II
Calendar No. 417
111th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. 3457
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
June 4, 2010
Mr. Levin, from the Committee on Armed Services reported, under authority of the order of the Senate of May 28 (legislative day, May 26), 2010, the following original bill; which was read twice and placed on the calendar
A BILL
To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2011 for defense activities of the Department of Energy, and for other purposes.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the
Department of Energy National Security
Act for Fiscal Year 2011
.
Table of contents
The table of contents for this Act is as follows:
Sec. 1. Short title.
Sec. 2. Table of contents.
Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees.
DIVISION C—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS
TITLE XXXI—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS
Subtitle A—National Security Programs Authorizations
Sec. 3101. National Nuclear Security Administration.
Sec. 3102. Defense environmental cleanup.
Sec. 3103. Other defense activities.
Subtitle B—Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations
Sec. 3111. Assessment of adequacy of budget requests with respect to maintaining the nuclear weapons stockpile.
Sec. 3112. Biennial plan on modernization and refurbishment of the nuclear security complex.
Sec. 3113. Future-years defense environmental management plan.
Sec. 3114. Notification of cost overruns for certain Department of Energy projects.
Sec. 3115. Authority to purchase or lease aircraft necessary to support the mission of the National Nuclear Security Administration.
Sec. 3116. Limitation on use of funds for establishment of centers of excellence in countries outside of the former Soviet Union.
Sec. 3117. Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy for appointment of certain scientific, engineering, and technical personnel.
Sec. 3118. Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy to enter into transactions to carry out certain research projects.
Sec. 3119. Extension of deadline for cooperation with the Russian Federation with respect to development of nuclear materials protection, control, and accounting program.
Sec. 3120. Repeal of sunset provision for modification of minor construction threshold for plant projects.
Sec. 3121. Extension of deadline for transfer of parcels of land to be conveyed to Los Alamos County, New Mexico, and held in trust for the Pueblo of San Ildefonso.
Subtitle C—Other Matters
Sec. 3131. Department of Energy energy parks program.
Sec. 3132. Reclassification of certain appropriations for the National Nuclear Security Administration.
TITLE XXXII—DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD
Sec. 3201. Authorization.
TITLE XXXIII—Maritime Administration
Sec. 3301. Maritime Administration.
DIVISION D—Funding Tables
Sec. 4001. Authorization of amounts in funding tables.
TITLE XLVI—Department of Energy National Security Programs
Sec. 4601. Department of Energy national security programs.
Congressional defense committees
For purposes of this Act, the term congressional defense committees has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY AUTHORIZATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS
National Security Programs Authorizations
National Nuclear Security Administration
Authorization of appropriations
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2011 for the activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
Authorization of new plant projects
From funds referred to in subsection (a) that are available for carrying out plant projects, the Secretary of Energy may carry out new plant projects for the National Nuclear Security Administration as follows:
For readiness in technical base and facilities, the following new plant project:
Project 11–D–801, TA55 Reinvestment Project–Phase II, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, $20,000,000.
For site stewardship, the following new plant project:
Project 11–D–601, sanitary effluent reclamation facility expansion, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, $15,000,000.
Defense environmental cleanup
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2011 for defense environmental cleanup activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
Other defense activities
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Energy for fiscal year 2011 for other defense activities in carrying out programs as specified in the funding table in section 4601.
Program Authorizations, Restrictions, and Limitations
Assessment of adequacy of budget requests with respect to maintaining the nuclear weapons stockpile
In general
Section 3255 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2455) is amended to read as follows:
Assessment of adequacy of budget requests with respect to maintaining the nuclear weapons stockpile
Assessment of adequacy of budget requests
In general
The Administrator shall include with the nuclear security budget materials submitted for each fiscal year an assessment by the Administrator of whether the budget materials specified in paragraph (2) provide for funding of the nuclear security complex and programs and activities to be carried out during that fiscal year at a level adequate to support the plans, programs, and activities described in the plan for maintaining the nuclear weapons stockpile required by section 4203 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2523).
Budget materials specified
The budget materials specified in this paragraph are the budget for a fiscal year and the future-years nuclear security program submitted to Congress in relation to that budget under section 3253.
Assessment of risks and implications of inadequate funding
In general
If the Administrator determines under subsection (a) that funding requested for a fiscal year for the nuclear security complex is inadequate to support the plans, programs, and activities referred to in subsection (a), the Administrator shall include with the nuclear security budget materials for that fiscal year an assessment of the risks and implications of inadequate funding with respect to the ability of the nuclear security complex—
to support the annual certification of the nuclear weapons stockpile under section 4203 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act; and
to maintain the long-term safety, security, and reliability of the nuclear weapons stockpile.
Coordination
In making the assessment described in paragraph (1), the Administrator shall coordinate in advance with the Secretary of Defense and the Commander of the United States Strategic Command.
Definitions
In this section:
Budget
The term budget means the budget for a fiscal year that is submitted to Congress by the President under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code.
