I
117th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 7389
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
April 4, 2022
Mr. Schrader (for himself, Mr. Guthrie, and Mr. Mullin) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce
A BILL
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to codify value-based purchasing arrangements under the Medicaid program and reforms related to price reporting under such arrangements, and for other purposes.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Medicaid VBPs for Patients Act
or the MVP Act
.
Findings
The Congress finds the following:
Value-based payment (VBP) arrangements are a critical component of a modernized reimbursement system. By codifying elements of the recently finalized “multiple best price” policies of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Congress is enshrining a sustainable and flexible payment approach for innovative treatments and cures.
Many of these treatments, including gene therapies, are different from traditional pharmaceutical and biologic products in that they can offer long-lasting—sometimes lifelong—benefits for patients and long-term value for the health care system alike.
There are hundreds of innovative, curative, and life-changing treatments currently in development in the United States. However, the current reimbursement structure was not designed with these therapies in mind, and allowing for innovative payment arrangements will spur greater development and access to future cures and treatments.
Medicaid is currently losing out on innovative ways to ensure patients have access to these treatments, while private payors continue to see the value provided through flexible payment arrangements.
VBP arrangements include the ability to pay based on evidence-based outcomes and, over time, spreading the risk across all entities involved in the contract and ensuring that these often costly treatments are accessible.
Evidence-based outcomes can demonstrate decreased cost to the health system and to patients, including reduced hospitalizations and lower utilization of other health care expenditures, including lab work, other medications, and office visits.
By allowing VBPs in Medicaid, the health care system will continue to move towards quality over quantity, holding manufacturers and providers accountable for the best treatment for every patient.
Codifying value-based purchasing arrangements under Medicaid and reforms related to price reporting under such arrangements
Codifying the VBP rule
The revision to section 447.505(a) of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations related to the inclusion of varying best price points available under a value-based purchasing arrangement (as defined in section 1927(k)(12) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–8(k)(12), as added by subsection (d) of this section) for a single dosage form and strength of a covered outpatient drug if a manufacturer offers such pricing structure to all States, as published by the Secretary of Health and Human Services on December 31, 2020 (85 Federal Register 87000), shall have the force and effect of law.
Quarterly reporting obligation
In general
Section 1927(b)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–8(b)(3)(A)) is amended—
in clause (iv), by striking at the end and
;
in clause (v), by striking at the end the period and inserting ; and
;
by inserting after clause (v) the following new clause:
for calendar quarters beginning on or after July 1, 2022, in conjunction with reporting required under clause (i), in the case of a covered outpatient drug that is sold under a value-based purchasing arrangement (as defined in subsection (k)(12)) made available by the manufacturer to a State plan—
the pricing structure for such drug based on pre-defined outcomes or measures specified in such value-based purchasing arrangement; and
the best price for such covered outpatient drug outside of a value-based purchasing arrangement, which in the event such drug is sold exclusively through such an arrangement, means the lowest price available net of any discounts or offsets that are unrelated to a refund, rebate, reimbursement, free item, withholding, or repayment made under a value-based purchasing arrangement for such drug.
; and
by adding at the end of the flush left matter at the end the following new sentence: Information reported with respect to a rebate period under clause (i)(I) relating to average manufacturer price and clause (i)(II) relating to best price shall be updated for such rebate period if, subsequent to the date such information was reported, cumulative discounts, rebates, or other arrangements adjust such average price actually realized or best price available to the extent that such cumulative discounts, rebates, or other arrangements are not excluded under this section from the determination of average manufacturer price or best price.
Rules of construction
Nothing in the amendments made by paragraph (1) shall be construed as—
requiring—
a State to enter into a value-based purchasing arrangement with a manufacturer for a covered outpatient drug; or
a manufacturer to enter into a value-based purchasing arrangement with a State for a covered outpatient drug;
prohibiting a manufacturer from treating a value-based purchasing arrangement as a bundled sale; or
precluding the execution of a supplemental rebate agreement, as provided in section 1927(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–8(a)(1)), for a covered outpatient drug sold under a value-based purchasing arrangement.
Definition of average manufacturer price
Section 1927(k)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–8(k)(1)) is amended—
in subparagraph (B)(i)—
in subclause (IV), by striking at the end and
;
in subclause (V), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and
; and
by adding at the end the following new subclause:
in accordance with subsection (b)(3)(A)(vi), with respect to such covered outpatient drug that is sold under a value-based purchasing arrangement (as defined in paragraph (12)) during the rebate period—
a refund, rebate, reimbursement, or free goods from the manufacturer or third party on behalf of the manufacturer; or
the withholding or reduction of a payment to the manufacturer or third party on behalf of the manufacturer;
; and
by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
Special rule for certain value-based purchasing arrangements
For purposes of subparagraph (A), in determining the average price paid to the manufacturer for a covered outpatient drug that is sold under a value-based purchasing arrangement (as defined in paragraph (12)) that provides that payment for such drug is made in installments over the course of such agreement, such price shall be determined as if the aggregate price per the terms of the agreement was paid in full in the first installment during the rebate period.
.
Definition of value-Based purchasing arrangement
Section 1927(k) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–8(k)) shall be amended by adding at the end the following paragraph:
Value-Based Purchasing Arrangement
The term value-based purchasing arrangement means an arrangement or agreement intended to align pricing or payments to an observed or expected therapeutic or clinical value in a select population and includes—
evidence-based measures, which substantially link the cost of a covered outpatient drug to existing evidence of effectiveness and potential value for specific uses of that product; or
outcomes-based measures, which substantially link payment for the covered outpatient drug to that of the drug’s actual performance in patient or a population, or a reduction in other medical expenses.
.
Effective date
The amendments made by this section shall apply beginning on July 1, 2022.
Remuneration in Federal health care programs
In general
Section 1128B(b)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320a–7b(b)(3)) is amended—
in subclause (J)—
by moving the left margin of such subparagraph 2 ems to the left; and
by striking and
after the semicolon at the end;
in subclause (K)—
by moving the left margin of such subparagraph 2 ems to the left; and
by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and
; and
by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
any remuneration provided by a manufacturer or third party on behalf of a manufacturer to a plan under a value-based purchasing arrangement (as defined in section 1927(k)(12)) in the case a patient fails to achieve outcomes or measures defined in such arrangement following the administration of a covered outpatient drug (as defined in section 1927(k)(2)).
.
Effective date
The amendments made by this section shall apply beginning on July 1, 2022.
GAO study and report on use of value-based purchasing arrangements
Study
The Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a study on the extent to which value-based purchasing arrangements (as defined in section 1927(k)(12) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–8(k)(12)) facilitate patient access to covered outpatient drugs, improve patient outcomes, lower overall health system costs, and lower costs for patients in Federal health care programs. In conducting such study, the Comptroller General shall—
study the impact of this Act on—
access to transformative therapies, including rare disease gene therapies, generally;
mitigating socioeconomic disparities in accessing covered outpatient drugs sold under value-based purchasing arrangements through its requirement that State Medicaid programs have access to the same value-based purchasing arrangement pricing structure that are available in the commercial market for such drugs; and
the Medicaid drug rebate program under section 1927 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–8), the 340B drug pricing program under section 340B of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 256b), and part B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395j et seq.), including compliance with such programs; and
using data submitted pursuant to clause (vi) of section 1927(b)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–8(b)(3)(A)), as added by section 3 of this Act, analyze all the types of value-based purchasing arrangement pricing structures, which structures are working well (as measured by price and ease of implementing), and which need improvement.
Report
Not later than June 30, 2027, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to Congress a report containing the results of the study conducted under subsection (a).