A resolution commemorating the life of the late Cynthia DeLores Tucker.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.

Mr. President, we all went home over this recess--most of us did--and we heard very clear messages. At least I can tell you I did. The messages are: Address the problems that face us and reach out a hand across the aisle and do it together. Pretty simple.

Today we have a chance to do that. Today we have a very clear chance to do that and to lift the spirits of the American people. The bill we will be voting on--actually we are voting to take it up, in essence; we need 60 votes to do that, unfortunately, because there is a filibuster again on this--is a very simple, straightforward jobs bill.

It has four parts. Two relate to tax breaks for business for doing good things. One is buying new equipment and getting a break on the expensing. The other is hiring people who have been unemployed for 60 days or more. The other two pieces involve the extension of the highway trust fund and the Build America Bond program, and that relates to building our infrastructure. In the case of the highway trust fund, of course, it does fund transportation of all kinds: transit systems as well as highways, bridges, roads. Very important.

Build America Bonds is a way to help the States issue bonds that they have voter approval to do, and helps them with the interest rate. In California, that program--Build America Bonds--resulted in billions of dollars of bonding to build roads and schools and all kinds of important necessities for my people back home.

So we have four things before us in one package: two tax breaks very important to businesses and two very important infrastructure measures.

I want to have printed in the Record--and I ask unanimous consent to do so--a very important letter sent to us by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, the American Road and Transportation Builders Association, the Associated General Contractors of America, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Laborers International Union, and the International Union of Operating Engineers.

I have to say I have worked with these organizations over the break to talk to them about what will happen if we vote this measure down and we do not continue our funding through the highway trust fund. They are very clear, and I am going to give you the information they told me about job losses that will happen if we do not act today.

As I read this list, I hope, Mr. President, you realize these organizations are Republican organizations, Democratic organizations, bipartisan organizations. They have Independents, Republicans, and Democrats. The Chamber of Commerce, we all know they

tend to go with the Republican side most of the time. They want a ``yes'' vote. The general contractors, they generally go--generally go--with the Republicans. They want a ``yes'' vote. Then you look at the unions, the workers, they generally go with the Democrats. They want a ``yes'' vote.

And why? Because they are fearing if we do not act, we are going to hurt business and we are going to hurt the working people of this country. They say:

Passage of [this] legislation . . . will provide much

needed certainty and stability within the States, local

transportation authorities and transit agencies to make long-

term capital commitments and plan for a full season of work.

. . . Without an extension that . . . stabilizes the Highway

Trust Fund--

Which, by the way, this does--

the transportation construction industry will continue to

decline and much needed transportation investments cannot be

made.

I want to repeat that. This is not a quote from a Senator, Republican or Democratic or Independent. This is a quote from the Republicans and the Democrats and the Independents who are represented by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, the American Road and Transportation Builders Association, the Associated General Contractors of America, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Laborers International Union, and the International Union of Operating Engineers. They are telling us this is critical. They say: ``The Nation needs these investments now.'' They put the word ``now'' in bold letters. Not tomorrow, not next week but now.

We urge the Senate to act to move this critical legislation. It is critically important, given the urgency of the investment in jobs issues that these provisions be included in the Senate jobs bill and they are.

Today, we have a chance to have a fresh start by voting for cloture-- in other words, ending a filibuster--on this package of four bills, two tax breaks for businesses and two very important investments in our infrastructure.

I wish to give the numbers that were given to us by the American Association of State Highway Officials.

We have asked the State highway officials in our States--and I see Senator Casey here; in his State--we have asked them all to give us an idea of the jobs we would lose if we do not make that $20 billion transfer into the highway trust fund that is included in the Reid jobs bill. In Arizona, it is estimated we would see 6,800 jobs lost; in California, 31,000; in Florida, 17,000--I am rounding these off--in Illinois, 11,000; Iowa, 4,000; Maine, 1,400; Massachusetts, 5,300; Michigan, 9,300; Missouri, 7,800; Nevada, 2,590, to be exact; Ohio, 12,000 jobs--let me repeat, 12,000 jobs would be lost in Ohio--in South Carolina, 5,000; Texas, 29,000-plus jobs would be lost if we don't get moving on this bill; in Utah, 2,600; and in Wisconsin, 6,500.

I just picked these States out for purposes of explanation.

If we fail to pass an extension, period, we would lose 1 million jobs in this great Nation.

So there are two scenarios. One is if we fail to extend the program, this is what will happen. The States will lose jobs immediately. If we don't authorize this program, we will lose 1 million jobs. Without the transfer, this highway trust fund will not have any funds by the summer. Some people say June. Some people say August. I ask my colleagues who may be watching this debate: Please consider what it will be like when you have your contractors come and tell you they have had to stop a project in midstream--a highway, a bike path, a freeway, fixing a bridge that is perhaps in danger of collapsing.

So I will tell my colleagues I don't think we have a choice.

I ask unanimous consent to have printed in the Record the estimated job loss if there is no extension whatsoever of the highway trust fund.

Mr. President, this is a pretty straightforward vote for us today. In essence, everything in this jobs bill is bipartisan. Everything in it is bipartisan. I can tell my colleagues right now that my Republican colleagues tell me they want to reauthorize this highway trust fund through the end of the year. They want to make sure the trust fund has the dollars it needs. Well, then, what is the reason why one might not vote to end the filibuster?