Nuclear security budget materials
The term nuclear security budget
materials
means the materials submitted to Congress by the
Administrator in support of the budget for a fiscal year.
Nuclear security complex
The term nuclear security complex means the physical facilities, technology, and human capital of the following:
The national security laboratories.
The Kansas City Plant, Kansas City, Missouri.
The Nevada Test Site, Nevada.
The Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina.
The Y-12 National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
The Pantex Plant, Amarillo, Texas.
.
Clerical amendment
The table of contents for the National Nuclear Security Administration Act is amended by striking the item relating to section 3255 and inserting the following new item:
Sec. 3255. Assessment of adequacy of budget requests with respect to maintaining the nuclear weapons stockpile.
.
Biennial plan on modernization and refurbishment of the nuclear security complex
In general
Subtitle A of title XLII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2521 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 4203 the following new section:
Biennial plan on modernization and refurbishment of the nuclear security complex
In general
In each even-numbered year beginning after the date of the enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011, the Secretary of Energy, acting through the Administrator for Nuclear Security, shall include in the plan for maintaining the nuclear weapons stockpile required by section 4203 a plan for the modernization and refurbishment of the nuclear security complex.
Plan design
In general
The plan required by subsection (a) shall be designed to ensure that the nuclear security complex is capable of supporting the following:
Except as provided in paragraph (2), the national security strategy of the United States as set forth in the most recent national security strategy report of the President under section 108 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 404a).
The nuclear posture of the United States as set forth in the most recent Nuclear Posture Review.
Exception
If, at the time the plan is submitted under subsection (a), a national security strategy report has not been submitted to Congress under section 108 of the National Security Act of 1947, the plan required by subsection (a) shall be designed to ensure that the nuclear security complex is capable of supporting the national defense strategy recommended in the report of the most recent Quadrennial Defense Review.
Plan elements
The plan required by subsection (a) shall include the following:
A description of the modernization and refurbishment measures the Secretary determines necessary to meet the requirements of—
the national security strategy of the United States as set forth in the most recent national security strategy report of the President under section 108 of the National Security Act of 1947 or the national defense strategy recommended in the report of the most recent Quadrennial Defense Review, as applicable under subsection (b); and
the Nuclear Posture Review.
A schedule for implementing the measures described in paragraph (1) during the ten years following the date on which the plan for maintaining the nuclear weapons stockpile required by section 4203 and into which the plan required by subsection (a) is incorporated is submitted to Congress under section 4203(c).
An estimate of the annual funds the Administrator determines necessary to carry out the plan required by subsection (a), including a discussion of the criteria, evidence, and strategies on which the estimate is based.
Definitions
In this section:
Nuclear security complex
The term nuclear security complex means the physical facilities, technology, and human capital of the following:
The national security laboratories (as defined in section 3281 of the National Nuclear Security Administration Act (50 U.S.C. 2471)).
The Kansas City Plant, Kansas City, Missouri.
The Nevada Test Site, Nevada.
The Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina.
The Y-12 National Security Complex, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
The Pantex Plant, Amarillo, Texas.
Quadrennial Defense Review
The term Quadrennial Defense Review means the review of the defense programs and policies of the United States that is carried out every four years under section 118 of title 10, United States Code.
.
Clerical amendment
The table of contents for the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4203 the following new item:
Sec. 4203A. Biennial plan on modernization and refurbishment of the nuclear security complex.
.
Future-years defense environmental management plan
In general
Title XLIV of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2581 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 4402 the following new section:
Future-years defense environmental management plan
In general
The Secretary of Energy shall submit to Congress each year, at or about the same time that the President’s budget is submitted to Congress for a fiscal year under section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, a future-years defense environmental management plan that—
reflects the estimated expenditures and proposed appropriations included in that budget for the Department of Energy for environmental management; and
covers a period that includes the fiscal year for which that budget is submitted and not less than the four succeeding fiscal years.
Elements
Each future-years defense environmental management plan required by subsection (a) shall contain the following:
A detailed description of the projects and activities relating to defense environmental management to be carried out during the period covered by the plan at the sites specified in subsection (c) and with respect to the activities specified in subsection (d).
A statement of proposed budget authority, estimated expenditures, and proposed appropriations necessary to support such projects and activities.
With respect to each site specified in subsection (c), the following:
A statement of each milestone included in an enforceable agreement governing cleanup and waste remediation for that site for each fiscal year covered by the plan.
For each such milestone, a statement with respect to whether each such milestone will be met in each such fiscal year.
For any milestone that will not be met, an explanation of why the milestone will not be met and the date by which the milestone is expected to be met.
Sites specified
The sites specified in this subsection are the following:
The Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho.
The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Carlsbad, New Mexico.
The Savannah River Site, Aiken, South Carolina.
The Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
The Hanford Site, Richland, Washington.
Any defense closure site of the Department of Energy.
Any site of the National Nuclear Security Administration.
Activities specified
The activities specified in this subsection are the following:
Program support.
Program direction.
Safeguards and security.
Technology development and deployment.
