Lumbee Recognition Act

Madam Speaker, I rise in opposition to H.R. 31, and I do so because I believe this bill sets a bad precedent. It extends Federal recognition to what I understand would become the third largest tribe in the country. Though the size of the Lumbee Tribe does not disqualify it from consideration for recognition, it does demand, nonetheless, that Congress exercise great caution. And I will point that out later on in my remarks.

Madam Speaker, a fundamental principle of Indian law is that a recognized tribe should be a tribe that can trace continuous existence from the earliest days of our Republic to the present. In fact, this is enshrined in one of the seven mandatory criteria that the Bureau of Indian Affairs, or BIA, uses to evaluate petitions from groups seeking recognition. The BIA process might have its problems, but at least it has a clear set of standards that a petitioner must meet.

We in Congress do not seem to have a clear standard for determining that the Lumbee Tribe warrants recognition. Legislative proposals to recognize the Lumbee has surfaced numerous times over the last century, yet none were enacted. No new information has come to light to justify passing that legislation today. Moreover, the committee applied no visible standard for determining why the Lumbees warrant recognition while other groups do not. Unless the House develops a clear, rational, fixed policy on recognition, then our act of recognizing a tribe would deem to be arbitrary. This could undermine the standing of recognized tribes everywhere.

The lack of transparent standards in H.R. 31 leads to a major issue: the tribe size and the cost of providing services to it. Two years ago when we considered the same legislation, the Congressional Budget Office, or CBO, estimated that recognizing the Lumbees would cost taxpayers $480 million over 5 years based on an enrollment of about 40,000 members. Today, CBO advises that the bill is going to cost $786 million over 5 years based on a tribal enrollment of 54,000.

$786 million, Madam Speaker, is an enormous sum and it could force the BIA and the Indian Health Service to alter formulas for the provisions of service to all other tribes, possibly reducing their allocation.

A recent news article in the North Carolina paper indicates the tribal rolls are closed because of the concerns over the size of the tribe. The implication is that the tribal rolls will be reopened again after Congress passes this bill. As I said earlier, the size of the tribe is not an issue here. What is at issue is the kind of enrollment standards the tribe applies because taxpayers and other tribes want to know what the cost implications will be down the road.

Let me restate a few points that I made when the Committee on Natural Resources marked up this measure, because the objections and the concerns that I raised then have not been resolved today.

First, the Obama administration testified in support of H.R. 31, reversing the stance of the previous administration. In the committee hearing on the

bill, the Department's witness did not explain how the administration came to the conclusion that the Lumbees warrant Federal recognition. When I asked the witness who was at the Department who made the decision, his reply was, The political leadership.

The Secretary of the Interior, Ken Salazar, is the top political leader there. I would note since the day he took office, Secretary Salazar has repeatedly stressed that his decisions will be based on the law and sound science. For example, an Interior news release quotes him as saying: ``My first priority at Interior is to lead the Department with openness in decision making, high ethical standards, and respect to scientific integrity.'' Again, this is from a news release that was sent out by the Department.

We are debating a bill about tribal recognition and the Department of the Interior is supposed to base its recognition decisions based on the research of the professional historians, anthropologists, and genealogists employed in the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

So in this new leadership at Interior, how did this new leadership at Interior and the administration arrive at support of H.R. 31? Was it because of the professional opinion of those career social scientists? Was there openness in this decisionmaking? I think the answer is no. The Department has not provided the committee with any data supporting its conclusion that the Lumbee met the same basic criteria as other tribes the Secretary has recognized.

While there are a number of other concerns with H.R. 31, let me highlight one more which is extremely important. While the Constitution grants Congress plenary authority to recognize a tribe, the Congress must respect some reasonable limits on the exercise of this authority. To do otherwise undermines the whole notion of tribal recognition and thereby dishonors all validly recognized tribes. With this in mind, the House today should, at a minimum, ensure that a tribe being formally recognized descends from a known historic tribe.

