H.R. 867 – Reading Mode

111th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 867

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 4, 2009

Mr. Bright (for himself and Mr. Rogers of Alabama) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study to assess the suitability and feasibility of designating certain lands as the Chattahoochee Trace National Heritage Corridor, and for other purposes.

Chattahoochee Trace, Alabama and Georgia

(a)

Definitions

In this section:

(1)

Corridor

The term Corridor means the Chattahoochee Trace National Heritage Corridor.

(2)

Secretary

The term Secretary means the Secretary of the Interior.

(3)

Study area

The term study area means the study area described in subsection (b)(2).

(b)

Study

(1)

In general

The Secretary, in consultation with State historic preservation officers, State historical societies, State tourism offices, and other appropriate organizations or agencies, shall conduct a study to assess the suitability and feasibility of designating the study area as the Chattahoochee Trace National Heritage Corridor.

(2)

Study area

The study area includes—

(A)

the portion of the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin and surrounding areas, as generally depicted on the map entitled Chattahoochee Trace National Heritage Corridor, Alabama/Georgia, numbered T05/80000, and dated July 2007; and

(B)

any other areas in the State of Alabama or Georgia that—

(i)

have heritage aspects that are similar to the areas depicted on the map described in subparagraph (A); and

(ii)

are adjacent to, or in the vicinity of, those areas.

(3)

Requirements

The study shall include analysis, documentation, and determinations on whether the study area—

(A)

has an assemblage of natural, historic, and cultural resources that—

(i)

represent distinctive aspects of the heritage of the United States;

(ii)

are worthy of recognition, conservation, interpretation, and continuing use; and

(iii)

would be best managed—

(I)

through partnerships among public and private entities; and

(II)

by linking diverse and sometimes noncontiguous resources and active communities;

(B)

reflects traditions, customs, beliefs, and folklife that are a valuable part of the story of the United States;

(C)

provides—

(i)

outstanding opportunities to conserve natural, historic, cultural, or scenic features; and

(ii)

outstanding recreational and educational opportunities;

(D)

contains resources that—

(i)

are important to any identified themes of the study area; and

(ii)

retain a degree of integrity capable of supporting interpretation;

(E)

includes residents, business interests, nonprofit organizations, and State and local governments that—

(i)

are involved in the planning of the Corridor;

(ii)

have developed a conceptual financial plan that outlines the roles of all participants in the Corridor, including the Federal Government; and

(iii)

have demonstrated support for the designation of the Corridor;

(F)

has a potential management entity to work in partnership with the individuals and entities described in subparagraph (E) to develop the Corridor while encouraging State and local economic activity; and

(G)

has a conceptual boundary map that is supported by the public.

(c)

Report

Not later than the 3rd fiscal year after the date on which funds are first made available to carry out this section, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate a report that describes—

(1)

the findings of the study; and

(2)

any conclusions and recommendations of the Secretary.