H.R. 1985House111th Congress (2009-2011)In Committee

Iran Diplomatic Enhancement Act of 2009

Sponsored by Mark KirkSen. Mark Kirk (R-IL)+ 1 co-lead
Introduced April 21, 2009

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

6 earlier actions
HouseIntro Referral Latest Action

Referred to House Ways and Means

April 21, 2009

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

April 21, 2009

HouseIntro Referral

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E918)

April 21, 2009

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to House Foreign Affairs

April 21, 2009

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on Financial Services, Oversight and Government Reform, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

April 21, 2009

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to House Financial Services

April 21, 2009

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to House Oversight and Government Reform

April 21, 2009

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to House Ways and Means

April 21, 2009

Floor Debate

11 members

What members said about H.R. 1985 on the floor

7 Republicans4 Democrats
Eni F. H. Faleomavaega
Rep. Eni F. H. FaleomavaegaD-AS · May 4, 2009

Mr. Speaker, again, I thank my good friend from New Jersey for yielding. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of House Concurrent Resolution 111, the legislation which expresses the sense of…

John Boozman
Rep. John BoozmanR-AR-3 · May 4, 2009

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, as we, today, commemorate 61 years of Israeli independence, we commemorate and celebrate so much more. We celebrate 61 years of…

Donald M. Payne
Rep. Donald M. PayneD-NJ-10 · May 4, 2009

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and agree to the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 111) recognizing the 61st anniversary of the independence of the State of Israel, as amended. Mr.…

Sheila Jackson Lee
Rep. Sheila Jackson LeeD-TX-18 · May 4, 2009

Mr. Speaker, I rise before you today in support of H Con. Res. 111, recognizing the 61st anniversary of the independence of the State of Israel. I would like thank my colleague, Representative Scott…

Jerry Moran
Rep. Jerry MoranR-KS-1 · Apr 29, 2009

Madam Speaker, a few weeks ago, I came to this House floor to address my colleagues and bring to their attention the danger that Iran poses to Israel. I shared with my colleagues some of the things…

Show 7 more
Edward J. Markey
Rep. Edward J. MarkeyD-MA-7 · May 4, 2009

Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of H. Con. Res. 111 recognizing the 61st anniversary of the founding of the State of Israel. This resolution enjoys bipartisan support, because Americans from…

Scott Garrett
Rep. Scott GarrettR-NJ-5 · May 4, 2009

Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman. I do now rise to commemorate this important event, the 61st anniversary of the founding of the modern State of Israel. As indicated, it was less than a century ago…

Jerry Moran
Rep. Jerry MoranR-KS-1 · May 4, 2009

Mr. Speaker, for the past 61 years, the United States and Israel have enjoyed a strategic partnership based on shared democratic values, commitment to freedom, friendship, and respect. I rise today…

Michele Bachmann
Rep. Michele BachmannR-MN-6 · May 4, 2009

Mr. Speaker, today I rise in support of H. Con. Res. 111, a resolution recognizing the 61st anniversary of the founding of the modern state of Israel. I believe it is important on this occasion to…

Elton Gallegly
Rep. Elton GalleglyR-CA-24 · May 4, 2009

Mr. Speaker, on May 14, Israel will celebrate its 61st anniversary as a sovereign and independent nation. Only eleven minutes after its creation, the United States recognized Israel and was one of…

Louie Gohmert
Rep. Louie GohmertR-TX-1 · May 4, 2009

Mr. Speaker, I appreciate my friend from Arkansas yielding me this time. On the 61st anniversary of the creation of Israel, we should stop to congratulate them. But I have a couple of points that I…

Ken Calvert
Rep. Ken CalvertR-CA-44 · May 4, 2009

Mr. Speaker, as many have said before, friendship is found and tested through adversity. The friendship between the United States and Israel has certainly been tried and proven true. Both our nations…

Bill Text

Latest available legislative text

Reading Mode
Latest
Introduced in HouseIssued April 21, 2009

I

111th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 1985

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

April 21, 2009

Mr. Kirk (for himself, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Wexler, Mr. Klein of Florida, Mr. Blunt, Mr. McMahon, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Linder, Ms. Kosmas, Mr. Schock, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Ms. Foxx, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Marchant, Mr. Lamborn, Mrs. Miller of Michigan, Ms. Berkley, Mr. Bilirakis, Mrs. Myrick, Mr. McHenry, Mr. Rehberg, Mr. Garrett of New Jersey, Mr. Platts, and Mr. Shimkus) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on Financial Services, Oversight and Government Reform, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To amend the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 to enhance United States diplomatic efforts with respect to Iran by expanding economic sanctions against Iran to include refined petroleum, and for other purposes.