H.R. 31 fails this test. The legislation limits the Secretary to ``confirming compliance with the membership criteria set out in the Tribe's constitution.''

The tribe has testified that its members are descendants of coastal North Carolina tribes. At a minimum, the Secretary should verify that every member of the tribe descends from such historic tribes. Such verification has not been done, and it is not required under H.R. 31. It could have been done if the amendment filed by the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Shuler) were made in order by the Rules Committee, but the Rules Committee chose not to make his amendment in order.

His amendment would have required the Secretary to evaluate the Lumbee recognition petition using the Bureau of Indian Affairs' seven mandatory criteria. One of the criteria requires a petitioner to show that its membership consists of individuals who descend from a historic Indian tribe.

H.R. 31, again, Madam Speaker, does not impose a reasonable standard that justifies the recognition of the Lumbee Tribe.

So with that, Madam Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Madam Speaker, I'm pleased to yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. McHenry).

I yield back the balance of my time.

Madam Speaker, I have a motion to recommit at the desk.

I am, in its current form, Madam Speaker.

Thank you very much, Madam Speaker.

Madam Speaker, the motion to recommit amends the bill to require the Secretary of the Interior to verify that members of the Lumbee Tribe are descendants of the Cheraw and coastal North Carolina tribes. I don't believe this is unreasonable, and I say that because the preamble contained in H.R. 31 states that, ``the Lumbee Indians of Robeson and adjoining counties in North Carolina are descendants of coastal North Carolina Indian tribes, principally Cheraw.''

At the same time, section 3 of the legislation limits the Secretary's role in verifying the Lumbee tribal rolls only to ``confirming compliance with the membership criteria set out in the tribe's constitution.''

Thus, Madam Speaker, nothing in H.R. 31 requires the Secretary or any third party to verify that individuals enrolled in the Lumbee Tribe are descendants of the historic Cheraw and coastal North Carolina Indians.

Under the Bureau of Indian Affairs regulations, as has been mentioned several times today, one of the seven mandatory requirements that must be met to be recognized by the Secretary as a tribe is that: ``The petitioner's membership consists of individuals who descend from a historical Indian tribe or from historical Indian tribes which combined and functioned as a single autonomous political entity.'' These regulations list a wide variety of evidence that can be used to meet this requirement.

The Rules Committee, as I have mentioned and as Mr. McHenry mentioned, would not make Mr. Shuler of North Carolina's amendment in order that would have required the Lumbees to meet all seven of the BIA criteria, including the one quoted above, to obtain Federal recognition.

This motion requires the Secretary to verify that members of the Lumbee Tribe meet the equivalent of just one of the seven criteria that are applied to the other petitioners seeking recognition through the BIA process.

I believe, Madam Speaker, this is reasonable because there have been some concerns about the tribe's enrollment.

Today, the tribe claims 54,000 members, and the CBO says the cost would be $786 million over 5 years. This is an increase from just 2 years ago when they were told that there were 40,000 tribal members. Moreover, it appears the tribe is keeping its rolls closed until Congress passes this bill.

It is fair to have the Secretary verify the base rolls the tribe uses to establish membership. This verification requirement does not cancel the tribe's recognition; it merely provides a means of verifying the base rolls, something the BIA should do if the Lumbees had gone through the regulatory process.

Thus, a motion to recommit merely ensures the House has taken extra care to ensure the decision to extend recognition to the Lumbee is appropriate, because a wrong decision, a wrong decision, Madam Speaker, could have an adverse impact on all tribes.

With that, I yield back the balance of my time.

Madam Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.

Madam Speaker, pursuant to House Resolution 490, I call up the bill (H.R. 31) to provide for the recognition of the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina, and for other purposes, and ask for its immediate consideration in the House.

