H.Con.Res. 89House114th Congress (2015-2017)Passed House

Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy.

Introduced October 29, 2015

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

12 earlier actions
SenateIntro Referral Latest Action

Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Finance.

June 13, 2016

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

October 29, 2015

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

October 29, 2015

HouseFloor

Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 767 Reported to House. Resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4775, H. Con. Res. 89, and H. Con. Res. 112.

June 7, 2016 • 7:34 PM

HouseFloor

Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 767. (consideration: CR H3669-3677)

June 10, 2016 • 9:16 AM

HouseFloor

Resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4775, H. Con. Res. 89, and H. Con. Res. 112.

June 10, 2016 • 9:16 AM

HouseFloor

DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H. Con. Res. 89.

June 10, 2016 • 9:16 AM

HouseFloor

The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule. (consideration: CR H3676)

June 10, 2016 • 10:17 AM

HouseFloor

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At conclusion of debate on H.Con.Res. 89, the Chair put the question on agreeing to the resolution and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mrs. Black demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings on agreeing to the resolution until later in the legislative day.

June 10, 2016 • 10:18 AM

HouseFloor

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3693)

June 10, 2016 • 12:45 PM

HouseFloor

Passed/agreed to in House: On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 237 - 163, 2 Present (Roll no. 295).(text: CR H3669)

June 10, 2016 • 12:51 PM

HouseFloor

On agreeing to the resolution Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 237 - 163, 2 Present (Roll no. 295). (text: CR H3669)

June 10, 2016 • 12:51 PM

HouseFloor

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

June 10, 2016 • 12:51 PM

SenateIntro Referral

Received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Finance.

June 13, 2016

Bill Text

3 versions available

Reading Mode
Latest
Referred in SenateIssued June 13, 2016

III

114th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. CON. RES. 89

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

June 13, 2016

Received and referred to the Committee on Finance

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy.

Whereas a carbon tax is a Federal tax on carbon released from fossil fuels;

Whereas a carbon tax will increase energy prices, including the price of gasoline, electricity, natural gas, and home heating oil;

Whereas a carbon tax will mean that families and consumers will pay more for essentials like food, gasoline, and electricity;

Whereas a carbon tax will fall hardest on the poor, the elderly, and those on fixed incomes;

Whereas a carbon tax will lead to more jobs and businesses moving overseas;

Whereas a carbon tax will lead to less economic growth;

Whereas American families will be harmed the most from a carbon tax;

Whereas, according to the Energy Information Administration, in 2011, fossil fuels share of energy consumption was 82 percent;

Whereas a carbon tax will increase the cost of every good manufactured in the United States;

Whereas a carbon tax will impose disproportionate burdens on certain industries, jobs, States, and geographic regions and would further restrict the global competitiveness of the United States;

Whereas American ingenuity has led to innovations in energy exploration and development and has increased production of domestic energy resources on private and State-owned land which has created significant job growth and private capital investment;

Whereas United States energy policy should encourage continued private sector innovation and development and not increase the existing tax burden on manufacturers;

Whereas the production of American energy resources increases the United States ability to maintain a competitive advantage in today’s global economy;

Whereas a carbon tax would reduce America’s global competitiveness and would encourage development abroad in countries that do not impose this exorbitant tax burden; and

Whereas the Congress and the President should focus on pro-growth solutions that encourage increased development of domestic resources: Now, therefore, be it

That it is the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to American families and businesses, and is not in the best interest of the United States.

Passed the House of Representatives June 10, 2016.

Karen L. Haas,

Clerk