Some say we didn't get everything we wanted in this bill. Well, neither did I. There are many things I would like to see in a jobs bill, believe me. I didn't get them in this bill because Senator Reid said we have to go slowly. We are going to have these smaller packages. They are more understandable. I think he has a point. But each of us could write our own jobs bill. Senator McConnell could write his. I could write mine. The fact is, what Senator Reid has done is to take four provisions that are bipartisan in nature and put them in this jobs package.

Frankly, I don't know how anyone could face their constituents in a time of unemployment that we are seeing now. Even though we have certainly gone from bleeding--600,000 jobs a month, 700,000 jobs a month--to very few in comparison, we have a long way to go. Building the infrastructure of this Nation is done by the private sector. We hear the Republicans on the other side say: Well, we want this to be built by the private sector. That is how this program works.

I ask unanimous consent to have printed in the Record at this time a notice that went out from the Missouri Department of Transportation, if I may.

Mr. President, I wish my colleagues to hear this because it is very shocking, and it could happen in Delaware, California, Pennsylvania, any of our States. It is a special notice to contractors, dated February 19:

All bidders take note. Unless the Federal Government takes

the necessary steps to ensure the availability of Federal

funds for the remaining fiscal year prior to 12 p.m. on

February 25, the scheduled February 26 bid opening will be

postponed or withdrawn until further notice.

This is real. This is real. I know this is a political season. I know firsthand it is a political season. But there comes a time when we have to put politics aside for 5 minutes--I would say 15 minutes--when we vote, put it aside for 15 minutes and let's not have a circumstance where we hear from the Missouri Department of Transportation that they are about to shut down their bidding process.

I also ask unanimous consent to have printed in the Record a letter from the American Highway Users Alliance.

Mr. President, it is signed by their CEO and President. They are asking us to support this bill. Here is what he says:

Our members represent millions of motorists, RVers,

motorcyclists, as well as hundreds of truck and bus

companies. It is critical that the Highway Trust Fund remain

solvent, that the expired bill be extended through the

current fiscal year, and that the rescissions that took

affect in September be repealed.

They get it. These are our constituents who drive on the highways and the freeways, and they are begging us to act and set aside our political games for 15 minutes and vote cloture. By the way, I am hopeful we can; I am.

I also have a letter to the Members of the Senate:

The current lack of funding certainty in the Federal

highway market is having a devastating effect on the

transportation construction industry. Our industry is in dire

economic shape. We urge the Senate to act promptly on passing

the Reid amendment.

Let me tell my colleagues who signed this letter. The President and CEO of American Concrete Pavement Association, the President of the National Asphalt Pavement Association, the President of the National Ready Mixed Concrete Association, the President and CEO of Portland Cement, the President and CEO of the National Stone, Sand, and Gravel Association.

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to have this letter printed in the Record.

Mr. President, these letters are stark in their message to us. If we don't listen to this incredible group of people who are writing us these letters--these are Republicans, they are Democrats, they are Independents, they are Americans. They are saying: Set aside your differences and fund the highway trust fund. This vote will send a shiver through the spine of our entire business community and our working people if we don't get 60 votes today.

So we have an opportunity today to send the clearest of messages that we are ready to come together around a simple premise; that is, the transportation infrastructure of this Nation is not a political whipping boy. There is no time to play politics here--no time. We have one State already saying: Beware. We are putting off our contracting. What more do we need to see than that? This is just the beginning of what is going to happen. We know the Build America Bonds program, which will allow State and local governments to borrow at lower costs, is going to put people to work. Our treasurer, California treasurer Bill Lockyer, said Build America Bonds have enabled the State--our State--to sell more than $19 billion in general obligation funds to meet voter- approved mandates for more than 7,000 vital infrastructure projects, in turn creating or sustaining more than 100,000 solid, middle-class, private sector jobs and businesses, large and small, in California.

The Build America Bond program is something our local people want, whether they are in California or anywhere else in the Nation. This program can cover bonds for school construction, clean energy, and all the rest. It will allow us to put people to work, and the decisions will not be made here but in our cities, our counties, and our States.

Clearly, the two infrastructure pieces in the Reid bill are essential in both

saving jobs and creating new jobs. Investments in infrastructure are a crucial component of job creation in our Nation. As we work our way out of this recession, the last thing we want to do is create uncertainty about our transportation funding. Too many people are counting on it.

I wish to mention, as the chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, that what we are doing today will give us the time we need to pass a larger authorization, and I am working on that authorization with Republicans and Democrats on our committee. I wish to commend, in particular, Senator Voinovich for reaching out to me in an extraordinary way. He is reaching out his hand and he says: Let's get started. I say to him, through my remarks on the Senate floor: Absolutely. We are going to start working. That bill is going to be transformational. It is going to, I think, be another boon to our economy.

There is one thing I can say after spending so much time back home. I have not heard one of my constituents in my State--and I traveled to every part of my State and I met with Democrats, Republicans, Independents, business, labor, nurses, firefighters, everybody--not one disagrees with this point; that is, a great nation must have a great infrastructure. Our infrastructure must be updated. That means our roads, our bridges, our highways, our transit systems, our sewer systems, our water systems. We have water systems with arsenic in them. We have water systems that are not healthful for our families. No great nation can be a great nation if our people are not at the top of their game. You can't be at the top of your game if your child is getting ill because they are drinking tainted water. These are the things we have to do, and they are done in the private sector. On the transportation side, there is a separate fund for that highway trust fund, separate funds that go into that user fee, and that is how we fund our highways and transit systems. It is a very sound idea.

