of volunteers in AmeriCorps, lowering the age for senior service from 60 to 55 and increasing the authorization for Learn and Serve. In addition, our bill creates a new service opportunity for high school students. After completing 300 hours of service to their community, high school students will earn a $1,000 award to use on college. This increases the critical service to communities, builds the habit of serving in young people and sets them on track to continue their education.

I hope that my colleagues will support this legislation.

I ask unanimous consent that the text of this bill be printed in the Record.

Mr. President, I rise today to introduce the Enhanced Protection of Our Cultural Heritage Act. This legislation was reported last year by the Energy Committee, and I hope that this year it will become law. The bill would increase the maximum penalties for violations of three existing statutes that protect the cultural and archaeological history of the American people, particularly Native Americans. The United States Sentencing Commission asked Congress last year to make these statutory changes, which would complement the Commission's strengthening of Federal sentencing

guidelines to ensure more stringent penalties for criminals who steal from our public lands. Senator Inouye joins me as a cosponsor.

This bill will increase the maximum penalties for the Archaeological Resources Protection Act, ARPA, 16 USC Sec. 470ee, the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, NAGPRA, 18 USC Sec. 1170, and for 18 USC Sec. 1163, which prohibits theft from Indian Tribal Organizations. All three statutes currently impose a 5-year maximum sentence, and each includes a lower maximum for a first offense of the statute and/or a violation of the statute involving property of less than a specified value. This bill would create a 10-year maximum sentence for each statute. In response to comments from the administration last year, the bill retains misdemeanor offenses for relatively minor offenses.

The increased maximum sentences would be consistent with similar Federal statutes. For example, the 1994 law proscribing museum theft carries a 10-year maximum sentence, as do the general statutes punishing theft and the destruction of Government property. Moreover, increasing the maximum sentences will give judges and the Sentencing Commission greater discretion to impose punishments appropriate to the amount of destruction a defendant has done.

Making these changes will also enable the Sentencing Commission's 2002 sentencing guidelines to be fully implemented. The Commission has increased sentencing guidelines for cultural heritage crimes, but the statutory maximum penalties contained in current law will prevent judges from issuing sentences in the upper range of the new guidelines. The 2002 guidelines had the enthusiastic support of the Justice and Interior Departments, the Society for American Archeology, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, numerous Native American nations, and many others. Congress should take the steps necessary to see the guidelines take full effect.

Two of the three laws this bill amends protect Native American lands and property. The third, ARPA, protects both public and Indian lands, and provides significant protection to my State of Vermont. For example, ARPA can be used to prosecute those who would steal artifacts from the wrecked military vessels at the bottom of Lake Champlain that date to the Revolutionary War and the War of 1812. U.S. Attorneys can also use ARPA to prosecute criminals who take items that are at least 100 years old from a protected site on Vermont state property without a permit, and then transport those goods into another state. In addition, ARPA protects artifacts found on the approximately 5 percent of Vermont land that is Federal property, land that includes many ``ghost towns'' that have long been abandoned but are an important part of our history.

Those who would pillage the rich cultural heritage of this nation and its people are committing serious crimes. These artifacts are the legacy of all Americans and should not be degraded as garage sale commodities or as fodder for private enrichment.

I would like to thank a number of people for their help and advice about this legislation. Charlie Tetzlaff, as well as the rest of the staff at the Sentencing Commission, helped us understand the importance of this issue, and made protecting our cultural heritage a priority when he served as United States Attorney for Vermont. Art Cohn, the director of the Lake Champlain Maritime Museum, and Giovanna Peebles, Vermont's State Archeologist, were very helpful in explaining how our laws protect the cultural heritage of Vermont and the rest of the nation, and I am grateful for their support for this bill.

Passage of this legislation would demonstrate Congress' commitment to preserving our Nation's history and our cultural heritage. I urge my colleagues to support this common-sense initiative.

I ask unanimous consent that the text of the bill be printed in the Record.

Mr. President, I am privileged to reintroduce the ``Call to Service Act'' with my colleagues, Senator John McCain, Senator Ted Kennedy and Senator Barbara Mikulski--all great leaders on national service. I am proud to join with them today to offer this significant expansion of national service opportunities for all Americans--young and old, affluent, people of more modest means, all united in their devotion to serving America.

In November 2001, Senator McCain and I introduced the ``Call to Service Act'' in an attempt to harness the spirit and overwhelming patriotism of our citizens after September 11. We wanted to give concrete opportunities to the countless Americans who were asking what they could do to give back to their country.

Weeks after we introduced our bill, we were encouraged when the President made his own more modest service proposals a rhetorical centerpiece of his 2002 State of the Union address. In that speech, President Bush promised a significant expansion of the AmeriCorps program. He said, ``We want to be a nation that serves goals larger than self. We've been offered a unique opportunity, and we must not let this moment pass.''

Unfortunately, the President is in danger of letting the moment pass. And now, almost a year and a half later, the promises of that speech sound hollow. The administration's efforts to expand service have been disappointingly lackluster. National Service expansion was held hostage in the last Congress by members of the President's own party on the far right, while he stood idly by.

