I
113th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 2572
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
June 28, 2013
Mr. Gary G. Miller of California introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services
A BILL
To improve the regulation of credit unions and depository institutions and to provide regulatory relief, and for other purposes.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the
Regulatory Relief for Credit Unions
Act of 2013
.
Enhancing the authority of the National Credit Union Administration
Review of Bureau regulations
In general
Section 120 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1766) is amended by adding at the end the following:
Review of Bureau regulations
If the Board determines that a regulation issued by the Bureau would create an undue hardship when applied to credit unions, the Board may—
delay the application of the regulation to credit unions until such time as the Board determines such application would not create an undue hardship; and
modify such regulation, as applied to credit unions, so long as the Board determines that such modification still meets the Bureau’s objective in issuing the regulation.
.
Bureau defined
Section 101 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1752) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
The term Bureau means the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.
.
Use of State regulations by Federal credit unions
Section 120 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1766), as amended by subsection (a), is further amended by adding at the end the following:
Use of State regulations
Application
With respect to a State law applicable to a State credit union, a Federal credit union may apply to the Board for permission to comply with such regulation in lieu of the applicable Federal regulation (if any), for purposes of the credit union’s branches located in such State. Such permission shall only apply to the State for which the permission is given, and the Federal credit union may not comply with such regulation in any other State in lieu of the applicable Federal regulation.
Determination
The Board may approve an application received under paragraph (1) if the Board determines that having the Federal credit union’s branches in such State comply with the particular State law would—
improve the credit unions’s ability to serve members and lend in that particular State; and
not endanger the safety and soundness of the credit union.
Exception
Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a Federal credit union may not apply to the Board for permission to comply with any provision of a State law if such law would conflict with the requirements of section 107A.
.
Improved capital standards and leverage ratios for credit unions
In general
Section 216 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1790d) is amended—
by redesignating subsection (o) as subsection (p);
by inserting after subsection (n) the following:
Revised capital standards
Two-tier system
The Board shall implement a two-tier system of net worth ratios for credit unions, consisting of a risk-based net worth ratio and a net worth capital ratio. Net worth categories in this section shall take into account the simplicity or complexity of credit unions in terms of risk profile.
Use of leverage ratios
The Board shall establish standards under this section with respect to leverage ratios of a credit union to the same extent as are provided for net worth ratios of a credit union. Such standards shall take into account the unique nature of credit unions and, to the extent practicable, be comparable to, but not necessarily identical to, the leverage ratio standards under section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.
; and
in subsection (p), as so redesignated, by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:
Net worth
The term net worth—
with respect to any insured credit union, means the retained earnings balance of the credit union, as determined under generally accepted accounting principles, together with—
any amounts that were previously retained earnings of any other credit union with which the credit union has combined; and
components of equity under generally accepted accounting principles not included in retained earnings, as determined by the Board;
with respect to any insured credit union, includes, at the Board’s discretion and subject to rules and regulations established by the Board, assistance provided under section 208 of this title to facilitate a least-cost resolution consistent with the best interests of the credit union system; and
with respect to a low income credit union, includes secondary capital accounts, subject to limitations set by the Board to address the safe and sound use of secondary capital to carry out the purpose of this section, that are—
uninsured; and
subordinate to all other claims against the credit union, including the claims of creditors, shareholders, and the Fund.
.
Amendments to net worth categories
Section 216(c)(1) of the Federal Credit Union Act is amended as follows:
Well capitalized
In subparagraph (A), by striking clauses (i) and (ii) and inserting the following:
it has a risk-based net worth ratio of not less than 10 percent; or
is considered to be well capitalized by any other standard, as determined by the Board.
.
Adequately capitalized
In subparagraph (B), by striking clauses (i) and (ii) and inserting the following:
it has a risk-based net worth ratio of not less than 8 percent; or
is considered to be adequately capitalized by any other standard, as determined by the Board.
.
Undercapitalized
In subparagraph (C), by striking clauses (i) and (ii) and inserting the following:
it has a risk-based net worth ratio of not less than 6 percent; or
is considered to be undercapitalized by any other standard, as determined by the Board.
.
Significantly undercapitalized
Subparagraph (D) is amended to read as follows:
Significantly undercapitalized
An insured credit union is significantly
undercapitalized
if—
it has a net worth ratio of less than 3.25 percent;
it has a net worth ratio of less than 4.25 percent, and either—
fails to submit an acceptable net worth restoration plan within the time allowed under subsection (f); or
materially fails to implement a net worth restoration plan approved by the Board; or
it has a risk-based net worth ratio of less than 6 percent.
