H.R. 1294House115th Congress (2017-2019)Passed House

Reducing DHS Acquisition Cost Growth Act

Introduced March 1, 2017

AI-Generated Summary

Updated April 15, 2026 at 1:17 PM UTC

The Reducing DHS Acquisition Cost Growth Act amends the Homeland Security Act to require the Department of Homeland Security to promptly notify senior officials and the Secretary when a major acquisition program exceeds cost, schedule, or performance thresholds. It also obligates program managers to develop a remediation plan and root‑cause analysis, which the Under Secretary for Management must review and then report to the congressional homeland security committees. The law applies to DHS acquisition programs projected to cost at least $300 million over their life cycle.

Key Provisions

  • If a breach occurs, the program manager must notify key DHS officials within 30 days; if the breach causes a cost overrun >15% or a delay >180 days, the Component Acquisition Executive must notify the Secretary and the Inspector General within five business days.
  • The program manager must submit a written remediation plan and root‑cause analysis detailing the breach, its causes, and corrective actions.
  • The Under Secretary for Management reviews the remediation plan and must approve or propose alternatives within 30 days.
  • Within 30 days of the review, the Under Secretary must send the remediation plan, root‑cause analysis, and a statement of corrective actions to the congressional homeland security committees.
  • For likely cost overruns >20% or delays >12 months, the Under Secretary must include a certification that the program is essential, has no cheaper alternatives, and that revised cost, schedule, and management are reasonable.
  • The bill defines a “major acquisition program” as any DHS program expected to cost at least $300 million and adds a new Sec. 836 to the Homeland Security Act’s table of contents.

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

14 earlier actions
SenateIntro Referral Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

March 21, 2017

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

March 1, 2017

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.

March 1, 2017

HouseCommittee

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

March 8, 2017

HouseCommittee

Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

March 8, 2017

HouseCommittee

Reported by the Committee on Homeland Security. H. Rept. 115-45.

March 20, 2017

HouseCalendars

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 25.

March 20, 2017

HouseFloor

Mr. Rutherford moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

March 20, 2017 • 4:08 PM

HouseFloor

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2213-2215)

March 20, 2017 • 4:08 PM

HouseFloor

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1294.

March 20, 2017 • 4:08 PM

HouseFloor

At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

March 20, 2017 • 4:15 PM

HouseFloor

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2222)

March 20, 2017 • 6:31 PM

HouseFloor

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 408 - 0 (Roll no. 173).(text of measure as passed: CR H2213-2214)

March 20, 2017 • 6:52 PM

HouseFloor

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 408 - 0 (Roll no. 173). (text of measure as passed: CR H2213-2214)

March 20, 2017 • 6:52 PM

HouseFloor

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

March 20, 2017 • 6:52 PM

SenateIntro Referral

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

March 21, 2017

Floor Debate

4 members

What members said about H.R. 1294 on the floor

2 Republicans2 Democrats
John H. Rutherford
Rep. John H. RutherfordR-FL-4 · Mar 20, 2017

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 1294) to amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to provide for congressional notification regarding major acquisition program…

Kathleen M. Rice
Rep. Kathleen M. RiceD-NY-4 · Mar 20, 2017

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 1294, the Reducing DHS Acquisition Cost Growth Act. Since the Department began its operations in 2002,…

Michael T. McCaul
Rep. Michael T. McCaulR-TX-10 · Mar 23, 2017

Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record the cost estimate from the Congressional Budget Office regarding H.R. 1294. The cost estimate was not available at the time of the filing of the Committee report.…

Michael T. McCaul
Rep. Michael T. McCaulR-TX-10 · Jul 24, 2017

Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record the cost estimate from the Congressional Budget Office regarding H.R. 2825. The cost estimate was not available at the time of the filing of the Committee report.…

Thomas R. Suozzi
Rep. Thomas R. SuozziD-NY-3 · Mar 20, 2017

Mr. Speaker, on rollcall vote 173 H.R. 1294, had I been present, I would have voted ``yea.'' On rollcall vote 174 H.R. 1249 (as amended), had I been present, I would have voted ``yea.'' On rollcall…

Bill Text

4 versions available

Reading Mode
Latest
Referred in SenateIssued March 21, 2017

IIB

115th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 1294

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

March 21, 2017

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

AN ACT

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to provide for congressional notification regarding major acquisition program breaches, and for other purposes.

