H.R. 1093House118th Congress (2023-2025)Passed House

To direct the Secretary of State to submit to Congress a report on implementation of the advanced capabilities pillar of the trilateral security partnership between Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Introduced February 17, 2023

AI-Generated Summary

Updated January 20, 2026 at 3:47 AM UTC

The bill requires the Secretary of State, working with the Secretary of Defense, to submit a detailed report to Congress on how the United States is implementing the advanced capabilities pillar of the AUKUS security partnership with Australia and the United Kingdom. The report must be delivered within 90 days of the law’s enactment and will cover export‑license processing times, ITAR violations, civil penalties, relevant laws, and recommendations for improving export‑control regimes. It is aimed at improving coordination among U.S. agencies and ensuring the partnership supports Indo‑Pacific stability.

Key Provisions

  • Expresses Congress’s sense that the AUKUS partnership should enhance Indo‑Pacific peace and requires a whole‑of‑government review of processes to support joint advanced‑capability development
  • Mandates that the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, submit a report to the House Foreign Affairs and Armed Services Committees and the Senate Foreign Relations and Armed Services Committees within 90 days of enactment
  • Requires the report to include average and median U.S. licensing review times for defense exports to Australia and the UK for 2021‑2022, and for foreign military sales requests
  • Calls for data on the number of ITAR‑related voluntary disclosures and violations by Australian and UK entities for fiscal years 2017‑2022, including details on unauthorized access, security lapses, and unauthorized re‑exports
  • Requests information on civil penalties assessed for such violations from 2017‑2022
  • Lists U.S. laws, regulations, treaties, and international agreements governing export authorizations relevant to AUKUS
  • Provides an assessment of U.S. recommendations to Australia and the UK for revising their laws and policies to support the partnership
  • Evaluates suggested improvements to export‑control laws in the United States, Australia, and the United Kingdom and identifies challenges faced by the allies in meeting U.S. requirements

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

12 earlier actions
SenateIntro Referral Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

March 23, 2023

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

February 17, 2023

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

February 17, 2023

HouseCommittee

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

February 28, 2023

HouseCommittee

Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

February 28, 2023

HouseFloor

Mr. McCaul moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

March 22, 2023 • 5:00 PM

HouseFloor

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H1309-1311)

March 22, 2023 • 5:01 PM

HouseFloor

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 1093.

March 22, 2023 • 5:01 PM

HouseFloor

At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.

March 22, 2023 • 5:15 PM

HouseFloor

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1316-1317)

March 22, 2023 • 6:30 PM

HouseFloor

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 393 - 4 (Roll no. 144). (text: CR H1309)

March 22, 2023 • 6:54 PM

HouseFloor

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 393 - 4 (Roll no. 144). (text: CR H1309)

March 22, 2023 • 6:54 PM

HouseFloor

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

March 22, 2023 • 6:54 PM

SenateIntro Referral

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

March 23, 2023

Floor Debate

13 members

What members said about H.R. 1093 on the floor

2 Republicans11 Democrats
Michael T. McCaul
Rep. Michael T. McCaulR-TX-10 · Mar 22, 2023

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 1093) to direct the Secretary of State to submit to Congress a report on implementation of the advanced capabilities pillar of the…

Joe Courtney
Rep. Joe CourtneyD-CT-2 · Mar 22, 2023

Mr. Speaker, I rise to enthusiastically support H.R. 1093, a bill that will identify key parts of our Nation's system of export controls that should be amended and expedited to achieve the goals of…

Gregory W. Meeks
Rep. Gregory W. MeeksD-NY-5 · Mar 22, 2023

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I thank the chairman and his staff for working collectively on this bipartisan bill at this very important time. Clearly, making…

Mikie Sherrill
Rep. Mikie SherrillD-NJ-11 · Mar 24, 2023

Mr. Speaker, on March 22, 2023, I missed votes on the House Floor. Had I been present, I would have voted: YEA on Roll Call No. 144, To direct the Secretary of State to submit to Congress a report on…

Earl Blumenauer
Rep. Earl BlumenauerD-OR-3 · Mar 22, 2023

Mr. Speaker, had I been present for rollcall No. 144, the vote today on the motion to suspend the rules and pass H.R. 1093, I would have voted ``yea.'' Additionally, had I been present for rollcall…

Show 8 more
Grace F. Napolitano
Rep. Grace F. NapolitanoD-CA-31 · Mar 22, 2023

Mr. Speaker, I was absent due to representing the United States government at the United Nations 2023 Water Conference. Had I been present, I would have voted in the following way: ``yea'' on…

Marcy Kaptur
Rep. Marcy KapturD-OH-9 · Apr 19, 2023

Mr. Speaker, I would like to clarify my position on H.R. 1093, the bill requiring State to submit a report to Congress on the impact of export controls on implementing the AUKUS partnership. I voted…

Jennifer Wexton
Rep. Jennifer WextonD-VA-10 · Mar 22, 2023

Mr. Speaker, I regret that I was not able to be present for rollcall No. 144, the motion to suspend the rules and pass H.R. 1093. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 144.