Federal contributions to the Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund established under section 1801 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2297g).
.
Clerical amendment
The table of contents for the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4402 the following new item:
Sec. 4402A. Future-years defense environmental management plan.
.
Notification of cost overruns for certain Department of Energy projects
In general
Subtitle A of title XLVII of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2741 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
Notification of cost overruns for certain Department of Energy projects
Establishment of cost and schedule baselines
Stockpile life extension projects
In general
The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall establish a cost and schedule baseline for each nuclear stockpile life extension project of the National Nuclear Security Administration.
Per unit cost
The cost baseline developed under subparagraph (A) shall include, with respect to each life extension project, an estimated cost for each warhead in the project.
Notification to congressional defense committees
Not later than 30 days after establishing a cost and schedule baseline under subparagraph (A), the Administrator shall submit the cost and schedule baseline to the congressional defense committees.
Defense-funded construction projects
In general
The Secretary of Energy shall establish a cost and schedule baseline under the project management protocols of the Department of Energy for each construction project carried out by the Department using funds authorized to be appropriated for a fiscal year pursuant to a DOE national security authorization.
Notification to congressional defense committees
Not later than 30 days after establishing a cost and schedule baseline under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall submit the cost and schedule baseline to the congressional defense committees.
Defense environmental management projects
In general
The Secretary shall establish a cost and schedule baseline under the project management protocols of the Department of Energy for each defense environmental management project carried out by the Department pursuant to such protocols.
Notification to congressional defense committees
Not later than 30 days after establishing a cost and schedule baseline under subparagraph (A) for a project with a total cost in excess of $100,000,000, the Secretary shall submit the cost and schedule baseline to the congressional defense committees.
Notification of costs or schedule exceeding baseline
The Administrator or the Secretary, as applicable, shall notify the congressional defense committees not later than 30 days after determining that—
the total cost for a project referred to in paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subsection (a) will exceed an amount that is equal to 125 percent of the cost baseline established under subsection (a) for that project;
the total time required to complete such a project will be longer than 125 percent of the time specified in the schedule baseline established under subsection (a) for that project; and
in the case of a stockpile life extension project referred to in subsection (a)(1), the cost for any warhead in the project will exceed an amount that is equal to 125 percent of the cost baseline established under subsection (a)(1)(B) for each warhead in that project.
Notification of determination with respect to termination or continuation of projects
Not later than 90 days after submitting a notification under subsection (b) with respect to a project, the Administrator or the Secretary, as applicable, shall—
notify the congressional defense committees with respect to whether the project will be terminated or continued; and
if the project will be continued, certify to the congressional defense committees that—
a revised cost and schedule baseline has been established for the project and, in the case of a stockpile life extension project referred to in subsection (a)(1), a revised estimate of the cost for each warhead in the project has been made;
the continuation of the project is necessary to the mission of the Department of Energy and there is no alternative to the project that would meet the requirements of that mission; and
a management structure is in place adequate to manage and control the cost and schedule of the project.
Applicability of requirements to revised cost and schedule baselines
A revised cost and schedule baseline established under subsection (c) shall—
be submitted to the congressional defense committees with the certification submitted under subsection (c)(2); and
be subject to the notification requirements of subsections (b) and (c) in the same manner and to the same extent as a cost and schedule baseline established under subsection (a).
.
Clerical amendment
The table of contents for the Atomic Energy Defense Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 4712 the following new item:
Sec. 4713. Notification of cost overruns for certain Department of Energy projects.
.
Authority to purchase or lease aircraft necessary to support the mission of the National Nuclear Security Administration
The Administrator for Nuclear Security may obligate and expend amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 3101 or amounts otherwise made available to the National Nuclear Security Administration for any fiscal year before fiscal year 2012 and available for obligation to purchase or lease aircraft necessary to support the mission of the Administration.
Limitation on use of funds for establishment of centers of excellence in countries outside of the former Soviet Union
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by section 3101 and made available by the funding table in section 4501 for defense nuclear nonproliferation activities may be obligated or expended to establish a center of excellence in a country that is not a state of the former Soviet Union until the date that is 15 days after the date on which the Administrator for Nuclear Security submits to the congressional defense committees a report that includes the following:
An identification of the country in which the center will be located.
A description of the purpose for which the center will be established.
The agreement under which the center will operate.
A funding plan for the center, including—
the amount of funds to be provided by the government of the country in which the center will be located; and
the percentage of the total cost of establishing and operating the center the funds described in subparagraph (A) will cover.
Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy for appointment of certain scientific, engineering, and technical personnel
Section 4601(c)(1) of the Atomic Energy
Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2701(c)(1)) is amended by striking September 30,
2011
and inserting September 30, 2016
.
Extension of authority of Secretary of Energy to enter into transactions to carry out certain research projects
Section 646(g)(10) of the Department of
Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7256(g)(10)) is amended by striking
September 30, 2010
and inserting September 30,
2015
.
