II
Calendar No. 82
112th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 1255
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
June 22, 2011
Mr. Levin, from the Committee on Armed Services, reported the following original bill; which was read twice and placed on the calendar
A BILL
To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2012 for military construction, and for other purposes.
Short title
This Act may be cited as
the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
.
Table of contents
The table of contents for this Act is as follows:
Sec. 1. Short title.
Sec. 2. Table of contents.
Sec. 3. Congressional defense committees.
Sec. 4. Scoring of budgetary effects.
DIVISION B—Military Construction Authorizations
Sec. 2001. Short title.
Sec. 2002. Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law.
Sec. 2003. Funding tables.
TITLE XXI—Army
Sec. 2101. Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2102. Family housing.
Sec. 2103. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2104. Authorization of appropriations, Army.
Sec. 2105. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2009 project.
Sec. 2106. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project.
Sec. 2107. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 projects.
Sec. 2108. Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 project.
Sec. 2109. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2008 projects.
Sec. 2110. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2009 projects.
Sec. 2111. Technical amendments to correct certain project specifications.
Sec. 2112. Rescission of Army military construction funds.
Sec. 2113. Tour normalization.
TITLE XXII—Navy
Sec. 2201. Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2202. Family housing.
Sec. 2203. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2204. Authorization of appropriations, Navy.
Sec. 2205. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2008 project.
Sec. 2206. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2009 projects.
Sec. 2207. Rescission of Navy military construction funds.
Sec. 2208. Guam realignment.
TITLE XXIII—Air Force
Sec. 2301. Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2302. Family housing.
Sec. 2303. Improvements to military family housing units.
Sec. 2304. Authorization of appropriations, Air Force.
Sec. 2305. Modification of authorization to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project.
Sec. 2306. Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2009 project.
Sec. 2307. Rescission of Air Force military construction funds.
TITLE XXIV—Defense Agencies
Subtitle A—Defense Agency Authorizations
Sec. 2401. Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2402. Energy conservation projects.
Sec. 2403. Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies.
Subtitle B—Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations
Sec. 2411. Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, Defense-wide.
Sec. 2412. Rescission of Defense Agencies military construction funds.
TITLE XXV—North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program
Sec. 2501. Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2502. Authorization of appropriations, NATO.
TITLE XXVI—Guard and Reserve Forces Facilities
Sec. 2601. Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2602. Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2603. Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2604. Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2605. Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects.
Sec. 2606. Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve.
Sec. 2607. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2008 projects.
Sec. 2608. Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2009 projects.
Sec. 2609. Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2009 project.
TITLE XXVII—Base Closure and Realignment Activities
Sec. 2701. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 1990.
Sec. 2702. Authorized base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005.
Sec. 2703. Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005.
Sec. 2704. Rescission of military construction funds for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 1990.
TITLE XXVIII—Military Construction General Provisions
Subtitle A—Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing Changes
Sec. 2801. General military construction transfer authority.
Sec. 2802. Extension of temporary, limited authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction projects outside the United States.
Sec. 2803. Clarification of authority to use the Pentagon Reservation maintenance revolving fund for minor construction and alteration activities at the Pentagon Reservation.
Subtitle B—Real Property and Facilities Administration
Sec. 2811. Exchange of property at military installations.
Sec. 2812. Clarification of authority to limit encroachments.
Sec. 2813. Department of Defense conservation and cultural activities.
Subtitle C—Land Conveyances
Sec. 2821. Release of reversionary interest, Camp Joseph T. Robinson, Arkansas.
Sec. 2822. Clarification of land conveyance authority, Camp Caitlin and Ohana Nui areas, Hawaii.
Subtitle D—Other Matters
Sec. 2831. Investment plan for the modernization of public shipyards under jurisdiction of Department of the Navy.
Sec. 2832. Data servers and centers.
Congressional defense committees
For purposes of this Act, the term congressional defense committees has the meaning given that term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code.
Scoring of budgetary effects
The budgetary effects
of this Act, for the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go-Act
of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the latest statement titled
Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation
for this Act, submitted
for printing in the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Senate Budget
Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on
passage.
Military Construction Authorizations
Short title
This division may be
cited as the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
.
Expiration of authorizations and amounts required to be specified by law
Expiration of authorizations after three years
Except as provided in subsection (b), all authorizations contained in titles XXI through XXVII for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor) shall expire on the later of—
October 1, 2014; or
the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2015.
Exception
Subsection (a) shall not apply to authorizations for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, and contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program (and authorizations of appropriations therefor), for which appropriated funds have been obligated before the later of—
October 1, 2014; or
the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for fiscal year 2015 for military construction projects, land acquisition, family housing projects and facilities, or contributions to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program.
Funding tables
In general
The amounts authorized to be appropriated by sections 2104, 2204, 2304, 2403, 2411, 2502, and 2606 shall be available in the amounts specified in the funding table in section 4501.
Base closure and realignment activities
The amounts authorized to be appropriated by section 2703 shall be available in the amounts specified in the funding table in section 4501.