Again, I say to all colleagues: If we turn our back today on this very straightforward proposal that extends the highway trust fund and gives it the funding it needs to spend at the authorized levels, we are going to see more State departments of transportation, such as this one in Missouri:

Special Notice: Unless the Federal Government takes the

necessary steps to ensure the availability of Federal funds

for the remaining fiscal year, then the bid opening will be

postponed or withdrawn until further notice.

That is not a threat; it is real.

I yield the floor.

Madam President, before the majority leader leaves the floor, I want to say to him that today jobs triumphed over politics. That is a great day around here. Jobs triumphed over politics. I want to say to Senator Reid, this idea you have to keep these bills very straightforward and very easy to understand, this bill, four parts to it, two parts dealt with infrastructure, two parts dealt with tax breaks that were related to making capital investments and hiring unemployed workers, is very simple for people to understand. I have to say to my Democratic colleagues, 57 of whom voted for this, thank you. And to the five Republicans who joined us, thank you so much. It means so much to the working families of this country, to the business community.

I want to say a special word to Senator Lautenberg if he is watching. I know how strongly he supports transportation. He is kind of Mr. Transportation in New Jersey. We all wish him well. We know he would have been here if there was any way for him to be here. I will not say any more than I said before. I want to thank specific people out there around the country whom I talked to on several conference calls over this break. They were always there. Night and day we talked. I explained to them how close this vote would be. They explained to me that they understood what the stakes were, a million jobs at stake in relation to the highway trust fund, thousands more at stake in relation to the Build America bonds. This is a good day.

I thank the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials; the American Road and Transportation Builders Association; the Associated General Contractors of America; the U.S. Chamber of Commerce; the Laborers International Union; the International Union of Operating Engineers; the American Highway Users Alliance; Faster, Better, Safer Americans for Transportation Mobility; the AAA, which wrote to us. I want to say to all of them, they made this vote work because they knew what was happening on the ground.

In closing, I have one more thank you. This is a strange thing to say but I want to thank the Missouri Department of Transportation for telling the truth. Listen to what they wrote:

All bidders--PLEASE TAKE NOTE!--Unless the federal

government takes the necessary steps to ensure the

availability of federal funds for the remaining fiscal year,

bid openings will be postponed or withdrawn until further

notice.

In other words, the Department of Transportation in Missouri, being the first State to be hit with this mess--by the way, followed closely by North Dakota, they are very close to this place, all of our States are--they came forward and told the truth that we had to act today. I hope the House will act with us, and we will get this resolved. In March we will start on the new bill. It is a good day.

I yield the floor.

Mr. President, what is the order before the Senate at this time?

Mr. President, if we are going to get the American economy back on track, we have to get the American people back to work. We know our serious troubles were not created in 1 day and we know they will not be solved overnight. But we have to begin. We have to take that first step. That is what the bill before us represents: a strong first step in the right direction.

This is a jobs plan that will cut businesses' taxes as an incentive to hire unemployed workers. It is a plan that includes tax breaks for keeping those workers on the payroll and even more help for small businesses to write off their investments. In fact, this legislation will allow small businesses to write off up to $250,000 for equipment and materials they purchased. That is a good deal. They do not have to depreciate it.

It will extend the highway trust fund and expand Build America Bonds. I just finished a meeting a few minutes ago with 11 Governors. This is one of the best programs with which they have ever dealt. We have no more money. It creates jobs immediately. It is oversubscribed. It is a wonderful program that will build roads, will build other projects, bridges. The highway trust fund, for example, will save 1 million jobs; in Nevada, thousands of jobs.

I have a letter, if people think this is not a serious issue we are dealing with--and I do this because it is the only one I have--from the Missouri Department of Transportation:

All bidders--PLEASE TAKE NOTE!--Unless the federal

government takes the necessary steps to ensure the

availability of federal funds for the remaining fiscal year

prior to 12:00 p.m. on February 25, 2010, the scheduled

February 26, 2010 bid opening will be Postponed/Withdrawn

until further notice.

That is how it is. Missouri is not alone.

With this bill, we will create the right conditions for the private sector to start hiring again, and we are doing so in the right places.

These moneys, even though they come from Congress, the taxpayers' dollars go to create private jobs. These highways are not built by a bunch of Federal employees; they are built by private contractors. For every $1 billion we invest in infrastructure, we create 47,500 high- paying jobs and other jobs that spin off from them.

With this first bill, we will create the right conditions for the private sector to start hiring again. I think we are doing it in the right places. When we help small businesses thrive, we will create jobs that will let more entrepreneurs innovate and invent. When we invest in improving our roads and bridges, we will create jobs so workers can support their families but also create infrastructure to support our growing Nation.

This bill is as good for the employees as it is for the employers. This bill is good for the employers who will do the hiring. This is such a good deal. If a person is out of work for 30 days, a business can hire them. If they hire them for up to 30 hours a week, they do not have to pay their withholding tax, and at the end of the year they get a $1,000 tax credit.