Extension of deadline for cooperation with the Russian Federation with respect to development of nuclear materials protection, control, and accounting program
Section 3156(b)(1) of
the Bob Stump National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (50
U.S.C. 2343(b)(1)) is amended by striking January 1, 2013
and
inserting January 1, 2017
.
Repeal of sunset provision for modification of minor construction threshold for plant projects
Section 3118 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2709) is amended—
by striking subsection (b);
by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (b); and
in subsection
(b), as so redesignated, by striking during fiscal year
2010
.
Extension of deadline for transfer of parcels of land to be conveyed to Los Alamos County, New Mexico, and held in trust for the Pueblo of San Ildefonso
Section 632 of the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1998 (42 U.S.C. 2391 note) is amended—
in subsection
(d)(2), by striking November 26, 2012
and inserting
September 30, 2022
; and
in subsection
(g)(3)(B), by striking November 26, 2012
and inserting
September 30, 2022
.
Other Matters
Department of Energy energy parks program
In general
The Secretary of Energy may establish a program to permit the establishment of energy parks on former defense nuclear facilities.
Objectives
The objectives for establishing energy parks pursuant to subsection (a) are the following:
To provide locations to carry out a broad range of projects relating to the development and deployment of energy technologies and related advanced manufacturing technologies.
To provide locations for the implementation of pilot programs and demonstration projects for new and developing energy technologies and related advanced manufacturing technologies.
To set a national example for the development and deployment of energy technologies and related advanced manufacturing technologies in a manner that will promote energy security, energy sector employment, and energy independence.
To create a business environment that encourages collaboration and interaction between the public and private sectors.
Consultation
In establishing an energy park pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with—
the local government with jurisdiction over the land on which the energy park will be located;
the local governments of adjacent areas; and
any community reuse organization recognized by the Secretary at the former defense nuclear facility on which the energy park will be located.
Report required
Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report on the implementation of the program under subsection (a). The report shall include such recommendations for additional legislative actions as the Secretary considers appropriate to facilitate the development of energy parks on former defense nuclear facilities.
Defense nuclear facility defined
In this section, the term defense nuclear facility has the meaning given the term Department of Energy defense nuclear facility in section 318 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286g).
Reclassification of certain appropriations for the National Nuclear Security Administration
Fiscal year 2009 appropriations
The matter under the heading
weapons activities
under the
heading National Nuclear Security Administration
under the heading Atomic Energy Defense Activities
under the
heading Department of Energy
under title III of
division C of the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111–8; 123 Stat.
621) is amended by striking the 09–D–007 LANSCE Refurbishment,
PED,
and inserting capital equipment acquisition, installation,
and associated design funds for LANSCE,
.
Fiscal year 2010 appropriations
The amount appropriated under the heading
weapons activities
under the
heading National Nuclear Security Administration
under the heading Atomic Energy Defense Activities
under the
heading Department of Energy
under title III of
the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010
(Public Law 111–85; 123 Stat. 2866) and made available for LANSCE Reinvestment,
PED, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, shall be made
available instead for capital equipment acquisition, installation, and
associated design funds for LANSCE, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos,
New Mexico.
DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD
Authorization
There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2011, $33,640,000 for the operation of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board under chapter 21 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2286 et seq.).
Maritime Administration
Maritime Administration
Section 109 of title 49, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
Maritime Administration
Organization
The Maritime Administration is an administration in the Department of Transportation.
Maritime administrator
The head of the Maritime Administration is the Maritime Administrator, who is appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.—The Administrator shall report directly to the Secretary of Transportation and carry out the duties prescribed by the Secretary.
Deputy maritime administrator
The Maritime Administration shall have a Deputy Maritime Administrator, who is appointed in the competitive service by the Secretary, after consultation with the Administrator. The Deputy Administrator shall carry out the duties prescribed by the Administrator. The Deputy Administrator shall be Acting Administrator during the absence or disability of the Administrator and, unless the Secretary designates another individual, during a vacancy in the office of Administrator.
Duties and powers vested in secretary
All duties and powers of the Maritime Administration are vested in the Secretary.
Regional offices
The Maritime Administration shall have regional offices for the Atlantic, Gulf, Great Lakes, and Pacific port ranges, and may have other regional offices as necessary. The Secretary shall appoint a qualified individual as Director of each regional office. The Secretary shall carry out appropriate activities and programs of the Maritime Administration through the regional offices.
Interagency and industry relations
The Secretary shall establish and maintain liaison with other agencies, and with representative trade organizations throughout the United States, concerned with the transportation of commodities by water in the export and import foreign commerce of the United States, for the purpose of securing preference to vessels of the United States for the transportation of those commodities.
Detailing officers from armed forces
To assist the Secretary in carrying out duties and powers relating to the Maritime Administration, not more than five officers of the armed forces may be detailed to the Secretary at any one time, in addition to details authorized by any other law. During the period of a detail, the Secretary shall pay the officer an amount that, when added to the officer's pay and allowances as an officer in the armed forces, makes the officer's total pay and allowances equal to the amount that would be paid to an individual performing work the Secretary considers to be of similar importance, difficulty, and responsibility as that performed by the officer during the detail.
