H.Res. 718House112th Congress (2011-2013)Failed

Raising a question of the privileges of the House.

Introduced June 29, 2012

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

4 earlier actions
HouseFloor Latest Action

On motion to table the measure Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 259 - 161 (Roll no. 443). (consideration: CR H4615)

June 29, 2012 • 10:36 AM

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

June 29, 2012

HouseFloor

A QUESTION OF THE PRIVILEGES OF THE HOUSE - Ms. Jackson Lee rose to a question of the privileges of the House and submitted a privileged resolution. Upon examination of the resolution, the Chair determined that the resolution qualified.

June 29, 2012 • 10:08 AM

HouseFloor

Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H4614-4615; text of measure as introduced: CR H4614-4615)

June 29, 2012 • 10:09 AM

HouseFloor

Mr. Webster moved to table the measure.

June 29, 2012 • 10:12 AM

HouseFloor

On motion to table the measure Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 259 - 161 (Roll no. 443). (consideration: CR H4615)

June 29, 2012 • 10:36 AM

Floor Debate

3 members

What members said about H.Res. 718 on the floor

1 Republican2 Democrats
Sheila Jackson Lee
Rep. Sheila Jackson LeeD-TX-18 · Jun 29, 2012

Mr. Speaker, I now rise to a question of the privileges of the House and offer the resolution previously noticed. Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.

Bob Filner
Rep. Bob FilnerD-CA-51 · Jun 29, 2012

Mr. Speaker, on rollcall 443, I was away from the Capitol due to prior commitments to my constituents. Had I been present, I would have voted ``nay.''

Daniel Webster
Rep. Daniel WebsterR-FL-8 · Jun 29, 2012

Mr. Speaker, I move to lay the resolution on the table.

Bill Text

Latest available legislative text

Reading Mode
Latest
Laid on Table in HouseIssued June 29, 2012

IV

112th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. RES. 718

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

June 29, 2012

Ms. Jackson Lee of Texas submitted the following resolution; which was laid on the table

RESOLUTION

Raising a question of the privileges of the House.

Whereas the chair of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has interfered with the work of an independent agency and pressured an administrative law judge of the National Labor Relations Board by compelling the production of documents related to an ongoing case, something independent experts said could seriously undermine the authority of those charged with enforcing the nation’s labor laws and which the House Ethics Manual discourages by noting that Federal courts have nullified administrative decisions on grounds of due process and fairness towards all of the parties when congressional interference with ongoing administrative proceedings may have unduly influenced the outcome;

Whereas the chair of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has politicized investigations by rolling back longstanding bipartisan precedents, including by authorizing subpoenas without the concurrence of the ranking member or a committee vote, by refusing to share documents and other information with the ranking member, and restricting the minority’s right to call witnesses at hearings;

Whereas the chair of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has jeopardized an ongoing criminal investigation by publicly releasing documents that his own staff admitted were under court seal;

Whereas the chair of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has unilaterally subpoenaed a witness who was expected to testify at an upcoming Federal trial, despite longstanding precedent and objections from the Department of Justice that such a step could cause complications at a trial and potentially jeopardize a criminal conviction;

Whereas the chair of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has engaged in a witch hunt, through the use of repeated incorrect and uncorroborated statements in the committee’s Fast and Furious investigation; and

Whereas the chair of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has chosen to call the Attorney General of the United States a liar on national television without corroborating evidence and has exhibited unprofessional behavior which could result in jeopardizing an ongoing Committee investigation into Operation Fast and Furious; Now, therefore, be it

That the House of Representatives disapproves of the behavior of the chair for interfering with ongoing criminal investigations; insisting on a personal attack against the Attorney General of the United States; and for calling the Attorney General of the United States a liar on national television without corroborating evidence thereby discredit to the integrity of the House.