1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Iran Diplomatic Enhancement Act of 2009.

2.

Findings

The Congress finds the following:

(1)

The Islamic Republic of Iran is a party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).

(2)

Iran is a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

(3)

On July 31, 2006, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) adopted Resolution 1696, setting a deadline of August 31, 2006, for Iran’s full, unconditional, and immediate compliance with its obligations under the NPT.

(4)

Iran is in violation of UNSC Resolution 1696.

(5)

On December 23, 2006, the UNSC adopted Resolution 1737, issuing a legally binding order that Iran immediately suspend all enrichment-related and reprocessing activities and work on all heavy water-related projects, and imposing economic sanctions on Iran until such time as it has fully complied with its obligations.

(6)

Iran is in violation of UNSC Resolution 1737.

(7)

On March 24, 2007, the UNSC adopted Resolution 1747, imposing further economic sanctions on Iran for its noncompliance with previous UNSC resolutions.

(8)

Iran is in violation of UNSC Resolution 1747.

(9)

On March 3, 2008, the UNSC adopted Resolution 1803, imposing further economic sanctions on Iran for its noncompliance with previous UNSC resolutions.

(10)

Iran is in violation of UNSC Resolution 1803.

(11)

On September 27, 2008, the UNSC adopted Resolution 1835, demanding that Iran immediately comply with previous UNSC resolutions.

(12)

Iran is in violation of UNSC 1835.

(13)

According to the IAEA, Iran has installed 2 or 3 types of next-generation centrifuges at Natanz FEP, including the IR–2 and the IR–3.

(14)

On October 26, 2008, IAEA inspectors were unable to carry out a scheduled design information verification visit to the Arak Heavy Water Reactor.

(15)

According to the IAEA, as of January 31, 2009, Iran had produced a total of some 1,010 kilograms of low enriched uranium hexafluoride, which is 30 percent higher than IAEA estimates and sufficient for a nuclear weapons breakout capability.

(16)

According to the IAEA’s February 19, 2009, report, Iran had installed more than 5,400 centrifuges.

(17)

According to the IAEA’s February 19, 2009, report, Iran is producing fuel rods containing uranium pellets for its IR–40 heavy water reactor.

(18)

According to the IAEA, the IAEA sought and was denied permission by Iran to visit the reactor itself in February 2009, which, according to the IAEA, could adversely impact the IAEA’s ability to carry out effective safeguards at that facility.

(19)

As evidenced by the February 3, 2009, launch of the Omid satellite into space using the Safir 2-stage space launch vehicle, Iran continues to expand its development of ballistic missiles.

(20)

According to the IAEA, as of its February 19, 2009, report, Iran has not answered IAEA questions about possible military dimensions of Iran’s nuclear programme.

(21)

Up to 40 percent of Iranian gasoline comes from imports.

(22)

Over the course of the past year, Iran purchased nearly all of this gasoline from just six companies, five of them European (the Swiss firm Vitol; the Swiss/Dutch firm Trafigura; the French firm Total; the Swiss firm Glencore; British Petroleum) and one Indian company, Reliance Industries.

(23)

In February 2009, Vitol and Trafigura supplied some 80 percent of Iran’s gasoline imports, while Reliance Industries and British Petroleum reportedly did not supply gasoline to Iran that month.

(24)

In light of the extensive relationship between the United States and Switzerland, it is a matter of particular concern that Swiss firms supply more than 80 percent of Iran’s gasoline imports.

(25)

The majority of tankers carrying gasoline to Iran are insured by Lloyds of London.

(26)

An interruption or significant limiting of the supply of gasoline to Iran would considerably impact the Iranian economy.

