H.R. 5049House114th Congress (2015-2017)Passed House

NSF Major Research Facility Reform Act of 2016

Introduced April 26, 2016

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

14 earlier actions
SenateIntro Referral Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

June 15, 2016

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

April 26, 2016

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

April 26, 2016

HouseCommittee

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

April 27, 2016

HouseCommittee

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

April 27, 2016

HouseCommittee

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. H. Rept. 114-619.

June 13, 2016

HouseCalendars

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 481.

June 13, 2016

HouseFloor

Mr. Loudermilk moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

June 13, 2016 • 7:04 PM

HouseFloor

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3732-3735)

June 13, 2016 • 7:04 PM

HouseFloor

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 5049.

June 13, 2016 • 7:04 PM

HouseFloor

At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

June 13, 2016 • 7:23 PM

HouseFloor

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3776-3777)

June 14, 2016 • 1:45 PM

HouseFloor

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 412 - 9 (Roll no. 301).(text: CR 6/14/2016 H3732-3733)

June 14, 2016 • 1:51 PM

HouseFloor

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 412 - 9 (Roll no. 301). (text: CR 6/14/2016 H3732-3733)

June 14, 2016 • 1:51 PM

HouseFloor

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

June 14, 2016 • 1:51 PM

SenateIntro Referral

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

June 15, 2016

Bill Text

4 versions available

Reading Mode
Latest
Referred in SenateIssued June 15, 2016

IIB

114th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. R. 5049

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

June 15, 2016

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

AN ACT

To provide for improved management and oversight of major multi-user research facilities funded by the National Science Foundation, to ensure transparency and accountability of construction and management costs, and for other purposes.

1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the NSF Major Research Facility Reform Act of 2016.

2.

Definitions

In this Act:

(1)

Director

The term Director means the Director of the Foundation.

(2)

Foundation

The term Foundation means the National Science Foundation established under section 2 of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 (42 U.S.C. 1861).

(3)

Major multi-user research facility

The term major multi-user research facility means a science and engineering infrastructure construction project that exceeds the lesser of 10 percent of a Directorate’s annual budget or $100,000,000 in total project cost that is funded in the major research equipment and facilities construction account, or any successor thereto.

3.

Management and oversight of large facilities

(a)

Large facilities office

The Director shall maintain a Large Facilities Office. The functions of the Large Facilities Office shall be to support the research directorates in the development, implementation, and assessment of major multi-user research facilities, including by—

(1)

serving as the Foundation’s primary resource for all policy or process issues related to the development and implementation of major multi-user research facilities;

(2)

serving as a Foundation-wide resource on project management, including providing expert assistance on nonscientific and nontechnical aspects of project planning, budgeting, implementation, management, and oversight;

(3)

coordinating and collaborating with research directorates to share best management practices and lessons learned from prior projects; and

(4)

assessing projects during preconstruction and construction phases for cost and schedule risk.

(b)

Oversight of large facilities

The Director shall appoint a senior agency official as head of the Large Facilities Office whose responsibility is oversight of the development, construction, and transfer to operations of major multi-user research facilities across the Foundation.

(c)

Policies for large facility costs

(1)

In general

The Director shall ensure that the Foundation’s polices for developing and maintaining major multi-user research facility construction costs are consistent with the best practices described in the March 2009 Government Accountability Office Report GAO–09–3SP, or any successor report thereto, the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR part 200, and the Federal Acquisition Regulation as appropriate.

(2)

Cost proposal analysis

(A)

General requirement

The Director shall ensure that an external cost proposal analysis is conducted for any major multi-user research facility.

(B)

Resolution of issues found

The Director, or a senior agency official within the Office of the Director designated by the Director, shall certify in writing that all issues identified during the cost analysis, including any findings of unjustified or questionable cost items, are resolved before the Foundation may execute a construction agreement with respect to the project.

(C)

Transmittal to Congress

The Director shall transmit each certification made under subparagraph (B) to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate.

(3)

Incurred cost audits

The Director shall ensure that an incurred cost audit is conducted at least biennially on any major multi-user research facility, in accordance with Government Auditing Standards as established in Government Accountability Office Report GAO–12–331G, or any successor report thereto, with the first incurred cost audit to commence no later than 12 months after execution of the construction agreement.