On my trip home, businesses on the verge of hiring people said: This is going to allow us to hire people. We can afford to do this. This is as good for the employers doing the hiring as it is for the employees who will be getting hired.

One thing about this bill. Everybody should hear this. It is fully paid for, no deficit spending, which means we are not adding a single dime to the deficit, not a penny. We are doing this the responsible way, holding ourselves to the same budgeting standards we teach our children: You can only spend the money you have.

Each of these components--what are they? The Build America Bonds provision I talked about; extending the highway bill for a year; the provision Senator Hatch and Senator Schumer came up with that I talked about that allows an employer to hire somebody who has been off work for up to 60 days; and the final provision that allows them to write off $250,000 in purchases--is a good deal. That is what is in this bill.

We are doing this bill in a way that is responsible. You should not spend money you do not have, and that is what we are doing here. Each of these components--the tax breaks, the support to help small businesses grow and hire more workers, the new construction projects, and the fiscally responsible way we are doing it--is a nonpartisan idea. Republicans have supported every part of this bill in the past-- every part of this bill--and Democrats have also done the same. There is simply no reason it should not receive overwhelming support from both sides of the aisle. But so far, I am sorry to say, this has not happened. I am disappointed that this has been the case.

As the Presiding Officer knows, we had to file cloture some 70 times last year--70 times. That is remarkably bad. Let's change that. I have spoken some with some of my Republican colleagues this past week and said: Let's don't do that anymore. Let's work together.

Who can complain about this bill? I have told the Republican leader and I have told anyone who will listen that we are going to move very quickly to a bill that will take about a day--travel promotion--after this. In every State in the Union, No. 1, No. 2, sometimes No. 3, but mostly No. 1 and No. 2, the economic driver is tourism. We are the only modern Nation that does not advertise itself. Watch TV and see the advertisements coming from Australia, New Zealand, South American countries, the Caribbean islands, and European countries. We should do the same. The Travel Promotion Act will save $\1/2\ billion, and it also pays for itself. There is no deficit spending.

As we finish that bill--it should be toward the end of the week--we are going to move into the tax extenders, unemployment, COBRA, issues such as those. I have explained that to the Republican leader.

Rather than figuring out how we can up the other politically, let's figure how to put Americans back to work. I am sorry to say my friends on the other side of the aisle are looking for ways not to vote for this bill. The business community supports this legislation. It is jobs. Rather than rally around a plan we know will create jobs, I have heard excuse after tired excuse. But the American people want us to work together. They are not buying these excuses.

Why wouldn't we do this bill? We can create jobs starting in just a few days. If someone could explain to me what is wrong with this bill, I would be happy to listen to them. What is wrong with this legislation? Some have questioned the size of the bill. Only in Washington

is a $15 billion investment to create and save more than 1 million jobs not enough. I was stunned to hear on the radio this morning--when I received my press briefing, I was told that the unions and the left-- whoever that is--oppose our bill because it is not big enough. Now try that one on, Mr. President. Only in Washington is a $15 billion investment to create and save more than 1 million jobs not enough.

The answer is not to do nothing. It is to do something to create jobs and then create more jobs and then create more jobs after that. That is why this is not the only jobs bill we are going to be dealing with or the last jobs bill we will bring to the floor. We have a jobs agenda, not a jobs bill. We are not going to stop until every American who wants a job can get one.

Some Senators--one Senator in particular, but there are others; this Senator does not stand alone--think that money that was spent on TARP should be returned for the deficit. Other Senators said: I think the money that has not been spent from the stimulus should be returned to employees. These are all good ideas, and amendments are going to be able to be offered when we get to our package later this week. That is the way it should be.

We want every person in America who needs a job to get a job, but we cannot do it alone. My friends on the other side of the aisle share this responsibility. When I had 60 votes, all the responsibility was mine. It is no longer that way. We are down to 59, and 1 of my Senators is sick today. I did speak with Senator Lautenberg last night. He is doing fine. He is such a strong man. He said he will be back in a week or two. He is doing just fine.

If Republicans support this bill, as they have all the elements of it in the past, and they join us to pass it, we are going to do many more bills just like this to create jobs. However, if my friends on the other side of the aisle want to put partisanship ahead of people-- people who are out of work--if they once again try to distract from the issue at hand, they will only confirm their reputation as the party of no. They will only confirm the American people's fear that Republicans refuse to do anything to help them.

So to my Republican colleagues, I say as seriously and fervently as I can: Work with us. Show us you are serious about legislating. Show our constituents you are serious about leading. Show the skeptics that you know that putting people back to work is far more important than putting points up on the political scoreboard. Most important, I ask my Republican colleagues to show those Americans who deserve a job they can go to every morning, a job they can get up and go to, that we are willing to do our job tonight.

It is remarkable we have to hold a procedural vote on a bill that will create jobs. It will be regrettable if the minority prevents us from moving forward, from taking that first step, from giving millions of unemployed Americans the hope that tomorrow will be better than yesterday.

Think what it is for someone to get up in the morning and have no place to go to work. I have met with some people, while I was home, dealing with domestic abuse. It has gotten out of hand. Why? Men do not have jobs. Women do not have jobs, either, but women are not abusive, most of the time. Men, when they are out of work, tend to become abusive. Our domestic crisis shelters in Nevada are jammed. That is the way it is all over the country. Jobs bring dignity, and that is what this legislation is all about.