Army
Authorized Army construction and land acquisition projects
Inside the United States
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104(1), the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Alabama | Fort Rucker | $11,600,000 |
| Alaska | Fort Wainwright | $114,000,000 |
| Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson | $103,600,000 | |
| California | Presidio of Monterey | $3,000,000 |
| Fort Irwin | $23,000,000 | |
| Colorado | Fort Carson | $238,600,000 |
| Georgia | Fort Benning | $66,700,000 |
| Fort Gordon | $1,450,000 | |
| Fort Stewart | $2,600,000 | |
| Hawaii | Fort Shafter | $17,500,000 |
| Schofield Barracks | $105,000,000 | |
| Kansas | Fort Riley | $83,400,000 |
| Forbes Air Field | $5,300,000 | |
| Kentucky | Fort Campbell | $247,500,000 |
| Fort Knox | $55,000,000 | |
| Louisiana | Fort Polk | $70,100,000 |
| Maryland | Aberdeen Proving Ground | $78,500,000 |
| Fort Meade | $79,000,000 | |
| Missouri | Fort Leonard Wood | $49,000,000 |
| New York | Fort Drum | $13,300,000 |
| North Carolina | Fort Bragg | $186,000,000 |
| Oklahoma | Fort Sill | $184,600,000 |
| McAlester Army Ammunition Plant | $8,000,000 | |
| South Carolina | Fort Jackson | $63,900,000 |
| Texas | Fort Bliss | $110,900,000 |
| Fort Hood | $132,000,000 | |
| Joint Base San Antonio | $10,400,000 | |
| Red River Army Depot | $44,000,000 | |
| Utah | Dugway Proving Ground | $32,000,000 |
| Virginia | Fort Belvoir | $52,000,000 |
| Joint Base Langley Eustis | $26,000,000 | |
| Washington | Joint Base Lewis McChord | $296,300,000 |
Outside the United States
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104(2), the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Afghanistan | Bagram Air Base | $80,000,000 |
| Germany | Grafenwoehr | $38,000,000 |
| Landstuhl | $63,000,000 | |
| Oberdachstetten | $12,200,000 | |
| Kelley Barracks | $12,200,000 | |
| Vilseck | $20,000,000 | |
| Honduras | Various | $20,000,000 |
| Korea | Camp Carroll | $41,000,000 |
| Camp Henry | $48,000,000 |
Family housing
Construction and acquisition
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104(5)(A), the Secretary of the Army may construct or acquire family housing units (including land acquisition and supporting facilities) at the installations or locations, in the number of units, and in the amounts set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Units | Amount |
| Belgium | Brussels | 10 | $10,000,000 |
| Germany | Baumholder | 64 | $34,329,000 |
| Illesheim | 80 | $41,000,000 | |
| Vilseck | 22 | $12,000,000 |
Planning and design
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104(5)(A), the Secretary of the Army may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $7,897,000.
Improvements to military family housing units
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2104(5)(A), the Secretary of the Army may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $103,000,000.
Authorization of appropriations, Army
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Army in the total amount of $3,748,646,000, as follows:
For military construction projects inside the United States authorized by section 2101(a), $2,400,250,000.
For military construction projects outside the United States authorized by section 2101(b), $334,400,000.
For unspecified minor military construction projects authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, $20,000,000.
For architectural and engineering services and construction design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, $255,241,000.
For military family housing functions:
For construction and acquisition, planning and design, and improvement of military family housing and facilities, $186,897,000.
For support of military family housing (including the functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United States Code), $494,858,000.
For the construction of increment 1 of an aviation complex, phase 3A at Fort Wainwright, Alaska, authorized by section 2101(a) of this Act, $57,000,000.
Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2009 project
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4658) for Fort Benning, Georgia, for construction of a Multipurpose Training Range at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may construct up to 1,802 square feet of loading dock consistent with the Army’s construction guidelines for Multipurpose Training Ranges.
Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2629) for Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington, for construction of an access road adjoining McChord Air Force Base and Fort Lewis, the Secretary of the Army may construct a secure elevated roadway over the existing railroad and public road in lieu of an on-grade road and access control point.
Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2011 projects
Hawaii
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4437) for Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, for renovations of buildings 450 and 452, the Secretary of the Army may renovate building 451 in lieu of building 452.
New York
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4437) for Fort Drum, New York, for construction of an Aircraft Maintenance Hangar at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may construct up to 39,049 square yards of parking apron consistent with the Army’s construction guidelines for Aircraft Maintenance Hangars and associated parking aprons.
Germany
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2101(b) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4438) for Wiesbaden Air Base, Germany, for construction of an Information Processing Center at the installation, the Secretary of the Army may construct up to 9,400 square yards of vehicle parking garage consistent with the Army’s construction guidelines for parking garages, in lieu of renovating 9,400 square yards of parking area.
Additional authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2012 project
Project authorization
The Secretary of the Army may carry out a military construction project to construct a water treatment facility for Fort Irwin, California, in the amount of $115,000,000.
Use of unobligated prior-year army military construction funds
The Secretary may use available, unobligated Army military construction funds appropriated for a fiscal year before fiscal year 2012 for the project described in subsection (a).
Congressional notification
The Secretary of the Army shall provide information in accordance with section 2851(c) of title 10, United States Code, regarding the project described in subsection (a). If it becomes necessary to exceed the estimated project cost, the Secretary shall utilize the authority provided by section 2853 of such title regarding authorized cost and scope of work variations.
Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2008 projects
Extension
Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 503), authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (122 Stat. 504), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later.
Table
The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
| State | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| Louisiana | Fort Polk | Child Care Facility | $6,100,000 |
| Missouri | Fort Leonard Wood | Multipurpose Machine Gun Range | $4,150,000 |
Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2009 projects
Extension
Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4658), authorizations set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2101 of that Act (122 Stat. 504), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later.
Table
The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
| State/Country | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| Alabama | Anniston Army Depot | Lake Yard Interchange | $1,400,000 |
| Hawaii | Schofield Barracks | Brigade Complex | $65,000,000 |
| Schofield Barracks | Battalion Complex | $69,000,000 | |
| Schofield Barracks | Battalion Complex | $27,000,000 | |
| Schofield Barracks | Infrastructure Expansion | $76,000,000 | |
| New Jersey | Picatinny Arsenal | Ballistic Evaluation Facility Phase I | $9,900,000 |
| Virginia | Fort Eustis | Vehicle Paint Facility | $3,900,000 |
Technical amendments to correct certain project specifications
The table in section 3002 of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (Public Law 111-383; 124 Stat. 4503) is amended—
in the item for
the Army relating to Entry Control Point and Access Roads
that
appears immediately below the item relating to Vet Clinic &
Kennel
at Bagram Air Force Base, by striking Delaram Ii
in the State/Country and Installation column and inserting Delaram
II
; and
in the item for
the Army that appears immediately below the item relating to Electrical
Utility Systems, Ph.2
at the Shank installation, by striking
Expand Extended Cooperation Programme I and Extended Cooperation
Programme 2
in the Project Title column and inserting Expand
Entry Control Point 1 and Entry Control Point 2
.
Rescission of Army military construction funds
Of the amounts appropriated or otherwise made available for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Army for fiscal years before fiscal year 2012 that remain available for obligation as of the date of the enactment of this Act, $100,000,000 is hereby rescinded.
Tour normalization
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated under this Act may be obligated or expended for tour normalization until—
the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation conducts an analysis of alternatives to tour normalization that identifies alternative courses of action and their associated life cycle costs, potential benefits, advantages, and disadvantages;
the Secretary of the Army submits to the congressional defense committees a master plan for completing all phases of tour normalization that includes a detailed description of all costs and a schedule for the construction of necessary facilities and infrastructure; and
legislation enacted after the date of the enactment of this Act authorizes the obligation of funds for such purpose.
