H.R. 3059House112th Congress (2011-2013)In Committee

Creating Hope Act of 2011

Introduced September 23, 2011

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

2 earlier actions
HouseCommittee Latest Action

Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

September 26, 2011

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

September 23, 2011

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

September 23, 2011

HouseCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

September 26, 2011

Floor Debate

24 members

What members said about H.R. 3059 on the floor

14 Republicans10 Democrats
Cliff Stearns
Rep. Cliff StearnsR-FL-6 · Jun 20, 2012

My colleagues, this reauthorization of the FDA's user fees will provide stability for the FDA's new product review as companies submit new and innovative drugs, medical devices, and biologics for…

Fred Upton
Rep. Fred UptonR-MI-6 · Jun 20, 2012

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (S. 3187) to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to revise and extend the user-fee programs for prescription drugs and medical…

Henry A. Waxman
Rep. Henry A. WaxmanD-CA-30 · Jun 20, 2012

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself 3 minutes. Today, the House considers a bill that represents a significant bipartisan and bicameral achievement. On May 30 of this year, the House passed its user fee…

John D. Dingell
Rep. John D. DingellD-MI-15 · Jun 20, 2012

Mr. Speaker, this is a good bill. I urge my colleagues to support it. I rise in strong support of it, and I urge my colleagues to join. This legislation enjoys broad bipartisan support on both sides…

Frank Pallone, Jr.
Rep. Frank Pallone, Jr.D-NJ-6 · Jun 20, 2012

Thank you, Chairman Waxman. I want to say I'm very proud to support the bill before us, which would reauthorize and revitalize a number of different programs at the Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to…

Show 8 more
Charles W. Dent
Rep. Charles W. DentR-PA-15 · Jun 20, 2012

Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act and particularly the provisions related to synthetic drugs. I introduced H.R. 1254, the Synthetic Drug…

Nick J. Rahall II
Rep. Nick J. Rahall IID-WV-3 · Jun 20, 2012

Mr. Speaker, I support the passage of the Food and Drug Administration Reform Act, which reauthorizes vital programs that will ensure the FDA continues to study and approve life-saving drugs and…

Edward J. Markey
Rep. Edward J. MarkeyD-MA-7 · Jun 20, 2012

I would like to thank Chairman Upton and Chairman Pitts and Ranking Member Waxman and Ranking Member Pallone and their staffs for their work in bringing the FDA Safety and Innovation Act to the floor…

Joseph R. Pitts
Rep. Joseph R. PittsR-PA-16 · Jun 20, 2012

Mr. Speaker, I stand to strongly support this legislation. This bipartisan agreement represents over 18 months of work from the Energy and Commerce Health Subcommittee, and I'm especially proud and…

Michael C. Burgess
Rep. Michael C. BurgessR-TX-26 · Jun 20, 2012

I thank the chairman for yielding and the Speaker for the recognition. Today, we are considering the Food and Drug Administration's Safety Innovation Act, and I urge my colleagues to support it. This…

Phil Gingrey
Rep. Phil GingreyR-GA-11 · Jun 20, 2012

Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding. The FDA Safety and Innovation Act of 2012 may not be a great bill, but it is a darn good bill. And as a physician and a member of the Energy and…

Diana DeGette
Rep. Diana DeGetteD-CO-1 · Jun 20, 2012

Mr. Speaker, I'm delighted to support this bipartisan legislation which addresses critical problems affecting the safety of drugs and medical devices in this country. There are several highlights I'd…

Erik Paulsen
Rep. Erik PaulsenR-MN-3 · Jun 20, 2012

Mr. Speaker, I want to applaud, first of all, the chairman, the subcommittee chairman, and the ranking members for their leadership in bringing this bipartisan package to the floor. Mr. Speaker,…

Show 11 more
G. K. Butterfield
Rep. G. K. ButterfieldD-NC-1 · Jun 20, 2012

Let me thank you, Mr. Pallone, for yielding the time, and I thank you so very much for your leadership on the Health Subcommittee. You do extraordinary work on our committee. Mr. Speaker, I rise…

Lois Capps
Rep. Lois CappsD-CA-23 · Jun 20, 2012

I thank my colleague for yielding. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of the FDA Safety and Innovation Act. This bipartisan effort will improve the health and safety of the American people;…

Tim Murphy
Rep. Tim MurphyR-PA-18 · Jun 20, 2012

Mr. Speaker, what good are life-saving drugs if you can't afford them? That's why real reform of the Nation's health care system begins with promoting quality and affordability. I am excited this…

Charles F. Bass
Rep. Charles F. BassR-NH-2 · Jun 20, 2012

I thank the distinguished chairman of the committee for recognizing me for 1 minute. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act. The user fee…