I hope we can pass this legislation and move on during this work period and work together in doing some good things for this country.

We have a couple minutes until 5:30 p.m. It is my understanding the vote is to occur at that time. Since there is no one on the floor, I ask unanimous consent that the vote start early, and we will not cut it off early.

Madam President, I hope this is the beginning of a new day in the Senate. Whether this new day was created by the new Senator from Massachusetts or some other reason, I am very happy that we were able to get this vote. But there are some winners--not any individual Senator, not Democrats or Republicans; the winners are small business people throughout this country.

On my trip home this past 10 days, people are excited about the fact they may be able to write off $250,000 for things they badly need--not depreciate it, just write it off. The other three

provisions are wonderful. To extend the highway bill for a year is going to save thousands of jobs in Nevada and 1 million jobs throughout the country. So the small business communities throughout this country are winners, and also workers. This is going to create jobs.

I had a long conversation today with the Republican leader, and I told him what the plans are in the Senate. He listened very closely, and we had a very good conversation. We are going to move, for a day or two after we complete this, to travel promotion, another bipartisan bill. It will save $\1/2\ billion. It will create thousands and thousands of jobs. All around the world countries advertise their tourism, but we do not. In this great country of ours, we do not see anything on TV. All we see is money being spent by other countries having us go to their countries. We want to do the same in their countries. That is what this is all about. Every State in the Union, all 50, the No. 1, 2, and in a few instances the third economic driving factor is tourism. This will help tourism.

As soon as we finish that, toward the end of this week, what we will do is move to the Finance Committee matters that they worked on before, and they worked very hard. I am glad we have made progress in that regard. I told Senator McConnell that will be open to amendment. I will try to work out with him so many amendments on each side. If we cannot do that, we will not do that. I hope we can do that. But if we cannot, we will move forward on the tax extenders, the expiring provisions, and a few other things.

It is really a new day. I look forward to this work period being one where we can all go home and say: You know, ladies and gentlemen from Nevada and New Hampshire and Illinois and New Jersey and New York and Arkansas, we are working together. We are really getting things done together. That is what legislation should be about. Legislation is the art of compromise. It is building consensus and working together.

Basically that is what this piece of legislation is all about. This is not the jobs bill that we just completed. At least cloture has been invoked, and we will vote on that in another day or so. It is part of an agenda. We are going to have, later this month, another jobs bill. I have spoken to a number of Republican Senators. They have specific provisions they want in this bill. It will deal with small business. During the last 10 years, 96 percent of all jobs in America were created by small businesses. I am very happy we were able to do this.

I express my appreciation to Senator Boxer, chairman of the Public Works Committee. She has worked so hard. I love her committee. I was chairman on two separate occasions. It is a committee I have fond memories of serving on. Every time I see the enthusiasm of Barbara Boxer, I know why the State of California cares so much about her.

Mr. President, I rise today in support of a resolution honoring the lifetime achievements of C. DeLores Tucker. Along with her family and many friends with us today in Washington, we pay tribute to her life of service and courageous commitment to justice for women and for the African-American community.

Cynthia DeLores Nottage Tucker was born in Philadelphia, PA, on October 4, 1927 and was the tenth of eleven children in her family. Her Bahamian-born Baptist minister father and her hard-working mother approached life from a Christian perspective and encouraged their children to do so as well. She grew up in a nurturing and achievement- oriented household. ``My mother and father gave us wonderful values,'' Tucker once told Good Housekeeping magazine. ``They taught us to be good and loving, and to use our lives to help others.''

Young DeLores originally intended to become a doctor and, as a girl, spent summers working in local hospitals. When she graduated from Girls' High of Philadelphia, her father took her to the Bahamas as a reward. During the trip, she became seriously ill and was restricted to a sickbed that kept her out of college for a year. This setback changed the course of her life. She subsequently finished her education at Temple University and the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. She also received two honorary degrees, from Morris College in Alabama and Villa Maria College in Pennsylvania.

C. DeLores Tucker first became active in the postwar civil rights movement when she worked to register Black voters during a 1950 mayoral campaign. In July 1951, she married a friend of her brother, Bill Tucker, a construction company owner who also owned real estate in and around Philadelphia. For several years, DeLores sold real estate and insurance and was active in local politics. She also became an accomplished fundraiser and public speaker. The experience she gained in civic causes and work with her husband, helped to make her a well known figure in the city. She became the first African-American and first woman to serve on the Philadelphia Zoning Board.

As the civil rights movement gained momentum in the late 1950s and early 1960s, DeLores found the perfect channel for her activism. She joined the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, NAACP, and helped the NAACP raise funds. She never shied away from sensitive political issues. As part of her civil rights activism, she walked with Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. in the Selma to Montgomery march. In 1965, she participated in the White House Conference on Civil Rights and was a strong advocate of the 1965 Voting Rights Bill signed by President Lyndon Johnson.

DeLores Tucker's life was guided by her deep convictions. Throughout the 1960s, she campaigned for African-American candidates and served on her party's state committee. Her strong will and organizing skills brought her to the attention of those in power. In January 1971, she was named Secretary of the Commonwealth by Governor Milton J. Shapp. This appointment made DeLores the first African-American woman in the United States to serve in such a role.