Contracts, cooperative agreements, and audits
Contracts and cooperative agreements
In the same manner that a private corporation may make a contract within the scope of its authority under its charter, the Secretary may make contracts and cooperative agreements for the United States Government and disburse amounts to—
carry out the Secretary's duties and powers under this section, subtitle V of title 46, and all other Maritime Administration programs; and
protect, preserve, and improve collateral held by the Secretary to secure indebtedness.
Audits
The financial transactions of the Secretary under paragraph (1) shall be audited by the Comptroller General. The Comptroller General shall allow credit for an expenditure shown to be necessary because of the nature of the business activities authorized by this section or subtitle V of title 46. At least once a year, the Comptroller General shall report to Congress any departure by the Secretary from this section or subtitle V of title 46.
Grant administrative expenses
Except as otherwise provided by law, the administrative and related expenses for the administration of any grant programs by the Maritime Administrator may not exceed 3 percent.
Authorization of appropriations
In general
Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, there are authorized to be appropriated such amounts as may be necessary to carry out the duties and powers of the Secretary relating to the Maritime Administration.
Limitations
Only those amounts specifically authorized by law may be appropriated for the use of the Maritime Administration for—
acquisition, construction, or reconstruction of vessels;
construction-differential subsidies incident to the construction, reconstruction, or reconditioning of vessels;
costs of national defense features;
payments of obligations incurred for operating-differential subsidies;
expenses necessary for research and development activities, including reimbursement of the Vessel Operations Revolving Fund for losses resulting from expenses of experimental vessel operations;
the Vessel Operations Revolving Fund;
National Defense Reserve Fleet expenses;
expenses necessary to carry out part B of subtitle V of title 46; and
other operations and training expenses related to the development of waterborne transportation systems, the use of waterborne transportation systems, and general administration.
Training vessels
Amounts may not be appropriated for the purchase or construction of training vessels for State maritime academies unless the Secretary has approved a plan for sharing training vessels between State maritime academies.
.
| TITLE XLVI—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS |
| SEC. 4601. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS. |
| DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY NATIONAL SECURITY
PROGRAMS (In Thousands of Dollars) |
|||
| Program | FY
2011 Request | Senate Change | Senate Authorized |
| Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability | |||
| Electricity Delivery & Energy Reliability | |||
| Infrastructure security & energy restoration | 6,188 | –6,188 | 0 |
| Weapons Activities | |||
| Directed stockpile work | |||
| Life extension programs | |||
| W76 Life extension program | 249,463 | –15,000 | 234,463 |
| Total, Life extension programs | 249,463 | –15,000 | 234,463 |
| Stockpile systems | |||
| B61 Stockpile systems | 317,136 | 317,136 | |
| W76 Stockpile systems | 64,521 | 64,521 | |
| W78 Stockpile systems | 85,898 | 85,898 | |
| W80 Stockpile systems | 34,193 | 34,193 | |
| B83 Stockpile systems | 39,349 | 39,349 | |
| W87 Stockpile systems | 62,603 | 62,603 | |
| W88 Stockpile systems | 45,666 | 45,666 | |
| Total, Stockpile systems | 649,366 | 0 | 649,366 |
| Weapons dismantlement and disposition | |||
| Operations and maintenance | 58,025 | 58,025 | |
| Total, Weapons dismantlement and disposition | 58,025 | 0 | 58,025 |
| Stockpile services | |||
| Production support | 309,761 | 309,761 | |
| Research and development support | 38,582 | 38,582 | |
| R&D certification and safety | 209,053 | 209,053 | |
| Management, technology, and production | 193,811 | 10,000 | 203,811 |
| Plutonium infrastructure sustainment | 190,318 | –20,000 | 170,318 |
| Total, Stockpile services | 941,525 | –10,000 | 931,525 |
| Total, Directed stockpile work | 1,898,379 | –25,000 | 1,873,379 |
| Campaigns: | |||
| Science campaign | |||
| Advanced certification | 76,972 | 76,972 | |
| Primary assessment technologies | 85,723 | 85,723 | |
| Dynamic materials properties | 96,984 | 96,984 | |
| Advanced radiography | 23,594 | 23,594 | |