To my colleagues on both sides of the aisle, let me begin by saying that this measure, which would extend Federal recognition to the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina, is more than a century overdue. When 240 of us voted for Federal recognition during the 102nd Congress, that should have resolved the question of Lumbee status. When we voted again in favor of similar legislation in the 103rd Congress, that certainly should have meant that the United States had finally taken a stand and done the right

thing by acknowledging a trust relationship with the Lumbee Tribe, but it was not to be. Last Congress, the Lumbee Tribe Recognition Act passed the House of Representatives with 256 votes but, unfortunately, this legislation stalled in the Senate.

So here we are again today, over 115 years after the Lumbee first sought Federal recognition, still attempting to clarify their status.

The history and struggle of the Lumbee Tribe to obtain Federal acknowledgment has been well documented. When Congress passed the Lumbee Act of 1956, it simultaneously recognized and terminated the Lumbee Tribe by acknowledging their status as an Indian tribe by denying them Federal service. That act was passed during the era of Federal Indian policy known as the Termination Era. If you examine the results of the Termination Acts of the 1950s, you would see how detrimental that misguided policy was to the terminated tribes. Through it all, the Lumbee Tribe has managed to maintain their sense of community and provide some services to their citizens.

This is a testament to the fact that the Lumbees have a functioning government worthy of Federal acknowledgment. Yet the Lumbee people still do not have the government-to-government relationship they deserve. At no time has the Department of the Interior ever opposed Federal recognition for this tribe based on the belief that the Lumbees are not entitled to such status. Indeed, the Department has repeatedly concluded that the Lumbee Tribe descends from similar speaking tribes.

Several studies undertaken by the Department have consistently concluded that the Lumbees are a distinct, self-governing Indian community which has been historically located on the Lumbee River in North Carolina.

During President Obama's campaign, he pledged his full support for recognition of the Lumbee people. At the Natural Resources hearing this year, the administration testified in support of H.R. 31 stating: ``There are rare circumstances when Congress should intervene and recognize a tribal group. And the case of Lumbee Indians is one such case.''

During this debate, we may hear a number of canards against Lumbee recognition but not one will be a legitimate reason to deny recognition. One such relates to the different names given the Lumbee Tribe. Although the State of North Carolina has recognized the tribe for over 100 years, it has done so under various names. Other than the Lumbee Tribe, North Carolina is responsible for the various names that it imposed upon the tribe. It was not until the tribe pressured the State that the tribe was authorized to conduct a referendum to choose their own name. When it did so in 1951, it chose the name Lumbee Indians of North Carolina. This is the only name ever selected by the tribe, and it is this name by which Congress, in 1956, recognized the Lumbees.

Some have expressed concern about the cost of this bill, and I want to note that the cost of this bill is for discretionary programs only. There is no mandatory spending. Any actual costs to this bill are subject to appropriations.

To address claims that the tribe was only interested in Federal recognition so that they may conduct gaming, the tribe supported an outright gaming prohibition which has been included in this bill. The gaming prohibition precludes the Lumbee Tribe from engaging in, licensing, or regulating gaming pursuant to the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act or any other Federal law.

Finally, some may argue that the Lumbees should not be allowed to bypass administrative process established by the Bureau of Indian Affairs and should be allowed to go through the administrative process. I can assure you extending Federal recognition to a tribe at this time is not something new, nor does it bypass administrative process. If a tribe has been terminated by the Federal Government, they are ineligible for the administrative process.

Because we, the Congress, terminated the Lumbees in 1956, it is solely our responsibility to restore their status.

In closing, I would like to commend the gentleman from North Carolina, Mr. Mike McIntyre, for his dedication to this issue. Over the years, he has acted in a professional and respectful manner in his tireless efforts, his superb leadership. This bill has garnered 185 cosponsors. Mr. McIntyre's dedication to the Lumbee people is most admirable, and I'm sure they recognize and salute him for that dedication.

I would also like to commend the Lumbee Tribe for being extremely patient with Congress as we have failed to clarify their status for far too long.