.
Relevant Capital Measures
Section 216(c)(2) of the Federal Credit Union Act is amended—
by striking , for purposes of
section 38(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act,
;
by striking
(as those terms are used in section 38),
; and
by inserting
or relevant capital measures as defined by the Board
after
leverage limit
each place such term appears.
Adjustment of levels
Section 216(c)(2)(A) of the Federal Credit Union Act is amended—
by striking
Federal banking agencies increase or decrease
and inserting
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation increases or decreases
;
and
by striking
level for
and inserting levels for
.
Adjusting net worth levels
Section
216(c)(2)(A) of the Federal Credit Union Act is amended by striking not
more than the difference between the required minimum level most recently
established by the Federal banking agencies and 4 percent of total assets (with
respect to institutions regulated by those agencies)
and inserting
the increase or decrease made by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation
.
Consultation With Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Section 216(c)(2)(B)(i) of the Federal
Credit Union Act is amended by striking Federal banking agencies
and inserting Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
.
Amendments relating to risk-Based net worth requirements
Section 216(d) of the Federal Credit Union Act is amended—
in paragraph (1)—
by striking
that are complex, as defined by the Board
; and
by inserting
, as defined by the Board
before the period at the end;
by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:
Standard
The Board shall design the risk-based net worth requirement to take account of any material risks, as defined by the Board, applicable to insured credit unions that are taken account of by comparable standards applicable to institutions insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
; and
in the heading for
such subsection, by striking for Complex Credit Unions
.
Treatment based on other criteria
Section 216(h)(1) of the Federal Credit Union Act is amended to read as follows:
the Board may not reclassify an insured credit union into a lower net worth category due solely to interest rate risk, or treat an insured credit union as if it were in a lower net worth category, for reasons not pertaining to the safety and soundness of that credit union; and
.
Definitions relating to net worth
Net worth ratio
Section 216(p) of the Federal Credit Union Act, as redesignated by subsection (a), is amended in paragraph (3)—
by inserting
minus its deposit in the Fund,
after net worth of credit
union
; and
by inserting
minus its deposit in the Fund
after total assets of the
credit union
.
Risk-based net worth ratio
Section 216(p) of the Federal Credit Union Act, as redesignated by subsection (a), is amended by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new paragraph:
Risk-based net worth ratio
The term risk-based net worth ratio means, with respect to any credit union—
the ratio of the net worth of the credit union, plus any loan loss reserves (subject to limitations established by the Board), and minus the credit union’s deposit in the Fund, to
the risk assets of the credit union, as defined by the Board.
.
Amendments relating to net worth restoration plans
Temporary waiver of net worth restoration plan requirement in response to disasters
Subsection 216(f)(1) of the Federal Credit Union Act is
amended by striking Each insured credit union
and inserting
Except as determined by the Board in the case of a credit union that
becomes or remains no less than undercapitalized due to the impact of a major
natural or man-made disaster, each insured credit union
.
Net worth restoration requirement for credit unions that are not well capitalized
Section 216(e) of the Federal Credit Union Act is amended to read as follows:
Net worth restoration plan requirement applicable to credit unions that are not well capitalized
The Board may require an insured credit union that is not well capitalized to submit a net worth restoration plan, as required under subsection (f), if—
material safety and soundness concerns caused the credit union to become less than well capitalized; and
the safety and soundness concerns remain unresolved.
.
Board action may include order to credit union
Section 216(i)(1)(B) of the Federal Credit Union Act is amended—
by
inserting order the credit union to
before take such
other action
; and
by
inserting , in the discretion of the Board,
after as the
Board
.
Substitution of 90 calendar days
Section 216(i)(3)(A) of the Federal Credit Union Act is amended—
by
striking calendar quarter
and inserting 90 calendar
days
; and
by
inserting first
after the date on which the credit
union
.
Clarification of coordination requirement
Section 216(l)(3)(A)(ii) of the Federal
Credit Union Act is amended by inserting before the semicolon the following:
, if the Board determines that such action by the official will carry
out the purpose of this section
.