| Secondary assessment technologies | 81,949 | 81,949 | |
| Total, Science campaign | 365,222 | 0 | 365,222 |
| Engineering campaign | |||
| Enhanced surety | 42,429 | 42,429 | |
| Weapon systems engineering assessment technology | 13,530 | 13,530 | |
| Nuclear survivability | 19,786 | 19,786 | |
| Enhanced surveillance | 66,175 | 66,175 | |
| Total, Engineering campaign | 141,920 | 0 | 141,920 |
| Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high yield campaign | |||
| Ignition | 109,506 | 109,506 | |
| NIF diagnostics, cryogenics and experimental support | 102,649 | 3,000 | 105,649 |
| Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion | 5,000 | 5,000 | |
| Joint program in high energy density laboratory plasmas | 4,000 | 4,000 | |
| Facility operations and target production | 260,393 | 260,393 | |
| Total, Inertial confinement fusion and high yield campaign | 481,548 | 3,000 | 484,548 |
| Advanced simulation and computing campaign | 615,748 | 615,748 | |
| Readiness Campaign | |||
| Stockpile readiness | 18,941 | 18,941 | |
| High explosives and weapon operations | 3,000 | 3,000 | |
| Nonnuclear readiness | 21,864 | 21,864 | |
| Tritium readiness | 50,187 | –5,000 | 45,187 |
| Advanced design and production technologies | 18,100 | 18,100 | |
| Total, Readiness campaign | 112,092 | –5,000 | 107,092 |
| Total, Campaigns | 1,716,530 | –2,000 | 1,714,530 |
| Readiness in technical base and facilities (RTBF) | |||
| Operations of facilities | |||
| Operations of facilities | 1,257,991 | 0 | 1,257,991 |
| Kansas City Plant-KCRIMS | –30,000 | –30,000 | |
| Pantex | 10,000 | 10,000 | |
| Y–12 | 10,000 | 10,000 | |
| Los Alamos National Lab PF–4 | 10,000 | 10,000 | |
| Total, Operations of facilities | 1,257,991 | 0 | 1,257,991 |
| Program readiness | 69,309 | 69,309 | |
| Material recycle and recovery | 70,429 | 70,429 | |
| Containers | 27,992 | 27,992 | |
| Storage | 24,233 | 24,233 | |
| Subtotal, Readiness in technical base and facilities (RTBF) | 1,449,954 | 0 | 1,449,954 |
| Construction: | |||
| 11–D–801, TA–55 Reinvestment project II, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM | 20,000 | 20,000 | |
| 09–D–107, LANSCE Refurbishment, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM | 20,000 | 20,000 | |
| 08–D–802, High explosive Pressing Facility, Pantex Plant, Amarillo, TX | 30,000 | 10,000 | 40,000 |
| 07–D–140, Project engineering and design (PED), various locations | 5,000 | 5,000 | |
| 06–D–140, Project engineering and design (PED), various locations | 4,000 | 4,000 | |
| 06–D–141, Project engineering & design (PED), Uranium Processing Facility, Y–12 National Security Complex, Oakridge, TN | 115,016 | 115,016 | |
| 04–D–125, Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Facility replacement project, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM | 225,000 | 225,000 | |
| Total, Construction | 399,016 | 30,000 | 429,016 |
| Total, Readiness in technical base and facilities | 1,848,970 | 30,000 | 1,878,970 |
| Secure transportation asset | |||
| Operation and equipment | 149,018 | 149,018 | |
| Program direction | 99,027 | 99,027 | |
| Total, Secure transportation asset | 248,045 | 0 | 248,045 |
| Nuclear counterterrorism incident response | 233,134 | 233,134 | |
| Facilities and infrastructure recapitalization program | |||
| Operations and maintenance: | |||
| Operations and maintenance | 94,000 | 25,000 | 119,000 |
| Total, Operations and maintenance | 94,000 | 25,000 | 119,000 |
| Total, Facilities and infrastructure recapitalization program | 94,000 | 25,000 | 119,000 |
| Site stewardship | |||
| Operations of facilities | |||
| Operations and maintenance | 90,478 | 90,478 | |
| Total, Operations of facilities | 90,478 | 0 | 90,478 |
| Construction | |||
| 11–D–601, Sanitary effluent reclamation facility, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM | 15,000 | 15,000 | |
| Total, Construction | 15,000 | 0 | 15,000 |
| Total, Site stewardship | 105,478 | 0 | 105,478 |
| Safeguards and security | |||
| Defense nuclear security | |||
| Operations and maintenance: | |||
| Operations and maintenance | 667,954 | 667,954 | |
| Total, Operations and maintenance | 667,954 | 0 | 667,954 |
| Construction: | |||
| 08–D–701, Nuclear materials safety and security upgrade project, phase II, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM | 52,000 | 52,000 | |
| Total, Construction | 52,000 | 0 | 52,000 |
| Total, Defense nuclear security | 719,954 | 0 | 719,954 |
| Cyber security | 124,345 | 124,345 | |
| Total, Safeguards and security | 844,299 | 0 | 844,299 |
| Science, technology and engineering capability | 20,000 | 20,000 | |
