H.R. 2110House109th Congress (2005-2007)Passed House

Colorado Northern Front Range Mountain Backdrop Protection Study Act

Sponsored by Mark UdallRep. Mark Udall (D-CO)
Introduced May 4, 2005

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

17 earlier actions
SenateIntro Referral Latest Action

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

November 13, 2006

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

May 4, 2005

HouseIntro Referral

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E872-873)

May 4, 2005

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the House Committee on Resources.

May 4, 2005

HouseCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health.

May 11, 2005

HouseCommittee

Subcommittee Hearings Held.

March 9, 2006

HouseCommittee

Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health Discharged.

July 19, 2006

HouseCommittee

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

July 19, 2006

HouseCommittee

Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.

July 19, 2006

HouseCommittee

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Resources. H. Rept. 109-624.

September 6, 2006

HouseCalendars

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 364.

September 6, 2006

HouseFloor

Mr. Gohmert moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

September 27, 2006 • 11:56 PM

HouseFloor

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H7670-7671)

September 27, 2006 • 11:57 PM

HouseFloor

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 2110.

September 27, 2006 • 11:57 PM

HouseFloor

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H7670)

September 27, 2006 • 11:59 PM

HouseFloor

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H7670)

September 27, 2006 • 11:59 PM

HouseFloor

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

September 27, 2006 • 11:59 PM

SenateIntro Referral

Received in the Senate.

September 28, 2006

SenateIntro Referral

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

November 13, 2006

Floor Debate

3 members

What members said about H.R. 2110 on the floor

1 Republican2 Democrats
Tom Udall
Rep. Tom UdallD-NM-3 · Sep 27, 2006

Madam Speaker, I rise in strong support of H.R. 210, the Colorado Northern Front Range Mountain Backdrop Protection Study bill. The bill is intended to help local communities identify ways to protect…

Louie Gohmert
Rep. Louie GohmertR-TX-1 · Sep 27, 2006

Madam Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 2110) to provide for a study of options for protecting the open space characteristics of certain lands in and adjacent to the…

Ron Kind
Rep. Ron KindD-WI-3 · Sep 27, 2006

Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Madam Speaker, we too encourage adoption of this legislation. I want to commend my good friend and colleague from the State of Colorado, Mr.…

Bill Text

4 versions available

Reading Mode
Latest
Referred in SenateIssued November 13, 2006

IIB

109th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. R. 2110

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

September 28, 2006

Received

November 13, 2006

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

AN ACT

To provide for a study of options for protecting the open space characteristics of certain lands in and adjacent to the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests in Colorado, and for other purposes.

1.

Short title; findings; purpose

(a)

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Colorado Northern Front Range Mountain Backdrop Protection Study Act.

(b)

Findings

Congress finds the following:

(1)

Rising dramatically from the Great Plains, the Front Range of the Rocky Mountains provides a scenic mountain backdrop to many communities in the Denver metropolitan area and elsewhere in Colorado. The portion of the range within and adjacent to the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests also includes a diverse array of wildlife habitats and provides many opportunities for outdoor recreation.

(2)

The open space character of this mountain backdrop is an important esthetic and economic asset for adjoining communities, making them attractive locations for homes and businesses.

(3)

Rapid population growth in the northern Front Range area of Colorado is increasing recreational use of the Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests and is also placing increased pressure for development of other lands within and adjacent to that national forest.

(4)

Efforts by local governments and other entities have provided important protection for portions of this mountain backdrop, especially in the northern Denver metropolitan area. However, some portions of the mountain backdrop in this part of Colorado remain unprotected and are at risk of losing their open space qualities.

(5)

It is in the national interest for the Federal Government, in collaboration with local communities, to assist in identifying options for increasing the protection of the mountain backdrop in the northern Front Range area of Colorado.

(c)

Purpose

The purpose of this Act is to identify options that may be available to assist in maintaining the open space characteristics of lands that are part of the mountain backdrop of communities in the northern section of the Front Range area of Colorado.

2.

Colorado northern front range mountain backdrop study

(a)

Study and report

The Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service and in consultation with the State and local officials and agencies specified in subsection (c), shall review the lands within the study area and, not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, shall report to such officials and to Congress regarding the following:

(1)

The present ownership of such lands.

(2)

Which undeveloped land may be at risk of development.

(3)

Actions that could be taken by the United States, the State of Colorado or a political subdivision of such State, or any other parties to preserve the open and undeveloped character of such lands.

(b)

Definitions

For the purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:

(1)

Study area

The term study area means those lands in southern Boulder, northern Jefferson, and northern Gilpin Counties, Colorado, that are situated west of Colorado State Highway 93, south and east of Colorado State Highway 119, and north of Colorado State Highway 46, excluding lands within the city limits of the cities of Boulder or Golden, Colorado, as generally depicted on the map entitled Northern Front Range Mountain Backdrop Study Area dated April, 2006.

(2)

Undeveloped land

The term undeveloped land means land that—

(A)

is located within the study area;

(B)

is free or primarily free of structures; and


(C)

the development of which is likely to adversely affect the scenic, wildlife, or recreational value of the study area.

(c)

Consultations

In implementing this Act, the Secretary shall consult with the following:

(1)

The Colorado Department of Natural Resources.

(2)

Colorado State Forest Service.

(3)

Colorado State Conservation Board.

(4)

Great Outdoors Colorado.

(5)

The Boards of County Commissioners of Boulder, Jefferson, and Gilpin Counties, Colorado.

(d)

Rule of construction

Nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the Secretary of Agriculture to take any action that would affect the use of any lands not owned by the United States.

Passed the House of Representatives September 27, 2006.

Karen L. Haas,

Clerk.