In the face of adversity, their determination and sheer stamina has served as testament to their belief in who they are as a people. They have endured rejection by Congress, hostility by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and have even been snubbed in their quest by neighboring Indian tribes unwilling to have the Lumbee recognized the Congress as they were.

All the Lumbee want is the respect of being acknowledged for who they are--an American Indian tribe.

Let us join this effort to grant the Lumbee the recognition they have so long deserved. It is up to us to do the right thing by extending Federal recognition to the Lumbee Tribe, and I urge all of my colleagues to support H.R. 31.

I reserve the balance of my time.

Madam Speaker, I'm most delighted to yield 10 minutes to the distinguished gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. McIntyre), lead sponsor of this legislation, and, again, commend him for his tremendous leadership.

(Mr. McINTYRE asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)

Madam Speaker, I yield 5 minutes to the gentleman from American Samoa (Mr. Faleomavaega).

(Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)

I yield back the balance of my time.

I rise in opposition to the motion to recommit.

Wow. Madam Speaker, it certainly has been a torturous and long path for the Lumbee Indian Tribe. This is but yet another stake that is attempted to be driven in their heart.

It is long established policy in this country for Indian tribes to determine their own membership, their own roll. This motion to recommit would single out the Lumbee Tribe as the only tribe in America that would be subject to this new requirement. It's discriminatory. It's ugly. It deserves to be defeated.

I want to make something very clear before yielding to the gentleman from North Carolina. This is not something new that we're doing today, granting Federal recognition to an Indian tribe. There are 561 federally recognized Indian tribes according to the GAO. Of those, 530 were recognized by the Congress of the United States. That would be this body. That's 530 of 561. And none were recognized under the criteria that's being offered in this motion to recommit.

I yield the balance of my time in opposition to the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. McIntyre).

Madam Speaker, if I have time left, I yield to the gentleman from American Samoa.

I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from American Samoa.

Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

(Mr. DREIER asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)

First, let me say how great it is to see you in the Chair, Mr.

Speaker. I would like to express my appreciation to my good friend from California, my colleague, Mr. Cardoza, for yielding me the customary 30 minutes.

Mr. Speaker, this rule actually provides for the consideration of two problematic bills--H.R. 1385, which would extend recognition to six Indian tribes in the Commonwealth of Virginia; and H.R. 31, which would extend recognition to the Lumbee Tribe in the State of North Carolina. Both adopt an arbitrary and inconsistent recognition process that threatens those tribes who are already Federally recognized and upends the process for future applicants. And this rule provides for an even more problematic process.

The issue of tribe recognition--like all matters before Congress-- demands clarity, fairness and transparency. The two underlying bills, unfortunately, deliver just the opposite. H.R. 1385 would extend recognition to six Virginia tribes rather than requiring that they go through the normal Federal recognition process at the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

These tribes have sought legislative action because they lack the proper documentation to complete the regular administrative process. This is due to the fact--and it was correctly pointed out by my California colleague--that they've been victims of targeted attacks in the past which resulted in the destruction of many of the very important historical documents that would have been necessary. This is a reminder, Mr. Speaker, of a very, very ugly chapter in our Nation's history, and Congress should work very carefully to address this issue.

While the situation of the Virginia tribes is difficult--and I recognize that--for the reasons I just stated, we need to consider the overall fairness of our actions. For instance, there are currently nine other tribes, nine other tribes that have fully completed their application processes and are awaiting final determinations. They have done their due diligence and deserve to have their cases addressed in the proper order. While the six tribes covered in H.R. 1385 may deserve special dispensation from the normal BIA process, questions have been raised regarding the fairness of penalizing the nine other tribes who fully completed the process and are patiently waiting in line for the determination.

The process serves a purpose: ensuring that tribal determination is fair, consistent and fully vetted. We need to think very, very carefully, Mr. Speaker, before upending that regime.