| Subtotal, Weapons activities | 7,008,835 | 28,000 | 7,036,835 |
| Adjustments | |||
| Use of prior year balances | 0 | –21,812 | –21,812 |
| Total, Adjustments | 0 | –21,812 | –21,812 |
| Total, Weapons Activities | 7,008,835 | 6,188 | 7,015,023 |
| Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation | |||
| Nonproliferation and verification R&D | |||
| Operations and maintenance: | |||
| Operations and maintenance | 351,568 | 8,000 | 359,568 |
| Total, Operations and maintenance | 351,568 | 8,000 | 359,568 |
| Total, Nonproliferation & verification R&D | 351,568 | 8,000 | 359,568 |
| Nonproliferation and international security | 155,930 | –4,000 | 151,930 |
| GIPP | [–4,000] | ||
| International nuclear materials protection and cooperation | 590,118 | 20,000 | 610,118 |
| Megaports | [20,000] | ||
| Fissile materials disposition | |||
| U.S. surplus fissile materials disposition | |||
| Operations and maintenance: | |||
| U.S. plutonium disposition | 278,940 | 20,000 | 298,940 |
| U.S. uranium disposition | 25,985 | 25,985 | |
| Total, Operations and maintenance | 304,925 | 20,000 | 324,925 |
| Construction: | |||
| 99–D–143, Mixed oxide fuel fabrication facility, Savannah River Site, SC | 475,788 | 475,788 | |
| 99–D–141–01, Pit disassembly and conversion facility, Savannah River Site, SC | 80,000 | –40,000 | 40,000 |
| 99–D–141–02, Waste solidification building, Savannah River Site, SC | 57,000 | 57,000 | |
| Total, Construction | 612,788 | –40,000 | 572,788 |
| Total, U.S. surplus fissile materials disposition | 917,713 | –20,000 | 897,713 |
| Russian surplus materials disposition | 113,000 | 113,000 | |
| Total, Fissile materials disposition | 1,030,713 | –20,000 | 1,010,713 |
| Global threat reduction initiative | 558,838 | –4,000 | 554,838 |
| Gap material | [–4,000] | ||
| Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation | 2,687,167 | 0 | 2,687,167 |
| Use of prior year balances | 0 | 0 | |
| Total, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation | 2,687,167 | 0 | 2,687,167 |
| Naval Reactors | |||
| Naval reactors development | |||
| Operations and maintenance | |||
| Operations and maintenance | 997,886 | 997,886 | |
| Total, Operations and maintenance | 997,886 | 0 | 997,886 |
| Construction: | |||
| 10-D–903, Security upgrades, KAPL | 400 | 400 | |
| 10-D–904, NRF infrastructure upgrades, Idaho | 500 | 500 | |
| 09–D–902, NRF Office Building #2 ECC Upgrade, Idaho | 4,000 | 4,000 | |
| 08–D–190 Expended Core Facility M–290 recovering discharge station, Naval Reactor Facility, ID | 25,000 | 25,000 | |
| 07–D–190 Materials research technology complex (MRTC) | 2,700 | 2,700 | |
| Total, Construction | 32,600 | 0 | 32,600 |
| Total, Naval reactors development | 1,030,486 | 0 | 1,030,486 |
| Program direction | 40,000 | 40,000 | |
| Total, Naval Reactors | 1,070,486 | 0 | 1,070,486 |
| Office Of The Administrator | |||
| Office of the administrator | 448,267 | 448,267 | |
| Subtotal, Office of the Administrator | 448,267 | 0 | 448,267 |
| Adjustments: | |||
| Use of prior year balances | 0 | 0 | |
| Subtotal, Office of the Administrator | 448,267 | 0 | 448,267 |
| Total, Office Of The Administrator | 448,267 | 0 | 448,267 |
| Defense Environmental Cleanup | |||
| Closure sites: | |||
| Closure sites administration | 6,375 | 6,375 | |
| Total, Closure sites | 6,375 | 0 | 6,375 |
| Central plateau remediation | |||
| Nuclear material stabilization and disposition PFP | 64,969 | 64,969 | |
| SNF stabilization and disposition | 94,016 | 94,016 | |
| Solid waste stabilization and disposition 2035 | 135,026 | 135,026 | |
| Soil and water remediation—groundwater vadose zone 2035 | 129,629 | 129,629 | |
| Total, Central plateau remediation | 423,640 | 0 | 423,640 |
| River corridor and other cleanup operations | |||
| Nuclear facility D&D—remainder of Hanford 2035 | 139,641 | 139,641 | |
| Nuclear facility D&D river corridor closure project | 386,028 | 386,028 | |
| Richland community and regulatory support | 19,620 | 19,620 | |
| Total, River corridor & other cleanup operations | 545,289 | 0 | 545,289 |
| Total, Hanford site | 968,929 | 0 | 968,929 |
| Idaho National Laboratory: | |||
| SNF stabilization and disposition—2012 | 43,337 | 43,337 | |
| Solid waste stabilization and disposition | 172,631 | 172,631 | |
| Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition | 111,773 | 111,773 | |
| Construction: | |||
| 06–D–401 Sodium bearing waste treatment project, Idaho | 6,500 | 6,500 | |
| Total, Construction | 6,500 | 0 | 6,500 |
| Soil and water remediation—2012 | 68,959 | 68,959 | |