The responsibilities of her job were serious. As Secretary of the Commonwealth, she was the keeper of the Great Seal of the Commonwealth and had the duty of authenticating government documents through the seal's use. By statute, she was a member of a number of important state boards and commissions. She also helped implement an affirmative action program to bring more equality to Pennsylvania's hiring practices. During her tenure, she advocated for the appointment of women and African-Americans as judges and as members of state boards and commissions. She led the effort to make Pennsylvania one of the first states to develop voter registration by mail and reduce the voting age from 21 to 18. Further, she helped pass statutes that would permit students to register and vote from their college districts. Ebony magazine named her among the ``100 most influential'' African-Americans every year of her tenure.

After leaving state government, Dr. Tucker was a candidate for several political offices, including lieutenant governor and United States Senator. Although her efforts were unsuccessful, she never wavered in her commitment to public service. She continued her commitment to community service, working with underprivileged young people both in Philadelphia and across the country.

DeLores Tucker always continued to participate in politics. As a fundraiser and organizer, she was involved in Jesse Jackson's presidential campaign in 1984. She chaired the Black Caucus of her party's national committee for several years, where she worked to increase the involvement of African-American women in politics.

One of Dr. Tucker's greatest legacies was her work as a founder of the National Political Congress of Black Women in 1984 which was created to advance the interests of the African-American community, especially women. The group devised a comprehensive ten-point plan to reclaim and improve the African-American community by focusing on voter registration, educational quality and equity, welfare reform that would not victimize poor people, and fair and adequate legal services for everyone. The National Political Congress of Black Women addressed both broad national

issues as well as local issues by, for example, supporting African- American congresswomen, as well as honoring civil rights pioneers, including Myrlie Evers-Williams, Dr. Betty Shabazz, and Coretta Scott King. The organization encouraged Black women to participate in the political process as voters, candidates, policymakers, fundraisers and role models. Today, the organization is known as the National Congress for Black Women. In 1992, Dr. Tucker succeeded Shirley Chisholm as the national chair of the National Congress of Black Women and served in that role until her death in 2005.

In 1991, Dr. Tucker founded the Bethune-DuBois Institute to promote the cultural and educational development of African-American youth. During this time, Dr. Tucker began her public criticism of some kinds of rap music. She argued that record companies should halt the distribution of popular music that she believed contained derogatory lyrics about women and minorities and had a negative impact on young people. Objecting to the sale of such lyrics to minors, she asked the Federal Bureau of Investigation to launch an inquiry. Both the NAACP and the Congressional Black Caucus supported Dr. Tucker's initiative.

Dr. Tucker rose to national prominence in African-American civil rights circles through her tireless activism and political fundraising. She worked to end racism and make the United States a more equal, multicultural society. Her career in civil rights spanned more than 50 years. Her husband, Bill Tucker, told the Washington Post that DeLores ``was one of the most fearless individuals I have ever known . . . She will take on anyone, anything, if that's what she thinks is right.''

Dr. Tucker chaired the Black Caucus of her party's national committee for 11 years and spoke at five national conventions. As a member of the national committee, she was one of the original organizers of the Black Caucus and the Women's Caucus. She worked tirelessly to ensure that women, African-Americans and other minorities had fair representation within her party. She was the first African-American to serve as President of the National Federation of Democratic Women. Dr. Tucker also served as a member of the NAACP Board of Trustees and on the board of the Points of Light Foundation. She was also a member of Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority.

During her career, Dr. Tucker received more than 400 awards and honors, including the NAACP Thurgood Marshall Award, the Martin Luther King, Jr. Distinguished Service Award and the Philadelphia Urban League Whitney Young Award.

C. DeLores Tucker passed away on October 12, 2005. Her legacy lives on through the work of her husband, Bill Tucker, her many nieces and nephews, and the hundreds of people she helped and mentored during her life.

DeLores Tucker was a daughter of Philadelphia, a city that has produced many notable leaders, in fields as diverse as the fine arts, politics, science, athletics, business, literature and entertainment. In December of 1939, Marcia Davenport wrote an article in Collier's magazine about the great internationally known contralto, Philadelphian Marian Anderson. Davenport's article described Anderson as a young girl in south Philadelphia--whose father, John Anderson, died when she was ten--playing on an imaginary piano and singing despite the poverty her family lived in.

But in the heart of Anna Anderson, as she watched her child

throbbing with music, there was a steadfast belief that for

any worthy end, a way will come.

For DeLores Tucker, through hard work, a passion for advocacy, a strong faith and a loving family, a way did come. A way to stand up for the powerless; a way to overcome racism, prejudice, and hatred; a way to shine the bright warm light of justice and compassion in the dark corners of America. Yes, a way did come for DeLores Tucker to use her voice to sing her own hymn of equal rights and opportunity for all, especially women and African-Americans.

Mr. President, the Senate is about to engage in a cloture vote on the Senate Democratic leadership's third stimulus bill. What I find surprising is that what we are about to vote on indisputably and absolutely belongs to the majority leader. That is to say we are not going to vote on a bipartisan package that I put together with Finance Committee Chairman Baucus. I was under the impression that the Senate Democratic leadership was genuine in its desire to work on a bipartisan basis, but clearly I was mistaken. Although the Senate Democratic leader was highly involved in the development of a bipartisan bill, he arbitrarily decided to replace it with a bill he hopes to jam through the Senate.