Navy
Authorized Navy construction and land acquisition projects
Inside the United States
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(1), the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Arizona | Marine Corps Air Station, Yuma | $162,785,000 |
| California | Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton | $335,080,000 |
| Naval Base, Coronado | $93,735,000 | |
| Marine Corps Base, Twentynine Palms | $67,109,000 | |
| Marine Corps Logistics Base, Barstow | $8,590,000 | |
| Marine Corps Mountain Warfare Training Center, Bridgeport | $16,138,000 | |
| Naval Base Ventura County Point Mugu | $15,377,000 | |
| Naval Air Station, Jacksonville | $36,552,000 | |
| Naval Station, Mayport | $14,998,000 | |
| Naval Air Station, Whiting Field (Eglin Air Force Base) | $20,620,000 | |
| Georgia | Naval Submarine Base, Kings Bay | $86,063,000 |
| Hawaii | Marine Corps Base, Kaneohe Bay | $57,704,000 |
| Pacific Missile Range Facility, Barking Sands | $9,679,000 | |
| Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam | $7,492,000 | |
| Illinois | Naval Station, Great Lakes | $91,042,000 |
| Maryland | Naval Support Facility, Indian Head | $67,779,000 |
| Naval Air Station, Patuxent River | $45,844,000 | |
| North Carolina | Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune | $200,482,000 |
| Marine Corps Air Station, Cherry Point | $17,760,000 | |
| Marine Corps Air Station, New River | $78,930,000 | |
| South Carolina | Marine Corps Air Station, Beaufort | $21,096,000 |
| Virginia | Naval Station, Norfolk | $81,304,000 |
| Naval Support Activity, Norfolk | $26,924,000 | |
| Naval Ship Yard, Portsmouth | $74,864,000 | |
| Marine Corps Base, Quantico | $183,690,000 | |
| Washington | Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton (Puget Sound Ship Yard) | $13,341,000 |
| Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton (Bangor) | $758,842,000 |
Outside the United States
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(2), the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installation or location outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Djibouti | Camp Lemonier | $89,499,000 |
| Diego Garcia | Naval Support Facility, Diego Garcia | $35,444,000 |
Family housing
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(5)(A), the Secretary of the Navy may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $3,199,000.
Improvements to military family housing units
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2204(5)(A), the Secretary of the Navy may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $97,773,000.
Authorization of appropriations, Navy
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Navy in the total amount of $2,656,457,000, as follows:
For military construction projects inside the United States authorized by section 2201(a), $1,956,822,000.
For military construction projects outside the United States authorized by section 2201(b), $124,943,000.
For unspecified minor military construction projects authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, $21,495,000.
For architectural and engineering services and construction design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, $84,362,000.
For military family housing functions:
For construction and acquisition, planning and design, and improvement of military family housing and facilities, $100,972,000.
For support of military family housing (including functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United States Code), $367,863,000.
Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2008 project
Extension
Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 503), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201(c) of that Act (122 Stat. 511) and extended by section 2206 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4443), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later.
Table
The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
| State/Country | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| Worldwide Unspecified | Various | Host Nation Infrastructure | $2,700,000 |
Technical amendment for consistency in project authorization display
The table in section 2201(c) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 511) is amended to read as follows:
| State/Country | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| Worldwide Unspecified | Various | Wharf Utilities Upgrade | $8,900,000 |
| Worldwide Unspecified | Various | Host Nation Infrastructure | $2,700,000 |
Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2009 projects
Extension
Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4658), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2201 of that Act (122 Stat 4670), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later.
Table
The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
| State/Country | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| California | Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendelton | Operations Assess Points, Red Beach | $11,970,000 |
| Marine Corps Air Station, Miramar | Emergency Response Station | $6,530,000 | |
| District of Columbia | Washington Navy Yard | Child Development Center | $9,340,000 |
Rescission of Navy military construction funds
Of the amounts appropriated or otherwise made available for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Navy for fiscal years before fiscal year 2012 that remain available for obligation as of the date of the enactment of this Act, $25,000,000 is hereby rescinded.
Guam realignment
None of the funds authorized to be appropriated under this title, or amounts provided by the Government of Japan for military construction activities on land under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense, may be obligated or expended to implement the realignment of United States Marine Corps forces from Okinawa to Guam as envisioned in the United States–Japan Roadmap for Realignment Implementation issued May 1, 2006, until—
the Commandant of the Marine Corps provides the congressional defense committees the Commandant's preferred force lay-down for the United States Pacific Command Area of Responsibility;
the Secretary of Defense submits to the congressional defense committees a master plan for the construction of facilities and infrastructure to execute the Commandant’s preferred force lay-down on Guam, including a detailed description of costs and a schedule for such construction;
the Secretary of Defense certifies to the congressional defense committees that tangible progress has been made regarding the relocation of Marine Corps Air Station Futenma; and
a plan coordinated by all pertinent Federal agencies is provided to the congressional defense committees detailing descriptions of work, costs, and a schedule for completion of construction, improvements, and repairs to the non-military utilities, facilities, and infrastructure on Guam affected by the realignment of forces.
Air Force
Authorized Air Force construction and land acquisition projects
Inside the United States
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(1), the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Alaska | Eielson Air Force Base | $45,000,000 |
| Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson | $97,000,000 | |
| Arizona | Davis-Monthan Air Force Base | $33,000,000 |
| Luke Air Force Base | $24,000,000 | |
| California | Travis Air Force Base | $22,000,000 |
| Vandenberg Air Force Base | $14,200,000 | |
| Colorado | U.S. Air Force Academy | $13,400,000 |
| Delaware | Dover Air Force Base | $2,800,000 |
| Kansas | Fort Riley, Kansas | $7,600,000 |
| Louisiana | Barksdale Air Force Base | $23,500,000 |
| Missouri | Whiteman Air Force Base | $4,800,000 |
| Nebraska | Offutt Air Force Base | $564,000,000 |
| Nevada | Nellis Air Force Base | $35,850,000 |
| New Mexico | Cannon Air Force Base | $22,598,000 |
| Holloman Air Force Base | $29,200,000 | |
| Kirtland Air Force Base | $25,000,000 | |
| North Carolina | Pope Air Force Base | $6,000,000 |
| North Dakota | Minot Air Force Base | $67,800,000 |
| Texas | Joint Base San Antonio | $110,000,000 |
| Utah | Hill Air Force Base | $16,500,000 |
| Virginia | Joint Base Langley Eustis | $50,000,000 |
| Washington | Fairchild Air Force Base | $27,600,000 |
Outside the United States
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(2), the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Germany | Ramstein Air Base | $34,697,000 |
| Greenland | Thule Air Base | $28,000,000 |
| Guam | Joint Region Marianas | $211,600,000 |
| Italy | Naval Air Station, Signonella | $15,000,000 |
| Korea | Osan Air Base | $23,000,000 |
Family housing
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(5)(A), the Secretary of the Air Force may carry out architectural and engineering services and construction design activities with respect to the construction or improvement of family housing units in an amount not to exceed $4,208,000.