In fact, Americans now have fewer opportunities to serve than before. In my State of Indiana, we are facing a 92 percent cut in AmeriCorps positions. Last year, there were nearly 400 full-time equivalent positions available to serve in Indiana. This year, there will only be fewer than 40 positions. This will have a dramatic impact on the AmeriCorps programs throughout Indiana and on Hoosiers throughout the State. It is a very real possibility that Indiana will only have one AmeriCorps program this year. Children are not going to be tutored and mentored, homes are not going to be built, neighborhoods are not going to be cleaned up, and communities are going to be left behind. Indiana is not unique, States across the country are facing similar reductions in programs and services.

I am grateful to Senators Mikulski and Bond for their efforts to ensure

that the OMB method of accounting is used to determine the number of AmeriCorps positions available this year. With this change, there will still be large reductions in AmeriCorps, but the damage will not be quite as severe.

As AmeriCorps faces its greatest challenge since it was created, it is important to restate our commitment to this program. Our legislation will expand AmeriCorps by 25,000 additional members each year for a total of 175,000 members in five years. It will continue to utilize volunteers to support homeland security functions to help meet our Nation's new security challenges in a smart, cost-efficient manner. Our legislation includes strong accountability measures to ensure that the funds and the volunteers will be devoting themselves to activities and programs that really make a difference, really work. It expands opportunities for our seniors to serve, so that as the baby boom generation retires they can give back to their country.

We stand here today to offer this consensus approach because we know we have arrived at a critical juncture in the cause of expanding national service. We are at risk of missing the moment if we don't act.

Frankly, what is called for here is leadership. We are attempting to provide that today by offering this consensus approach, Republicans and Democrats, leader of the committee, those of us who are not on the committee.

But the President must get engaged. He's said all the right things, now it is important that he do the right thing. If we're going to get a significant commitment to national service it is going to take more than lip service, and I hope that he will step forward and provide the kind of leadership that is necessary before this opportunity slips away from us.

The moment has not yet passed us. Americans are eager to serve. We are eager to enact this legislation, put an end to this sad chapter for national service, and build toward a Nation where the great energies and good intentions of our citizens are put to productive use.

Mr. President, I rise to introduce the ``Wrongful Death Accountability Act,'' legislation that would, among other things, increase the maximum criminal penalty for those who willfully violate workplace safety laws and cause the death of an employee.

Unbelievably, under existing law, that crime is a misdemeanor, and carries a maximum prison sentence of just 6 months. This legislation would increase the penalty for this most egregious workplace crime to 10 years--making it a felony. The bill also would increase the penalty associated with lying to an OSHA inspector from 6 months to 1 year, and would increase the penalty for illegally giving advance warning of an upcoming inspection from 6 months to 2 years.

In recent months, this Congress has focused on a shocking succession of corporate scandals: Enron, Tyco, WorldCom, to name a few. These revelations of corporate abuse raised the ire and indignation of the American people. But corporate abuses can sometimes go further than squandering employee pension funds and costing shareholder value. Sometimes, corporate abuses can cost lives.

My legislation is based on the simple premise that going to work should not carry a death sentence. Annually, more than 6,000 Americans are killed on the job, and some 50,000 more die from work-related illnesses. Many of those deaths--deaths that leave wives without husbands, brothers without sisters, and children without parents--are completely preventable.

Earlier this year, the New York Times published an eye-opening, multi-part series that documented the failure of the Federal government to prosecute violators of workplace safety laws. The articles were deeply disturbing to anyone concerned about the health and well being of workers in America, detailing one company's pattern of recklessly disregarding basic safety rules. The authors linked at least nine employee deaths in five states--New York, New Jersey, Ohio, Alabama, and Texas--over a 7-year period with the failure of a single company, McWane Foundry, to follow established workplace safety regulations. Three of those deaths were judged to have been caused by deliberate and willful violations of federal safety rules.

As a result of that article and a subsequent criminal investigation, McWane has begun to clean up its act.

But no one should be deluded. McWane is not the only company with a record of putting employees at risk. Others--although still the clear minority--continue to flout workplace safety rules and jeopardize the health and well being of workers.

The administration recognized that there was a problem and recently announced its ``enhanced enforcement policy,'' a small step in the right direction. But more needs to be done, and I have requested the support of Secretary Henshaw, Administrator of OSHA, for my legislation.

While many factors contribute to the unsafe working environment that exists at certain jobsites, one easily remedied factor is an ineffective regime of criminal penalties. The criminal statutes associated with OSHA have been on the books since the 1970s, but--over time--the deterrence value of these important workplace safety laws has eroded substantially. With the maximum jail sentence a paltry 6 months, Federal prosecutors have only a minimal incentive to spend time and resources prosecuting renegade employers. According to a recent analysis, since the Occupational Safety and Health Act was enacted, only 11 employers who caused the death of a worker on the job were incarcerated.

The logic behind this legislation is simple. The bill will increase the incentive for prosecutors to hold renegade employers accountable for endangering the lives of their workers and, thereby, help ensure that OSHA criminal penalties cannot be safely ignored. This will provide the OSHA criminal statute with sufficient teeth to deter the small percentage of bad actors who knowingly and willfully place their employees at risk.

I urge my colleagues to support this important piece of legislation and ask unanimous consent that the text of the bill be printed in the Record.