S. 2024Senate113th Congress (2013-2015)Introduced

State Marriage Defense Act of 2014

A bill to amend chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, with regard to the definition of "marriage" and "spouse" for Federal purposes and to ensure respect for State regulation of marriage.

Sponsored by Ted CruzSen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)
Introduced February 12, 2014

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

2 earlier actions
SenateCalendars Latest Action

Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 308.

February 24, 2014

View full timeline
SenateIntro Referral

Introduced in Senate

February 12, 2014

SenateCalendars

Introduced in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.

February 12, 2014

SenateCalendars

Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 308.

February 24, 2014

Floor Debate

1 member

What members said about S. 2024 on the floor

1 Democrat
Harry Reid
Sen. Harry ReidD-NV · Feb 24, 2014

Mr. President, I now move to proceed to Calendar No. 301, Following my remarks and those of the Republican leader, if any, the Senate will be in a period of morning business until 5 p.m. Senators,…

Harry Reid
Sen. Harry ReidD-NV · Feb 12, 2014

Mr. President, I understand S. 2024 is at the desk and due for its first reading. Mr. President, I ask for a second reading of the bill, but for the purpose of placing the bill on the calendar under…

Bill Text

Latest available legislative text

Reading Mode
Latest
Placed on Calendar SenateIssued February 24, 2014

II

Calendar No. 308

113th CONGRESS

2d Session

S. 2024

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

February 12, 2014

Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Lee, Mr. Vitter, and Mr. Roberts) introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

February 24, 2014

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

A BILL

To amend chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, with regard to the definition of marriage and spouse for Federal purposes and to ensure respect for State regulation of marriage.

1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the State Marriage Defense Act of 2014.

2.

Findings

Congress finds the following:

(1)

Congress affirms the States’ legitimate and proper public policy interests in regulating domestic relations and in defining marriage for the residents of their States.

(2)

Despite striking down section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, the Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Windsor, 133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013) did not institute a new Federal definition of marriage that includes same sex marriage. Instead, United States v. Windsor specifically required the Federal Government to defer to state sovereign choices about who may be married in determining marital status for Federal purposes.

(3)

United States v. Windsor reaffirmed that the historic and essential authority to define the marital relation rests with the States and criticized Federal actions that put a thumb on the scales and influence a state’s decision as to how to shape its own marriage laws.

(4)

Congress recognizes that current actions by the Federal Government to afford benefits to certain relationships not recognized as marriages by a person’s State of residence go beyond the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. Windsor. These Federal actions create two contradictory marriage regimes within the same State, in direct contradiction of United States v. Windsor.

(5)

Actions taken by the Federal Government to grant recognition of marital status for persons not recognized as married in their State of domicile undermine a State’s legitimate authority to define marriage for its residents.

3.

Amendment to definition of marriage for Federal purposes

Section 7 of title 1, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

7.

Definition of marriage and spouse

For purposes of determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, as applied with respect to individuals domiciled in a State or in any other territory or possession of the United States, the term marriage shall not include any relationship which that State, territory, or possession does not recognize as a marriage, and the term spouse shall not include an individual who is a party to a relationship that is not recognized as a marriage by that State, territory, or possession.

.

February 24, 2014

Read the second time and placed on the calendar