Improvements to military family housing units
Subject to section 2825 of title 10, United States Code, and using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2304(5)(A), the Secretary of the Air Force may improve existing military family housing units in an amount not to exceed $80,596,000.
Authorization of appropriations, Air Force
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Air Force in the total amount of $1,716,623,000, as follows:
For military construction projects inside the United States authorized by section 2301(a), $677,848,000.
For military construction projects outside the United States authorized by section 2301(b), $184,297,000.
For unspecified minor military construction projects authorized by section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, $20,000,000.
For architectural and engineering services and construction design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, $81,913,000.
For military family housing functions:
For construction and acquisition, planning and design, and improvement of military family housing and facilities, $84,804,000.
For support of military family housing (including functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United States Code), $404,761,000.
For the construction of increment 2 of the Air Force Technical Applications Center at Patrick Air Force Base, Florida, as authorized by section 2301(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4444), $79,000,000.
For the construction of increment 1 of a STRATCOM replacement facility at Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, authorized by section 2301(a) of this Act, $120,000,000.
For the construction of increment 1 of a Guam Strike fuel maintenance hangar at Joint Region Marianas, Guam, authorized by section 2301(a) of this Act, $64,000,000.
Modification of authorization to carry out certain fiscal year 2010 project
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2301(a) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2636) for Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii, for construction of a Ground Control Tower at the installation, the Secretary of the Air Force may construct 43 vertical meters (141 vertical feet) in lieu of 111 square meters (1,195 square feet), consistent with the Air Force’s construction guidelines for control towers, using amounts appropriated pursuant to authorizations of appropriations in prior years.
Extension of authorization of certain fiscal year 2009 project
Extension
Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4658), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2301(b) of that Act (122 Stat. 4680) shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later:
Table
The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
| State | Installation
or Location | Project | Amount |
| Germany | Spangdahlem AB | Construct Child Development Center | $11,400,000 |
Rescission of Air Force military construction funds
Of the amounts appropriated or otherwise made available for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of the Air Force for fiscal years before fiscal year 2012 that remain available for obligation as of the date of the enactment of this Act, $32,000,000 is hereby rescinded.
Defense Agencies
Defense Agency Authorizations
Authorized Defense Agencies construction and land acquisition projects
Inside the United States
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(1), the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Alabama | Redstone Arsenal | $58,800,000 |
| Alaska | Anchorage | $18,400,000 |
| Eielson Air Force Base | $14,800,000 | |
| Arizona | Davis-Monthan Air Force Base | $23,000,000 |
| California | Defense Distribution Depot Tracy | $15,500,000 |
| Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton | $12,141,000 | |
| Naval Base, Coronado | $42,000,000 | |
| Naval Base, Coronado (San Clemente) | $21,800,000 | |
| Colorado | Buckley Air Force Base | $140,932,000 |
| District of Columbia | Bolling Air Force Base | $16,736,000 |
| Florida | Eglin Air Force Base | $61,100,000 |
| Macdill Air Force Base | $15,200,000 | |
| Naval Air Station, Whiting Field | $3,800,000 | |
| Georgia | Fort Benning | $37,205,000 |
| Fort Gordon | $17,705,000 | |
| Fort Stewart | $72,300,000 | |
| Hawaii | Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam | $14,400,000 |
| Illinois | Naval Station, Great Lakes | $16,900,000 |
| Kentucky | Fort Campbell | $138,500,000 |
| Fort Knox | $38,845,000 | |
| Louisiana | Barksdale Air Force Base | $6,200,000 |
| Maryland | Joint Base Andrews | $265,700,000 |
| National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda | $18,000,000 | |
| Massachusetts | Hanscom Air Force Base | $34,040,000 |
| Westover Air Reserve Base | $23,300,000 | |
| Mississippi | Columbus Air Force Base | $2,600,000 |
| Construction Battalion Center, Gulfport | $34,700,000 | |
| Missouri | Arnold | $9,253,000 |
| New Mexico | Cannon Air Force Base | $132,997,000 |
| New York | Fort Drum | $20,400,000 |
| North Carolina | Camp Lejeune | $6,670,000 |
| Fort Bragg | $206,274,000 | |
| Marine Corps Air Station, New River | $22,687,000 | |
| Pope Air Force Base | $5,400,000 | |
| Ohio | Defense Supply Center Columbus | $10,000,000 |
| Oklahoma | Altus Air Force Base | $8,200,000 |
| Pennsylvania | Defense Distribution Depot New Cumberland | $46,000,000 |
| Defense Supply Center Philadelphia | $8,000,000 | |
| South Carolina | Joint Base Charleston | $24,868,000 |
| Texas | Joint Base Antonio | $194,300,000 |
| Virginia | Charlottesville | $10,805,000 |
| Fort Belvoir | $54,625,000 | |
| Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek-Fort Story | $37,000,000 | |
| Marine Corps Base, Quantico | $46,727,000 | |
| Naval Air Station, Oceana (Dam Neck) | $23,116,000 | |
| Dahlgren | $1,988,000 | |
| Pentagon Reservation | $8,742,000 | |
| Washington | Joint Base Lewis-McChord | $35,000,000 |
| Naval Air Station, Whidbey Island | $25,000,000 | |
| West Virginia | Camp Dawson | $2,200,000 |
Outside the United States
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(2), the Secretary of Defense may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the installations or locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Installation or Location | Amount |
| Belgium | Brussels | $24,118,000 |
| Germany | Ansbach | $11,672,000 |
| Baumholder | $59,419,000 | |
| Grafenwoehr | $6,529,000 | |
| Rhine Ordnance Barracks | $1,196,650,000 | |
| Spangdahlem Air Base | $129,043,000 | |
| Stuttgart-Patch Barracks | $2,434,000 | |
| Italy | Vicenza | $41,864,000 |
| Japan | Yokota Air Base | $61,842,000 |
| United Kingdom | Menwith Hill Station | $68,601,000 |
| Royal Air Force Alconbury | $35,030,000 |
Energy conservation projects
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2403(6), the Secretary of Defense may carry out energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, in the amount of $135,000,000.
