Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of S. 997, the East Bench Irrigation District Water Contract Extension. Water and energy are pretty important to Montana, and as you may know, I've spent a lot of…
Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of S. 997, the East Bench Irrigation District Water Contract Extension.
Water and energy are pretty important to Montana, and as you may know, I've spent a lot of time working with the House Water and Power Subcommittee over the years on these issues. This time, though, there's something a little different. There's just something cool about working on a bill that starts with ``S'' instead of ``H.R.''--I think I could get used to this!
I'm sure it's not lost on you that this legislation is sponsored by Senator Jon Tester, the Junior Senator from Montana. We're both Montanans and while there are certainly things we disagree about-- President Obama's health reform and stimulus, protecting gun rights and government bailouts--even with all those differences, there are ways to find common ground.
An example of common ground is this legislation. S. 997 is a good idea, and it's one I hope my colleagues will vote in favor of.
The bill simply authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to extend a water contract between the United States and the East Bench Irrigation District in Beaverhead and Madison Counties in southwestern Montana. It has no impact on the federal budget.
The Clark Canyon Dam and Reservoir--owned and operated by the Bureau of Recreation--supplies irrigation water for 28,000 acres within the East Bench Irrigation District.
The operation is bound by a contract between the federal government and the District--a contract that expired on December 31, 2005. Since then, federal appropriations acts have extended the original contract for two year durations. S. 997 extends it again through the end of 2013.
I realize this sort of congressional contract extension isn't common, but in cases where specific variables delay contract renewals, it's appropriate and necessary. In this case, the law requires Montana's 5th District Court to issue a decree before any new contract can be signed.
That decree has been delayed, so S. 997 provides the regional farmers and ranchers with necessary water certainty until at least 2014. Hopefully, by then, all parties will be ready to agree to a new long- term contract.
For dry land farmers and ranchers, water is our most precious resource. We have a lot of land--plenty of dirt between light bulbs-- and our productivity is only constrained by our access to water. In Montana where we rely on water for drinking, irrigation, and energy.
It's vitally important we pass this bill to try to avoid needless disruptions in service. There is no conflict or objection to this ``housekeeping'' matter, and its importance to the many impacted farmers and ranchers cannot be over-emphasized. I have worked hard to extend the contract in the past and look forward to passing this critical legislation today. As I said, it's a good idea.
I'm here to do what's best for Montana, and a good idea is a good idea regardless of who gets credit. That's why I'm up here today.
This is a good bill, and I hope my colleagues will join me in voting in favor of its passage.