(4)

Contingencies

(A)

In general

Except as provided for in subparagraph (C)(ii), the Foundation shall—

(i)

provide oversight for contingency in accordance with Cost Principles Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR part 200.433, or any successor thereto, and the Federal Acquisition Regulation as appropriate, except as provided in this paragraph; and

(ii)

not make any award which provides for contributions to a contingency reserve held or managed by the awardee, as defined in 2 CFR part 200.433(c).

(B)

Updating policy manual

The Foundation shall update its Large Facilities Manual and any other applicable guidance for contingencies on major multi-user research facilities with regard to estimating, monitoring, and accounting for contingency.

(C)

Foundation requirements

The policy updated under subparagraph (B) shall require that the Foundation—

(i)

may only include contingency amounts in an award in accordance with Cost Principles Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR part 200.433, or any successor thereto, and the Federal Acquisition Regulation as appropriate; and

(ii)

shall retain control over funds budgeted for contingency, but may disburse budgeted contingency funds incrementally to the awardee to ensure project stability and continuity.

(D)

Awardee requirements

The policy updated under subparagraph (B) shall require that an awardee shall—

(i)

provide verifiable documentation to support any amounts proposed for contingencies; and

(ii)

support requests for the release of contingency funds with evidence of a bona fide need and that the amounts allocated to the performance baseline are reasonable and allowable.

(E)

Current awardees

The Foundation shall work with awardees for whom awards with contingency provisions have been made before the date of enactment of this Act—

(i)

to determine if any of their use of contingency funds represents out-of-scope changes for which Foundation’s prior written approval was not obtained; and

(ii)

if out-of-scope changes are found, to identify any financial action that may be appropriate.

(5)

Management fees

(A)

Definition

In this paragraph, the term management fee means a portion of an award made by the Foundation for the purpose of covering ordinary and legitimate business expenses necessary to maintain operational stability which are not otherwise allowable under Cost Principles Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR part 200, Subpart E, or any successor regulation thereto.

(B)

Limitation

The Foundation may provide a management fee under an award only if the awardee provides justification as to the need for such funds. In such cases, the Foundation shall take into account the awardee’s overall financial circumstances when determining the amount of the fee if justified.

(C)

Financial information

The Foundation shall require award applicants to provide income and financial information covering a period of no less than 3 prior years (or in the case of an entity established less than 3 years prior to the entity’s application date, the period beginning on the date of establishment and ending on the application date), including cash on hand and net asset information, in support of a request for management fees. The Foundation shall also require awardees to report to the Foundation annually any sources of non-Federal funds received in excess of $50,000 during the award period.

(D)

Expense reporting

The Foundation shall require awardees to track and report to the Foundation annually all expenses reimbursed or otherwise paid for with management fee funds, in accordance with Federal accounting practices as established in Government Accountability Office Report GAO–12–331G, or any successor report thereto.

(E)

Audits

The Inspector General of the Foundation may audit any Foundation award for compliance with this paragraph.

(F)

Prohibited uses

An awardee may not use management fees for—

(i)

costs allowable under Cost Principles Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR part 200, Subpart E, or any successor regulation thereto;

(ii)

alcoholic beverages;

(iii)

tickets to concerts, sporting, or other entertainment events;

(iv)

vacation or other travel for nonbusiness purposes;

(v)

charitable contributions, except for a charitable contribution of direct benefit to the project or activity supported by the management fee;

(vi)

social or sporting club memberships;

(vii)

meals or entertainment for nonbusiness purposes;

(viii)

luxury or personal items;

(ix)

lobbying, as described in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.450; or

(x)

any other purpose the Foundation determines is inappropriate.

(G)

Review

The Foundation shall review management fee usage for each Foundation award on at least an annual basis for compliance with this paragraph and the Foundation’s Large Facilities Manual.

(6)

Report

Not later than 12 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director shall submit to Congress a report describing the Foundation’s policies for developing and managing major multi-user research facility construction costs, including a description of any aspects of the policies that diverge from the best practices recommended in Government Accountability Office Report GAO–09–3SP, or any successor report thereto, and the Uniform Guidance in 2 CFR part 200.

(7)

Noncompliance

The Director shall ensure that the Foundation shall take the enforcement actions specified in 45 CFR 92.43 for noncompliance with this section.

4.

Whistleblower education

(a)

In general

The Foundation shall be subject to section 4712 of title 41, United States Code.

(b)

Education and training

The Foundation shall provide education and training for Foundation managers and staff on the requirements of such section 4712, and provide information on such section to all awardees, contractors, and employees of such awardees and contractors.

Passed the House of Representatives June 14, 2016.

Karen L. Haas,

Clerk.