S. 1044Senate109th Congress (2005-2007)Passed Senate
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006

An original bill to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2006 for military construction, and for other purposes.
Also known as Military Construction FY2006 Authorization bill · Authorization bill FY2006, Military Construction
Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
9 earlier actions
HouseFloor Latest Action
Held at the desk.
December 6, 2005 • 7:40 PM
View full timeline
SenateCommittee
Committee on Armed Services ordered to be reported an original measure.
Armed Services Committee
May 12, 2005
SenateIntro Referral
Introduced in Senate
May 17, 2005
SenateCommittee
Committee on Armed Services. Original measure reported to Senate by Senator Warner. Without written report.
Armed Services Committee
May 17, 2005
SenateCalendars
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 104.
May 17, 2005
SenateFloor
Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S12810)
November 15, 2005
SenateFloor
Senate struck all after the Enacting Clause and substituted the language of S.1042 amended (Division B only).
November 15, 2005
SenateFloor
Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.
November 15, 2005
SenateFloor
Message on Senate action sent to the House.
November 22, 2005
HouseFloor
Received in the House.
December 6, 2005 • 2:04 PM
HouseFloor
Held at the desk.
December 6, 2005 • 7:40 PM
Floor Debate

3 members
What members said about S. 1044 on the floor
2 Republicans1 Democrat
Sen. John WarnerR-VA · Nov 15, 2005
Mr. President, with respect to H.R. 1815, the House- passed version of the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2006, I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on Armed Services be…
Mr. President, with respect to H.R. 1815, the House- passed version of the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2006, I ask unanimous consent that the Committee on Armed Services be discharged from any further consideration of the bill; that the Senate proceed to its immediate consideration; that all after the enacting clause be stricken and the text of S. 1042, as amended, be substituted in lieu thereof, and that the bill be advanced to third reading and passed; that the Senate insist on its amendment to the bill and request a conference with the House on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses, and the Chair be authorized to appoint conferees; that the motion to reconsider the above-mentioned votes be laid upon the table; and that the foregoing occur without intervening action or debate.
I ask unanimous consent with respect to S. 1042, S. 1043, S. 1044, and S. 1045, as just passed by the Senate, that if the Senate receives a message with respect to any of these bills from the House of Representatives, the Senate disagree with the House on its amendment or amendments to the Senate-passed bill and agree to or request a conference as appropriate with the House on the disagreeing votes of the two Houses; that the Chair be authorized to appoint conferees, and that the foregoing occur without intervening action or debate.
Now, Mr. President, the Chair was about to announce the conferees.
The PRESIDING OFFICER appointed Mr. Warner, Mr. McCain, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Sessions, Ms. Collins, Mr. Ensign, Mr. Talent, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Graham, Mrs. Dole, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Thune, Mr. Levin, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Byrd, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Reed, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Nelson of Florida, Mr. Nelson of Nebraska, Mr. Dayton, Mr. Bayh, and Mrs. Clinton as conferees on the part of the Senate.
Mr. President, time is short. We are about to go to our respective caucuses, but I say to my colleagues that I wish to express my profound appreciation first and foremost to my distinguished friend and colleague of 27 years; we have been together in this Chamber, working toward the passage of authorization bills in each and every one of those 27 years. I thank my friend.
I thank the distinguished members of our staff, and I do use the word ``distinguished'': Charlie Abell, who left the Department of Defense at our request to come over to be our chief of staff, replacing a very fine person, Judy Ansley, who went on up to the National Security Council, and our Democratic staff director, Rick DeBobes, who has been with us many years. Together they have led a dedicated professional staff, all of whom deserve credit and recognition in helping Members reach agreements and to prepare all types of information needed by the Members, and I may say to give good, sound advice. I have always encouraged that of our staff. They are not just to be there to be ``yessayers'' or naysayers. They are to give us their best advice, and that they do.
Accordingly, I ask unanimous consent that the names of both the majority and minority staff be printed in the Record.
Mr. President, as we stand in this great Chamber, I marvel at the work conducted by the Armed Services Committee since the beginning of the 109th Congress. The committee has conducted 46 hearings and received numerous policy and operational briefings on the President's budget request for 2006 and related defense issues. Since the committee reported out this important legislation on May 12, the Senate has debated many important provisions contained in this legislation. Along the way, there have been many contentious issues to resolve, such as detainee policy, missile defense, BRAC, and many others.
After a total of 12 days of debate on the Senate floor, we have now resolved them. I am proud we have achieved our goal of passing this important bill. This marks the 46th year the Senate has passed a national defense authorization bill. I thank particularly my ranking member and my colleagues for their support.
Mr. President, we won't make any predictions. We will get started and do our best. I thank my good friend and look forward to working with him again next year. We have truly formed a unique partnership, the two of us together. I thank so many Senators who recognize that he and I have a trusting partnership and resolved a lot of problems that otherwise could prove contentious and maybe not had a resolution. So to the next year.
I must say, I have consulted with the Senator from Michigan. Both of us have great concern about the IED problem. We are going to have one more hearing, in all probability a closed hearing, on this subject, listening to some viewpoints in the private sector. We regularly meet with those in the Department of Defense who have the primary jurisdiction over this problem. This is one issue on which I am gravely concerned and over which I lose sleep at night, as I am sure all of us do, about the frightful weaponry the insurgents are employing and how best we can put the entire country to work to resolve this problem.
I thank my good friend.
Mr. President, I thank my good friend; again, a partnership effort to achieve that.
Sen. Carl LevinD-MI · Nov 15, 2005
Mr. President, we would not be at this point in our deliberations, we could not have arrived at this point on the road without our chairman, Senator John Warner, who is not only a person who is…
Mr. President, we would not be at this point in our deliberations, we could not have arrived at this point on the road without our chairman, Senator John Warner, who is not only a person who is eminently fair--he is invariably that, fair--he is unflappable. Despite his passion for the men and women of the military, he is unflappable when it comes to getting things done in a very calm, deliberative, and bipartisan manner. I am proud to serve in this Senate for many reasons but not the least of them is being able to be a friend and colleague of John Warner of Virginia, truly a gentleman.
Our staff, as he has pointed out, has made it possible for us to be here as well. We function on a bipartisan basis. We obviously have disagreements at times. We are always able to work those out in an agreeable way or disagree in an agreeable way. We have been able to bring the bill to the floor again with the help of our bipartisan staff. We are glad Charlie Abell is back on our side of the Potomac again where he belongs. Dick DeBobes, as the chairman pointed out, leads our minority staff with distinction. I probably should not single out any other member of our staff, but I want to mention Peter Levine because of the unusual circumstance we found ourselves in where his particular expertise made it possible for us to resolve this issue relative to detainees. It is most needed and appreciated by all of us.
I think I can speak for both Senator Warner and myself when I say that our staffs not only work together, as Senator Warner has indicated, but make it possible for us to reach the point where we are.
I wanted to add my thanks, and now on to conference, which is always fun. We have had more bumps on the road this year than I can remember in any prior year for an authorization bill. We were on the floor, off the floor, on the floor, off the floor for various reasons which we don't need to recount. Hopefully, the road ahead of us will be smoother and we can come out of conference, I guess now would be early in the next year.
Mr. President, if I may very briefly respond.
Mr. President, I commend our chairman for the initiative which he has shown on the IED issue. We had a hearing a few weeks ago on this issue which was one of the most fascinating and I think one of the most important hearings our committee has held, at least that I can remember, exclusively on the IED issue. It was under the chairman's leadership that we did this. I think it was a significant hearing.
This committee has been absolutely dedicated to doing everything we possibly can in addressing this threat. We have done everything we know how to do, but we still have not solved the problem. As the chairman mentioned, we are looking for additional technologies, additional ways in which this problem can be addressed.
I did want to mention that hearing because I thought it was unusually important.
Sen. William H. FristR-TN · May 10, 2006
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order of November 15, 2005, with respect to S. 1042, S. 1043, S. 1044, and S. 1045 be vitiated.
Bill Text

2 versions available
Reading Mode
Raw Text PDF
Engrossed in SenateIssued November 15, 2005
        [Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1044 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

109th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 1044

_______________________________________________________________________

AN ACT

To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2006 for military
construction, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ``Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2006''.

SEC. 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS.

The table of contents for this Act is as follows:

Sec. 1. Short title.
Sec. 2. Table of contents.
Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees.
DIVISION B--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS

TITLE XXI--ARMY

Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2102. Family housing.
Sec. 2103. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2104. Authorization of appropriations, Army.
Sec. 2105. Construction of battalion dining facilities, Fort Knox,
Kentucky.
TITLE XXII--NAVY

Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2202. Family housing.
Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy.
Sec. 2205. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2005 projects.
Sec. 2206. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year
2004 project.
TITLE XXIII--AIR FORCE

Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition
projects.
Sec. 2302. Family housing.
Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force.
TITLE XXIV--DEFENSE AGENCIES

Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land
acquisition projects.
Sec. 2402. Energy conservation projects.
Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies.
TITLE XXV--NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY INVESTMENT
PROGRAM

Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO.
TITLE XXVI--GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES

Sec. 2601. Authorized Guard and Reserve construction and land
acquisition projects.
Sec. 2602. Specific authorized Army National Guard construction
projects.
Sec. 2603. Construction of facilities, New Castle County Airport Air
Guard Base, Delaware.
Sec. 2604. Construction of maintenance hangar, New Castle County
Airport Air Guard Base, Delaware.
Sec. 2605. National Guard construction projects.
TITLE XXVII--EXPIRATION AND EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS

Sec. 2701. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be
specified by law.
Sec. 2702. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2003
projects.
Sec. 2703. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2002
projects.
Sec. 2704. Effective date.
TITLE XXVIII--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Subtitle A--Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing
Changes

Sec. 2801. Increase in thresholds for unspecified minor military
construction projects.
Sec. 2802. Modification of cost variation authority.
Sec. 2803. Department of Defense housing funds.
Sec. 2804. Temporary authority to use minor military construction
authority for construction of child
development centers.
Sec. 2805. Inapplicability to child development centers of restriction
on authority to acquire or construct
ancillary supporting facilities.
Sec. 2806. Authority to carry out exchanges of facilities including
associated utilities, equipment, and
furnishings.
Sec. 2807. Increase in number of family housing units in Korea
authorized for lease by the Army at maximum
amount.
Subtitle B--Real Property and Facilities Administration

Sec. 2821. Authority to lease non-excess property of Department of
Defense field activities.
Sec. 2822. Modified criteria for agreements to limit encroachments and
other constraints on military training,
testing, and operations.
Sec. 2823. Expanded authority to enter into lease-purchase agreements.
Subtitle C--Land Conveyances

Part I--Army Conveyances

Sec. 2841. Land conveyance, Helena, Montana.
Sec. 2842. Land conveyance, Army Reserve Center, Bothell, Washington.
Sec. 2843. Land conveyance, Iowa Army Ammunition Plant, Middletown,
Iowa.
Part II--Navy Conveyances

Sec. 2851. Land conveyance, Marine Corps Air Station, Miramar, San
Diego, California.
Sec. 2852. Lease of United States Navy Museum facilities at Washington
Navy Yard, District of Columbia.
Part III--Air Force Conveyances

Sec. 2861. Acquisition of build-to-lease family housing at Eielson Air
Force Base, Alaska.
Sec. 2862. Land conveyance, Air Force property, La Junta, Colorado.
Subtitle D--Other Matters

Sec. 2881. Reorganization and technical improvement of codified laws
applicable to real property of the
Department of Defense.
Sec. 2882. Report on application of force protection and anti-terrorism
standards to leased facilities.
Sec. 2883. Construction at Fort Buchanan, Puerto Rico, for reserve
components.
Sec. 2884. Authority to use Papago Park Military Reservation, Arizona,
for general military purposes.
Sec. 2885. One-year extension of Department of Defense laboratory
revitalization program.
Sec. 2886. Sense of Congress on establishment of Bakers Creek Memorial.
Sec. 2887. Report on use of ground source heat pumps at Department of
Defense facilities.
Sec. 2888. Treatment of Indian Tribal Governments as public entities
for purposes of disposal of real property
recommended for closure in July 2003 BRAC
Commission Report.
Sec. 2889. Sense of the Senate regarding community impact assistance
related to construction of Navy Landing
Field, North Carolina.
Sec. 2890. Designation of William B. Bryant Annex.
Sec. 2891. Required consultation with State and local entities on
transportation, housing, and other
infrastructure issues related to the
addition of personnel or facilities at
military installations as part of 2005
round of defense base closure and
realignment.
Sec. 2892. Sense of the Senate on reversionary interests at Navy
homeports.
Sec. 2893. Identification of environmental conditions at military
installations closed or realigned under
2005 round of defense base closure and
realignment.
Sec. 2894. Sense of Congress on limitation on transfer of units from
closed and realigned military installations
pending readiness of receiving locations.

