II
112th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 552
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
March 10, 2011
Mr. Sanders (for himself and Ms. Mikulski) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance
A BILL
To reduce the Federal budget deficit by creating a surtax on high income individuals and eliminating big oil and gas company tax loopholes.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the
Emergency Deficit Reduction
Act
.
Findings
The Senate finds the following:
At a time when our Nation has a $14.2 trillion national debt and a $1.6 trillion annual deficit, moving aggressively toward deficit reduction means that we must include not only well-targeted budget cuts, but revenue raised in a fair and economically just way. Questions every Member of Congress should be asking are the following:
Do we ask the highest paid executives on Wall Street to give up a $1 million a year tax break, or do we ask senior citizens to go cold in the winter by cutting the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program?
Do we ask Exxon Mobil and other big oil companies to give up their tax breaks, or do we ask over 9 million college students to go further into debt by cutting Pell Grants by $5.7 billion?
Do we stop cutting taxes for the richest 400 American families, who earned an average of $345 million in 2007, or do we delay Social Security benefits to 500,000 Americans by a $1.7 billion cut in the Social Security Administration?
Do we establish an emergency deficit reduction surtax on millionaires and billionaires, or do we deny over 200,000 little children the opportunity to enroll in Head Start by cutting this program by $1.1 billion?
Do we finally tax hedge fund managers who make at least $1 billion at a higher rate than police officers, teachers, firefighters, and nurses, or will 11 million Americans be denied access to quality primary healthcare by a $1.3 billion cut in community health centers?
At a time when the wealthiest people in this country are doing phenomenally well, when the effective Federal tax rates for the richest Americans are the lowest on record, and when the top 2 percent of taxpayers have received hundreds of billions of dollars in tax breaks in recent years, it would be morally wrong for the United States Congress to move towards a balanced budget on the backs of the middle class, the elderly, the sick, and the most vulnerable people in our society while asking nothing of the highest income earners and most profitable corporations.
Creating an emergency deficit reduction surtax on income over $1 million will reduce the deficit in a fair and economically just way by increasing revenue from those who can afford it the most.
From 2000 to 2010, the 5 largest oil companies in the United States made nearly $1 trillion in profits, yet some of them paid nothing in Federal income taxes in recent years. Ending outdated and unnecessary tax credits, deductions, and subsidies for big oil companies is a fair and economically just way to raise revenue and reduce the deficit.
In the midst of the worst recession since the Great Depression, America's middle class and working families have already paid a very heavy price in terms of lost jobs, lost homes, lost wages, and lost opportunity. The time has come to ask the wealthiest in our society and the most profitable corporations in America to help our Nation address its deficit crisis. Any deficit reduction package must include raising revenue from the wealthy and eliminating tax breaks for big oil companies.
Emergency deficit reduction surcharge on high income individuals
In general
Subchapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new part:
Emergency deficit reduction surcharge on high income individuals
Sec. 59B. Emergency deficit reduction surcharge on high income individuals.
Emergency deficit reduction surcharge on high income individuals
General rule
In the case of a taxpayer other than a corporation, there is hereby imposed (in addition to any other tax imposed by this subtitle) a tax equal to 5.4 percent of so much of the modified adjusted gross income of the taxpayer as exceeds $1,000,000 ($2,000,000 in the case of any taxpayer making a joint return under section 6013).
Modified adjusted gross income
For purposes of this section, the term modified adjusted gross income means adjusted gross income reduced by any deduction (not taken into account in determining adjusted gross income) allowed for investment interest (as defined in section 163(d)). In the case of an estate or trust, adjusted gross income shall be determined as provided in section 67(e).
Special rules
Nonresident alien
In the case of a nonresident alien individual, only amounts taken into account in connection with the tax imposed under section 871(b) shall be taken into account under this section.
Citizens and residents living abroad
The dollar amount in effect under subsection (a) shall be decreased by the excess of—
the amounts excluded from the taxpayer’s gross income under section 911, over
the amounts of any deductions or exclusions disallowed under section 911(d)(6) with respect to the amounts described in subparagraph (A).
Charitable trusts
Subsection (a) shall not apply to a trust all the unexpired interests in which are devoted to one or more of the purposes described in section 170(c)(2)(B).
Not treated as tax imposed by this chapter for certain purposes
The tax imposed under this section shall not be treated as tax imposed by this chapter for purposes of determining the amount of any credit under this chapter or for purposes of section 55.
.
Clerical amendment
The table of parts for subchapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
Part VIII. Emergency deficit reduction surcharge on high income individuals.
.
Section 15 not To apply
The amendment made by subsection (a) shall not be treated as a change in a rate of tax for purposes of section 15 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
Effective date
The amendments made by this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2010.
Repeal of expensing and 60-month amortization of intangible drilling costs
Subsection (c) of section 263 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking the period at the end of
the third sentence and inserting , or to any costs paid or incurred
after December 31, 2010.
.
Repeal of percentage depletion for oil and gas wells
In general
Section 613 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
Termination of percentage depletion for oil and gas properties
In the case of oil and gas properties, this section shall not apply to any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2010.
.
Limitations on percentage depletion in case of oil and gas wells
Section 613A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
Termination
This section shall not apply to any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2010.
.
Denial of deduction for income attributable to domestic production of oil, natural gas, or primary products thereof
In general
Subparagraph (B) of
section
199(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by
striking or
at the end of clause (ii), by striking the period at
the end of clause (iii) and inserting , or
, and by inserting
after clause (iii) the following new clause:
the production, refining, processing, transportation, or distribution of oil, natural gas, or any primary product thereof.
.
Primary product
Section 199(c)(4)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following flush sentence:
For purposes of clause (iv), the term primary product has the same meaning as when used in section 927(a)(2)(C), as in effect before its repeal.
.
Conforming amendments
Section 199(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended—
in subparagraph (A)(i)(III) by striking
electricity, natural gas,
and inserting
electricity
, and
in subparagraph (B)(ii) by striking
electricity, natural gas,
and inserting
electricity
.
Section 199(d) of such Code is amended by striking paragraph (9) and by redesignating paragraph (10) as paragraph (9).
Effective date
The amendments made by this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2010.