S.Res. 386Senate110th Congress (2007-2009)Passed Congress

A resolution to authorize testimony and legal representation in State of Nebraska v. Pamir J. Safi.

Sponsored by Harry ReidSen. Harry Reid (D-NV)
Introduced November 16, 2007

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

1 earlier action
SenateFloor Latest Action

Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S14658; text as passed Senate: CR S14658; text of measure as introduced: CR S14643)

November 16, 2007

View full timeline
SenateIntro Referral

Introduced in Senate

November 16, 2007

SenateFloor

Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S14658; text as passed Senate: CR S14658; text of measure as introduced: CR S14643)

November 16, 2007

Floor Debate

2 members

What members said about S.Res. 386 on the floor

2 Democrats
Harry Reid
Sen. Harry ReidD-NV · Nov 16, 2007

Mr. President, this resolution concerns a request for testimony in a criminal action in Nebraska District Court for Lancaster County in Lincoln, in which the victim was, at the time of the alleged…

Jim Webb
Sen. Jim WebbD-VA · Nov 16, 2007

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of S. Res. 386, submitted earlier today. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the resolution be…

Bill Text

Latest available legislative text

Reading Mode
Latest
Agreed to SenateIssued November 16, 2007

III

110th CONGRESS

1st Session

S. RES. 386

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

November 16, 2007

Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize testimony and legal representation in State of Nebraska v. Pamir J. Safi.

Whereas, in the case of State of Nebraska v. Pamir J. Safi, No. CR05–87, pending in Nebraska District Court for Lancaster County in Lincoln, Nebraska, testimony has been requested from Dorothy Anderson and Blayne Garth Glissman, Jr., former employees in the office of Senator Chuck Hagel;

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to their official responsibilities;

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate; and

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it

That Dorothy Anderson and Blayne Garth Glissman, Jr. are authorized to testify in the case of State of Nebraska v. Pamir J. Safi, except concerning matters for which a privilege should be asserted.

2.

The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent Dorothy Anderson and Blayne Garth Glissman, Jr. in connection with the testimony authorized in section one of this resolution.