SEC. 3. CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES DEFINED.

For purposes of this Act, the term ``congressional defense
committees'' has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of
title 10, United States Code.

DIVISION B--MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATIONS

TITLE XXI--ARMY

SEC. 2101. AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

(a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated pursuant
to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104(a)(1), the
Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military
construction projects for the installations or locations inside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Army: Inside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Installation or
State                      location              Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama........................  Redstone Arsenal......      $20,000,000
Alaska.........................  Fort Richardson.......       $4,700,000
Fort Wainwright.......      $44,660,000
Arizona........................  Yuma Proving Ground...       $8,100,000
California.....................  Fort Irwin............      $17,000,000
Concord...............      $11,850,000
Colorado.......................  Fort Carson...........      $70,622,000
Georgia........................  Fort Benning..........      $28,211,000
Fort Gillem...........       $3,900,000
Fort Gordon...........       $4,550,000
Fort Stewart/Hunter         $57,980,000
Army Air Field.......
Hawaii.........................  Pohakuloa Training          $60,300,000
Area.
Schofield Barracks....      $53,900,000
Kansas.........................  Fort Riley............      $33,900,000
Kentucky.......................  Fort Campbell.........     $112,875,000
Fort Knox.............       $4,600,000
Louisiana......................  Fort Polk.............      $28,887,000
Missouri.......................  Fort Leonard Wood.....      $17,000,000
New Jersey.....................  Picatinny Arsenal.....       $4,450,000
New York.......................  Fort Drum.............      $73,350,000
United States Military       $4,000,000
Academy, West Point..
North Carolina.................  Fort Bragg............     $289,850,000
Oklahoma.......................  Fort Sill.............       $5,850,000
McAlester Army               $5,400,000
Ammunition Plant.....
Pennsylvania...................  Letterkenny Depot.....       $6,300,000
Texas..........................  Fort Hood.............      $46,438,000
Fort Sam Houston......       $7,000,000
Utah...........................  Dugway Proving Ground.      $25,000,000
Virginia.......................  Fort A.P. Hill........       $2,700,000
Fort Belvoir..........      $18,000,000
Fort Eustis...........       $3,100,000
Fort Myer.............      $15,200,000
Washington.....................  Fort Lewis............      $99,949,000
----------------
Total.............   $1,189,622,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated pursuant
to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104(a)(2), the
Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military
construction projects for the installations or locations outside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Army: Outside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Country              Installation or location     Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Germany.........................  Grafenwoehr.............   $84,081,000
Italy...........................  Pisa....................    $5,254,000
Korea...........................  Camp Humphreys..........   $99,162,000
Yongpyong...............    $1,450,000
-------------
Total...................  $189,947,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2102. FAMILY HOUSING.

(a) Construction and Acquisition.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2104(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire
family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting
facilities) at the installations or locations, for the purposes, and in
the amounts set forth in the following table:

Army: Family Housing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State                     Installation or location             Purpose               Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska..................................  Fort Richardson............  117 Units..................   $49,000,000
Fort Wainwright............  180 Units..................   $91,000,000
Arizona.................................  Fort Huachuca..............  131 Units..................   $31,000,000
Yuma Proving Grounds.......  35 Units...................   $11,200,000
Oklahoma................................  Fort Sill..................  129 Units..................   $24,000,000
Virginia................................  Fort Lee...................  96 Units...................   $19,500,000
Fort Monroe................  21 Units...................    $6,000,000
-------------
Total..................  ...........................  $231,700,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Planning and Design.--Using amounts appropriated pursuant to
the authorization of appropriations in section 2104(a)(5)(A), the
Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and engineering
services and construction design activities with respect to the
construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to
exceed $17,536,000.

SEC. 2103. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS.

Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in
section 2104(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the Army may improve existing
military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $300,400,000.

SEC. 2104. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, ARMY.

(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby authorized
to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2005,
for military construction, land acquisition, and military family
housing functions of the Department of the Army in the total amount of
$2,972,142,000 as follows:
(1) For military construction projects inside the United
States authorized by section 2101(a), $1,012,722,000.
(2) For military construction projects outside the United
States authorized by section 2101(b), $189,947,000.
(3) For unspecified minor military construction projects
authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United States Code,
$20,000,000.
(4) For architectural and engineering services and
construction design under section 2807 of title 10, United
States Code, $163,215,000.
(5) For military family housing functions:
(A) For construction and acquisition, planning and
design, and improvement of military family housing and
facilities, $549,636,000.
(B) For support of military family housing
(including the functions described in section 2833 of
title 10, United States Code), $812,993,000.
(6) For the construction of phase 2 of a barracks complex
at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, authorized by section 2101(a) of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2005 (division B of Public Law 108-375; 118 Stat. 2101),
$24,650,000.
(7) For the construction of phase 3 of the Lewis & Clark
instructional facility at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, authorized
by section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108-136; 117
Stat. 1697), $42,642,000.
(8) For the construction of phase 2 of trainee barracks
basic training complex 1 at Fort Knox, Kentucky, authorized by
section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108-375; 118
Stat. 2101), $21,000,000.
(9) For the construction of phase 2 of a barracks complex
renewal at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, authorized by section
2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108-375; 118 Stat.
2101), $30,611,000.
(10) For the construction of phase 2 of a library and
learning center at the United States Military Academy, West
Point, New York, authorized by section 2101(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B
of Public Law 108-375; 118 Stat. 2101), $25,470,000.
(11) For the construction of phase 2 of a barracks complex
at Vilseck, Germany, authorized by section 2101(b) of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004
(division B of Public Law 108-136; 117 Stat. 1698),
$13,600,000.
(12) For the construction of phase 2 of a vehicle
maintenance facility at Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, authorized
by section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108-375; 118
Stat. 2101), $24,656,000.
(13) For the construction of phase 2 of the Drum Road
upgrade at Helemano Military Reservation, Hawaii, authorized by
section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108-375; 118
Stat. 2101), $41,000,000.
(b) Limitation on Total Cost of Construction Projects.--
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title
10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law,
the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2101 of this
Act may not exceed the sum of the following:
(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under
paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection (a).
(2) $16,500,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under
section 2101(a) for construction of a barracks complex, 10300
block, Fort Drum, New York).
(3) $31,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under
section 2101(a) for construction of a barracks complex for the
2nd Brigade, Fort Bragg, North Carolina).
(4) $77,400,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under
section 2101(a) for construction of a barracks complex for
DIVARTY, Fort Bragg, North Carolina).
(5) $50,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under
section 2101(a) for construction of a barracks complex for the
3rd Brigade, Fort Bragg, North Carolina).
(6) $13,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under
section 2101(a) for construction of a defense access road, Fort
Belvoir, Virginia).

SEC. 2105. CONSTRUCTION OF BATTALION DINING FACILITIES, FORT KNOX,
KENTUCKY.

(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--The amount authorized to be
appropriated by section 2104(a) for military construction, land
acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of
the Army and the amount of such funds authorized by paragraph (1) of
such subsection for military construction projects inside the United
States are each hereby decreased by $3,600,000.
(b) Use of Funds.--Of the amount authorized to be appropriated by
section 2104(a)(1) for the Department of the Army and available for
military construction at Fort Knox, Kentucky, $4,600,000 is available
for the construction of battalion dining facilities at Fort Knox.

TITLE XXII--NAVY

SEC. 2201. AUTHORIZED NAVY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

(a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated pursuant
to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a)(1), the
Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military
construction projects for the installations or locations inside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Navy: Inside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Installation or
State                      location              Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona........................  Marine Corps Air             $3,637,000
Station, Yuma.
California.....................  Marine Corps Air             $1,400,000
Station, Camp
Pendleton............
Marine Corps Base,          $90,437,000
Camp Pendleton.
Naval Air Station,           $8,480,000
Lemoore.
Naval Air Warfare           $19,158,000
Center, China Lake.
Connecticut....................  Naval Submarine Base,        $4,610,000
New London.
Florida........................  Naval Air Station,          $88,603,000
Jacksonville.
Naval Air Station,           $8,710,000
Pensacola............
Naval Station, Mayport      $10,750,000
Navy Diving and              $9,678,000
Salvage Training
Center, Panama City..
Whiting Field.........       $4,670,000
Georgia........................  Albany Depot..........       $4,000,000
Navy Submarine Base,         $3,000,000
Kings Bay............
Hawaii.........................  Marine Corps Air             $5,700,000
Station, Kaneohe Bay.
Naval Base, Pearl           $29,700,000
Harbor...............
Illinois.......................  Recruit Training           $167,750,000
Command, Great Lakes.
Indiana........................  Naval Warfare Center,        $8,220,000
Crane................
Maine..........................  Naval Shipyard,              $8,100,000
Portsmouth...........
Maryland.......................  Naval Air Warfare            $5,800,000
Center, Patuxent
River................
United States Naval         $51,720,000
Academy, Annapolis...
Mississippi....................  Naval Air Station,          $10,450,000
Meridian.............
North Carolina.................  Marine Corps Air            $27,147,000
Station, Cherry Point
Marine Corps Base,          $44,590,000
Camp Lejeune.........
Marine Corps Air             $6,840,000
Station, New River...
Rhode Island...................  Naval Station, Newport      $10,620,000
Texas..........................  Naval Air Station,           $6,010,000
Kingsville.
Virginia.......................  Marine Corps Air            $19,698,000
Field, Quantico.
Marine Corps Base,           $4,000,000
Quantico.............
Naval Air Station,          $11,680,000
Oceana...............
Naval Amphibious Base,      $36,034,000
Little Creek.
Naval Station, Norfolk     $111,033,000
Naval Surface Warfare        $9,960,000
Center, Dahlgren.....
Washington.....................  Naval Station, Everett      $70,950,000
Naval Submarine Base,       $60,160,000
Bangor.
----------------
Total.............     $963,295,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated pursuant
to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(a)(2), the
Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military
construction projects for the installation or location outside the
United States, and in the amount, set forth in the following table:

Navy: Outside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Installation or
Country                      location             Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guam...........................  Naval Station, Guam....     $55,473,000
---------------
Total..............     $55,473,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2202. FAMILY HOUSING.

