Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 4178) to amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to provide for deposit restricted qualified tuition programs, and for other purposes,…
Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 4178) to amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to provide for deposit restricted qualified tuition programs, and for other purposes, as amended.
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days within which to revise and extend their remarks on this legislation and to insert extraneous material thereon.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, today we are taking up H.R. 4178, the Deposit Restricted Qualified Tuition Programs Act of 2009. This
bill establishes an avenue for those wanting to save for the college education of a child, grandchild, or other related individual, to do so in a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, FDIC-insured, deposit.
At the present time, savers can only access the 529 College Savings Program through a securities-based plan, and my bill would not change this avenue. However, following the recent crash of the stock market, many savers saw their accounts drop in value by 50 percent or more, and as such, are reluctant to place any more money in a securities-based plan. Furthermore, many small savers can find investing in securities- based products both complex and intimidating. An FDIC-insured deposit option would provide guaranteed principal return and a guaranteed return on the deposit, all from a commercial bank with which the saver likely has a relationship.
This proposed legislation will help families across the United States save in a safe, sound, and simple manner for their children and grandchildren's college education. This bill does not make any changes to the current 529 College Savings Program nor the current delivery system of the program through a securities-based plan, nor the tax treatment of the 529 plans. It simply adds another 529 College Savings Program delivery option through an FDIC-insured deposit.
This is a bipartisan bill. It has both the chairman and the ranking Republican member of the House Financial Services Committee as cosponsors, among other Republicans and Democrats. At a time when our Nation is concerned about congressional quarreling based on political party affiliation, it is refreshing that both parties can support this bill.
Currently, section 529 programs are established and maintained by the States, who in turn generally contract out with securities firms and others to administer the programs. Investors may go through a State agency to invest in a 529 or, in many cases, through a securities dealer. Many States typically offer a number of investment options or portfolios, including ones that minimize the potential loss of invested principal. The bill is intended to encourage States to offer, among the options they provide investors, deposit-restricted qualified tuition programs.
The bill will not be independent of, nor compete with, the current State programs. In order to qualify as a 529 program under section 529 of the Internal Revenue Code, the program must be established and maintained by a State. Therefore, this program would be a State program, and the laws of the various States would have to be adapted to establish such a program.
In my home State of Missouri, the law which has already been adopted establishes a deposit-only program as separate from the securities- based program. The State would still generally hire a third party to administer the program. The third party could be the same one that manages the securities program or it could be a different third party. I do have a letter of support from our State Treasurer asking that this bill be approved.
H.R. 4178 does not create a State program. The bill is intended to provide States another option to offer investors this deposit- restricted qualified tuition program.
Total 529 savings plans assets were $117 billion at the end of the fourth quarter of 2009, reflecting a 6 percent increase from third quarter 2009 assets of $110.5 billion.
My office asked the FDIC for statistical information on 529 plans and deposit insurance programs. The FDIC provided the following information: ``Currently seven States offer 529 plans that include an option to invest in an insured deposit either as part of a broader investment strategy or as a sole investment. All of these plans are open to nonresidents, although the Ohio plan requires nonresidents to go through a broker to access the plan. Two of the States have offered the insured deposit option since 1998. Three of the States recently added the insured deposit option to their plans. States offering an insured deposit investment option are Arizona, Colorado, Montana, Ohio, Utah, Virginia, and Wisconsin. Information gathered from five of these States indicates that at the end of 2009, there was approximately $670 million invested in FDIC-insured deposit options of their plans. For these States approximately $207 million was added to the FDIC-insured option in 2009. Three of the responding States were able to identify whether the funds invested in their FDIC-insured option represented new money or a transfer of funds from another option in an already established 529 plan. For these States approximately 47 percent of the funds placed in the FDIC-insured option in 2009 were transferred from other 529 options, representing approximately $82 million of the approximately $173 million added to the FDIC-insured option in these States.''
Additionally, the FDIC has already said they will insure 529 deposited accounts at the regular insured rate of $250,000, which we raised. The Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation have completed the review of the budgetary impact of H.R. 4178, the Deposit Restricted Qualified Tuition Programs Act of 2009. They determined that by enacting this legislation, it would affect revenues but estimate that the reduction in revenues would not be significant over the 2010-2020 period. Similarly, implementing the bill could affect direct spending, but the net impact of such spending would be negligible over the next 10 years.
Mr. Speaker, in particular I would like to congratulate the Missouri Bankers Association president, Max Cook, for bringing this needed bill to my attention. The Missouri Bankers Association moved a bill in the Missouri legislature several years ago to allow the FDIC-insured 529 deposit accounts because they thought it would be helpful to Missouri college students and parents who were saving for them.
For the Record, I would like to submit records of support from the Missouri Bankers Association, the Missouri Independent Bankers Association, the Office of the Missouri State Treasurer, the Independent Community Bankers Association, and the American Bankers Association. Although the support letters are written in support of H.R. 3599, H.R. 4178 is identical to H.R. 3599 except for some small technical changes and more cosponsors.
I am pleased this Congress will address H.R. 4178 and move the legislation forward. This is a bill all Members can support. I strongly urge all Members to vote for H.R. 4178.
Missouri Bankers Association,
Jefferson City, MO, Nov. 3, 2009.
Hon. Emanuel Cleaver II,
House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
Dear Representative Cleaver: I am writing today on behalf
of the three hundred twenty-five Missouri Bankers Association
member banks and savings and loans to express our exuberant
support for H.R. 3599, The Deposit Restricted Qualified
Tuition Programs Act of 2009.
As you know, this legislation establishes a means for
thousands and thousands of Americans wanting to save for the
college education of a child, grandchild or other related
person and to do so in a Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC) insured deposit. At the present time,
savers can only access the 529 college savings program
through a securities based plan. This legislation leaves that
in place and adds the FDIC insured deposit option.
After the recent crash of the stock market, many savers saw
their 529 accounts drop in value by as much as fifty percent
or more and as such are reluctant to place any more monies in
a securities based plan. Furthermore, many small savers can
find investing in securities based products both complex and
intimidating. A FDIC insured deposit option would provide
guaranteed principal return and a guaranteed return on the
deposit, all from a commercial bank that the saver likely has
a relationship with. This proposed legislation will help
families across the United States save in a safe, sound and
simple manner for their children and grandchildren's college
education.
We sincerely thank you for your sponsorship of this
legislation and look forward to its swift passage in the
House.
Sincerely,
Max Cook,
President and CEO.
Mr. Speaker, I have no further requests for time, and I yield back the balance of my time.