H.R. 31 is even more controversial, not least because the price tag comes to $786 million--or, Mr. Speaker, I should say ``at least'' $786 million. We know that an enactment of this bill would cost, again, at least three-quarters of a billion dollars. And I say ``billion'' because I know the word ``trillion'' is used more frequently around here tragically these days. But it would be very, very, very costly. It could balloon to an even larger level of funding.

At issue is conflicting membership estimates of the Lumbee Tribe. The Interior Department estimates it at 40,000; the tribe itself estimates it at about 55,000, a difference of nearly 40 percent. But what's more, local North Carolina media have reported that some in the tribe intend to expand its membership once this bill is enacted. They're waiting for Federal recognition and then want to increase their numbers, expanding the cost of this bill even further and pulling resources away from the long-recognized tribes.

Now, Mr. Speaker, the Lumbee Tribe, just like any other Indian tribe, should obtain Federal recognition on its merits. It may indeed deserve recognition. However, the merits are still far from clear. The last several administrations have opposed their application. The Obama administration has reversed course, but it has not offered any explanation as to why. In fact, the administration does not yet have its appointees in place at the Interior Department to even articulate their reasoning.

Mr. Speaker, Congress must fully vet all of these issues and act in a clear, comprehensive way that eliminates the current confusion and restores clarity and certainty. And yet inexplicably, the rule which we're debating right now curtails the ability of Members, Republican and Democratic Members, to offer their amendments so that a comprehensive consensus solution could, in fact, be reached.

Rather than an open process which would have allowed the House to address many of these issues, the rule for the Lumbee Tribe bill is a closed rule, despite submission of the very thoughtful amendment by Mr. Shuler. It is, in fact, a bipartisan amendment. He should be allowed to bring his alternative before the House for an up-or-down vote. It's very sad that I have to stand here as a minority Member fighting for the rights of a majority Member of this institution.

Similarly, Madam Speaker, the ranking member of the Agriculture Committee, our friend from Roanoke, Virginia, (Mr. Goodlatte) asked for an open amendment process on the Virginia bill. While two of his amendments were made in order, an open process would have allowed him to offer all of his amendments and permitted all Members to participate.

Madam Speaker, these bills have problems but this rule has a bigger problem. As happens all too often in this Democratic majority, this debate will be closed rather than open, and Members will be shut out of the process.

So I urge my colleagues to oppose the rule. We can address these very, very important issues in a more fair and balanced way.

With that, I reserve the balance of my time.

Would the gentleman yield?

I thank my friend for yielding, and, Madam Speaker, I will inform my friend that there are no other requests for time on our side of the aisle. At this juncture, I will encourage my colleagues to oppose this rule, and I yield back the balance of my time.

Madam Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.

Madam Speaker, I rise today in strong support of H.R. 31, the proposed bill to provide for the recognition of the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina.

First, I want to commend the gentleman and my dear friend, the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. McIntyre) for his leadership and tremendous work that he has done to move this bill through committee that is now before us.

I also want to commend Chairman Rahall and our ranking member, Mr. Hastings, and my colleagues on the Natural Resources Committee for their agreement to bringing this bill to the floor.

Madam Speaker, it has been more than 120 years since the Lumbees first attempted Federal recognition since 1888. More than a century has passed since they first started this labyrinth known as Federal recognition process. Since then, the Lumbee themselves have been subjected to such demeaning vetting process, including having the size of their teeth measured and their blood tested to see how much Indian they were.

Since 1888, the Lumbees have submitted all documentation they have to prove their existence. After more than 100 years' worth of documentation and witness testimony, the Lumbees have fully exhausted the Federal recognition process but to no avail.

Madam Speaker, it is also important to note that the policy of the United States has been terribly inconsistent with regard to the original inhabitants of this land, the first Americans. Our first policy was to do battle with them, kill them. The prevailing opinion at the time was epitomized by General Philip Sheridan in 1869 when he said: ``The only good Indians I ever saw were dead.''

