S.Res. 136Senate112th Congress (2011-2013)Passed Congress

A resolution to authorize document production in United States v. Douglas D. Hampton (D.D.C.).

Sponsored by Harry ReidSen. Harry Reid (D-NV)
Introduced April 7, 2011

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

1 earlier action
SenateFloor Latest Action

Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2285; text as passed Senate: CR S2285; text of measure as introduced: CR S2281)

April 7, 2011

View full timeline
SenateIntro Referral

Introduced in Senate

April 7, 2011

SenateFloor

Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2285; text as passed Senate: CR S2285; text of measure as introduced: CR S2281)

April 7, 2011

Floor Debate

2 members

What members said about S.Res. 136 on the floor

2 Democrats
Harry Reid
Sen. Harry ReidD-NV · Apr 7, 2011

Madam President, this resolution concerns records that several offices of the Senate have provided to the Department of Justice in connection with a criminal investigation. As those documents may be…

Richard J. Durbin
Sen. Richard J. DurbinD-IL · Apr 7, 2011

Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of S. Res. 136 submitted earlier today. I ask unanimous consent that the resolution be agreed to, the…

Bill Text

Latest available legislative text

Reading Mode
Latest
Agreed to SenateIssued April 7, 2011

III

112th CONGRESS

1st Session

S. RES. 136

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

April 7 (legislative day, April 5), 2011

Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. McConnell) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize document production in United States v. Douglas D. Hampton (D.D.C.).

Whereas, in the case of United States v. Douglas D. Hampton, Crim. No. 11–085 (D.D.C.), pending in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, documents that have been produced to the United States Department of Justice by offices of the Senate in earlier related proceedings may be needed for use in this proceeding;

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be taken from such control or possesion but by permission of the Senate;

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistent with the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it

That records that have been produced by offices of the Senate in connection with investigation by the Department of Justice are authorized to be used in the case of United States v. Douglas D. Hampton and any related proceedings.