Authorization of appropriations, Defense Agencies
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of Defense (other than the military departments) in the total amount of $3,435,108,000, as follows:
For military construction projects inside the United States authorized by section 2401(a), $1,559,624,000.
For military construction projects outside the United States authorized by section 2401(b), $511,144,000.
For unspecified minor military construction projects under section 2805 of title 10, United States Code, $32,964,000.
For contingency construction projects of the Secretary of Defense under section 2804 of title 10, United States Code, $10,000,000.
For architectural and engineering services and construction design under section 2807 of title 10, United States Code, $439,602,000.
For energy conservation projects under chapter 173 of title 10, United States Code, $135,000,000.
For military family housing functions:
For support of military family housing (including functions described in section 2833 of title 10, United States Code), $50,723,000.
For credits to the Department of Defense Family Housing Improvement Fund under section 2883 of title 10, United States Code, and the Homeowners Assistance Fund established under section 1013 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 3374), $3,468,000.
For the construction of increment 6 of the Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases Stage I at Fort Detrick, Maryland, authorized by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (division B of Public Law 109–364; 120 Stat. 2457), $137,600,000.
For the construction of increment 4 of replacement fuel storage facilities at Point Loma Annex, California, authorized by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 521), as amended by section 2406 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2646), $27,000,000.
For the construction of increment 4 of the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense replacement facility at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, authorized by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4689), $22,850,000.
For the construction of increment 3 of a National Security Agency data center at Camp Williams, Utah, authorized as a Military Construction, Defense-Wide project by title IX of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111–32; 123 Stat. 1888), $123,201,000.
For the construction of increment 3 of the hospital at Fort Bliss, Texas, authorized by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2642), $109,400,000.
For the construction of increment 1 of a Mountainview operations facility at Buckley Air Force Base, Colorado, authorized by section 2401(a) of this Act, $70,432,000.
For the construction of increment 1 of an ambulatory care center at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, authorized by section 2401(a) of this Act, $121,500,000.
For the construction of increment 1 of an ambulatory care center, phase 3 at Fort Bliss, Texas, authorized by section 2401(a) of this Act, $80,600,000.
Chemical Demilitarization Authorizations
Authorization of appropriations, chemical demilitarization construction, Defense-wide
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for military construction and land acquisition for chemical demilitarization in the total amount of $75,312,000, as follows:
For the construction of phase 13 of a chemical munitions demilitarization facility at Pueblo Chemical Activity, Colorado, authorized by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 (division B of Public Law 104–201; 110 Stat. 2775), as amended by section 2406 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 839), section 2407 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (division B of Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2698), and section 2413 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4697), $15,338,000.
For the construction of phase 12 of a munitions demilitarization facility at Blue Grass Army Depot, Kentucky, authorized by section 2401(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (division B of Public Law 106–65; 113 Stat. 835), as amended by section 2405 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 (division B of Public Law 107–107; 115 Stat. 1298), section 2405 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2003 (division B of Public Law 107–314; 116 Stat. 2698), section 2414 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4697), and section 2412 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4450), $59,974,000.
Rescission of Defense Agencies military construction funds
Of the amounts appropriated or otherwise made available for military construction, land acquisition, and military family housing functions of the Department of Defense (other than the military departments) for fiscal years before fiscal year 2012 that remain available for obligation as of the date of the enactment of this Act, $131,000,000 is hereby rescinded.
North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program
Authorized NATO construction and land acquisition projects
The Secretary of Defense may make contributions for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program as provided in section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, in an amount not to exceed the sum of the amount authorized to be appropriated for this purpose in section 2502 and the amount collected from the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as a result of construction previously financed by the United States.
Authorization of appropriations, NATO
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for contributions by the Secretary of Defense under section 2806 of title 10, United States Code, for the share of the United States of the cost of projects for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Security Investment Program authorized by section 2501, in the amount of $272,611,000.
