H.Res. 143House111th Congress (2009-2011)Failed

Raising a question of the privileges of the House.

Introduced February 10, 2009

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

5 earlier actions
HouseFloor Latest Action

On motion to table the measure Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 242 - 157, 16 Present (Roll no. 57).

February 10, 2009 • 7:38 PM

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

February 10, 2009

HouseFloor

QUESTION OF THE PRIVILEGES OF THE HOUSE - Mr. Carter rose to a question of the privileges of the House and offered a resolution. The Chair directed the Clerk to report the resolution.

February 10, 2009 • 7:11 PM

HouseFloor

Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H1128-1129; text of measure as introduced: CR H1128)

February 10, 2009 • 7:11 PM

HouseFloor

At the conclusion of the reading of the resolution the Chair announced that the resolution qualified as a question of privilege.

February 10, 2009 • 7:15 PM

HouseFloor

Mr. Crowley moved to table the measure.

February 10, 2009 • 7:16 PM

HouseFloor

On motion to table the measure Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 242 - 157, 16 Present (Roll no. 57).

February 10, 2009 • 7:38 PM

Floor Debate

5 members

What members said about H.Res. 143 on the floor

4 Republicans1 Democrat
John Campbell
Rep. John CampbellR-CA-48 · Mar 5, 2009

Madam Speaker, from February 3, 2009, to March 4, 2009, I missed Roll Call votes 47-96. Unfortunately, I underwent a surgical procedure and was in California recuperating. Had I been here, I would…

Timothy V. Johnson
Rep. Timothy V. JohnsonR-IL-15 · Feb 11, 2009

Madam Speaker, unfortunately last night, February 10, 2009, I was unable to cast my votes on the Motion to Instruct Conferees on H.R. 1, H. Res. 114, H. Res. 60, H. Res. 143, H. Res. 128, and H. Res.…

Michele Bachmann
Rep. Michele BachmannR-MN-6 · Feb 11, 2009

Madam Speaker, I was detained and unable to cast a vote for rollcall vote No. 57, the motion to table the privileged resolution, H. Res. 143. I would have voted ``nay'' on that motion.

John R. Carter
Rep. John R. CarterR-TX-31 · Feb 10, 2009

Mr. Speaker, I rise to a question of the privileges of the House and offer the resolution as noticed. Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.

Joseph Crowley
Rep. Joseph CrowleyD-NY-7 · Feb 10, 2009

Mr. Speaker, I move to lay the resolution on the table.

Bill Text

Latest available legislative text

Reading Mode
Latest
Laid on Table in HouseIssued February 10, 2009

IV

111th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. RES. 143

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 10, 2009

Mr. Carter submitted the following resolution; which was laid on the table

RESOLUTION

Raising a question of the privileges of the House.

Whereas the gentleman from New York, Charles B. Rangel, the fourth most senior Member of the House of Representatives, serves as chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, a position of considerable power and influence within the House of Representatives;

Whereas clause one of rule 23 of the Rules of the House of Representatives provides A Member, Delegate, Resident Commission, officer, or employee of the House shall conduct himself at all times in a manner that shall reflect creditably on the House;

Whereas The New York Times reported on September 5, 2008, that Representative Charles B. Rangel has earned more than $75,000 in rental income from a villa he has owned in the Dominican Republic since 1988, but never reported it on his federal or state tax returns, according to a lawyer for the congressman and documents from the resort.;

Whereas, in an article in the September 5, 2008, edition of The New York Times, his attorney confirmed that Representative Rangel’s annual congressional Financial Disclosure statements failed to disclose the rental income from his resort villa;

Whereas The New York Times reported on September 6, 2008, that Representative Charles B. Rangel paid no interest for more than a decade on a mortgage extended to him to buy a villa at a beachfront resort in the Dominican Republic, according to Mr. Rangel’s lawyer and records from the resort. The loan, which was extended to Mr. Rangel in 1988, was originally to be paid back over seven years at a rate of 10.5 percent. But within two years, interest on the loan was waived for Mr. Rangel.;

Whereas clause 5(a)(2)(A) of House Rule 25 defines a gift as … a gratuity, favor, discount entertainment, hospitality, loan, forbearance, or other item having monetary value and prohibits the acceptance of such gifts except in limited circumstances;

Whereas Representative Rangel’s acceptance of thousands of dollars in interest forgiveness is a violation of the House gift ban;

Whereas Representative Rangel’s failure to disclose the aforementioned gifts and income on his Personal Financial Disclosure Statements violates House rules and Federal law;

Whereas Representative Rangel’s failure to report the aforementioned gifts and income on Federal, State, and local tax returns is a violation of the tax laws of those jurisdictions;

Whereas the Committee on Ways and Means, which Representative Rangel chairs, has jurisdiction over the United States Tax Code;

Whereas the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct first announced on July 31, 2008, that it was reviewing allegations of misconduct by Representative Rangel;

Whereas The House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct announced on September 24, 2008, that it had established an investigative subcommittee in the matter of Representative Rangel;

Whereas The New York Times reported on November 24, 2008, that Congressional records and interviews show that Mr. Rangel was instrumental in preserving a lucrative tax loophole that benefited [Nabors Industries] an oil drilling company last year, while at the same time its chief executive was pledging $1 million to the Charles B. Rangel School of Public Service at C.C.N.Y.;

Whereas the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct announced on December 9, 2008, that it had expanded the jurisdiction of the aforementioned investigative subcommittee to examine the allegations related to Representative Rangel’s involvement with Nabors Industries;

Whereas Roll Call newspaper reported on September 15, 2008, that The inconsistent reports are among myriad errors, discrepancies and unexplained entries on Rangel’s personal disclosure forms over the past eight years that make it almost impossible to get a clear picture of the Ways and Means chairman’s financial dealings.;

Whereas Roll Call newspaper reported on September 16, 2008, that Rangel said he would hire a forensic accountant to review all of his disclosure forms going back 20 years, and to provide a report to the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, which Rangel said will then make public.;

Whereas, nearly five months after Representative Rangel pledged to provide a public forensic accounting of his tax and Federal financial disclosure records, he has failed to do so;

Whereas an editorial in The New York Times on September 15, 2008, stated Mounting embarrassment for taxpayers and Congress makes it imperative that Representative Charles Rangel step aside as chairman of the Ways and Means Committee while his ethical problems are investigated.;

Whereas, on May 24, 2006, then Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi cited high ethical standards in a letter to Representative William Jefferson asking that he resign his seat on the Committee on Ways and Means in light of ongoing investigations into alleged financial impropriety by Representative Jefferson; and

Whereas, by the conduct giving rise to this resolution, Representative Charles B. Rangel has dishonored himself and brought discredit to the House: Now, therefore, be it

That upon adoption of this resolution and pending completion of the investigation into his affairs by the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, Representative Rangel is hereby removed as chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means.