(27)

An international restriction of gasoline exports to Iran would significantly bolster current diplomatic initiatives.

(28)

On June 4, 2008, then-Senator Barack Obama said, we should work with Europe, Japan, and the Gulf states to find every avenue outside the U.N. to isolate the Iranian regime—from cutting off loan guarantees and expanding financial sanctions, to banning the export of refined petroleum to Iran.

(29)

On October 7, 2008, then-Senator Barack Obama said, Iran right now imports gasoline … if we can prevent them from importing the gasoline that they need … that starts changing their cost-benefit analysis. That starts putting the squeeze on them..

3.

Amendments to the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996

(a)

Expansion of Sanctions to Refined Petroleum

Section 5(a) of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 (50 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended to read as follows:

(a)

Sanctions with respect to the development of petroleum resources of Iran and export of refined petroleum resources to Iran

Except as provided in subsection (f), the President shall impose 2 or more of the sanctions described in paragraphs (1) through (6) of section 6 if the President determines that a person has, with actual knowledge—

(1)
(A)

on or after the date of the enactment of this Act, made an investment of $40,000,000 or more (or any combination of investments of at least $10,000,000 each, which in the aggregate equals or exceeds $40,000,000 in any 12-month period), that directly and significantly contributed to the enhancement of Iran’s ability to develop petroleum resources of Iran; or

(B)

on or after the date of the enactment of the Iran Diplomatic Enhancement Act of 2009, made an investment of $20,000,000 or more (or any combination of investments of at least $5,000,000 each, which in the aggregate equals or exceeds $20,000,000 in any 12-month period), that directly and significantly contributed to the enhancement of Iran’s ability to develop petroleum resources of Iran; or

(2)

on or after the date of the enactment of the Iran Diplomatic Enhancement Act of 2009

(A)

provided Iran with refined petroleum resources;

(B)

engaged in an activity, including production, brokerage, insurance, and tanker delivery services, that could contribute to Iran’s ability to import refined petroleum resources; or

(C)

provided Iran with goods, services, or technology for refining petroleum.

.

(b)

International policy

Section 4 of the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 (50 U.S.C. 1701 note) is amended by adding at the end the following:

(g)

United States policy toward Iran

It shall be the policy of the United States to encourage foreign governments—

(1)

to direct state-owned entities to cease all investment in Iran's energy sector and all exports of refined petroleum resources to Iran; and

(2)

to persuade, and, where possible, require private entities based in their territories to cease all investment in Iran's energy sector and all exports of refined petroleum resources to Iran.

.

(c)

Presidential Waiver

Section 9(c)(2)(C) of such Act is amended by striking section 5(a) or section 5(b) to Iran’s ability to, respectively, develop its petroleum resources or its weapons of mass destruction or other military capabilities and inserting section 5(a)(1), section 5(a)(2), or section 5(b) to Iran’s ability to, respectively, develop its petroleum resources, import refined petroleum resources or refine petroleum, or develop its weapons of mass destruction or other military capabilities.

(d)

Reports on United States Efforts To Curtail the Export of Refined Petroleum to Iran

Section 10 of such Act is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

(d)

Reports on Refined Petroleum Exports to Iran

(1)

Semiannual reports

Not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of the Iran Diplomatic Enhancement Act of 2009, and every 6 months thereafter, the President shall transmit to the appropriate congressional committees a report describing, with respect to the preceding 6-month period—

(A)

any person that has provided Iran with refined petroleum resources, and the petroleum resources so provided;

(B)

any activity, including production, brokerage, insurance, and tanker delivery services, engaged in that could contribute to Iran’s ability to import refined petroleum resources;

(C)

any person that has provided Iran with goods, services, or technology for refining petroleum, and the goods, services, or technology so provided; and

(D)

steps taken by the President to carry out the policy set forth in section 4(g).

(2)

Additional information

With respect to each matter reported under subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of paragraph (1), the President shall describe the steps that the United States has taken to respond to the provision of refined petroleum resources described in paragraph (1)(A), the activity described in paragraph (1)(B), or the provision of goods, services, or technology described in paragraph (1)(C), as the case may be.

.