Our next policy was that of assimilation. During this period, the United States tried to make Indians part of American mainstream. And then in the 1950s and the early 1960s, this country's policy was termination, termination meaning Indian tribes were no longer in existence.

Then there was the policy of reinstatement. Since 1978, the tribes now have to seek recognition from the Federal Government, and doing so by a series of administrative regulations that have caused tremendous hardship for the tribes seeking to be recognized by the Federal Government.

Throughout this entire period, the Lumbees were seeking recognition.

While Congress recognized the Lumbee Indians in the 1956 Act, the Lumbees were still deprived of critical services and benefits that were available to other Indian tribes. Since then, the Lumbees have felt like they were second-class citizens. And I agree.

Madam Speaker, it is public record that the Interior Department has found the Lumbee petition for recognition wanting. Apparently, the Lumbees didn't keep sufficient written records of their existence for the period supposedly encompassing roughly from 1760 to 1850 to convince the Department of the Interior. I guess the Department thinks that any group of people who don't have a paper trail to prove their existence aren't worthy of Federal recognition.

While I know it's true that the Bureau of Indian Affairs exists only to create a paper trail, I cannot help but think the Lumbee case is a perfect example of a bureaucratic process run amok.

Madam Speaker, there comes a time when the process for process' sake loses its value. While it might be procedurally nice for the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Department of the Interior to provide a timely review of each group that seeks recognition, sometimes justice requires otherwise. The cost of continuing the acknowledgment process in the case of the Lumbees, for me at least, is just simply too high. And I believe that this is one of the principal roles that Congress has to play.

The time has come for this institution to take action. By our own inaction, Congress will continue to defer to a Federal recognition process that, in the case of the Lumbees, has failed miserably, a Federal recognition process that is also in greater need of reform. And I have introduced legislation to have Congress change the process.

Today, we are considering H.R. 31, a bill to grant Lumbees Federal recognition. After reviewing this bill, there's nothing in here that threatens the economic stream of other federally recognized tribes. Indeed, H.R. 31 contains prohibition of gaming activities.

Madam Speaker, further inaction would lead to more time lost for the Lumbees. For over 100 years, the Lumbees are still seeking recognition. And just prior to the introduction of this bill, we have had to recognize six tribes from Virginia after they waited for 400 years. Does this suggest that the poor Lumbees are to wait for another 300 years, Madam Speaker? I say not.

The time has come to give the Lumbees Federal recognition. I urge my colleagues and Members of this House, do pass H.R. 31 and give the Lumbee Indians at last the recognition they so dearly deserve.

I just want to note for the record, as much as I respect my dear friend, the gentleman from Washington, I remember distinctly we had a hearing on this very issue, and the gentleman who wrote the regulations, the seven criteria that were outlined in terms of what these poor tribes had to go through, admitted before this committee, our committee, even he would not have been able to seek recognition if this is the way the bureaucratic maze had to be conducted on how to recognize an Indian tribe.

So I say this to my good friend from the State of Washington, we are setting precedent here to the effect that we have already recognized all other tribes, the six that we just recognized 30 minutes ago. There was no requirement they had to go back to one of the separate criteria in order to be recognized.

This is the prerogative of the Congress. The Congress can pass this legislation to give recognition to this tribe. And I say this with all due respect to my good friend from Washington.

Mr. Speaker, by direction of the Committee on Rules, I call up House Resolution 490 and ask for its immediate consideration.

Thank you, Mr. Speaker.

For the purpose of debate only, I yield the customary 30 minutes to the gentleman from California (Mr. Dreier). All time yielded during consideration of the rule today is for debate only.

General Leave

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members have 5 legislative days within which to revise and extend their remarks on House Resolution 490.

I yield myself such time as I may consume.