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2204(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the Navy may
construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition
and supporting facilities) at the installation or location, for the
purpose, and in the amount set forth in the following table:

Navy: Family Housing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State                     Installation or Location             Purpose               Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guam....................................  Naval Station, Guam........  126 Units..................   $43,495,000
-------------
Total..................  ...........................   $43,495,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2203. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS.

Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in
section 2204(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing
military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $178,644,000.

SEC. 2204. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NAVY.

(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby authorized
to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2005,
for military construction, land acquisition, and military family
housing functions of the Department of the Navy in the total amount of
$1,918,465,000, as follows:
(1) For military construction projects inside the United
States authorized by section 2201(a), $761,751,000.
(2) For military construction projects outside the United
States authorized by section 2201(b), $25,584,000.
(3) For unspecified minor construction projects authorized
by section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, $1.
(4) For architectural and engineering services and
construction design under section 2807 of title 10, United
States Code, $54,507,000.
(5) For military family housing functions:
(A) For construction and acquisition, planning and
design, and improvement of military family housing and
facilities, $222,139,000.
(B) For support of military family housing
(including functions described in section 2833 of title
10, United States Code), $593,660,000.
(6) For the construction of increment 2 of the Presidential
Helicopter program support facility at Naval Air Warfare
Station, Patuxent River, Maryland, authorized by section
2201(c) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108-375; 118 Stat.
2106), $55,700,000.
(7) For the construction of increment 2 of the apron and
hangar recapitalization at Naval Air Field, El Centro,
California, authorized by section 2201(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B
of Public Law 108-375; 118 Stat. 2105), $18,666,000.
(8) For the construction of increment 3 of pier 11
replacement at Naval Station, Norfolk, Virginia, authorized by
section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108-136; 117
Stat. 1704), $40,200,000.
(9) For the construction of increment 2 of the limited area
production and storage complex at Strategic Weapons Facility
Pacific, Bangor, Washington, authorized by section 2201(a) of
the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2005 (division B of Public Law 108-375; 118 Stat. 2106),
$47,095,000.
(10) For the construction of increment 2 of a White Side
complex at Marine Corps Air Facility, Quantico, Virginia,
authorized by section 2201(a) of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public
Law 108-375; 118 Stat. 2106), $34,730,000.
(11) For the construction of increment 3 of the general
purpose berthing pier at Naval Weapons Station, Earle, New
Jersey, authorized by section 2201(a) of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B
of Public Law 108-136; 117 Stat. 1704), $64,432,000.
(b) Limitation on Total Cost of Construction Projects.--
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title
10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law,
the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2201 of this
Act may not exceed the sum of the following:
(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under
paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection (a).
(2) $43,424,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under
section 2201(a) to replace a helicopter hangar, Naval Air
Station, Jacksonville, Florida).
(3) $45,850,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under
section 2201(a) to upgrade infrastructure, Recruit Training
Command, Great Lakes, Illinois).
(4) $26,790,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under
section 2201(a) for construction of the Wesley Brown Field
House, United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland).
(5) $31,059,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under
section 2201(a) to replace ship repair pier 3, Naval Station,
Norfolk, Virginia).
(6) $21,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under
section 2201(a) for construction of a bachelor enlisted
quarters for the homeport ashore program, Naval Station,
Everett, Washington).
(7) $33,421,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under
section 2201(a) to perform reclamation and conveyance
activities, Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, California).
(8) $29,889,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under
section 2201(b) to improve Alpha/Bravo wharves, Naval Station,
Guam).
(c) Adjustment.--The total amount authorized to be appropriated
pursuant to paragraphs (1) through (11) of subsection (a) is the sum of
the amounts authorized to be appropriated in such paragraphs, reduced
by $92,354,000, which represents prior year savings.

SEC. 2205. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR
2005 PROJECTS.

(a) Modification of Inside the United States Projects.--The table
in section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108-375; 118 Stat. 2106) is
amended--
(1) in the item relating to Marine Corps Air Facility,
Quantico, Virginia, by striking ``$73,838,000'' in the amount
column and inserting ``$74,470,000''; and
(2) by striking the amount identified as the total in the
amount column and inserting ``$952,687,000''.
(b) Modification of Unspecified Worldwide Project.--The table in
section 2201(c) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108-375; 118 Stat. 2106) is
amended--
(1) in the item relating to Unspecified Worldwide, by
striking ``$105,982,000'' in the amount column and inserting
``$95,200,000''; and
(2) by striking the amount identified as the total in the
amount column and inserting ``$95,200,000''.
(c) Conforming Amendments.--Section 2204(b) of that Act (118 Stat.
2108) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (4), by striking ``$34,098,000'' and
inserting ``$34,730,000''; and
(2) in paragraph (7), by striking ``$65,982,000'' and
inserting ``$55,200,000''.

SEC. 2206. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR
2004 PROJECT.

(a) Modification of Inside the United States Project.--The table in
section 2201(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108-136; 117 Stat. 1704) is
amended--
(1) in the item relating to Naval Weapons Station, Earle,
New Jersey, by striking ``$123,720,000'' in the amount column
and inserting ``$140,372,000''; and
(2) by striking the amount identified as the total in the
amount column and inserting ``$1,352,524,000''.
(b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 2204(b)(4) of that Act is
amended by striking ``$96,980,000'' and inserting ``$113,652,000''.

TITLE XXIII--AIR FORCE

SEC. 2301. AUTHORIZED AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION
PROJECTS.

(a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated pursuant
to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a)(1), the
Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out
military construction projects for the installations or locations
inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the
following table:

Air Force: Inside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Installation or
State                      location              Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama........................  Maxwell Air Force Base      $14,900,000
Alaska.........................  Clear Air Station.....      $20,000,000
Elmendorf Air Force         $84,820,000
Base.
Arizona........................  Davis-Monthan Air            $8,600,000
Force Base.
Luke Air Force Base...      $13,000,000
Arkansas.......................  Little Rock Air Force        $2,500,000
Base.
California.....................  Beale Air Force Base..      $14,200,000
Edwards Air Force Base     $103,000,000
Travis Air Force Base.      $42,500,000
Vandenberg Air Force        $16,845,000
Base.
Colorado.......................  Buckley Air Force Base      $20,100,000
Peterson Air Force          $12,800,000
Base.
United States Air           $13,000,000
Force Academy.
Delaware.......................  Dover Air Force Base..      $19,000,000
District of Columbia...........  Bolling Air Force Base      $14,900,000
Florida........................  Cape Canaveral........       $6,200,000
Hurlburt Field........       $2,540,000
MacDill Air Force Base     $107,200,000
Tyndall Air Force Base      $11,500,000
Georgia........................  Robins Air Force Base.       $2,000,000
Hawaii.........................  Hickam Air Force Base.      $13,378,000
Idaho..........................  Mountain Home Air            $9,835,000
Force Base.
Louisiana......................  Barksdale Air Force         $10,800,000
Base.
Massachusetts..................  Hanscom Air Force Base       $3,900,000
Mississippi....................  Columbus Air Force          $10,000,000
Base.
Keesler Air Force Base      $47,500,000
Missouri.......................  Whiteman Air Force           $5,721,000
Base.
Montana........................  Malmstrom Air Force         $13,500,000
Base.
Nebraska.......................  Offutt Air Force Base.      $63,080,000
Nevada.........................  Indian Springs Air          $60,724,000
Force Auxiliary Field
Nellis Air Force Base.      $24,370,000
New Jersey.....................  McGuire Air Force Base      $13,185,000
New Mexico.....................  Holloman Air Force          $15,000,000
Base.
Kirtland Air Force           $6,600,000
Base.
North Dakota...................  Minot Air Force Base..       $8,700,000
Ohio...........................  Wright-Patterson Air        $19,670,000
Force Base.
Oklahoma.......................  Tinker Air Force Base.      $31,960,000
Vance Air Force Base..      $14,000,000
South Carolina.................  Charleston Air Force         $2,583,000
Base.
Shaw Air Force Base...       $9,730,000
South Dakota...................  Ellsworth Air Force          $8,400,000
Base.
Texas..........................  Sheppard Air Force          $36,000,000
Base.
Utah...........................  Hill Air Force Base...      $33,900,000
Virginia.......................  Langley Air Force Base      $38,665,000
Washington.....................  Fairchild Air Force          $8,200,000
Base.
----------------
Total.............   $1,039,006,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated pursuant
to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a)(2), the
Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out
military construction projects for the installations or locations
outside the United States, and in the amounts set forth in the
following table:

Air Force: Outside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Installation or
Country                     location              Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Germany........................  Ramstein Air Base.....      $11,650,000
Spangdahlem Air Base..      $12,474,000
Guam...........................  Andersen Air Base.....      $18,500,000
Italy..........................  Aviano Air Base.......      $22,660,000
Korea..........................  Kunsan Air Base.......      $44,188,000
Osan Air Base.........      $39,719,000
Portugal.......................  Lajes Field, Azores...      $12,000,000
Turkey.........................  Incirlik Air Base.....       $5,780,000
United Kingdom.................  Royal Air Force,             $5,125,000
Lakenheath.
Royal Air Force,            $13,500,000
Mildenhall.
----------------
Total.............     $185,596,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2302. FAMILY HOUSING.

(a) Construction and Acquisition.--Using amounts appropriated
pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section
2304(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the Air Force may construct or acquire
family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting
facilities) at the installations or locations, for the purposes, and in
the amounts set forth in the following table:

Air Force: Family Housing
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State                     Installation or location             Purpose               Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alaska..................................  Eielson Air Force Base.....  392 Units..................   $55,794,000
California..............................  Edwards Air Force Base.....  226 Units..................   $59,699,000
Florida.................................  MacDill Air Force Base.....  109 Units..................   $40,982,000
Idaho...................................  Mountain Home Air Force      194 Units..................   $56,467,000
Base......................
Missouri................................  Whiteman Air Force Base....  111 Units..................   $26,917,000
Montana.................................  Malmstrom Air Force Base...  296 Units..................   $68,971,000
North Carolina..........................  Seymour Johnson Air Force    255 Units..................   $48,868,000
Base......................
North Dakota............................  Grand Forks Air Force Base.  300 Units..................   $86,706,000
Minot Air Force Base.......  223 Units..................   $44,548,000
South Carolina..........................  Charleston Air Force Base..  10 Units...................   $15,935,000
South Dakota............................  Ellsworth Air Force Base...  60 Units...................   $14,383,000
Texas...................................  Dyess Air Force Base.......  190 Units..................   $43,016,000
Germany.................................  Ramstein Air Base..........  101 Units..................   $62,952,000
Turkey..................................  Incirlik Air Base..........  100 Units..................   $22,730,000
United Kingdom..........................  Royal Air Force, Lakenheath  107 Units..................   $48,437,000
-------------
Total..................  ...........................  $696,405,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Planning and Design.--Using amounts appropriated pursuant to
the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(a)(5)(A), the
Secretary of the Air Force may carry out architectural and engineering
services and construction design activities with respect to the
construction or improvement of military family housing units in an
amount not to exceed $37,104,000.

SEC. 2303. IMPROVEMENTS TO MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS.

Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using
amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in
section 2304(a)(5)(A), the Secretary of the Air Force may improve
existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed
$409,113,000.