Joe Barton
Rep. Joe BartonR-TX-6 · Jun 20, 2012

I thank the distinguished chairman. Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of this bill. When the American public asks, ``Why can't Congress just work together?'' we should hold this bill up as…

Sue Wilkins Myrick
Rep. Sue Wilkins MyrickR-NC-9 · Jun 20, 2012

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The bill before us contains critical improvements to the current law. Among them is the creation of a priority review voucher program for companies that develop treatments…

Brett Guthrie
Rep. Brett GuthrieR-KY-2 · Jun 20, 2012

Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the gentleman for yielding. I rise today in support of the legislation to reauthorize the Prescription Drug and Medical Device User Fee Act and authorize new user fee…

Eliot L. Engel
Rep. Eliot L. EngelD-NY-17 · Jun 20, 2012

I thank my friend for yielding to me. I rise in strong support of S. 3187, the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act of 2012. This is one of these rare occasions these days when…

Brian P. Bilbray
Rep. Brian P. BilbrayR-CA-50 · Jun 20, 2012

Mr. Speaker, I stand in support of this bill. I want to thank Chairman Upton and the leadership on both sides of the aisle for getting together and doing what's right for the American people. In this…

Leonard Lance
Rep. Leonard LanceR-NJ-7 · Jun 20, 2012

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Speaker, such legislation will ensure that patients get improved access to innovative, lifesaving therapies and medical devices while protecting and creating U.S. jobs.…

James P. Moran
Rep. James P. MoranD-VA-8 · Jun 20, 2012

Mr. Speaker, I don't oppose the bill, but I do have concerns about one element of this bill, and that is the provision that affects whistleblowers in the Public Health Service. The law that would…

Bill Text

Latest available legislative text

Reading Mode
Latest
Introduced in HouseIssued September 23, 2011

I

112th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 3059

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

September 23, 2011

Mr. McCaul (for himself, Mr. Butterfield, Mrs. Myrick, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Burgess, Ms. Speier, Mr. Kelly, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Towns, Mrs. Christensen, Mr. Rush, Mr. Cuellar, Mr. Bilbray, Mr. Wolf, Mrs. McMorris Rodgers, Mr. Keating, Mr. Olson, Mr. Canseco, Mr. Rogers of Alabama, Mr. Boustany, Mr. Davis of Kentucky, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Ms. Pelosi, and Mr. Rothman of New Jersey) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

A BILL

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to improve the priority review voucher incentive program relating to tropical and rare pediatric diseases.

1.

Short title; references

(a)

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Creating Hope Act of 2011.

(b)

References

Wherever in this Act an amendment is expressed in terms of an amendment to a section or other provision, the reference shall be considered to be made to a section or other provision of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.).

2.

Improvement of the tropical disease voucher program

(a)

Heading

The heading of section 524 (21 U.S.C. 360n) is amended to read as follows: Priority review to encourage treatments for tropical diseases and rare pediatric diseases.

(b)

Definitions

Section 524(a) (21 U.S.C. 360n(a)) is amended—

(1)

by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs (6) and (7), respectively;

(2)

by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively;

(3)

by inserting after In this section:, the following:

(1)

Eligible treatment

The term eligible treatment means a new drug, including a biological product that is a new drug, that is the subject of an application submitted under section 505(b)(1) of this Act or section 351(a) of the Public Health Service Act, if that drug contains no active ingredient (including any ester or salt of the active ingredient) that has been previously approved in any other application under section 505(b)(1), 505(b)(2), or 505(j) of this Act or section 351(a) or 351(k) of the Public Health Service Act.

;

(4)

in paragraph (3), as so redesignated, by inserting or rare pediatric disease product application after tropical disease product application each place that phrase appears;

(5)

by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:

(4)

Rare pediatric disease

The term rare pediatric disease means a disease that meets each of the following criteria:

(A)

The disease primarily affects individuals aged from birth to 18 years, including age groups often called neonates, infants, children, and adolescents.

(B)

The disease is a rare disease or condition, within the meaning of section 526.

(5)

Rare pediatric disease product application

The term rare pediatric disease product application means a human drug application, as defined in section 735(1)—

(A)

for prevention or treatment of a rare pediatric disease;

(B)

that the Secretary deems eligible for priority review;

(C)

that is for an eligible treatment;

(D)

that relies on clinical data derived from studies examining a pediatric population and dosages of the drug intended for that population; and

(E)

that does not seek approval for an adult indication in the original rare pediatric disease product application.

;

(6)

in paragraph (6), as so redesignated—

(A)

by redesignating subparagraph (Q) as subparagraph (R); and

(B)

by inserting after subparagraph (P) the following:

(Q)

Chagas Disease.