Guard and Reserve Forces Facilities
Authorized Army National Guard construction and land acquisition projects
Inside the United States
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606(1), the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Location | Amount |
| Alabama | Fort McClellan | $16,500,000 |
| Arizona | Papago Military Reservation | $17,800,000 |
| Arkansas | Fort Chafee | $3,500,000 |
| California | Camp Roberts | $38,160,000 |
| Camp San Luis Obispo | $8,000,000 | |
| Colorado | Alamosa | $6,400,000 |
| Aurora | $3,600,000 | |
| Fort Carson | $43,000,000 | |
| District of Columbia | Anacostia | $5,300,000 |
| Florida | Camp Blanding | $5,500,000 |
| Georgia | Atlanta | $11,000,000 |
| Hinesville | $17,500,000 | |
| Macon | $14,500,000 | |
| Hawaii | Kalaeloa | $33,000,000 |
| Illinois | Normal | $10,000,000 |
| Indiana | Camp Atterbury | $81,900,000 |
| Indianapolis | $25,700,000 | |
| Maine | Bangor | $15,600,000 |
| Brunswick | $23,000,000 | |
| Maryland | Dundalk | $16,000,000 |
| La Plata | $9,000,000 | |
| Westminster | $10,400,000 | |
| Massachusetts | Natick | $9,000,000 |
| Minnesota | Camp Ripley | $8,400,000 |
| Mississippi | Camp Shelby | $64,600,000 |
| Nebraska | Grand Island | $22,000,000 |
| Mead | $9,100,000 | |
| Nevada | Las Vegas | $23,000,000 |
| New Jersey | Lakehurst | $49,000,000 |
| New Mexico | Santa Fe | $5,200,000 |
| North Carolina | Greensboro | $3,700,000 |
| Oklahoma | Camp Gruber | $13,361,000 |
| Oregon | The Dalles | $13,800,000 |
| South Carolina | Allendale | $4,300,000 |
| Utah | Camp Williams | $6,500,000 |
| Virginia | Fort Pickett | $11,000,000 |
| West Virginia | Buckhannon | $10,000,000 |
| Wisconsin | Camp Williams | $7,000,000 |
| Wyoming | Cheyenne | $8,900,000 |
Outside the United States
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606(1), the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army National Guard locations outside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| Country | Location | Amount |
| Puerto Rico | Fort Buchanan | $57,000,000 |
Authorized Army Reserve construction and land acquisition projects
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606(2), the Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Army Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Location | Amount |
| California | Fort Hunter Liggett | $5,200,000 |
| Colorado | Fort Collins | $13,600,000 |
| Illinois | Homewood | $16,000,000 |
| Rockford | $12,800,000 | |
| Indiana | Fort Benjamin Harrison | $57,000,000 |
| Kansas | Kansas City | $13,000,000 |
| Massachusetts | Attleboro | $22,000,000 |
| Minnesota | Saint Joseph | $11,800,000 |
| Missouri | Weldon Springs | $19,000,000 |
| New York | Schenectady | $20,000,000 |
| North Carolina | Greensboro | $19,000,000 |
| South Carolina | Orangeburg | $12,000,000 |
| Wisconsin | Fort McCoy | $27,300,000 |
Authorized Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve construction and land acquisition projects
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606(3), the Secretary of the Navy may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Navy Reserve and Marine Corps Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Location | Amount |
| Pennsylvania | Pittsburgh | $13,759,000 |
| Tennessee | Memphis | $7,949,000 |
Authorized Air National Guard construction and land acquisition projects
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606(4), the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Air National Guard locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Location | Amount |
| California | Beale Air Force Base | $6,100,000 |
| Moffett Field | $26,000,000 | |
| Hawaii | Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam | $39,521,000 |
| Indiana | Fort Wayne International Airport | $4,000,000 |
| Maryland | Martin State Airport | $4,900,000 |
| Massachusetts | Otis Air National Guard Base | $7,800,000 |
| Ohio | Springfield Beckley-Municipal Airport | $6,700,000 |
Authorized Air Force Reserve construction and land acquisition projects
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2606(5), the Secretary of the Air Force may acquire real property and carry out military construction projects for the Air Force Reserve locations inside the United States, and in the amounts, set forth in the following table:
| State | Location | Amount |
| California | March Air Force Base | $16,393,000 |
| South Carolina | Charleston Air Force Base | $9,593,000 |
Authorization of appropriations, National Guard and Reserve
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for the costs of acquisition, architectural and engineering services, and construction of facilities for the Guard and Reserve Forces, and for contributions therefor, under chapter 1803 of title 10, United States Code (including the cost of acquisition of land for those facilities), in the following amounts:
For the Department of the Army, for the Army National Guard of the United States, $773,592,000.
For the Department of the Army, for the Army Reserve, $280,549,000.
For the Department of the Navy, for the Navy and Marine Corps Reserve, $26,299,000.
For the Department of the Air Force, for the Air National Guard of the United States, $116,246,000.
For the Department of the Air Force, for the Air Force Reserve, $33,620,000.
Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2008 projects
Extension
Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 (division B of Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 503), the authorization set forth in the table in subsection (b), as provided in section 2601 and 2604 of that Act (122 Stat. 527–528), shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later.
Table
The table referred to in subsection (a) is as follows:
| State | Installation or Location | Project | Amount |
| Pennsylvania | Coatesville | Readiness Center | $ 8,300,000 |
Extension of authorizations of certain fiscal year 2009 projects
Extension
Notwithstanding section 2002 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4658), the authorization set forth in the tables in subsection (b), as provided in sections 2601, 2602, and 2603 of that Act, shall remain in effect until October 1, 2012, or the date of the enactment of an Act authorizing funds for military construction for fiscal year 2013, whichever is later.
Tables
The tables referred to in subsection (a) are as follows:
| State | Installation
or Location | Project | Amount |
| Indiana | Camp Atterbury | Multipurpose Machine Gun Range | $5,800,000 |
| Nevada | Elko | Readiness Center | $11,375,000 |
| State | Installation
or Location | Project | Amount |
| New York | Staten Island | Army Reserve Center | $18,550,000 |
| State | Installation
or Location | Project | Amount |
| Delaware | Wilmington | Armed Forces Reserve Center | $11,530,000 |
Modification of authority to carry out certain fiscal year 2009 project
In the case of the authorization contained in the table in section 2601(a) of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (division B of Public Law 110–417; 122 Stat. 4701) for Elko, Nevada, for construction of an Army Reserve Center, the Secretary of the Army may instead construct the Army Reserve Center at Carlin, Nevada.
Base Closure and Realignment Activities
Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 1990
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for base closure and realignment activities, including real property acquisition and military construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department of Defense Base Closure Account 1990 established by section 2906 of such Act, in the total amount of $323,543,000, as follows:
For the Department of the Army, $70,716,000.
For the Department of the Navy, $129,351,000.
For the Department of the Air Force, $123,476,000.
Authorized base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005
Using amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in section 2703, the Secretary of Defense may carry out base closure and realignment activities, including real property acquisition and military construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005 established by section 2906A of such Act, in the amount of $258,776,000.
Authorization of appropriations for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005
Funds are hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2011, for base closure and realignment activities, including real property acquisition and military construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department of Defense Base Closure Account 2005 established by section 2906A of such Act, in the total amount of $258,776,000 as follows:
For the Department of the Army, $229,190,000.
For the Department of the Navy, $25,829,000.
For the Department of the Air Force, $1,966,000.
For the Defense Agencies, $1,791,000.
Rescission of military construction funds for base realignment and closure activities funded through Department of Defense Base Closure Account 1990
Of the amounts appropriated or otherwise made available for fiscal years before fiscal year 2012 for base closure and realignment activities, including real property acquisition and military construction projects, as authorized by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (part A of title XXIX of Public Law 101–510; 10 U.S.C. 2687 note) and funded through the Department of Defense Base Closure Account 1990 established by section 2906 of such Act that remain available for obligation as of the date of the enactment of this Act, $100,000,000 is hereby rescinded.