1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Reducing DHS Acquisition Cost Growth Act.

2.

Congressional notification for major acquisition programs

(a)

In general

Subtitle D of title VIII of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 391 et seq.) is further amended by adding at the end the following new section:

836.

Congressional notification and other requirements for major acquisition program breach

(a)

Requirements within Department in event of breach

(1)

Notifications

(A)

Notification of breach

If a breach occurs in a major acquisition program, the program manager for such program shall notify the Component Acquisition Executive for such program, the head of the component concerned, the Executive Director of the Program Accountability and Risk Management division, the Under Secretary for Management, and the Deputy Secretary not later than 30 calendar days after such breach is identified.

(B)

Notification to Secretary

If a breach occurs in a major acquisition program and such breach results in a cost overrun greater than 15 percent, a schedule delay greater than 180 days, or a failure to meet any of the performance thresholds from the cost, schedule, or performance parameters specified in the most recently approved acquisition program baseline for such program, the Component Acquisition Executive for such program shall notify the Secretary and the Inspector General of the Department not later than five business days after the Component Acquisition Executive for such program, the head of the component concerned, the Executive Director of the Program Accountability and Risk Management Division, the Under Secretary for Management, and the Deputy Secretary are notified of the breach pursuant to subparagraph (A).

(2)

Remediation plan and root cause analysis

(A)

In general

If a breach occurs in a major acquisition program, the program manager for such program shall submit to the head of the component concerned, the Executive Director of the Program Accountability and Risk Management division, and the Under Secretary for Management in writing a remediation plan and root cause analysis relating to such breach and program. Such plan and analysis shall be submitted at a date established at the discretion of the Under Secretary for Management.

(B)

Remediation plan

The remediation plan required under this subparagraph (A) shall—

(i)

explain the circumstances of the breach at issue;

(ii)

provide prior cost estimating information;

(iii)

include a root cause analysis that determines the underlying cause or causes of shortcomings in cost, schedule, or performance of the major acquisition program with respect to which such breach has occurred, including the role, if any, of—

(I)

unrealistic performance expectations;

(II)

unrealistic baseline estimates for cost or schedule or changes in program requirements;

(III)

immature technologies or excessive manufacturing or integration risk;

(IV)

unanticipated design, engineering, manufacturing, or technology integration issues arising during program performance;

(V)

changes to the scope of such program;

(VI)

inadequate program funding or changes in planned out-year funding from one 5-year funding plan to the next 5-year funding plan as outlined in the Future Years Homeland Security Program required under section 874;

(VII)

legislative, legal, or regulatory changes; or

(VIII)

inadequate program management personnel, including lack of sufficient number of staff, training, credentials, certifications, or use of best practices;

(iv)

propose corrective action to address cost growth, schedule delays, or performance issues;

(v)

explain the rationale for why a proposed corrective action is recommended; and

(vi)

in coordination with the Component Acquisition Executive for such program, discuss all options considered, including the estimated impact on cost, schedule, or performance of such program if no changes are made to current requirements, the estimated cost of such program if requirements are modified, and the extent to which funding from other programs will need to be reduced to cover the cost growth of such program.

(3)

Review of corrective actions

(A)

In general

The Under Secretary for Management shall review the remediation plan required under paragraph (2). The Under Secretary may approve such plan or provide an alternative proposed corrective action within 30 days of the submission of such plan under such paragraph.