Mr. Speaker, House Resolution 490 provides for consideration of H.R. 31, the Lumbee Recognition Act, under a closed rule, and also for separate consideration of H.R. 1385, the Thomasina E. Jordan Indian Tribes of Virginia Federal Recognition Act of 2009, under a structured rule. Both bills are debatable for 1 hour, each equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking member of the Committee on Natural Resources. The rule for H.R. 1385 makes in order two amendments listed in the Rules Committee report. Each amendment is debatable for 10 minutes. The rule also provides for a motion to recommit with or without instructions on both bills.

Mr. Speaker, the two bills before us today will right several wrongs in our country's history and bring closure to the issue of full Federal recognition of the Lumbee Indians of North Carolina and six Indian tribes in Virginia.

Since the late 1800s, the Lumbee Tribe has been seeking Federal recognition despite the fact that congressional hearings and the Department of the Interior's studies have consistently concluded that the Lumbees are a distinct, self-governing Indian community. In fact, the Lumbees were first recognized as a tribe in 1885 by their home State of North Carolina. In that time, however, various bills to recognize the tribe failed due to opposition from the Department of the Interior.

Most importantly, in 1956, Congress formally acknowledged the Lumbee Tribe with passage of the Lumbee Act. However, it was passed during a period of Federal Indian policy known as the Termination Era. As such, while Congress acknowledged the Lumbee, it effectively ended its relationship with the tribe at the same time by denying them access to the benefits and privileges that accompany Federal recognition.

This termination has subsequently prevented the Lumbees from receiving recognition from the Department of the Interior which has maintained that only Congress can restore that relationship.

A similar injustice has occurred in Virginia. Records exist documenting a relationship between the six Indian tribes, local governments, and the Commonwealth of Virginia for centuries. It has long been established that ancestors of these six tribes resided in Virginia when the first white settlers landed in Jamestown, yet their history is fraught with deliberate discrimination and document destruction.

During the Civil War, most local records and tribal documentation were destroyed in fires at government buildings. At that time, many Indians began adopting Anglo-American names, language, and customs to conceal their tribal identity and ensure their survival.

In addition, Virginia's 1924 Racial Integrity Act--pushed by a noted white supremacist--was responsible for the deliberate and systematic destruction of over 46 years of any records that traced and recorded the existence of vast Indian tribes.

The Department of the Interior has generally not questioned the tribes' ancestry or tribal government status. But despite the wealth of documentation that exists for each tribe, it is not clear whether they could obtain proper documentation to be acknowledged by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. I would add that each of these six tribes was recognized by the Commonwealth of Virginia between 1983 and 1989.

Mr. Speaker, the circumstances surrounding all of these tribes are certainly unique and warrant special attention by Congress. Congress has passed bills recognizing all of these tribes several times, including last session. The Lumbee bill passed with strong bipartisan support while the Virginia Tribes bill passed by voice vote.

I ask my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to once again support these long-overdue bills.

I reserve the balance of my time.

Madam Speaker, I'd like to inquire from my friend and colleague from California if he has any further speakers.

I would yield.

Madam Speaker, I very much appreciate my colleague from California, and I understand that he has concerns about this process and these measures.

I would just like to remind the entire body that the Lumbee bill has, in fact, been before the Congress before. This Congress has acted on it. Despite the claims to the contrary, Congress has traditionally taken the lead in recognizing Indian tribes. In fact, Congress has recognized 530 of the 561 Federally recognized tribes.

Despite the fact that the Department of the Interior established certain administrative procedures in 1978, Congress has stepped in and recognized tribes nine additional times due to extraordinary circumstances, much like this.

I think that this is an appropriate rule, and I think we will have an opportunity to debate the issues during the debate time that has been allotted.

I would ask my colleagues to support the rule, and I urge Members on both sides of the aisle to once again take an important step forward in correcting hundreds of years of injustice which are long overdue.

Madam Speaker, I urge a ``yes'' vote on the rule and on the previous question.

I yield back the balance of my time, and I move the previous question on the resolution.

The previous question was ordered.