S.Res. 162Senate109th Congress (2005-2007)In Committee

A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate concerning Griswold v. Connecticut.

Introduced June 7, 2005

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

2 earlier actions
SenateIntro Referral Latest Action

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text of measure as introduced: CR S6170)

June 7, 2005

View full timeline
SenateIntro Referral

Introduced in Senate

June 7, 2005

SenateIntro Referral

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S6170-6171)

June 7, 2005

SenateIntro Referral

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text of measure as introduced: CR S6170)

June 7, 2005

Floor Debate

2 members

What members said about S.Res. 162 on the floor

1 Republican1 Democrat
Barack Obama
Sen. Barack ObamaD-IL · Jun 7, 2005

Mr. President, today marks the 40th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Griswold v. Connecticut, which struck down Connecticut laws that prohibited reproductive counseling and the use…

Olympia J. Snowe
Sen. Olympia J. SnoweR-ME · Jun 7, 2005

Mr. President, today we mark forty years since a momentous Supreme Court decision. It is difficult for many young Americans to imagine that in the not too distant past, the provision of…

Bill Text

Latest available legislative text

Reading Mode
Latest
Introduced in SenateIssued June 7, 2005

III

109th CONGRESS

1st Session

S. RES. 162

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

June 7, 2005

Ms. Snowe (for herself, Mr. Obama, Mr. Corzine, Mrs. Boxer, Mrs. Murray, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Durbin, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Reid, Mr. Feingold, and Mr. Jeffords) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate concerning Griswold v. Connecticut.

Whereas June 7, 2005, marks the 40th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) in which the Court recognized the constitutional right of married couples to use contraception—a right that the Court would extend to unmarried individuals within less than a decade;

Whereas the decision in Griswold v. Connecticut paved the way for widespread use of birth control among American women;

Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recognized family planning in its published list of the Ten Great Public Health Achievements in the 20th Century;

Whereas the typical woman in the United States wants only 2 children and therefore spends roughly 30 years of her life trying to prevent pregnancy;

Whereas birth control is a critical component of basic preventive health care for women and has been the driving force in reducing national rates of unintended pregnancy and the need for abortion;

Whereas the ability of women to control their fertility and avoid unintended pregnancy has led to dramatic declines in maternal and infant mortality rates and has improved maternal and infant health;

Whereas in 1965, there were 31.6 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births and in 2000 there were 9.8 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births;

Whereas in 1965, 24.7 infants under 1 year of age died per 1,000 live births and in 2003 this figure had declined to 7 infant deaths per 1,000 live births;

Whereas the ability of women to control their fertility has enabled them to achieve personal educational and professional goals critical to the economic success of the United States;

Whereas in 1965, 7 percent of women completed 4 or more years of college compared to 26 percent in 2004;

Whereas in 1965, women age 16 and over constituted 39 percent of the workforce compared to 59 percent in 2004;

Whereas publicly-funded family planning programs have increased the ability of women, regardless of economic status, to access birth control and experience the resulting health and economic benefits;

Whereas public investment in this most basic preventive health care is extremely cost effective—for every dollar spent on publicly funded family planning, $3 is saved in pregnancy-related and newborn care cost to the Medicaid program alone;

Whereas Congress had repeatedly recognized the importance of a women’s ability to access contraceptives through support for Medicaid, title X of the Public Health Service Act, and the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program;

Whereas 40 years after the Griswold decision, many women still face challenges in accessing birth control and using it effectively;

Whereas the United States has one of the highest rates of unintended pregnancy among Western nations and each year, half of all pregnancies in the United States are unintended, and nearly half of those end in abortion;

Whereas teen pregnancy rates have dramatically declined, still, 78 percent of teen pregnancies are unintended and more than one-third of teen girls will become pregnant before age 20; and

Whereas publicly funded family planning clinics are the only source of healthcare for many uninsured and low-income women: Now, therefore, be it

That it is the sense of the Senate that—

(1)

forty years ago the United States Supreme Court in Griswold v. Connecticut held that married people have a constitutional right to use contraceptives, a right that the Court would extend to unmarried individuals within less than a decade;

(2)

the ability of women to control their fertility through birth control has vastly improved maternal and infant health, has reduced national rates of unintended pregnancy, and has allowed women the ability to achieve personal educational and professional goals critical to the economic success of the United States; and

(3)

Congress should take further steps to ensure that all women have universal access to affordable contraception.