Josh Gottheimer
Rep. Josh GottheimerD-NJ-5 · Mar 22, 2023

Mr. Speaker, I missed the following votes due to a family issue. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 144 and ``yea'' on rollcall No. 145.

Suzanne Bonamici
Rep. Suzanne BonamiciD-OR-1 · Mar 22, 2023

Mr. Speaker, I regret to inform you that I missed the vote on rollcall No. 144. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 144.

Marcy Kaptur
Rep. Marcy KapturD-OH-9 · Mar 22, 2023

Mr. Speaker, during rollcall vote No. 144 on H.R. 1093, I mistakenly recorded my vote as ``no'' when I should have voted ``yes''.

Jennifer A. Kiggans
Rep. Jennifer A. KiggansR-VA-2 · Mar 22, 2023

Mr. Speaker, I was unavoidably detained. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 144.

Adam B. Schiff
Sen. Adam B. SchiffD-CA · Mar 22, 2023

Mr. Speaker, I was unavoidably detained. Had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 144.

Show 1 more
Al Green
Rep. Al GreenD-TX-9 · Mar 22, 2023

Mr. Speaker, had I been present, I would have voted ``yea'' on rollcall No. 144.

Bill Text

3 versions available

Reading Mode
Latest
Referred in SenateIssued March 23, 2023

IIB

118th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 1093

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

March 23, 2023

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of State to submit to Congress a report on implementation of the advanced capabilities pillar of the trilateral security partnership between Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States.


1.

Implementation of the advanced capabilities pillar of the trilateral security partnership between Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States

(a)

Sense of congress

It is the sense of Congress that—

(1)

the enhanced trilateral security partnership between Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States (in this section referred to as the AUKUS partnership) is intended to positively contribute to peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region through enhanced deterrence;

(2)

to this end, implementation of the AUKUS partnership will require a whole-of-government review of processes and procedures for Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States to benefit from such partnership and, in particular, to support joint development of advanced capabilities;

(3)

the Department of State plays a pivotal role in the administration of arms exports and sales programs under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq.) and the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.);

(4)

the Department of State should work in coordination with the Department of Defense and other relevant United States Government agencies to seek to expeditiously implement the AUKUS partnership; and

(5)

the Department of State, in coordination with the Department of Defense, should clearly communicate any United States requirements to address matters related to the technology security and export control measures of Australia and the United Kingdom.

(b)

Report

(1)

In general

Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on efforts of the Department of State to implement the advanced capabilities pillar of the AUKUS partnership.

(2)

Matters to be included

The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:

(A)

For each of the calendar years 2021 and 2022—

(i)

the average and median times for the United States Government to review applications for licenses to export defense articles or defense services to persons, corporations, and the governments (including agencies and subdivisions of such governments, including official missions of such governments) of Australia or the United Kingdom;

(ii)

the average and median times for the United States Government to review applications from Australia and the United Kingdom for foreign military sales beginning from the date Australia or the United Kingdom submitted a letter of request that resulted in a letter of acceptance with; and

(iii)

the number of applications from Australia and the United Kingdom for licenses to export defense articles and defense services that were denied or approved with provisos, listed by year.

(B)

For each of the fiscal years 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022, the number of voluntary disclosures resulting in a violation of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) enumerated under section 40 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780) or involving proscribed countries listed in section 126.1 of the ITAR, by persons, corporations, and the governments (including agencies and subdivisions of such governments, including official missions of such governments) of Australia or the United Kingdom, including information with respect to—

(i)

any instance of unauthorized access to technical data or defense articles;

(ii)

inadequate physical or cyber security;

(iii)

retransfers or re-exports without authorization; and

(iv)

employees of foreign companies that are United States persons that provide defense services without authorization.

(C)

The value of any civil penalties assessed from 2017 to 2022 for disclosures or violations described in subparagraph (B) on United States applicants that involved foreign persons, foreign corporations, and foreign governments in the United Kingdom or Australia.

(D)

A list of relevant United States laws, regulations, and treaties and other international agreements to which the United States is a party that govern authorizations to export defense articles or defense services that are required to implement the AUKUS partnership.

(E)

An assessment of key recommendations the United States Government has provided to the governments of Australia and the United Kingdom to revise laws, regulations, and policies of such countries that are required to implement the AUKUS partnership.

(F)

An assessment of recommended improvements to export control laws and regulations of Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States that such countries should make to implement the AUKUS partnership and to otherwise meet the requirements of section 38(j)(2) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778(j)(2)), and the challenges Australia and the United Kingdom have conveyed in meeting these requirements including with respect to sensitive defense technology security controls.

(c)

Appropriate congressional committees defined

In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means—

(1)

the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives; and

(2)

the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate.

Passed the House of Representatives March 22, 2023.

Cheryl L. Johnson,

Clerk.