SEC. 2304. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, AIR FORCE.

(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Funds are hereby authorized
to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2005,
for military construction, land acquisition, and military family
housing functions of the Department of the Air Force in the total
amount of $3,108,982,000, as follows:
(1) For military construction projects inside the United
States authorized by section 2301(a), $914,006,000.
(2) For military construction projects outside the United
States authorized by section 2301(b), $185,596,000.
(3) For unspecified minor military construction projects
authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United States Code,
$15,000,000.
(4) For architectural and engineering services and
construction design under section 2807 of title 10, United
States Code, $83,719,000.
(5) For military family housing functions:
(A) For construction and acquisition, planning and
design, and improvement of military family housing and
facilities, $1,142,622,000.
(B) For support of military family housing
(including functions described in section 2833 of title
10, United States Code), $766,939,000.
(b) Limitation on Total Cost of Construction Projects.--
Notwithstanding the cost variations authorized by section 2853 of title
10, United States Code, and any other cost variation authorized by law,
the total cost of all projects carried out under section 2301 of this
Act may not exceed the sum of the following:
(1) The total amount authorized to be appropriated under
paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of subsection (a).
(2) $30,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under
section 2301(a) for a C-17 maintenance complex, Elmendorf Air
Force Base, Alaska).
(3) $66,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under
section 2301(a) to replace the main runway, Edwards Air Force
Base, California).
(4) $29,000,000 (the balance of the amount authorized under
section 2301(a) for construction of a joint intelligence center
for Headquarters, Central Command, MacDill Air Force Base,
Florida).

TITLE XXIV--DEFENSE AGENCIES

SEC. 2401. AUTHORIZED DEFENSE AGENCIES CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

(a) Inside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated pursuant
to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a)(1), the
Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military
construction projects for the installations or locations inside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Defense Agencies: Inside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Installation or
Agency                      location             Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Defense Intelligence Agency....  Bolling Air Force Base,      $7,900,000
District of Columbia..
Defense Logistics Agency.......  Cannon Air Force Base,      $13,200,000
New Mexico............
Defense Distribution         $6,500,000
Depot, New Cumberland,
Pennsylvania..........
Defense Distribution        $33,635,000
Depot, Tracy,
California............
Fort Belvoir, Virginia.      $4,500,000
Marine Corps Air             $7,300,000
Station Yuma, Arizona.
McConnell Air Force         $15,800,000
Base, Kansas..........
Miramar, California....     $23,000,000
Naval Station, Norfolk,      $6,700,000
Virginia..............
Seymour Johnson Air         $18,500,000
Force Base, North
Carolina..............
Defense Education Agency.......  Fort Bragg, North           $18,075,000
Carolina..............
Fort Stewart/Hunter         $16,629,000
Army Air Field,
Georgia...............
National Security Agency.......  Augusta, Georgia.......     $61,466,000
Fort Meade, Maryland...     $28,049,000
Kunia, Hawaii..........     $61,466,000
Special Operations Command.....  Eglin Air Force Base,       $12,800,000
Florida...............
Fort Bragg, North           $14,769,000
Carolina..............
Fort Campbell, Kentucky     $37,800,000
Fort Lewis, Washington.     $53,300,000
Fort Stewart/Hunter         $10,000,000
Army Air Field,
Georgia...............
Naval Surface Warfare       $28,350,000
Center, Corona,
California............
TRICARE Management Activity....  Beale Air Force Base,       $18,000,000
California............
Charleston, South           $35,000,000
Carolina..............
Fort Detrick, Maryland.     $55,200,000
Keesler Air Force Base,     $14,000,000
Mississippi...........
Lackland Air Force          $11,000,000
Base, Texas...........
Naval Hospital, San         $15,000,000
Diego, California.....
Nellis Air Force Base,       $1,700,000
Nevada................
Uniformed Services          $10,350,000
University of the
Health Sciences,
Bethesda, Maryland....
Peterson Air Force           $1,820,000
Base, Colorado........
---------------
Total..............    $641,809,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Outside the United States.--Using amounts appropriated pursuant
to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(a)(2), the
Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military
construction projects for the installations or locations outside the
United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:

Defense Agencies: Outside the United States
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Installation or
Agency                      location             Amount
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Defense Education Agency.......  Landstuhl, Germany.....      $6,543,000
Vilseck, Germany.......      $2,323,000
Agana, Guam............     $40,578,000
Taegu, Korea...........      $8,231,000
Naval Station, Rota,         $7,963,000
Spain.
Defense Logistics Agency.......  Souda Bay, Greece......      $7,089,000
Missile Defense Agency.........  Kwajalien Atoll,             $4,901,000
Kwajalien.............
National Security Agency.......  Menwith Hall, United        $41,697,000
Kingdom...............
TRICARE Management Activity....  Bahrain, SWA...........      $4,750,000
---------------
Total..............    $124,075,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2402. ENERGY CONSERVATION PROJECTS.

Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of
appropriations in section 2403(a)(6), the Secretary of Defense may
carry out energy conservation projects under section 2865 of title 10,
United States Code, in the amount of $60,000,000.

SEC. 2403. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, DEFENSE AGENCIES.

(a) In General.--Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2005, for military
construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions
of the Department of Defense (other than the military departments) in
the total amount of $2,973,914,000, as follows:
(1) For military construction projects inside the United
States authorized by section 2401(a), $641,809,000.
(2) For military construction projects outside the United
States authorized by section 2401(b), $123,104,000.
(3) For unspecified minor military construction projects
under section 2805 of title 10, United States Code,
$15,736,000.
(4) For contingency construction projects of the Secretary
of Defense under section 2804 of title 10, United States Code,
$10,000,000.
(5) For architectural and engineering services and
construction design under section 2807 of title 10, United
States Code, $135,081,000.
(6) For energy conservation projects authorized by section
2403 of this Act, $60,000,000.
(7) For base closure and realignment activities funded
through the account created pursuant to section 2906 of, and
authorized by, the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of
1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C.
2687 note), $377,827,000.
(8) For base closure and realignment activities funded
through the account created pursuant to section 2906A of, and
authorized by, the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of
1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C.
2687 note), $1,504,466,000.
(9) For military family housing functions:
(A) For support of military family housing
(including functions described in section 2833 of title
10, United States Code), $46,391,000.
(B) For credit to the Department of Defense Family
Housing Improvement Fund established by section
2883(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code, $2,500,000.
(10) For the construction of increment 2 of the hospital
replacement at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, authorized by section
2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act of
Fiscal Year 2005 (division B of Public Law 108-375; 118 Stat.
2100), $57,000,000.
(b) Notice and Wait Requirement Applicable to Obligation of Funds
for Base Closure and Realignment Activities.--None of the funds
authorized to be appropriated by subsection (a)(8) may be obligated
until 21 days after the date on which the Secretary of Defense submits
to the congressional defense committees a report describing the
specific programs, projects, and activities for which such funds are to
be obligated.

TITLE XXV--NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION SECURITY INVESTMENT
PROGRAM

SEC. 2501. AUTHORIZED NATO CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment program as provided in
section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount not to
exceed the sum of the amount authorized to be appropriated for this
purpose in section 2502 and the amount collected from the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construction previously
financed by the United States.

SEC. 2502. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS, NATO.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years
beginning after September 30, 2005, for contributions by the Secretary
of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, for the
share of the United States of the cost of projects for the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment program authorized by
section 2501, in the amount of $206,858,000.

TITLE XXVI--GUARD AND RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES

SEC. 2601. AUTHORIZED GUARD AND RESERVE CONSTRUCTION AND LAND
ACQUISITION PROJECTS.

Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years
beginning after September 30, 2005, for the costs of acquisition,
architectural and engineering services, and construction of facilities
for the reserve components, and for contributions therefore, under
chapter 1803 of title 10, United States Code (including the cost of
acquisition of land for those facilities), in the following amounts:
(1) For the Department of the Army--
(A) for the Army National Guard of the United
States, $445,100,000; and
(B) for the Army Reserve, $121,077,000.
(2) For the Department of the Navy, for the Naval and
Marine Corps Reserve, $50,226,000.
(3) For the Department of the Air Force--
(A) for the Air National Guard of the United
States, $264,061,000; and
(B) for the Air Force Reserve, $79,260,000.

SEC. 2602. SPECIFIC AUTHORIZED ARMY NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS.

(a) Camp Roberts, California.--Of the amount authorized to be
appropriated for the Department of the Army for the Army National Guard
of the United States under section 2601(1)(A)--
(1) $1,500,000 is available for the construction of an
urban combat course at Camp Roberts, California; and
(2) $1,500,000 is available for the addition or alteration
of a field maintenance shop at Fort Dodge, Iowa.

SEC. 2603. CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES, NEW CASTLE COUNTY AIRPORT AIR
GUARD BASE, DELAWARE.

Of the amount authorized to be appropriated for the Department of
the Air Force for the Air National Guard of the United States under
section 2601(3)(A)--
(1) $1,400,000 is available for the construction of a
security forces facility at New Castle County Airport Air Guard
Base, Delaware; and
(2) $1,500,000 is available for the construction of a
medical training facility at New Castle County Airport Air
Guard Base, Delaware.

SEC. 2604. CONSTRUCTION OF MAINTENANCE HANGAR, NEW CASTLE COUNTY
AIRPORT AIR GUARD BASE, DELAWARE.

(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--The amount authorized to be
appropriated by section 2601(3)(A) for the Department of the Air Force
for the Air National Guard of the United States is hereby increased by
$1,440,000.
(b) Use of Funds.--Of the amount authorized to be appropriated by
section 2601(3)(A) for the Department of the Air Force for the Air
National Guard of the United States, as increased by subsection (a),
$1,440,000 is available for planning and design for a replacement C-130
aircraft maintenance hangar at Air National Guard New Castle County
Airport, Delaware.
(c) Offset.--The amount authorized to be appropriated by section
2204(a) for military construction, land acquisition, and military
family housing functions of the Department of the Navy and the amount
of such funds authorized by paragraph (11) of such subsection for the
construction of increment 3 of the general purpose berthing pier at
Naval Weapons Station, Earle, New Jersey, are each hereby decreased by
$1,440,000.

SEC. 2605. NATIONAL GUARD CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.

(a) Army National Guard at Camp Dawson, West Virginia.--
(1) Authorization of appropriations.--The amount authorized
to be appropriated by section 2601(1)(A) for the Department of
the Army for the Army National Guard of the United States is
hereby increased by $4,500,000.
(2) Use of funds.--Of the amount authorized to be
appropriated by section 2601(1)(A) for the Department of the
Army for the Army National Guard of the United States, as
increased by paragraph (1), $4,500,000 is available for the
construction of a readiness center at Camp Dawson, West
Virginia.
(3) Offset.--The amount authorized to be appropriated by
section 2601(3)(A) for the Department of the Air Force for the
Air National Guard of the United States, and available for the
construction of a bridge/gate house/force protection entry
project at Camp Yeager, West Virginia, is hereby decreased by
$4,500,000.
(b) Air National Guard at Eastern West Virginia Regional Airport.--
Of the amount authorized to be appropriated by section 2603(3)(A) for
the Department of the Air Force for the Air National Guard of the
United States, and otherwise available for the construction of a
bridge/gate house/force protection entry project at Air National Guard
Base, West Virginia, $2,000,000 shall be available instead for C-5
aircraft shop upgrades at Eastern West Virginia Regional Airport,
Shepherd Field, Martinsburg, West Virginia.