As much as I was surprised by the Senate Democratic leader's disregard for bipartisanship, I am even more surprised by the explanations given by him and his cohorts.

Perhaps the most significant change between the bipartisan package Chairman Baucus and I helped put together and the package we will be voting to move to is that a package of expired tax provisions has been removed. Normally referred to as extenders, these generally very popular and certainly bipartisan provisions have been extended several times over the past few years.

What is surprising is that hyperpartisan members of the majority have suddenly decided that the tax extenders are partisan pork for Republicans. A representative sample comes from one report, which describes the bipartisan bill as ``an extension of soon-to-expire tax breaks that are highly beneficial to major corporations, known as tax extenders, as well as other corporate giveaways that had been designed to win GOP support.'' Just today the Washington Post includes this attribution to the Senate Democratic Leadership. From the Post:

``We're pretty close,'' {the majority leader} said Friday

during a television appearance in Nevada, adding that he

thought ``fat cats'' would have benefitted too much from the

larger Baucus-Grassley bill.

The portrait being painted by certain members of the majority, echoed without critical examination in some press reports, is wildly inaccurate. For one thing, the tax extenders include provisions such as the deduction for qualified tuition and related expenses and also the deduction for certain expenses of elementary and secondary school teachers. If you are going to school or if you are a grade school teacher, the Senate Democratic leadership thinks you are a fat cat so you are on your own. If your house was destroyed in a recent natural disaster and you still need any of the temporary disaster relief provisions contained in the extenders package, too bad, because helping you would amount to a corporate giveaway in the eyes of some.

The tax extenders have been routinely passed repeatedly because they are bipartisan and very popular. Democrats have consistently voted in favor of extending these tax provisions.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi released a very strong statement upon House passage of tax extenders in December of 2009, saying this was, ``good

for businesses, good for homeowners, and good for our communities.'' December of 2009 was not very long ago. In 2006, the then-Democratic leader released a blistering statement: ``After Bush Republicans in the Senate blocked passage of critical tax extenders, . . . American families and businesses are paying the price because this Do Nothing Republican Congress refuses to extend important tax breaks.'' I ask unanimous consent that both of these statements be printed in the Record in their entirety.

Recent bipartisan votes in the Senate on extending expiring tax provisions have come in the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008; the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, which passed the Senate by unanimous consent; and the Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004, which originally passed the Senate by voice vote although the conference report received 92 votes in favor and a whopping 3 against. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service, extension of several of these provisions go back even further, including the Tax Relief Extension Act of 1999, which again passed the Senate by unanimous consent but lost one vote on the conference report.

Blinded and dazed by the power of their now not-so-super majority, certain Democrats have in the last few weeks turned against the extenders. One Democrat said:

Our side isn't sure that the Republicans are real

interested in developing good policy and to move forward

together. Instead, they are more inclined to play rope-a-dope

again. My own view is, let's test them.

Another member of this large 59-vote majority exclaimed:

It looks more like a tax bill than a jobs bill to me. What

the Democratic Caucus is going to put on the floor is

something that's more focused on job creation than on tax

breaks.

The only explanation for this behavior is that certain Senators have decided that it serves a deeply partisan goal to slander what have been for several years bipartisan and popular tax provisions benefitting many different people.

Today's Washington Post article I quoted from earlier includes a statement from a Senate Democratic leadership aide saying:

No decisions have been made, but anyone expecting us

immediately to go back to a bill that includes tax extenders

will be sorely disappointed.

Having put their heads into the sand, this chamber's Democratic leaders seem intent on keeping them there. I appeal to all of you to vote against the Democratic Leadership's effort today to jam the Senate. A vote for the Senate Democratic Leadership's cloture motion is a vote to foreclose an opportunity to improve the bill. It also is a vote to forbid any corrections to mistakes in the bill. And there is a significant mistake in the Senate Democratic Leadership's bill. The bill as currently written would allow employers of illegal workers to benefit from the payroll tax holiday. We should correct that mistake with an amendment.

The Senate Democratic Leadership's posture prohibits this correction.

Either the Democratic leaders are playing partisan politics with tax extenders, or they don't understand the worth of the provisions to the economy, including job retention and creation. The biodiesel industry alone says 23,000 jobs are at risk due to the biodiesel tax credit being allowed to expire. Those workers are not fat cats.

And in case anyone thinks biodiesel is something only Iowans worry about, these green jobs are in 44 of the 50 states. There are 24 facilities in Texas. There are 15 facilities in Iowa. There are 6 facilities in Illinois and 6 in Missouri. There are 4 facilities in Washington. Ohio has 11 facilities. There are 5 facilities in Indiana. There are 3 facilities each in Mississippi and South Carolina. There are 7 facilities in Pennsylvania and 4 in Arkansas. New Jersey has 2 facilities.

There is one facility in North Dakota. Only 6 of the 50 States do not have some biodiesel production. They are Alaska, Delaware, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, and Wyoming. The other 44 States have some biodiesel presence. I have an article from the Erie, PA, newspaper, describing the struggles of a local biodiesel plant.