Military Construction General Provisions
Military Construction Program and Military Family Housing Changes
General military construction transfer authority
Authority to transfer authorization of appropriations
Authority
Upon a determination by the Secretary of a military department, or with respect to the Defense Agencies, the Secretary of Defense, that such action is necessary in the national interest, the Secretary concerned may transfer amounts of authorization of appropriations made available to that military department or Defense Agency in this division for fiscal year 2012 between any such authorization of appropriations for that military department or Defense Agency for that fiscal year. Amounts of authorization of appropriations so transferred shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes as the authorization of appropriations to which transferred.
Aggregate limit
The aggregate amount of authorizations that the Secretaries concerned may transfer under the authority of this section may not exceed $400,000,000.
Limitation
The authority provided by this section to transfer authorizations may only be used to fund increases in the cost of military construction projects that have been authorized by law.
Effect on authorization amounts
A transfer made from one account to another under the authority of this section shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized for appropriation for the account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal to the amount transferred.
Notice to Congress
The Secretary concerned shall promptly notify the congressional defense committees of each transfer made by that Secretary under subsection (a).
Extension of temporary, limited authority to use operation and maintenance funds for construction projects outside the United States
One-year extension of authority
Section 2808 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004 (division B of Public Law 108–136; 117 Stat. 1723), as most recently amended by section 2804 of the Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 (division B of Public Law 111–383; 124 Stat. 4459), is amended—
in subsection
(c)(2), by striking fiscal year 2011
and inserting fiscal
year 2012
; and
in subsection (h)—
in paragraph (1),
by striking September 30, 2011
and inserting September
30, 2012
; and
in paragraph (2),
by striking fiscal year 2012
and inserting fiscal year
2013
.
Modification of quarterly reporting requirement
Subsection (g) of such section is amended—
by striking
Quarterly reports
or
in the subsection heading;
by striking
the report for a fiscal-year quarter under subsection (d) or
;
and
by striking
report or
.
Technical amendments
Subsections (a) and (i) of such section are amended by
striking Combined Task Force-Horn of Africa
each place it
appears and inserting Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of
Africa
.
Clarification of authority to use the Pentagon Reservation maintenance revolving fund for minor construction and alteration activities at the Pentagon Reservation
Section 2674(e)(4) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
by striking The authority
and inserting (A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the
authority
; and
by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
The Secretary may use monies from the Fund to support construction or alteration activities at the Pentagon Reservation within the limits stated in section 2805 of this title.
.
Real Property and Facilities Administration
Exchange of property at military installations
Exchange authority
Section 2869 of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
in the section
heading, by striking Conveyance of property at military installations to limit
encroachment
and inserting Exchange of property at military
installations
; and
in subsection (a)—
in the subsection
heading, by striking Conveyance authorized; consideration
and
inserting Exchange
authorized
; and
in paragraph (1),
by striking to any person who agrees, in exchange for the real property,
to carry out a land acquisition
and inserting to any eligible
entity who agrees, in exchange for the real property, to transfer to the United
States all right, title, and interest of the entity in and to a parcel of real
property, including any improvements thereon under their control, or to carry
out a land acquisition
.
Extension of authority
Such section is further amended—
by striking subsection (f); and
by redesignating subsections (g) and (h) as subsections (f) and (g), respectively.
Clerical amendment
The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 169 of such title is amended by striking the item relating to section 2869 and inserting the following new item:
2869. Exchange of property at military installations.
.
Clarification of authority to limit encroachments
Inapplicability of certain contract requirements
Subsection (c) of section 2684a of title 10, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:
Inapplicability of certain contract requirements
Notwithstanding chapter 63 of title 31, an agreement under this section that is a cooperative agreement or a grant may be used to acquire property or services for the direct benefit or use of the United States Government.
.
Acquisition and acceptance of property and interests
Subsection (d) of such section is amended—
in paragraph (3)—
by inserting
, and the monitoring and enforcement of any right, title, or interest
in,
after resources on
;
by inserting
and monitoring and enforcement
after natural resource
management
; and
by adding at the end the following:
Any such payment by the United States—
may be paid in a lump sum and include an amount intended to cover the future costs of natural resource management and monitoring and enforcement; and
shall be placed by the eligible entity in an interest-bearing account, and any interest shall be applied for the same purposes as the principal.
; and
in paragraph (5)—
inserting
(A)
after (5)
;
by inserting
after the first sentence the following: No such requirement need be
included in the agreement if the property or interest is being transferred to a
State, or the agreement requires it to be subsequently transferred to a State,
and the Secretary concerned determines that the laws and regulations applicable
to the future use of such property or interest provide adequate assurance that
the property concerned will be developed and used in a manner appropriate for
purposes of this section.
; and
by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), if all or a portion of the property or interest acquired under the agreement is subsequently transferred to the United States and administrative jurisdiction over the property is under a Federal official other than a Secretary concerned, the Secretary concerned and that Federal official shall enter into a memorandum of agreement providing, to the satisfaction of the Secretary concerned, for the management of the property or interest concerned in a manner appropriate for purposes of this section. Such memorandum of agreement shall also provide that, should it be proposed that the property or interest concerned be developed or used in a manner not appropriate for purposes of this section, including declaring the property to be excess to the agency’s needs or proposing to exchange the property for other property, the Secretary concerned may request that administrative jurisdiction over the property be transferred to the Secretary concerned at no cost, and, upon such a request being made, the administrative jurisdiction over the property shall be transferred accordingly.
.
Department of Defense conservation and cultural activities
Section 2694(b)(2) of title 10, United States Code, is amended—
in subparagraph
(B), by inserting and sustainability
after
safety
; and
by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
The implementation of ecosystem-wide land management plans—
for a single ecosystem that encompasses at least two non-contiguous military installations, if those military installations are not all under the administrative jurisdiction of the same Secretary of a military department; and
providing synergistic benefits unavailable if the installations acted separately.
.
Land Conveyances
Release of reversionary interest, Camp Joseph T. Robinson, Arkansas
Section 2852 of the Military Construction
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of Public Law 111–84; 123
Stat. 2685) is amended by striking to be acquired by the United States
of America
and inserting to be acquired by the Military
Department of Arkansas
.