Study on reform of prompt corrective action
Study
The National Credit Union Administration Board shall carry out a study of problems associated with the current prompt corrective action regime. In carrying out such study, the Board shall consult with qualified industry and National Credit Union Administration representatives.
Report
Not later than the end of the 1-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Board shall issue a report to the Congress containing all findings and determinations made in carrying out the study required under paragraph (1), including any specific legislative recommendations recommended by the Board.
Review of credit union regulations
Cost-Benefit Analysis
National Credit Union Administration
Section 120 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1766), as amended by section 2, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
Cost-Benefit Analyses
Pre-issuance
Each regulation issued by the Board shall include a thorough cost-benefit analysis that details the estimated cost to a credit union of complying with such regulation compared to the measurable benefit the regulation may have. Any information provided to the Board from credit unions for purposes of the Board’s analysis shall be on a voluntary basis.
3-year review
At the end of the 3-year period following the date on which the Board issues a final regulation, the Board shall—
carry out a review of the actual cost to a credit union of complying with the regulation; and
issue a report to the Congress containing the results of such review.
Rule revision
If, in carrying out a review under paragraph (2), the Board determines that the actual cost of complying with a regulation is more than 20 percent higher than the Board initially estimated, the Board shall revise the rule.
.
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
Section 1022 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5512) is amended by adding at the end the following:
Regulations applicable to credit unions
Cost-benefit analyses
Pre-issuance
Each regulation issued by the Bureau shall, to the extent the rule applies to a credit union, include a thorough cost-benefit analysis that details the estimated cost to a credit union of complying with such regulation compared to the measurable benefit the regulation may have. Any information provided to the Bureau from credit unions for purposes of its analysis shall be on a voluntary basis.
3-year review
At the end of the 3-year period following the date on which the Bureau issues a final regulation that applies to a credit union, the Bureau shall—
carry out a review of the actual cost to a credit union of complying with the regulation; and
issue a report to the Congress containing the results of such review.
Rule revision
If, in carrying out a review under subparagraph (B), the Bureau determines that the actual cost of complying with a regulation is more than 20 percent higher than the Bureau initially estimated, the Bureau shall revise the rule.
Additional considerations
In proposing any regulation that applies to credit unions, the Bureau shall—
consider the impact of such regulation on—
all federally insured credit unions; and
consumers in rural areas; and
consult with the National Credit Union Administration and other appropriate Federal agencies, both prior to proposing such regulation and during the comment process for such regulation, regarding consistency with prudential, market, and systemic objectives of such Administration and other agencies.
Objections
In general
If, during the consultation process described in paragraph (2)(B), the National Credit Union Administration or another agency provides the Bureau with a written objection to the proposed regulation, or a portion thereof, the Bureau shall include with the final regulation a description of the objection and the basis for the Bureau’s decision, if any, regarding such objection.
Construction
Nothing in this subsection shall be construed as altering or limiting the procedures under section 1023 that may apply to any regulation prescribed by the Bureau.
.
Modernizing the Central Liquidity Facility
Study
The Comptroller General of the United States shall, in consultation with the National Credit Union Administration, carry out a study of the Central Liquidity Facility that examines the need for any improvements or modernizing needed of such Facility.
Report
Not later than the end of the 180-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall issue a report to the Congress containing all of the findings and determinations made in carrying out the study required under subsection (a), including any legislative recommendations the Comptroller General may have for modernizing the Central Liquidity Facility.
Modernizing credit union investment options
Investments in securities by Federal credit unions
Section 107 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1757) is amended—
by striking
A Federal credit union
and inserting the following:
In general
A Federal credit union
; and
by adding at the end the following new subsection:
Investment for the credit union’s own account
In general
A Federal credit union may purchase and hold for its own account such investment securities of investment grade as the Board may authorize by regulation, subject to such limitations and restrictions as the Board may prescribe.
Percentage limitations
Single person
The total amount of investment securities of any single person held by a Federal credit union for the credit union’s own account may not exceed 10 percent of the net worth of the credit union.
Aggregate investments
The aggregate amount of investment securities held by a Federal credit union for the credit union’s own account may not exceed 10 percent of the total assets of the credit union.
Definitions
For purposes of this subsection:
Investment grade
The term investment grade means, with respect to an investment security purchased by a credit union for its own account, an investment security that at the time of such purchase meets the credit criteria established by the Board and reflects the applicable market standards.