(B)

Submission to Congress

Not later than 30 days after the review required under subparagraph (A) is completed, the Under Secretary for Management shall submit to the congressional homeland security committees the following:

(i)

A copy of the remediation plan and the root cause analysis required under paragraph (2).

(ii)

A statement describing the corrective action or actions that have occurred pursuant to paragraph (2)(b)(iv) for the major acquisition program at issue, with a justification for such action or actions.

(b)

Requirements relating to congressional notification if breach occurs

(1)

Notification to Congress

If a notification to the Secretary is made under subsection (a)(1)(B) relating to a breach in a major acquisition program, the Under Secretary for Management shall notify the congressional homeland security committees of such breach in the next quarterly Comprehensive Acquisition Status Report, as required by title I of division D of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, (Public Law 114–113) following receipt by the Under Secretary of notification under such subsection.

(2)

Significant variances in costs or schedule

If a likely cost overrun is greater than 20 percent or a likely delay is greater than 12 months from the costs and schedule specified in the acquisition program baseline for a major acquisition program, the Under Secretary for Management shall include in the notification required in paragraph (1) a written certification, with supporting explanation, that—

(A)

such program is essential to the accomplishment of the Department’s mission;

(B)

there are no alternatives to the capability or asset provided by such program that will provide equal or greater capability in both a more cost-effective and timely manner;

(C)

the new acquisition schedule and estimates for total acquisition cost are reasonable; and

(D)

the management structure for such program is adequate to manage and control cost, schedule, and performance.

(c)

Definitions

In this section:

(1)

Acquisition

The term acquisition has the meaning given such term in section 131 of title 41, United States Code.

(2)

Acquisition program

The term acquisition program means the process by which the Department acquires, with any appropriated amounts, by contract for purchase or lease, property or services (including construction) that support the missions and goals of the Department.

(3)

Acquisition program baseline

The term acquisition program baseline, with respect to an acquisition program, means a summary of the cost, schedule, and performance parameters, expressed in standard, measurable, quantitative terms, which must be met in order to accomplish the goals of such program.

(4)

Best practices

The term best practices, with respect to acquisition, means a knowledge-based approach to capability development that includes—

(A)

identifying and validating needs;

(B)

assessing alternatives to select the most appropriate solution;

(C)

clearly establishing well-defined requirements;

(D)

developing realistic cost assessments and schedules;

(E)

securing stable funding that matches resources to requirements;

(F)

demonstrating technology, design, and manufacturing maturity;

(G)

using milestones and exit criteria or specific accomplishments that demonstrate progress;

(H)

adopting and executing standardized processes with known success across programs;

(I)

establishing an adequate workforce that is qualified and sufficient to perform necessary functions; and

(J)

integrating the capabilities described in subparagraphs (A) through (I) into the Department’s mission and business operations.

(5)

Breach

The term breach, with respect to a major acquisition program, means a failure to meet any cost, schedule, or performance threshold specified in the most recently approved acquisition program baseline.

(6)

Congressional homeland security committees

The term congressional homeland security committees means—

(A)

the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; and

(B)

the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and of the Senate.

(7)

Component Acquisition Executive

The term Component Acquisition Executive means the senior acquisition official within a component who is designated in writing by the Under Secretary for Management, in consultation with the component head, with authority and responsibility for leading a process and staff to provide acquisition and program management oversight, policy, and guidance to ensure that statutory, regulatory, and higher level policy requirements are fulfilled, including compliance with Federal law, the Federal Acquisition Regulation, and Department acquisition management directives established by the Under Secretary for Management.

(8)

Major acquisition program

The term major acquisition program means a Department acquisition program that is estimated by the Secretary to require an eventual total expenditure of at least $300,000,000 (based on fiscal year 2017 constant dollars) over its life cycle cost.

.

(b)

Clerical amendment

The table of contents in section 1(b) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 835 the following new item:

Sec. 836. Congressional notification and other requirements for major acquisition program breach.

.

Passed the House of Representatives March 20, 2017.

Karen L. Haas,

Clerk.