; and

(7)

by amending paragraph (7), as so redesignated, to read as follows:

(7)

Tropical disease product application

The term tropical disease product application means a human drug application, as defined in section 735(1)—

(A)

for prevention or treatment of a tropical disease;

(B)

that the Secretary deems eligible for priority review;

(C)

that is for an eligible treatment; and

(D)

that the sponsor affirms in the application is for a drug that has not been approved for commercial marketing for any tropical disease indication by a government authority outside of the United States for more than 24 months before the tropical disease product application is submitted.

.

(c)

Rules regarding use and transfer of priority review vouchers

Section 524(b) (21 U.S.C. 360n(b)) is amended—

(1)

in paragraph (1), by inserting or rare pediatric disease product application after tropical disease product application each place that phrase appears;

(2)

by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:

(2)

Transferability

(A)

In general

The sponsor of a tropical disease product application or rare pediatric disease product application that receives a priority review voucher under this section may transfer (including by sale) the entitlement to such voucher. There is no limit on the number of times a priority review voucher may be transferred before such voucher is used.

(B)

Conditions of transfer

If a sponsor transfers a priority review voucher after such sponsor has provided notification to the Secretary under paragraph (4)(A) of the intent of such sponsor to use the voucher, the transfer shall be subject to the provisions of subparagraphs (B) and (C) of paragraph (4).

(C)

Notification of transfer

The person to whom a voucher is transferred under paragraph (4)(B)(i) shall notify the Secretary of such change in ownership of the voucher not later than 30 days after such transfer.

;

(3)

by amending paragraph (3) to read as follows:

(3)

Limitation for prior applications

(A)

Tropical disease product applications

A sponsor of a tropical disease product application may not receive a priority review voucher under this section if the tropical disease product application was submitted to the Secretary prior to September 27, 2007.

(B)

Rare pediatric disease product applications

A sponsor of a rare pediatric disease product application may not receive a priority review voucher under this section if the rare pediatric disease product application was submitted to the Secretary prior to the date that is 90 days after the date of enactment of the Creating Hope Act of 2011.

; and

(4)

by amending paragraph (4) to read as follows:

(4)

Notification

(A)

Timing

At least 90 days before the date on which a human drug application for which the sponsor intends to use a priority review voucher is submitted, the sponsor of such human drug application shall notify the Secretary of the intent of such sponsor to submit the human drug application.

(B)

Transfer of voucher after notification

(i)

In general

The sponsor of a human drug application that provides notification of the intent of such sponsor to use the voucher for the human drug application may transfer the voucher after such notification is provided, if such sponsor has not yet submitted the human drug application described in the notification.

(ii)

Exception

The person to whom a voucher is transferred under clause (i) (referred to in this paragraph as the transferee) shall give notification of the intent of such transferee to use the voucher in accordance with this subsection, unless—

(I)

the transferee uses the voucher for a human drug application including the same indications as the human drug application described in the transferor’s notification; and

(II)

the transferee notifies the Secretary within 30 days of the transfer of the intent of such transferee to use the voucher for such purpose.

(iii)

Internal transfer

If the sponsor transfers a voucher internally for use with a drug application including one or more indications that were not included in the drug application that was the subject of the notification of such sponsor, the sponsor shall notify the Secretary of the transfer in accordance with this subsection.

(C)

Fee due upon notification; credit for transferred voucher

(i)

Due upon notification

The notification under this subsection shall be a legally binding commitment to pay for the user fee to be assessed in accordance with this section. Such fee shall be payable by the sponsor upon the submission by such sponsor of such notification.

(ii)

Credit

If a sponsor pays a user fee upon providing notification of the intent of such sponsor to use a priority review voucher, but later transfers the voucher for which such sponsor gave notification, the Secretary shall credit the user fees paid to the next human drug application for which a sponsor provides notification of the intent of such sponsor to use the same transferred voucher.

(iii)

Difference in fee

The Secretary may require a sponsor using a transferred voucher to pay the difference between the credit associated with the transferred voucher and the user fee prevailing at the time the sponsor submits notification of the intent of such sponsor to use the transferred voucher. This provision does not apply in cases where a transferee is exempted from submitting notification under this paragraph.

.

(d)

Payment

Section 524(c)(4) (21 U.S.C. 360n(c)(4)) is amended—

(1)

in subparagraph (A), by striking submission of a human drug application under section 505(b)(1) or section 351 of the Public Health Services Act for which the priority review voucher is used. and inserting notification by a sponsor of the intent of such sponsor to use the voucher, as specified in subsection (b)(4)(A). All other user fees associated with the human drug application shall be due as required by the Secretary or under applicable law.; and

(2)

in subparagraph (C), by striking the period at the end and inserting , except as specified in subsection (b)(4)(C)..