TITLE XXVII--EXPIRATION AND EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS

SEC. 2701. EXPIRATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS AND AMOUNTS REQUIRED TO BE
SPECIFIED BY LAW.

(a) Expiration of Authorizations After Three Years.--Except as
provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained in titles XXI
through XXVI for military construction projects, land acquisition,
family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North
Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment program (and
authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire on the later
of--
(1) October 1, 2008; or
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds
for military construction for fiscal year 2009.
(b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations
for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing
projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization Security Investment program (and authorizations of
appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have been
obligated before the later of--
(1) October 1, 2008; or
(2) the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds
for fiscal year 2009 for military construction projects, land
acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, or
contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
Security Investment program.

SEC. 2702. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2003
PROJECTS.

(a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2701 of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (division B of
Public Law 107-314; 116 Stat. 2681), authorizations set forth in the
tables in subsection (b), as provided in sections 2301, 2302, and 2401
of that Act, shall remain in effect until October 1, 2006, or the date
of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction
for fiscal year 2007, whichever is later.
(b) Tables.--The tables referred to in subsection (a) are as
follows:

Air Force: Extension of 2003 Project Authorizations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State                   Installation or location             Project                 Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Florida...............................  Eglin Air Force Base.....  Replace family housing (134       $15,906,000
Units)......................
Florida...............................  Eglin Air Force Base.....  Replace Family Housing Office        $597,000
Mississippi...........................  Keesler Air Force Base...  Replace family housing (117       $16,505,000
Units)......................
Texas.................................  Randolph Air Force Base..  Replace family housing (112       $14,311,000
Units)......................
Texas.................................  Randolph Air Force Base..  Replace Housing Maintenance          $447,000
Facility....................
Italy.................................  Aviano Air Base..........  Consolidate Area A-1 and A-2.      $5,000,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Defense Wide: Extension of 2003 Project Authorization
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency                   Installation or location             Project                 Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Operations Command............  Stennis Space Center,      SOF Training Range...........      $5,000,000
Mississippi.............
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2703. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN FISCAL YEAR 2002
PROJECTS.

(a) Extension.--Notwithstanding section 2701 of the Military
Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (division B of
Public Law 107-107; 115 Stat. 1301), authorizations set forth in the
tables in subsection (b), as provided in sections 2101 and 2302 of that
Act, shall remain in effect until October 1, 2006, or the date of the
enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for
fiscal year 2007, whichever is later.
(b) Tables.--The tables referred to in subsection (a) are as
follows:

Army: Extension of 2002 Project Authorization
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State                   Installation or location             Project                 Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hawaii................................  Pohakuloa Training         Land purchase................      $1,500,000
Facility................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Air Force: Extension of 2002 Project Authorization
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State                   Installation or location             Project                 Amount
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Louisiana.............................  Barksdale Air Force Base.  Replace family housing (56         $7,300,000
Units)......................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEC. 2704. EFFECTIVE DATE.

Titles XXI, XXII, XXIII, XXIV, XXV, and XXVI shall take effect on
the later of--
(1) October 1, 2005; or
(2) the date of the enactment of this Act.

TITLE XXVIII--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Subtitle A--Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing
Changes

SEC. 2801. INCREASE IN THRESHOLDS FOR UNSPECIFIED MINOR MILITARY
CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS.

(a) Increase.--Section 2805(a)(1) of title 10, United States Code,
is amended--
(1) by striking ``$1,500,000'' and inserting
``$2,500,000''; and
(2) by striking ``$3,000,000'' and inserting
``$4,000,000''.
(b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall
take effect on October 1, 2005.

SEC. 2802. MODIFICATION OF COST VARIATION AUTHORITY.

(a) Limitation on Cost Decreases Related to Military Construction
and Military Family Housing Projects.--Section 2853 of title 10, United
States Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) by striking ``may be increased by not more than
25 percent'' and inserting ``may be increased or
decreased by not more than 25 percent''; and
(B) by striking ``if the Secretary concerned
determines that such an increase in cost is required''
and inserting ``if the Secretary concerned determines
that such revised cost is required'';
(2) in subsection (c)--
(A) by striking ``limitation on cost increase'' and
inserting ``limitation on cost variations''; and
(B) by striking ``the increase'' both place it
appears and inserting ``the variation''; and
(3) in subsection (d), by striking ``limitation on cost
increases'' and inserting ``limitation on cost variations''.
(b) Additional Information Required for Notification in Connection
with Waiver of Limitations on Cost Increases.--Subsection (c)(2) of
such section is further amended by inserting after ``the reasons
therefor'' the following: ``, including a description of the funds
proposed to be used to finance any increased costs''.
(c) Technical Amendments.--
(1) Section heading.--The heading of such section is
amended to read as follows:
``Sec. 2853. Authorized cost and scope of work variations''.
(2) Table of sections.--The item relating to such section
in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 169 of
such title is amended to read as follows:

``2853. Authorized cost and scope of work variations.''.

SEC. 2803. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HOUSING FUNDS.

(a) Requirement To Fund Certain Acquisition and Improvement of
Military Housing Solely Through Defense Housing Funds.--Subsection (e)
of section 2883 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting ``(1) The
Secretary''; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(2) The Funds established under subsection (a) shall be the sole
source of funds for activities carried out under this subchapter.''.
(b) Authority to Transfer Funds Appropriated for the Improvement of
Military Family Housing to Defense Housing Funds.--Subsection (c)(1)(B)
of such section is amended by striking ``acquisition or construction''
and inserting ``acquisition, improvement, or construction''.
(c) Reporting Requirements Related to Department of Defense Housing
Funds.--Section 2884 of such title is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)(2)(D), by inserting after
``description of the source of such funds'' the following: ``,
including a description of the specific construction,
acquisition, or improvement projects from which funds were
transferred to the Funds established under section 2883 of this
title in order to finance the contract, conveyance, or lease'';
and
(2) in subsection (b)(1)--
(A) by striking ``a report'' and inserting ``a
separate report'';
(B) by striking ``covering the Funds'' and
inserting ``covering each of the Funds''; and
(C) by striking the period at the end and inserting
the following: ``, including a description of the
specific construction, acquisition, or improvement
projects from which funds were transferred and the
privatization projects or contracts to which those
funds were transferred. Each report shall also include,
for each military department or defense agency, a
description of all funds to be transferred to such
Funds for the current fiscal year and the next fiscal
year.''.

SEC. 2804. TEMPORARY AUTHORITY TO USE MINOR MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
AUTHORITY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS.

(a) Thresholds on Construction Authorized.--The Secretary of
Defense shall establish a program to carry out minor military
construction projects under section 2805 of title 10, United States
Code, to construct child development centers.
(b) Increased Maximum Amounts Applicable to Minor Construction
Projects.--For the purpose of any military construction project carried
out under the authority provided by this section--
(1) the amount specified in the second sentence of
subsection (a)(1) of section 2805 of title 10, United States
Code, shall be deemed to be $7,000,000;
(2) the amount specified in the third sentence of
subsection (a)(1) of such section shall be deemed to be
$8,000,000;
(3) the amount specified in subsection (b)(1) of such
section shall be deemed to be $5,000,000;
(4) the amount specified in subsection (c)(1)(A) of such
section shall be deemed to be $7,000,000; and
(5) the amount specified in subsection (c)(1)(B) of such
section shall be deemed to be $5,000,000.
(c) Program Requirements.--
(1) Notification.--All notification requirements under such
section shall remain in effect for construction projects
carried out under the authority provided by this section.
(2) Review and approval.--The Secretary shall establish
procedures for the review and approval of requests from the
Secretaries of military departments to carry out construction
projects under the authority provided by this section.
(d) Report on Program.--
(1) Report required.--Not later than March 1, 2007, the
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense
committees a report on the program authorized under this
section.
(2) Content.--The report shall include--
(A) a list and description of the construction
projects carried out under the program, including the
location and cost of each such project; and
(B) the assessment of the Secretary of the
advisability of extending or expanding the authority
for the program under this section.
(e) Expiration of Authority.--The authority provided by this
section expires on September 30, 2007.
(f) Construction of Authority.--Nothing in this section may be
construed to limit any other authority provided by law for a military
construction project at a child development center.
(g) Child Development Center Defined.--In this section, the term
``child development center'' includes a facility, and the utilities to
support such facility, the function of which is to support the daily
care of children aged 6 weeks old through 5 years old for full-day,
part-day, and hourly service.

SEC. 2805. INAPPLICABILITY TO CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTERS OF RESTRICTION
ON AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE OR CONSTRUCT ANCILLARY SUPPORTING
FACILITIES.

Section 2881(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by
inserting ``, other than a project for the acquisition or construction
of a child development center,'' after ``A project referred to in
subsection (a)''.

SEC. 2806. AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT EXCHANGES OF FACILITIES INCLUDING
ASSOCIATED UTILITIES, EQUIPMENT, AND FURNISHINGS.

(a) In General.--Section 18240 of title 10, United States Code, is
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(h) Facility Defined.--In this section, the term `facility'
includes--
``(1) any facility, as that term is defined in section
18232(2) of this title; and
``(2) any associated utilities, equipment, and furnishings
required to be installed in any such facility.''.
(b) Temporary Authority Related to Cash Equalization Payments.--
Section 2809(c)(4) of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108-375; 118 Stat.
2127) is amended by striking ``the term `facility' has the meaning
given that term in section 18232(2) of title 10, United States Code''
and inserting the following: ``the term `facility' has the meaning
given that term in section 18240(h) of title 10, United States Code''.

SEC. 2807. INCREASE IN NUMBER OF FAMILY HOUSING UNITS IN KOREA
AUTHORIZED FOR LEASE BY THE ARMY AT MAXIMUM AMOUNT.

Section 2828(e)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by
striking ``2,400'' and inserting ``2,800''.

Subtitle B--Real Property and Facilities Administration

SEC. 2821. AUTHORITY TO LEASE NON-EXCESS PROPERTY OF DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE FIELD ACTIVITIES.

Section 2667a of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) by amending the heading to read as follows:
``Sec. 2667a. Leases: non-excess property of Defense Agencies and
Department of Defense Field Activities'';
(2) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``Defense agency''
and inserting ``Defense Agency or Department of Defense Field
Activity''; and
(3) in subsection (d)--
(A) by striking ``Defense agency'' and inserting
``Defense Agency or Department of Defense Field
Activity''; and
(B) by striking ``a Defense agency's special
account'' and inserting ``the special account of a
Defense Agency or Department of Defense Field
Activity''.

SEC. 2822. MODIFIED CRITERIA FOR AGREEMENTS TO LIMIT ENCROACHMENTS AND
OTHER CONSTRAINTS ON MILITARY TRAINING, TESTING, AND
OPERATIONS.