So we need to turn away from talk of fat cats. We need to get back to work on the bipartisan package that was in the works until the Senate Democratic Leadership's dramatic change in direction. Many people who are not fat cats or a part of large corporations are counting on these provisions being extended, and they are counting on their elected representatives to work together, as we were doing, to get the job done.

I ask unanimous consent the article be printed in the Record.

Madam President, I thank Senator Dorgan, who has led with Senator Durbin on all kinds of job creation efforts, understanding that although the private sector creates these jobs, it is a partnership with the private and public sector and State and local and Federal governments. He had it right. We need to follow his suggestions and those of Senator Durbin as we move forward, including what was on the floor earlier this evening.

There are in my State some 640,000 unemployed people, in a State of about 11 million. There are hundreds of thousands more who are underemployed. There are tens of thousands of small businesses across Ohio. There are hundreds of thousands of Ohioans who help ensure that roads and bridges and transit systems serve the best interests of residents and businesses.

The bill we voted on today would help those Ohioans. These Ohioans didn't bring about our Nation's economic crisis. It wasn't people who work every day in Zaynesville and Lima or Findley who brought this on, but they are paying the price for it every day. Too many people are losing health insurance.

I was just on public television with the senior Senator from New Hampshire. I pointed out that 390 Ohioans every day lose their health insurance. This economy has squeezed more and more people, people who have jobs, let alone the anxiety of people who have jobs and are afraid that they will lose those jobs. Small businesses in my State have everything it takes to thrive, but they are undermined by this perilous economic climate. Construction workers, manufacturing workers, small businesses, other hard-working Ohioans who keep our State going are losing jobs, not because they are not good employees, not because they don't show up, not because they aren't working hard, but because the dollars aren't there to pay them because employers are laying them off, whether in the private or public sector. Unemployed workers are remaining that way not because they don't have the drive or the skills to succeed.

Majority Leader Reid has introduced a bill based on proposals from Democrats and Republicans alike that would give tax breaks to small businesses and ensure dollars continue to flow into the highway trust fund. It is a bill designed to cut businesses a break. It is a bill designed to sustain our roads and bridges and transit systems to prevent massive job loss among the millions of Americans who work to ensure the safety and the effectiveness of our transportation infrastructure. If they are working, if people are working construction, if our bus drivers in the cities who are getting particularly the elderly and low-income people to their doctors' appointments or to their workplace, if they are working, if the bus drivers and the transit workers and the construction workers and the highway builders, if they are working, then there is more money in the economy and more people are working.

It is a bill, unfortunately, most Republicans in this Chamber, for whatever reason--they always have a reason to be obstructive literally 100 times in this session, more than 100 times--it is a bill that most of my Republican colleagues are determined to kill. I thank Senator Voinovich, the senior Republican in my State, for his support. I thank the other four or five Republicans who voted at least to let us debate this bill, something in the past they haven't even been willing to do on other legislation.

So at least we have made progress that way. But if the press is right, the Republican leadership and their lobbying friends gathered together. They have been working 24/7 to convince the public that a bill solely focused on small businesses and middle-class jobs is a bad bill. You may have seen news reports that 100 lobbyists sat down with Republicans and figured out a strategy to try to kill this jobs bill. It is the same story, it is the same movie we watched last year on health care. It is the same story again that we have seen, that they are doing whatever it takes to kill this legislation. Fortunately for the American people, fortunately for these hundreds of thousands of Ohioans who are unemployed or underemployed, they did not get away with it today, that enough Republicans broke with their leadership and supported efforts to move forward on jobs legislation.

Earlier today, I met with 200 to 300 Ohioans to unveil a report on how to get our State's economy back on track. This was a group of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents, and it was a group that had everyone from the mayor of Mansfield and the mayor of Marietta, to small businesses, to large companies, a couple of executives, American Electric Power Company, to a whole host of citizen activists who want to do whatever it takes. They want to fight for made-in-America legislation that Senator Dorgan mentioned. They want a manufacturing industrial policy in this country. We are the only country in the developed world that does not have a real plan on how to do manufacturing, on how to build an industrial economy, on how we begin to lead the world not just in the technology, which we have done in solar and wind turbines and biomass and fuel cells--we lead in technology; we do not lead in industrial development and making those products. We developed the wind turbine technology in Sandusky, OH, about 30 miles from where I live, but most of the wind turbines, the components--a lot of components are made in Ohio, but most of the wind turbines are manufactured and assembled overseas. It is the same on solar technology, the same on biomass, the same on fuel cells. Our scientists, our engineers, our professors,

and our researchers develop a lot of this technology, but we are not making it in Ohio and New Hampshire and States around the country.

So today, as I said, all couple hundred, 250, 300 Ohioans--Democrats, Independents, Republicans--gathered to figure out how to do this, to move our State forward. As I said, there were a lot of Republicans. But Republicans in Washington look at the world differently. Many of them are trying to demonize a bill that provides tax breaks, that saves jobs. They need to take a step back, the Republicans in this body who I believe are very out of step with Republicans and everybody else in States such as mine. They need to take a step back and remember for whom they work.

Opposition for opposition's sake is not working for the American people. On the Senate floor, we need to work together to save small businesses, to help these small businesses get credit, to help these small businesses work with local communities to provide jobs. That is what they want to do. We can do this if we work together.

Madam President, I yield the floor.

I suggest the absence of a quorum.

Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.