| Idaho community and regulatory support | 3,900 | 3,900 | |
| Total, Idaho National Laboratory | 407,100 | 0 | 407,100 |
| NNSA sites | |||
| Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory | 635 | 635 | |
| NNSA Service Center/SPRU | 15,547 | 15,547 | |
| Nevada | 66,000 | 66,000 | |
| California site support | 238 | 238 | |
| Los Alamos National Laboratory | 196,953 | 196,953 | |
| Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites | 279,373 | 0 | 279,373 |
| Oak Ridge Reservation: | |||
| Building 3019 | 50,001 | 50,001 | |
| Nuclear facility D & D ORNL | 58,101 | 58,101 | |
| Nuclear facility D & D Y–12 | 63,775 | 63,775 | |
| Nuclear facility D & D, E. Tennessee technology park | 87 | 87 | |
| OR reservation community and regulatory support | 6,409 | 6,409 | |
| Solid waste stabilization and disposition—2012 | 23,925 | 23,925 | |
| Total, Oak Ridge Reservation | 202,298 | 0 | 202,298 |
| Office of River Protection: | |||
| Waste treatment and immobilization plant | |||
| Construction: | |||
| 01–D–416, Waste treatment and immobilization plant, Hanford, WA | |||
| 01–D–16 A-D, facilities | 370,178 | 370,178 | |
| 01–D–16E, Pretreatment facility | 370,000 | 370,000 | |
| Total, Construction | 740,178 | 0 | 740,178 |
| Total, Waste treatment and immobilization plant | 740,178 | 0 | 740,178 |
| Tank farm activities | |||
| Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition | 418,000 | 418,000 | |
| Total, Tank farm activities | 418,000 | 0 | 418,000 |
| Total, Office of River protection | 1,158,178 | 0 | 1,158,178 |
| Cleanup and waste disposition | |||
| Savannah River Community and regulatory support | 18,330 | 18,330 | |
| Total, Cleanup and waste disposition | 18,330 | 0 | 18,330 |
| Site risk management operations | |||
| Radioactive liquid tank waste | |||
| NM stabilization and disposition | 370,042 | 370,042 | |
| SNF stabilization and disposition | 23,194 | 23,194 | |
| Total, Radioactive liquid tank waste | 393,236 | 0 | 393,236 |
| Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization | |||
| Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition | 549,282 | 549,282 | |
| Construction: | |||
| 05–D–405 Salt waste processing facility, Savannah River | 256,951 | 256,951 | |
| Total, Construction | 256,951 | 0 | 256,951 |
| Total, Radioactive liquid tank waste | 806,233 | 0 | 806,233 |
| Total, Site risk management operations | 1,199,469 | 0 | 1,199,469 |
| Total, Savannah River site | 1,217,799 | 0 | 1,217,799 |
| Waste Isolation Pilot Plant | |||
| Waste isolation pilot plant | 134,999 | 134,999 | |
| Central characterization project | 25,797 | 25,797 | |
| Transportation | 30,678 | 30,678 | |
| Community and regulatory support | 28,771 | 28,771 | |
| Total, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant | 220,245 | 0 | 220,245 |
| Program direction | 323,825 | 323,825 | |
| Program support | 25,143 | 25,143 | |
| Safeguards and Security: | |||
| Oak Ridge Reservation | 17,300 | 17,300 | |
| Paducah | 8,496 | 8,496 | |
| Portsmouth | 15,979 | 15,979 | |
| Richland/Hanford Site | 69,234 | 69,234 | |
| Savannah River Site | 132,064 | 132,064 | |
| Waste Isolation Pilot Project | 4,755 | 4,755 | |
| West Valley | 1,926 | 1,926 | |
| Total, Safeguards and Security | 249,754 | 0 | 249,754 |
| Technology development | 32,320 | 32,320 | |
| Uranium enrichment D&D fund contribution | 496,700 | 496,700 | |
| Subtotal, Defense environmental cleanup | 5,588,039 | 0 | 5,588,039 |
| Total, Defense Environmental Cleanup | 5,588,039 | 0 | 5,588,039 |
| Other Defense Activities | |||
| Health, safety and security | |||
| Health, safety and security | 356,471 | 356,471 | |
| Program direction | 107,740 | 107,740 | |
| Total, Health, safety and security | 464,211 | 0 | 464,211 |
| Office of Legacy Management | |||
| Legacy management | 176,122 | 176,122 | |
| Program direction | 12,504 | 12,504 | |
| Total, Office of Legacy Management | 188,626 | 0 | 188,626 |
| Defense-related activities | |||
| Infrastructure | |||
| Idaho sitewide safeguards and security | 88,200 | 88,200 | |
| Total, Infrastructure | 88,200 | 0 | 88,200 |
| Total, Defense-related activities | 88,200 | 0 | 88,200 |
| Defense related administrative support | 118,836 | 118,836 | |
| Acquisitions workforce improvement | 11,892 | 11,892 | |
| Office of hearings and appeals | 6,444 | 6,444 | |
| Total, Other Defense Activities | 878,209 | 0 | 878,209 |
| Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities | 17,681,003 | 6,188 | 17,687,191 |
| Total, Department of Energy | 17,687,191 | 0 | 17,687,191 |
June 4, 2010
Read twice and placed on the calendar