(a) Modified Criteria.--Section 2684a of title 10, United States
Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) by inserting ``or entities'' after ``entity'';
and
(B) by striking ``in the vicinity of a military
installation'' and inserting ``in the vicinity of, or
ecologically related to, a military installation or the
airspace of such installation'';
(2) in subsection (d)--
(A) in paragraph (1)--
(i) by striking ``An agreement with an
eligible entity under this section may provide
for'' and inserting ``An agreement with an
eligible entity or entities under this section
shall provide for'';
(ii) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``or
entities'' after ``entity''; and
(iii) by amending subparagraph (B) to read
as follows:
``(B) the equal sharing by the Department of Defense and
the entity or entities of the acquisition costs, whether by
contribution of funding or like-kind exchange of property or
lesser property interest.'';
(B) by redesignating paragraphs (2), (3), (4), and
(5) as paragraphs (4), (5), (6), and (7), respectively;
(C) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following
new paragraphs:
``(2) The Secretary concerned may waive the requirement in
paragraph (1)(B) to equally share acquisition costs if--
``(A) the Secretary determines that the agreement is
essential to accomplish the mission of the installation;
``(B) the Secretary notifies the congressional defense
committees in writing of the determination and the reasons for
the determination; and
``(C) a period of 21 days has elapsed after the date on
which such notification is received by the committees.
``(3) The acquisition cost of any lesser interest in the property
may not exceed 70 percent of the appraised value of the property.'';
and
(D) in paragraph (5), as redesignated by
subparagraph (B), by inserting ``or entities'' after
``entity'';
(3) by redesignating subsection (h) as subsection (i); and
(4) by inserting after subsection (g) the following new
subsection:
``(h) Annual Reports.--(1) Not later than March 15, 2006, and
annually thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination
with the Secretaries of the military departments and the Director of
the Department of Defense Test Management Resource Center, submit to
the congressional defense committees a report on the implementation of
projects undertaken pursuant to this section.
``(2) The reports submitted under paragraph (1) shall include--
(A) a description of the status of such projects;
(B) an assessment of the effectiveness of such projects and
other actions undertaken pursuant to this section as part of a
long-range strategy to ensure the sustainability of military
test and training ranges, military installations, and
associated airspace;
(C) an evaluation of the methodology and criteria used to
select and prioritize projects undertaken pursuant to this
section;
(D) a description of the shared costs by the Department of
Defense and the eligible entity or entities under each
agreement undertaken or proposed; and
(E) recommendations for any legislation or changes in
regulations to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of
actions taken under this section.''.
(b) Applicability of Modified Criteria.--The requirement under
subsection (d)(1)(B) of such section (as amended by subsection
(a)(2)(A)(iii)) that an agreement under such section shall provide for
the equal sharing of acquisition costs by the Department of Defense and
an eligible entity or entities shall not apply to an agreement
initiated before the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 2823. EXPANDED AUTHORITY TO ENTER INTO LEASE-PURCHASE AGREEMENTS.

Section 2812 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)(1)--
(A) by striking ``a private contractor'' and
inserting ``an eligible entity''; and
(B) by striking ``the contractor'' and inserting
``the eligible entity'';
(2) in subsection (c)--
(A) by striking ``(c)(1)'' and inserting ``(c)'';
(B) by striking paragraph (2); and
(C) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as
paragraphs (1) and (2); and
(3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
``(e) In this section, the term `eligible entity' means any private
person, corporation, firm, partnership, company, or State or local
government.''.

Subtitle C--Land Conveyances

PART I--ARMY CONVEYANCES

SEC. 2841. LAND CONVEYANCE, HELENA, MONTANA.

(a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Army may convey by
quitclaim deed to the Helena Indian Alliance, all right, title, and
interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property
consisting of approximately 3.0 acres located at Sheridan Hall United
States Army Reserve Center, 501 Euclid Avenue, Helena, Montana,
including improvements thereon, for the purposes of supporting Native
American health care, mental health counseling, and the operation of an
education training center.
(b) Reversionary Interest.--If the Secretary determines at any time
that the real property conveyed under subsection (a) is not being used
in accordance with the purposes of the conveyance specified in such
subsection, all right, title, and interest in and to the property shall
revert, at the option of the Secretary, to the United States, and the
United States shall have the right of immediate entry onto the
property. Any determination of the Secretary under this subsection
shall be made on the record after an opportunity for a hearing.
(c) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary shall require the Helena
Indian Alliance to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary,
or to reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the
Secretary, to carry out the conveyance under subsection (a),
including survey costs, costs related to environmental
documentation, and other administrative costs related to the
conveyance. If amounts are collected from the Helena Indian
Alliance in advance of the Secretary incurring the actual
costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs actually
incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the
Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the Alliance.
(2) Reimbursement.--Amounts received as reimbursement under
paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was
used to cover the costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying
out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with
amounts in such fund or account and shall be available for the
same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and
limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(d) Description of Real Property.--The exact acreage and legal
description of the real property to be conveyed under subsection (a)
shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary.
(e) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require
such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance
under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect
the interests of the United State.

SEC. 2842. LAND CONVEYANCE, ARMY RESERVE CENTER, BOTHELL, WASHINGTON.

(a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Army may convey,
without consideration, to the Snohomish County Fire Protection District
#10 (in this section referred to as the ``Fire District'') all right,
title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real
property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of
approximately 1.0 acres located at the Army Reserve Center, Bothell,
Washington, for the purpose of permitting the Fire District to operate
a fire station on the property.
(b) Reversionary Interest.--If the Secretary determines at any time
that the real property conveyed under subsection (a) is not being used
in accordance with the purpose of the conveyance specified in such
subsection, all right, title, and interest in and to the property shall
revert, at the option of the Secretary, to the United States, and the
United States shall have the right of immediate entry onto the
property. Any determination of the Secretary under this subsection
shall be made on the record after an opportunity for a hearing.
(c) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary may require the Fire
District to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to
reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to
carry out the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey
costs, costs related to environmental documentation, and other
administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are
collected from the Fire District in advance of the Secretary
incurring the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds
the costs actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the
conveyance, the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to
Fire District.
(2) Reimbursement.--Amounts received as reimbursement under
paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was
used to cover the costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying
out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with
amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the
same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and
limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(d) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal
description of the real property to be conveyed under subsection (a)
shall be determined by surveys satisfactory to the Secretary. The cost
of each survey shall be borne by the Fire District.
(e) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require
such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance
under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect
the interests of the United States.

SEC. 2843. LAND CONVEYANCE, IOWA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT, MIDDLETOWN,
IOWA.

(a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Army may convey to
the City of Middletown (in this section referred to as the ``City'')
all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to a parcel
of real property, including any improvements thereon, consisting of
approximately 1.0 acres located at the Iowa Army Ammunition Plant,
Middletown, Iowa, for the purpose of economic development.
(b) Consideration.--As consideration for the conveyance of property
under subsection (a), the City shall provide the United States, whether
by cash payment, in-kind consideration, or a combination thereof, an
amount that is not less than the fair market value of the conveyed
property, as determined by the Secretary.
(c) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary may require the City to
cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to reimburse
the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to carry out
the conveyance under subsection (a), including survey costs,
costs related to environmental documentation, and other
administrative costs related to the conveyance. If amounts are
collected from the City in advance of the Secretary incurring
the actual costs, and the amount collected exceeds the costs
actually incurred by the Secretary to carry out the conveyance,
the Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the City.
(2) Reimbursement.--Amounts received as reimbursement under
paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was
used to cover the costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying
out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with
amounts in such fund or account, and shall be available for the
same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and
limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(d) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal
description of the real property to be conveyed under subsection (a)
shall be determined by surveys satisfactory to the Secretary. The cost
of each survey shall be borne by the City.
(e) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require
such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance
under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect
the interests of the United States.

PART II--NAVY CONVEYANCES

SEC. 2851. LAND CONVEYANCE, MARINE CORPS AIR STATION, MIRAMAR, SAN
DIEGO, CALIFORNIA.

(a) Conveyance Authorized.--Subject to subsection (c), the
Secretary of the Navy may convey to the County of San Diego, California
(in this section referred to as the ``County''), all right, title, and
interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property,
including any improvements thereon and appurtenant easements thereto,
consisting of approximately 230 acres located on the eastern boundary
of Marine Corps Air Station, Miramar, California, for the purpose of
removing the property from the boundaries of the installation and
permitting the County to preserve the entire property known as the
Stowe Trail as a public passive park/recreational area.
(b) Consideration.--
(1) In general.--As consideration for the conveyance under
subsection (a), the County shall provide the United States an
amount with a total value that is not less than the fair market
value of the conveyed real property, as determined by the
Secretary.
(c) Reversionary Interest.--
(1) In general.--If the Secretary determines at any time
that the real property conveyed under subsection (a) is not
being used in accordance with the purpose of the conveyance
specified in such subsection, all right, title, and interest in
and to the property, including any improvements thereon, shall
revert, at the option of the Secretary, to the United States,
and the United States shall have the right of immediate entry
onto the property. Any determination of the Secretary under
this subsection shall be made on the record after an
opportunity for a hearing.
(2) Release of reversionary interest.--The Secretary shall
release, without consideration, the reversionary interest
retained by the United States under paragraph (1) if the Marine
Corps Air Station, Miramar, is no longer being used for
Department of Defense activities.
(d) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
(1) Payment required.--The Secretary shall require the
County to cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary, or to
reimburse the Secretary for costs incurred by the Secretary, to
carry out the conveyance under subsection (a) and implement the
receipt of consideration under subsection (b), including
appraisal costs, survey costs, costs related to environmental
documentation, and other administrative costs related to the
conveyance and receipt of consideration. If amounts are
collected from the County in advance of the Secretary incurring
the actual costs, and the amount received exceeds the costs
actually incurred by the Secretary under this section, the
Secretary shall refund the excess amount to the County.
(2) Reimbursement.--Amounts received as reimbursement under
paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund or account that was
used to cover the costs incurred by the Secretary in carrying
out the conveyance. Amounts so credited shall be merged with
amounts in such fund or account and shall be available for the
same purposes, and subject to the same conditions and
limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(e) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal
description of the real property to be conveyed under subsection (a)
shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary.
(f) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require
such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance
under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect
the interests of the United States.

SEC. 2852. LEASE OF UNITED STATES NAVY MUSEUM FACILITIES AT WASHINGTON
NAVY YARD, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

(a) Lease or License Authorized.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of the Navy may lease to the
Naval Historical Foundation (in this section referred to as the
``Foundation'') facilities located at Washington Naval Yard,
Washington, District of Columbia, that house the United States
Navy Museum (in this section referred to as the ``Museum'') for
the purpose of carrying out the following activities:
(A) Generation of revenue for the Museum through
the rental of facilities to the public, commercial and
non-profit entities, State and local governments, and
other Federal agencies.
(B) Administrative activities in support of the
Museum.
(2) Limitation.--Any activities carried out at the leased
facilities under paragraph (1) must be consistent with the
operations of the Museum.
(b) Consideration.--The amount of consideration paid in a year by
the Foundation to the United States for the lease of facilities under
subsection (a) may not exceed the actual cost, as determined by the
Secretary, of the annual operation and maintenance of the facilities.
(c) Use of Proceeds.--
(1) Deposit of proceeds.--The Secretary shall deposit any
amounts received under subsection (b) for the lease or license
of facilities under subsection (a) into the account for
appropriations available for the operation and maintenance of
the Museum.
(2) Availability of amounts.--The Secretary may use any
amounts deposited under paragraph (1) to cover the costs
associated with the operation and maintenance of the Museum and
its exhibits.
(d) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require
such additional terms and conditions in connection with the lease or
lease of facilities under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers
appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.

PART III--AIR FORCE CONVEYANCES

SEC. 2861. ACQUISITION OF BUILD-TO-LEASE FAMILY HOUSING AT EIELSON AIR
FORCE BASE, ALASKA.