Clarification of land conveyance authority, Camp Caitlin and Ohana Nui areas, Hawaii
Section 2856(a) of the
Military Construction Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (division B of
Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2689) is amended by inserting before the period at
the end the following: , before the property or portion thereof is made
available for transfer pursuant to the Hawaiian Home Lands Recovery Act (title
II of Public Law 104–42; 109 Stat. 357), for use by any other Federal agency,
or for disposal under applicable laws
.
Other Matters
Investment plan for the modernization of public shipyards under jurisdiction of Department of the Navy
Plan Required
Not later than March 1, 2012, the Secretary of the Navy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a plan to address the facilities and infrastructure requirements at each public shipyard under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Navy.
Content
The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements:
A description of the operations and support required at each shipyard under the control of the Secretary, including the location, year constructed, the classes of ships serviced, number of personnel assigned, and the average age of facilities at each location.
A review of all workload requirements in the past 5 years, an assessment of the efficiency in the use of existing facilities to meet the workload, and an estimate of the workload planned for each shipyard through the current Future Years Defense plan.
An assessment of the adequacy of each facility—
to carry out efficient depot-level ship maintenance with modern technology and equipment;
to ensure workplace safety;
to support nuclear-related activities (where applicable);
to maintain the quality of life of the workforce; and
to meet the energy savings goals of the Secretary of the Navy for military installations.
An assessment of the existing condition of each facility at each shipyard to include a review of existing and projected deficiencies or inadequate conditions at each facility, and whether any of the facilities listed are temporary structures.
A description and cost estimate for each project to improve, repair, renovate, or modernize facilities or infrastructure.
A description of the facility improvements or new construction projects at each shipyard that would improve the efficiency of the facility’s operations or generate energy savings based upon a business case analysis.
An investment strategy planned for each shipyard to correct deficiencies identified in paragraph (4), including timelines to complete each project and cost estimates and timelines necessary to complete the projects identified in paragraph (6).
A list of projects, costs, and timelines through the future years defense plan to meet the requirements of the minimum capital investment percentage required under section 2476 of title 10, United States Code.
Data servers and centers
Limitations on obligation of funds
Limitations
Before performance plan
During the period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending on May 1, 2012, a department, agency, or component of the Department of Defense may not obligate funds for a data server, data server upgrade, data server farm, or data center unless approved by the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense or the Chief Information Officer of a component of the Department to whom the Chief Information Officer of the Department has specifically delegated such approval authority.
Under performance plan
After May 1, 2012, a department, agency, or component of the Department may not obligate funds for a data center, or any information systems technology used therein, unless that obligation is in accordance with the performance plan required by subsection (b) and is approved as described in subparagraph (A).
Requirements for approvals
Before performance plan
An approval of the obligation of funds may not be granted under paragraph (1)(A) unless the official granting the approval determines, in writing, that existing resources of the agency, component, or element concerned cannot affordably or practically be used or modified to meet the requirements to be met through the obligation of funds.
Under performance plan
An approval of the obligation of funds may not be granted under paragraph (1)(B) unless the official granting the approval determines that—
existing resources of the Department do not meet the operation requirements to be met through the obligation of funds; and
the proposed obligation is in accordance with the performance standards and measures established by the Chief Information Officer of the Department under subsection (b).
Reports
Not later than 30 days after the end of each calendar quarter, each Chief Information Officer of a component of the Department who grants an approval under paragraph (1) during such calendar quarter shall submit to the Chief Information Officer of the Department a report on the approval or approvals so granted during such calendar quarter.
Performance plan for reduction of resources required for data servers and centers
Component plans
In general
Not later than January 15, 2012, the Secretaries of the military departments and the heads of the Defense Agencies shall each submit to the Chief Information Officer of the Department a plan for the department or agency concerned to achieve the following:
A reduction in the square feet of floor space devoted to information systems technologies, attendant support technologies, and operations within data centers.
A reduction in the use of all utilities necessary to power and cool information systems technologies and data centers.
An increase in multi-organizational utilization of data centers, information systems technologies, and associated resources.
An increase in virtualization of data servers.
A reduction in the number of commercial and government developed applications running on data servers and within data centers.
A reduction in the number of government and vendor provided full-time equivalent personnel, and in the cost of labor, associated with the operation of data servers and data centers.
Specification of required elements
The Chief Information Officer of the Department shall specify the particular performance standards and measures and implementation elements to be included in the plans submitted under this paragraph, including specific goals and schedules for achieving the matters specified in subparagraph (A).
Defense-wide plan
In general
Not later than April 1, 2012, the Chief Information Officer of the Department shall submit to the congressional defense committees a performance plan for a reduction in the resources required for data centers and information systems technologies Department-wide. The plan shall be based upon and incorporate appropriate elements of the plans submitted under paragraph (1).
Elements
The performance plan required under this paragraph shall include the following:
A Department-wide performance plan for achieving the matters specified in paragraph (1)(A), including performance standards and measures for data centers and information systems technologies, goals and schedules for achieving such matters, and an estimate of cost savings anticipated through implementation of the plan.
A Department-wide strategy for each of the following:
Desktop, laptop, and mobile device virtualization.
Transitioning to cloud computing through data center virtualization and consolidation.
Migration of Defense data and government-provided services from Department-owned and operated data centers to cloud computing services generally available within the private sector.
Utilization of private sector-managed security services for data centers and cloud computing services.
Responsibility
The Chief Information Officer of the Department shall discharge the responsibility for establishing performance standards and measures for data centers and information systems technologies for purposes of this subsection. Such responsibility may not be delegated.
Exception
The Chief Information Officer of the Department and the Chief Information Officer of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence may jointly exempt from the applicability of this section such intelligence components of the Department of Defense (and the programs and activities thereof) that are funded through the National Intelligence Program (NIP) as the Chief Information Officers consider appropriate.
Reports on cost savings
In general
Not later than March 1 of each fiscal year, and ending in fiscal year 2016, the Chief Information Officer of the Department shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the cost savings, cost reductions, cost avoidances, and performance gains achieved, and anticipated to be achieved, as of the date of such report as a result of activities undertaken under this section.
Appropriate committees of Congress defined
In this subsection, the term appropriate committees of Congress means—
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
the Committee on Armed Services, the Committee on Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.
June 22, 2011
Read twice and placed on the calendar