(e)

Designation process; product implementation requirement

Section 524 (21 U.S.C. 360n) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections:

(d)

Designation process

(1)

Designation of rare pediatric diseases

(A)

In general

Upon the request of the manufacturer or the sponsor of a new drug, the Secretary may designate that the new drug is for a rare pediatric disease. Such a request for designation, if sought, shall be made when requesting designation of orphan disease status under section 526 or fast-track designation under section 506. Requesting designation of rare pediatric disease status under this paragraph is not a prerequisite to receiving a priority review voucher.

(B)

Determination by Secretary

Not later than 60 days after a request is submitted under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall determine whether the disease or condition that is the subject of such request is a rare pediatric disease.

(2)

Designation of eligible treatments

(A)

In general

Upon the request of the manufacturer or the sponsor of a new drug, the Secretary may designate that a new drug is an eligible treatment. Such a request for designation, if sought, shall be made when requesting fast-track designation under section 506. Requesting designation that a new drug is an eligible treatment is not a prerequisite to receiving a priority review voucher.

(B)

Determination by Secretary

Not later than 60 days after a request is submitted under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall determine whether the new drug that is the subject of such request is an eligible treatment.

(e)

Product implementation for rare pediatric disease products

(1)

In general

The Secretary shall deem a rare pediatric disease product application incomplete if such application does not contain a description of the plan of the sponsor of such application to market the product in the United States.

(2)

Good faith intent to market

(A)

Good faith intent

The Secretary may refuse to issue a priority review voucher upon the approval of a rare pediatric disease product application if the Secretary finds that the sponsor of such application lacks a good faith intention to market the product in the United States. The Secretary may consider any fact relevant to this determination, including the history of such sponsor of producing rare pediatric disease products for which such sponsor received a priority review voucher, orphan drugs for which the sponsor received exclusivity under section 527, or pediatric drugs for which the sponsor received an additional 6 months of exclusivity under section 505A.

(B)

Presumption

The sponsor may establish a presumption of good faith by demonstrating that such sponsor has allocated sufficient resources or otherwise arranged for the production (by the sponsor or by another manufacturer) of the rare pediatric disease product in a manner sufficient to meet the expected demand for the product during the 5-year period following approval of the application.

(C)

Guidance

If the Secretary requires sponsors seeking a priority review voucher to demonstrate a good faith intent to market the rare pediatric disease product in the United States, the Secretary shall first issue a guidance document setting forth the required evidentiary support necessary to demonstrate such a good faith intent.

(3)

Postapproval production report

(A)

Report required

The sponsor of an approved rare pediatric disease product shall submit a report to the Secretary not later than 5 years after the approval of the applicable rare pediatric disease product application. Such report shall provide the following information, with respect to each of the first 4 years after approval of such product:

(i)

The estimated population in the United States suffering from the rare pediatric disease.

(ii)

The estimated demand in the United States for such rare pediatric disease product.

(iii)

The actual amount of such rare pediatric disease product distributed in the United States.

(B)

Publication upon failure to demonstrate good faith effort to market

The Secretary may publish the results of a report submitted under subparagraph (A) in the Federal Register if the Secretary finds that the sponsor that submitted such report has not made a good faith effort to meet the demand in the United States for the product that is the subject of such report during each of the first 4 years after approval of such product.

(f)

Production report for tropical disease products

(1)

Report required

The sponsor of an approved tropical disease product shall submit a report to the Secretary not later than 5 years after the approval of the applicable rare tropical disease product application. Such report shall provide the following information, with respect to each of the first 4 years after approval of such product:

(A)

The estimated global population suffering from the tropical disease.

(B)

The estimated global demand for such tropical disease product.

(C)

The actual amount of such tropical disease product distributed globally.

(2)

Publication upon failure to demonstrate good faith effort to market

The Secretary may publish the results of a report submitted under paragraph (1) in the Federal Register if the Secretary finds that the sponsor that submitted such report has not made a good faith effort to meet the global demand for the product that is the subject of such report during each of the first 4 years after approval of such product.

(g)

Notice of issuance and use of voucher

The Secretary shall publish a notice in the Federal Register and on the Web site of the Food and Drug Administration not later than 30 days after the occurrence of each of the following:

(1)

The Secretary issues a priority review voucher under this section.

(2)

A sponsor submits a human drug application for which such sponsor uses a priority review voucher.

(h)

Eligibility for other programs

A sponsor who seeks a priority review voucher under this section may participate in any other incentive program, including the programs the Secretary has implemented under this Act, if the sponsor meets the applicable criteria of such other incentive program.

(i)

Relation to other provisions

The provisions of this section shall supplement, not supplant, any other provisions of this Act or the Public Health Service Act that encourage the development of drugs for tropical diseases and rare pediatric diseases.

.

(f)

Conforming amendment

Section 740(b) of the Agricultural, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010 (21 U.S.C. 360aa note) is amended by striking (a)(3) each place such term appears and inserting (a)(6).

3.

Effective date

This Act (and the amendments made by this Act) shall take effect on the date that is 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act.