(a) Acquisition Authorized.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary of the Air Force may
purchase the entire interest of the developer in the military
family housing project at Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska,
described in paragraph (2) if the Secretary determines that the
purchase is in the best economic interests of the Air Force.
(2) Description of project.--The military family housing
project referred to in this section is the 300-unit military
family housing project at Eielson Air Force Base that was
constructed by the developer and is leased by the Secretary
under section 2835 of title 10, United States Code (in this
section referred to as the ``Eielson housing project'').
(b) Consideration.--The consideration paid by the Secretary under
this section for the interest of the developer in the Eielson housing
project may not exceed an amount equal to the fair market value of such
interest, as determined by the Secretary.
(c) Time for Purchase.--
(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary
may make the purchase authorized by subsection (a) at any time
after the end of the term of the lease for the Eielson housing
project.
(2) Notice and wait requirement.--The Secretary may not
make the purchase authorized by subsection (a) until 30 days
after notifying the congressional defense committees of the
Secretary's election to make such purchase.

SEC. 2862. LAND CONVEYANCE, AIR FORCE PROPERTY, LA JUNTA, COLORADO.

(a) Conveyance Authorized.--The Secretary of the Air Force may
convey, without consideration, to the City of La Junta, Colorado (in
this section referred to as the ``City''), all right, title, and
interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real property,
including improvements thereon, consisting of approximately 8 acres
located at the USA Bomb Plot in the La Junta Industrial Park for the
purpose of training local law enforcement officers.
(b) Payment of Costs of Conveyance.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary shall require the City to
cover costs to be incurred by the Secretary after the date of
enactment of the Act, or to reimburse the Secretary for costs
incurred by the Secretary after that date, to carry out the
conveyance under subsection (a), including any survey costs,
costs related to environmental assessments, studies, analyses,
or other documentation, and other administrative costs related
to the conveyance. If amounts are collected from the City in
advance of the Secretary incurring the actual costs, and the
amount collected exceeds the costs actually incurred by the
Secretary to carry out the conveyance, the Secretary shall
refund the excess amount to the City.
(2) Treatment of amounts received.--Amounts received as
reimbursement under paragraph (1) shall be credited to the fund
or account that was used to cover the costs incurred by the
Secretary in carrying out the conveyance. Amounts so credited
shall be merged with amounts in such fund or account, and shall
be available for the same purposes, and subject to the same
conditions and limitations, as amounts in such fund or account.
(c) Description of Property.--The exact acreage and legal
description of the property to be conveyed under subsection (a) shall
be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary.
(d) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require
such additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance
under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect
the interests of the United States.

Subtitle D--Other Matters

SEC. 2881. REORGANIZATION AND TECHNICAL IMPROVEMENT OF CODIFIED LAWS
APPLICABLE TO REAL PROPERTY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

(a) Consolidation of Acquisition Authority.--Section 2663 of title
10, United States Code, is amended--
(1) in the heading, by inserting ``authority'' after
``Acquisition'';
(2) in subsection (a)--
(A) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and (3)
as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), respectively;
(B) by striking ``(a) The Secretary'' and inserting
the following:
``(a) In General.--(1) The Secretary''; and
(C) in paragraph (1)(C), as redesignated by this
paragraph, by striking ``clause (2)'' and inserting
``subparagraph (B)'';
(3) by redesignating subsections (b), (c), and (d), as
paragraphs (2), (3), and (4), respectively;
(4) by striking ``subsection (a)'' each place it appears
and inserting ``paragraph (1)''; and
(5) by adding at the end the following new subsections:
``(b) Low-Cost Interests in Land.--(1) The Secretary of a military
department may acquire any interest in land that--
``(A) the Secretary determines--
``(i) is needed in the interest of national
defense; and
``(ii) does not cost more than $750,000,
exclusive of administrative costs and the
amounts of any deficiency judgments; or
``(B) the Secretary determines--
``(i) is needed solely to correct a
deficiency that is life-threatening, health-
threatening, or safety-threatening; and
``(ii) does not cost more than $1,500,000,
exclusive of administrative costs and the
amounts of any deficiency judgments.
``(2) This subsection does not apply to the acquisition, as part of
the same project, of more than one parcel of land unless--
``(A) the parcels are noncontiguous; or
``(B) if the parcels are contiguous--
``(i) the total cost of such parcels is not more
than $750,000 in the case of an acquisition under
paragraph (1)(A); or
``(ii) the total cost of such parcels is not more
than $1,500,000 in the case of an acquisition under
paragraph (1)(B).
``(3) Appropriations available to the Department of Defense for
operation and maintenance or for military construction may be used for
the acquisition of land or interests in land under paragraph (1).
``(c) Interests in Land When Need Is Urgent.--(1) The Secretary of
a military department may acquire any interest in land in any case in
which the Secretary determines that--
``(A) the acquisition is needed in the interest of
national defense;
``(B) the acquisition is required to maintain the
operational integrity of a military installation; and
``(C) considerations of urgency do not permit the
delay necessary to include the acquisition in an annual
Military Construction Authorization Act.
``(2) Not later than 10 days after the date on which the Secretary
of a military department determines to acquire an interest in land
under the authority of this subsection, the Secretary shall submit to
the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on
Armed Services of the House of Representatives written notice
containing a description of the property and interest to be acquired
and the reasons for the acquisition.
``(3) Appropriations available for military construction may be
used for the acquisition of land under this subsection.
``(d) Scope of Authority.--The authority to acquire interests in
real property (including a temporary interest) under this section
includes authority to--
``(1) make surveys; and
``(2) acquire interests in real property by gift, purchase,
exchange of real property owned by the United States, or
otherwise.''.
(b) Acquisition Limitations.--
(1) Transfer of limitations.--Section 2676 of such title
is--
(A) transferred to appear after section 2663 of
such title; and
(B) redesignated as section 2664 of such title.
(2) Stylistic and clerical amendments.--Section 2664 of
such title, as redesignated by paragraph (1), is amended--
(A) by striking subsection (b);
(B) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e)
as subsections (b), (c), and (d), respectively;
(C) in subsection (b), as redesignated by
subparagraph (B)--
(i) by striking ``determines (A) that
such'' and inserting the following:
``determines that--
``(A) such'';
(ii) by striking ``cost, and (B) that
such'' and inserting the following: ``cost; and
``(B) that such''; and
(iii) by striking ``subsection (d)'' and
inserting ``subsection (c)'';
(D) in subsection (c), as so redesignated, by
striking ``subsection (c)'' and inserting ``subsection
(b)''; and
(E) in subsection (d), as so redesignated, by
striking ``subsections (c) and (d)'' and inserting
``subsections (b) and (c)''.
(c) Repeal of Consolidated Sections.--The following sections of
chapter 159 of such title are repealed:
(1) Section 2672.
(2) Section 2672a.
(d) Clerical Amendments.--The table of sections at the beginning of
such chapter is amended--
(1) by amending the item relating to section 2663 to read
as follows:

``2663. Acquisition authority.'';
(2) by inserting after the item relating to section 2663
the following new item:

``2664. Acquisition: limitations.''; and
(3) by striking the items relating to sections 2672, 2672a,
and 2676.
(e) Repeal of Obsolete Authority.--Section 2665 of such title is
amended--
(1) by striking subsection (a);
(2) by redesignating subsections (b), (c), (d), (e), and
(f) as subsections (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e), respectively;
(3) in subsection (b), as redesignated by paragraph (2), by
striking ``subsection (a) or (b)'' and inserting ``subsection
(a)''; and
(4) in paragraph (2) of subsection (e), as so
redesignated--
(A) by striking ``subsections (a) and (b)'' and
inserting ``subsection (a)'';
(B) by striking ``subsection (d)'' and inserting
``subsection (c)''; and
(C) by striking ``subsection (e)'' and inserting
``subsection (d)''.
(f) Transfer of Ford Island Provision.--
(1) Transfer and redesignation.--Section 2814 of such title
is--
(A) transferred to appear after section 7524 of
such title; and
(B) redesignated as section 7525 of such title.
(2) Technical and conforming amendments.--Subsection (i) of
section 7525 of such title, as transferred and redesignated by
paragraph (1), is amended--
(A) in paragraph (2)--
(i) by striking ``To extent'' and inserting
``To the extent; and
(ii) by striking ``this chapter'' and
inserting ``chapter 169 of this title''; and
(B) in paragraph (3)(B), by striking ``this
chapter'' and inserting ``chapter 169 of this title''.
(3) Clerical amendments.--(A) The table of sections at the
beginning of chapter 169 of such title is amended by striking
the item relating to section 2814.
(B) The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 645
of such title is amended by adding at the end the following new
item:

``7525. Special authority for development of Ford Island,
Hawaii.''.
(g) Application of Real Property Management Authorities to Pentagon
Reservation.--Section 2661 of such title is amended by adding at the
end the following new subsection:
``(d) In this chapter, the terms `Secretary concerned' and
`Secretary of a military department' include the Secretary of Defense
with respect to the Pentagon Reservation.''.

SEC. 2882. REPORT ON APPLICATION OF FORCE PROTECTION AND ANTI-TERRORISM
STANDARDS TO LEASED FACILITIES.

(a) Report Required.--Not later than May 1, 2006, the Secretary of
Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report
on the application of Department of Defense Anti-Terrorism/Force
Protection standards to all facilities leased by the Department of
Defense or leased by the General Services Administration as an agent
for the Department of Defense as of September 30, 2005.
(b) Information on Leased Facilities.--For each facility identified
in the report submitted under subsection (a), the Secretary shall
include the following:
(1) A description of the function of the leased facility,
including the location, size, terms of lease, and the number of
personnel housed within the facility.
(2) A description of the threat assessment and the joint
security integrated vulnerability assessment for each leased
facility.
(3) A description and cost estimate of any actions
necessary to mitigate risk to an acceptable level in each
leased facility.
(4) A description and cost estimate of the actions to be
taken by the Secretary of Defense for each leased facility to
ensure compliance with Department of Defense Anti-Terrorism/
Force Protection standards.
(5) The total estimated cost of, and a proposed funding
plan for, implementation of the force protection and anti-
terrorism measures required to ensure the compliance of all
leased facilities with Defense Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection
standards.
(c) Information on Support Priorities.--The report submitted under
subsection (a) shall also include a separate description of the
procedures used by the Secretary of Defense to prioritize funding for
the application of force protection and antiterrorism standards to
leased facilities, including a description of any such procedures
applicable to the entire Department of Defense.
(d) Applicability.--The reporting requirements under this section
apply to any space or facility that houses 11 or more personnel in
service to, or employed by, the Department of Defense.

SEC. 2883. CONSTRUCTION AT FORT BUCHANAN, PUERTO RICO, FOR RESERVE
COMPONENTS.

Section 1507(b)(2) of the Floyd D. Spence National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106-398, 114 Stat.
1654A-355) is amended to read as follows:
``(2) The construction, conversion, rehabilitation,
extension, and improvement of reserve component and
nonappropriated fund facilities.''.

SEC. 2884. AUTHORITY TO USE PAPAGO PARK MILITARY RESERVATION, ARIZONA,
FOR GENERAL MILITARY PURPOSES.

Section 1 of the Act of April 7, 1930 (46 Stat. 142, chapter 107),
is amended by striking ``reserved for military purposes for use of the
National Guard of Arizona as a rifle range'' and inserting ``reserved
for military purposes for use by the State of Arizona as a military
installation known as Papago Park Military Reservation''.

