H.R. 6130House111th Congress (2009-2011)Passed House

Strengthening Medicare Anti-Fraud Measures Act of 2010

Introduced September 15, 2010

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

11 earlier actions
SenateIntro Referral Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

September 23, 2010

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

September 15, 2010

HouseIntro Referral

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E1637)

September 15, 2010

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to House Energy and Commerce

September 15, 2010

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

September 15, 2010

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to House Ways and Means

September 15, 2010

HouseFloor

Mr. Pallone moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

September 22, 2010 • 4:04 PM

HouseFloor

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H6837-6839)

September 22, 2010 • 4:04 PM

HouseFloor

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 6130.

September 22, 2010 • 4:04 PM

HouseFloor

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.(text: CR H6837)

September 22, 2010 • 4:21 PM

HouseFloor

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H6837)

September 22, 2010 • 4:21 PM

HouseFloor

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

September 22, 2010 • 4:21 PM

SenateIntro Referral

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

September 23, 2010

Floor Debate

5 members

What members said about H.R. 6130 on the floor

2 Republicans3 Democrats
Wally Herger
Rep. Wally HergerR-CA-2 · Sep 22, 2010

I reserve the balance of my time. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, there is broad agreement that more needs to be done to combat waste, fraud, and abuse in…

Frank Pallone, Jr.
Rep. Frank Pallone, Jr.D-NJ-6 · Sep 22, 2010

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 6130) to amend title XI of the Social Security Act to expand the permissive exclusion from participation in Federal health care…

Fortney Pete Stark
Rep. Fortney Pete StarkD-CA-13 · Sep 22, 2010

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume and rise in support of H.R. 6130, which strengthens the Medicare Anti-Fraud Measures Act, as you have heard described here. This bipartisan…

Ed Whitfield
Rep. Ed WhitfieldR-KY-1 · Sep 22, 2010

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to support H.R. 6130, a commonsense solution to combating fraud in Medicare. This legislation will provide the Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General with…

John Lewis
Rep. John LewisD-GA-5 · Sep 22, 2010

Mr. Speaker, I want to thank my friend, my colleague, Chairman Stark, for yielding time. Mr. Speaker, we as a Nation have a duty to provide the very best health care to our seniors and our disabled…

Bill Text

3 versions available

Reading Mode
Latest
Referred in SenateIssued September 23, 2010

IIB

111th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. R. 6130

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

September 23, 2010

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

AN ACT

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to expand the permissive exclusion from participation in Federal health care programs to individuals and entities affiliated with sanctioned entities.

1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Strengthening Medicare Anti-Fraud Measures Act of 2010.

2.

Permissive exclusion from Federal health care programs expanded to individuals and entities affiliated with sanctioned entities

Section 1128(b)(15) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320a–7(b)(15)) is amended to read as follows:

(15)

Individuals or entities affiliated with a sanctioned entity

(A)

Any of the following:

(i)

Any individual who—

(I)

is a person with an ownership or control interest (as defined in section 1124(a)(3)) in a sanctioned entity or an affiliated entity of such sanctioned entity (or was a person with such an interest at the time of any of the conduct that formed a basis for the conviction or exclusion described in subparagraph (B)); and

(II)

knows or should know (as defined in section 1128A(i)(7)) (or knew or should have known) of such conduct.

(ii)

Any individual who is an officer or managing employee (as defined in section 1126(b)) of a sanctioned entity or affiliated entity of such sanctioned entity (or was such an officer or managing employee at the time of any of the conduct that formed a basis for the conviction or exclusion described in subparagraph (B)).

(iii)

Any affiliated entity of a sanctioned entity.

(B)

For purposes of this paragraph, the term sanctioned entity means an entity—

(i)

that has been convicted of any offense described in subsection (a) or in paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of this subsection; or

(ii)

that has been excluded from participation under a program under title XVIII or under a State health care program.

(C)
(i)

For purposes of this paragraph, the term affiliated entity means, with respect to a sanctioned entity—

(I)

an entity affiliated with such sanctioned entity; and

(II)

an entity that was so affiliated at the time of any of the conduct that formed the basis for the conviction or exclusion described in subparagraph (B).

(ii)

For purposes of clause (i), an entity shall be treated as affiliated with another entity if—

(I)

one of the entities is a person with an ownership or control interest (as defined in section 1124(a)(3)) in the other entity (or had such an interest at the time of any of the conduct that formed a basis for the conviction or exclusion described in subparagraph (B));

(II)

there is a person with an ownership or control interest (as defined in section 1124(a)(3)) in both entities (or had such an interest at the time of any of the conduct that formed a basis for the conviction or exclusion described in subparagraph (B)); or

(III)

there is a person who is an officer or managing employee (as defined in section 1126(b)) of both entities (or was such an officer or managing employee at the time of any of the conduct that formed a basis for the conviction or exclusion described in subparagraph (B)).

.

3.

Budgetary effects of PAYGO legislation

The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.

Passed the House of Representatives September 22, 2010.

Lorraine C. Miller,

Clerk