Investment security
In general
The term investment security means marketable obligations evidencing the indebtedness of any person in the form of bonds, notes, or debentures and other instruments commonly referred to as investment securities.
Further definition by board
The Board may further define the term investment security.
Clarification of prohibition on stock ownership
No provision of this subsection shall be construed as authorizing a Federal credit union to purchase shares of stock of any corporation for the credit union’s own account, except as otherwise permitted by law.
.
Mortgage servicing rights
Section 107(a) of the Federal Credit Union Act, as amended by this section, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
Federal credit unions may purchase mortgage servicing rights as an investment, including purchases of mortgage servicing rights from other credit unions subject to limits established by the Board.
.
National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund parity with Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Section 207(k)(1) of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1787(k)(1)) is amended—
in subparagraph (A)—
by inserting after deposits in the
name of the member
the following: or held in the member’s
account on behalf of another person
; and
by striking
the member
and inserting the person
; and
in subparagraph
(C), by striking or in joint tenancy.
and inserting the
following: in joint tenancy, or where a member holds funds for the use
of a nonmember. Coverage for an account established by a member shall be
consistent with that of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, regardless
of the membership status of the owner of the funds that are deposited in an
account established by a member.
.
Enhancing the authority of the appropriate Federal banking agencies
In general
The Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5481 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 1023 the following:
Review of Bureau regulations on depository institutions
If the appropriate Federal banking agency determines that a regulation issued by the Bureau would create an undue hardship when applied to a class of depository institutions regulated by such agency, the agency may—
delay the application of the regulation to the class of depository institutions until such time as the agency determines such application would not create an undue hardship; and
modify such regulation, as applied to the class of depository institutions, so long as the agency determines that such modification still meets the Bureau’s objective in issuing the regulation.
.
Technical amendment
The table of contents for the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1023 the following new item:
1023A. Review of Bureau regulations on depository institutions.
.
Review of depository institution regulations
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Pre-issuance
Each regulation issued by an appropriate Federal banking agency shall include a thorough cost-benefit analysis that details the estimated cost to a depository institution of complying with such regulation compared to the measurable benefit the regulation may have. Any information provided to an agency from a depository institution for purposes of the agency’s analysis shall be on a voluntary basis.
3-year review
At the end of the 3-year period following the date on which the agency issues a final regulation, the agency shall—
carry out a review of the actual cost to a depository institution of complying with the regulation; and
issue a report to the Congress containing the results of such review.
Rule revision
If, in carrying out a review under paragraph (2), the agency determines that the actual cost of complying with a regulation is more than 20 percent higher than the agency initially estimated, the agency shall revise the rule.
Definitions
For purposes of this subsection, the terms appropriate Federal banking agency and depository institution have the meaning given such terms, respectively, under section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813).
Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
Section 1022 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5512), as amended by section 4, is further amended by adding at the end the following:
Regulations applicable to depository institutions
Cost-benefit analyses
Pre-issuance
Each regulation issued by the Bureau shall, to the extent the rule applies to a depository institution, include a thorough cost-benefit analysis that details the estimated cost to a depository institution of complying with such regulation compared to the measurable benefit the regulation may have. Any information provided to the Bureau from depository institutions for purposes of its analysis shall be on a voluntary basis.
3-year review
At the end of the 3-year period following the date on which the Bureau issues a final regulation that applies to a credit union, the Bureau shall—
carry out a review of the actual cost to a depository institution of complying with the regulation; and
issue a report to the Congress containing the results of such review.
Rule revision
If, in carrying out a review under subparagraph (B), the Bureau determines that the actual cost of complying with a regulation is more than 20 percent higher than the Bureau initially estimated, the Bureau shall revise the rule.
Additional considerations
In proposing any regulation that applies to depository institutions, the Bureau shall—
consider the impact of such regulation on—
community-based depository institutions; and
consumers in rural areas; and
consult with the appropriate Federal banking agencies, both prior to proposing such regulation and during the comment process for such regulation, regarding consistency with prudential, market, and systemic objectives of such agencies.
Objections
In general
If, during the consultation process described in paragraph (2)(B), an agency provides the Bureau with a written objection to the proposed regulation, or a portion thereof, the Bureau shall include with the final regulation a description of the objection and the basis for the Bureau’s decision, if any, regarding such objection.
Construction
Nothing in this subsection shall be construed as altering or limiting the procedures under section 1023 that may apply to any regulation prescribed by the Bureau.
.