SEC. 2885. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE LABORATORY
REVITALIZATION PROGRAM.

Section 2892(g) of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 1996 (Public Law 104-106; 10 U.S.C. 2805 note), as amended
by section 2891 of the Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108-375; 118 Stat. 2154), is
further amended by striking ``September 30, 2005'' and inserting
``September 30, 2006''.

SEC. 2886. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON ESTABLISHMENT OF BAKERS CREEK MEMORIAL.

(a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
(1) In 1943 and 1944, the United States Armed Forces
operated a rest and relaxation facility in Mackay, Queensland,
Australia, for troops serving in the Pacific Theater during
World War II.
(2) On June 14, 1943, a Boeing B-17C was transporting 6
crew members and 35 servicemen from Mackay to Port Moresby, New
Guinea, to return the servicemen to duty after 10 days of rest
and relaxation leave at an Army/Red Cross facility.
(3) The aircraft crashed shortly after take-off at Bakers
Creek, Australia, killing all 6 crew members and 34 of the 35
servicemen being transported in what was at that point the
worst crash in American air transport history, and what remains
the worst air disaster in Australian history.
(4) Due to wartime censorship rules related to the movement
of troops, the tragic crash and loss of life were not reported
to the Australian or United States public.
(5) Many family members of those killed did not learn the
circumstances of the troops deaths until they were contacted by
the Bakers Creek Memorial Foundation beginning in 1992.
(6) As of May 2005, the Bakers Creek Memorial Foundation
had contacted 36 of the 40 families that lost loved ones in the
tragic crash, and was continuing efforts to locate the
remaining four families to inform them of the true events of
the crash at Bakers Creek.
(7) The Australian people marked the tragic crash at Bakers
Creek with a memorial established in 1992, but no similar
memorial has been established in the United States.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the
Secretary of the Army may establish an appropriate marker, at a site to
be chosen at the discretion of the Secretary, to commemorate the 40
members of the United States Armed Forces who lost their lives in the
air crash at Bakers Creek, Australia, on June 14, 1943.

SEC. 2887. REPORT ON USE OF GROUND SOURCE HEAT PUMPS AT DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE FACILITIES.

(a) Report Required.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the
congressional defense committees a report on the use of ground source
heat pumps at Department of Defense facilities.
(b) Content.--The report required under subsection (a) shall
include--
(1) a description of the types of Department of Defense
facilities that use ground source heat pumps;
(2) an assessment of the applicability and cost-
effectiveness of the use of ground source heat pumps at
Department of Defense facilities in different geographic
regions of the United States;
(3) a description of the relative applicability of ground
source heat pumps for purposes of new construction at, and
retrofitting of, Department of Defense facilities; and
(4) recommendations for facilitating and encouraging the
increased use of ground source heat pumps at Department of
Defense facilities.

SEC. 2888. TREATMENT OF INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS AS PUBLIC ENTITIES
FOR PURPOSES OF DISPOSAL OF REAL PROPERTY RECOMMENDED FOR
CLOSURE IN JULY 2003 BRAC COMMISSION REPORT.

Section 8013 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 1994
(Public Law 103-139; 107 Stat. 1440) is amended by striking ``the
report to the President from the Defense Base Closure and Realignment
Commission, July 1991'' and inserting ``the reports to the President
from the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission, July 1991 and
July 1993''.

SEC. 2889. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING COMMUNITY IMPACT ASSISTANCE
RELATED TO CONSTRUCTION OF NAVY LANDING FIELD, NORTH
CAROLINA.

It is the sense of the Senate that--
(1) the planned construction of an outlying landing field
in North Carolina is vital to the national security interests
of the United States; and
(2) the Department of Defense should work with other
Federal agencies to provide community impact assistance to
those communities directly impacted by the location of the
outlying landing field, including, where appropriate--
(A) economic development assistance;
(B) impact aid program assistance;
(C) the provision by cooperative agreement with the
Navy of fire, rescue, water, and sewer services;
(D) access by leasing arrangement to appropriate
land for farming for farmers impacted by the location
of the landing field;
(E) direct relocation assistance; and
(F) fair compensation to landowners for property
purchased by the Navy.

SEC. 2890. DESIGNATION OF WILLIAM B. BRYANT ANNEX.

(a) Designation.--The annex to the E. Barrett Prettyman Federal
Building and United States Courthouse located at 333 Constitution
Avenue Northwest in the District of Columbia shall be known and
designated as the ``William B. Bryant Annex''.
(b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,
paper, or other record of the United States to the annex referred to in
subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William B.
Bryant Annex''.

SEC. 2891. REQUIRED CONSULTATION WITH STATE AND LOCAL ENTITIES ON
TRANSPORTATION, HOUSING, AND OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES
RELATED TO THE ADDITION OF PERSONNEL OR FACILITIES AT
MILITARY INSTALLATIONS AS PART OF 2005 ROUND OF DEFENSE
BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT.

Section 2905(a) of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of
1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101-510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note)
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
``(3) In carrying out any closure or realignment under this part
that would add personnel or facilities to an existing military
installation, the Secretary shall consult with appropriate State and
local entities on matters affecting the local community related to
transportation, utility infrastructure, housing, schools, and family
support activities during the development of plans to implement such
closure or realignment.''.

SEC. 2892. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON REVERSIONARY INTERESTS AT NAVY
HOMEPORTS.

It is the sense of the Senate that, in implementing the decisions
made with respect to Navy homeports as part of the 2005 round of
defense base closure and realignment, the Secretary of the Navy should,
consistent with the national interest and Federal policy supporting
cost-free conveyances of Federal surplus property suitable for use as
port facilities, release or otherwise relinquish any entitlement to
receive, pursuant to any agreement providing for such payment,
compensation from any holder of a reversionary interest in real
property used by the United States for improvements made to any
military installation that is closed or realigned as part of such base
closure round.

SEC. 2893. IDENTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AT MILITARY
INSTALLATIONS CLOSED OR REALIGNED UNDER 2005 ROUND OF
DEFENSE BASE CLOSURE AND REALIGNMENT.

(a) Identification of Environmental Condition of Property.--
(1) In general.--Not later than May 31, 2007, the Secretary
of Defense, in consultation with the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency, other appropriate Federal
agencies, and State, tribal, and local government officials,
shall complete an identification of the environmental condition
of the real property (including groundwater) of each military
installation approved for closure or realignment under the 2005
round of defense base closure and realignment in accordance
with section 120(h)(4) of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C.
9620(h)(4)).
(2) Results.--
(A) In general.--As soon as practicable after the
date on which an identification under paragraph (1) is
completed, the Secretary of Defense shall--
(i) provide a notice of the results of the
identification to--
(I) the Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency;
(II) the head of any other
appropriate Federal agency, as
determined by the Secretary; and
(III) any affected State or tribal
government official, as determined by
the Secretary; and
(ii) publish in the Federal Register the
results of the identification.
(B) Request for concurrence.--The Secretary shall
include in a notice provided under subclause (I) or
(III) of subparagraph (A)(i) a request for concurrence
with the identification in such form as the Secretary
determines to be appropriate.
(3) Concurrence.--
(A) In general.--An identification under paragraph
(1) shall not be considered to be complete until--
(i) for a property that is a site, or part
of a site, on the National Priorities List
developed by the President in accordance with
section 105(a)(8)(B) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C.
9605(a)(8)(B)), the date on which the
Administrator of the Environmental Protection
Agency and each appropriate State and tribal
government official concur with the
identification; and
(ii) for any property that is not a site
described in clause (i), the date on which each
appropriate State and tribal government
official concurs with the identification.
(B) Failure to act.--The Administrator, or a State
or tribal government official, shall be considered to
concur with an identification under paragraph (1) if
the Administrator or government official fails to make
a determination with respect to a request for
concurrence with such identification under paragraph
(2)(B) by not later than 90 days after the date on
which such request for concurrence is received.
(b) Expediting Environmental Response.--The Secretary of Defense
shall coordinate with appropriate Federal, State, tribal, and local
governmental officials, as determined by the Secretary, to expedite
environmental response at military installations approved for closure
or realignment under the 2005 round of defense base closure and
realignment.
(c) Report.--The Secretary shall submit to Congress, as part of
each annual report under section 2706 of title 10, United States Code,
a report describing any progress made in carrying out this section.
(d) Effect of Section.--Nothing in this section affects any
obligation of the Secretary with respect to any other Federal or State
requirement relating to--
(1) the environment; or
(2) the transfer of property.

SEC. 2894. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON LIMITATION ON TRANSFER OF UNITS FROM
CLOSED AND REALIGNED MILITARY INSTALLATIONS PENDING
READINESS OF RECEIVING LOCATIONS.

(a) Findings.--
(1) The Commission on Review of Overseas Military Facility
Structure of the United States, also known as the Overseas
Basing Commission, transmitted a report to the President and
Congress on August 15, 2005, that discussed considerations for
the return to the United States of up to 70,000 service
personnel and 100,000 family members and civilian employees
from overseas garrisons.
(2) The 2005 Base Closure and Realignment Commission
released a report on September 8, 2005, to the President that
assessed the closure and realignment decisions of the
Department of Defense, which would affect 26,830 military
personnel positions.
(3) Both of these reports expressed concerns that massive
movements of units, service personnel, and families may disrupt
unit operational effectiveness and the quality of life for
family members if not carried out with adequate planning and
resources.
(4) The 2005 Base Closure and Realignment Commission, in
its decision to close Fort Monmouth, included a provision
requiring the Secretary of Defense to provide a report that
``movement of organizations, functions, or activities from Fort
Monmouth to Aberdeen Proving Ground will be accomplished
without disruption of their support to the Global War on
Terrorism or other critical contingency operations, and that
safeguards exist to ensure that necessary redundant
capabilities are put in place to mitigate potential degradation
of such support, and to ensure maximum retention of critical
workforce''.
(5) The Overseas Basing Commission found that ``base
closings at home along with the return of yet additional masses
of service members and dependents from overseas will have major
impact on local communities and the quality of life that can be
expected. Movements abroad from established bases into new
locations, or into locations already in use that will be put
under pressure by increases in populations, will impact on
living conditions.''
(6) The Overseas Basing Commission notes that the four most
critical elements of quality of life as they relate to
restructuring of the global defense posture are housing,
military child education, healthcare, and service member and
family services.
(7) The Overseas Basing Commission recommended that
``planners must take a `last day-first day' approach to the
movement of units and families from one location to another'',
meaning that they must maintain the support infrastructure for
personnel until the last day they are in place and must have
the support infrastructure in place on the first day troops
arrive in the new location.
(8) The Overseas Basing Commission further recommended that
it is ``imperative that the `last day-first day' approach
should be taken whether the movement is abroad from one locale
to another, from overseas to the United States, or from one
base in CONUS [the continental United States] to yet another as
a result of base realignment and closures''.
(b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that the
Secretary of Defense should not transfer any unit from a military
installation closed or realigned due to the relocation of forces under
the Integrated Global Presence and Basing Strategy or the 2005 round of
defense base closure and realignment until adequate facilities and
infrastructure necessary to support the unit's mission and quality of
life requirements for military families are ready for use at the
receiving location.

Passed the Senate November 15, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

1st Session

S. 1044

_______________________________________________________________________

AN ACT

To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2006 for military
construction, and for other purposes.