S.Con.Res. 23Senate112th Congress (2011-2013)In Committee

A concurrent resolution declaring that it is the policy of the United States to support and facilitate Israel in maintaining defensible borders and that it is contrary to United States policy and national security to have the borders of Israel return to the armistice lines that existed on June 4, 1967.

Introduced June 9, 2011

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

2 earlier actions
SenateIntro Referral Latest Action

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text of measure as introduced: CR S3694)

June 9, 2011

View full timeline
SenateIntro Referral

Introduced in Senate

June 9, 2011

SenateIntro Referral

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR S3694)

June 9, 2011

SenateIntro Referral

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text of measure as introduced: CR S3694)

June 9, 2011

Floor Debate

2 members

What members said about S.Con.Res. 23 on the floor

2 Republicans
John Thune
Sen. John ThuneR-SD · Jun 9, 2011

Mr. President, last week I had the opportunity to travel my State of South Dakota, as I think most Senators did who were home over the break. During the week, I was able to be part of a couple of…

Orrin G. Hatch
Sen. Orrin G. HatchR-UT · Jun 9, 2011

Mr. President, today I am pleased to rise and offer, with my good friend, the senior Senator from Connecticut, a concurrent resolution which reaffirms our Nation's steadfast and unshakable commitment…

Orrin G. Hatch
Sen. Orrin G. HatchR-UT · Jun 9, 2011

Mr. President, I ask for enough time to give my remarks this morning and I ask for an equivalent amount of time for the other side. I hope I can stay within the time constraints, but I am not sure. I…

Bill Text

Latest available legislative text

Reading Mode
Latest
Introduced in SenateIssued June 9, 2011

III

112th CONGRESS

1st Session

S. CON. RES. 23

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

June 9, 2011

Mr. Hatch (for himself, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Nelson of Nebraska, Mr. Johanns, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Moran, Mr. Toomey, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Kirk, Mr. Burr, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Kyl, Mr. Lee, Mr. Thune, Mr. Portman, Mr. Coats, Mr. Coburn, Ms. Ayotte, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Brown of Massachusetts, Mr. Vitter, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Isakson, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Lugar, and Mr. Chambliss) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Declaring that it is the policy of the United States to support and facilitate Israel in maintaining defensible borders and that it is contrary to United States policy and national security to have the borders of Israel return to the armistice lines that existed on June 4, 1967.

Whereas, throughout its short history, Israel, a liberal democratic ally of the United States, has been repeatedly attacked by authoritarian regimes and terrorist organizations that denied its right to exist;

Whereas the United States Government remains steadfastly committed to the security of Israel, especially its ability to maintain secure, recognized, and defensible borders;

Whereas the United States Government is resolutely bound to its policy of preserving and strengthening the capability of Israel to deter enemies and defend itself against any threat;

Whereas United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 (1967) recognized Israel’s right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force;

Whereas the United States has long recognized that a return to the 1967 lines would create a strategic military vulnerability for Israel and greatly impede its sovereign right to defend its borders; and

Whereas Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu correctly stated on May 20, 2011, that the 1967 lines were not boundaries of peace. They are the boundaries of repeated war: Now, therefore, be it

That—

(1)

it is the policy of the United States to support and facilitate Israel in creating and maintaining secure, recognized, and defensible borders; and

(2)

it is contrary to United States policy and our national security to have the borders of Israel return to the armistice lines that existed on June 4, 1967.