H.R. 3399House118th Congress (2023-2025)Passed House

Soo Locks Security and Economic Reporting Act of 2023

Sponsored by John JamesRep. John James (R-MI)
Introduced May 17, 2023

AI-Generated Summary

Updated January 20, 2026 at 7:48 AM UTC

The Soo Locks Security and Economic Reporting Act of 2023 requires the federal government to examine the safety of the Soo Locks in Michigan and how a lock failure would affect U.S. supply chains. Within one year of the law’s passage, the Secretary of Transportation, working with the Coast Guard and the Defense Department, must deliver a detailed report to several congressional committees. The bill aims to identify security gaps, potential threats, and economic consequences, and to suggest ways to improve protection and reduce supply‑chain disruptions.

Key Provisions

  • Mandates a report to be submitted within one year of enactment.
  • The report must be prepared by the Secretary of Transportation in coordination with the Coast Guard Commandant and the Secretary of Defense.
  • The report must cover security deficiencies, supply‑chain and economic impacts of a lock failure, domestic and international threats, and the current security framework involving federal, state, and local agencies.
  • It must include recommendations and cost estimates for strengthening lock security and mitigating supply‑chain impacts.
  • The report is to be sent to the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, the Senate Commerce, Transportation, and Science Committee, and the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

18 earlier actions
SenateIntro Referral Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

July 27, 2023

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

May 17, 2023

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

May 17, 2023

HouseCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation.

May 18, 2023

HouseCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.

May 18, 2023

HouseCommittee

Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Discharged.

May 23, 2023

HouseCommittee

Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment Discharged.

May 23, 2023

HouseCommittee

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

May 23, 2023

HouseCommittee

Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

May 23, 2023

HouseCommittee

Reported by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. H. Rept. 118-133.

July 10, 2023

HouseCalendars

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 104.

July 10, 2023

HouseFloor

Mr. James moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

July 25, 2023 • 4:59 PM

HouseFloor

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H3916-3918)

July 25, 2023 • 4:59 PM

HouseFloor

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 3399.

July 25, 2023 • 4:59 PM

HouseFloor

At the conclusion of debate, the chair put the question on the motion to suspend the rules. Mr. James objected to the vote on the grounds that a quorum was not present. Further proceedings on the motion were postponed. The point of no quorum was considered as withdrawn.

July 25, 2023 • 5:08 PM

HouseFloor

Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H3976)

July 26, 2023 • 2:04 PM

HouseFloor

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: 7/25/2023 CR H3916)

July 26, 2023 • 2:05 PM

HouseFloor

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: 7/25/2023 CR H3916)

July 26, 2023 • 2:05 PM

HouseFloor

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

July 26, 2023 • 2:05 PM

SenateIntro Referral

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

July 27, 2023

Floor Debate

3 members

What members said about H.R. 3399 on the floor

2 Republicans1 Democrat
John James
Rep. John JamesR-MI-10 · Jul 25, 2023

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 3399) to study the security of the Soo Locks and effects on the supply chain resulting from a malfunction or failure of the Soo Locks,…

Pete Stauber
Rep. Pete StauberR-MN-8 · Jul 25, 2023

Mr. Speaker, I spent the last 2 years of my college experience living in dorm rooms that were about 250 yards from the Soo Locks at the beautiful Lake Superior State University. Mr. Speaker, I rise…

Jake Auchincloss
Rep. Jake AuchinclossD-MA-4 · Jul 25, 2023

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. I rise in support of H.R. 3399, which, like my bill that is also under suspension today, will help to ensure a safe and resilient American…

Bill Text

4 versions available

Reading Mode
Latest
Referred in SenateIssued July 27, 2023

IIB

118th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 3399

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

July 27, 2023

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

AN ACT

To study the security of the Soo Locks and effects on the supply chain resulting from a malfunction or failure of the Soo Locks, and for other purposes.


1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Soo Locks Security and Economic Reporting Act of 2023.

2.

Report on security and economic effects on supply chain of Soo Locks, Michigan

(a)

In general

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation, in coordination with the Commandant of the Coast Guard and the Secretary of Defense, shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that—

(1)

highlights any security deficiencies that exist with respect to the Soo Locks in Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan;

(2)

highlights the supply chain, logistical, and economic effects that would result in the event of a malfunction or failure of the Soo Locks and how such effects would impact the region surrounding the Soo Locks and the United States;

(3)

highlights any potential domestic or international threats to the integrity of the Soo Locks;

(4)

details the current security structure of the Coast Guard and any other relevant Federal, State, or local agency to protect the Soo Locks; and

(5)

provides any recommendations, and cost estimates for such recommendations, for—

(A)

strengthening the security of the Soo Locks; and

(B)

reducing the impacts to the supply chain of the United States that would result in the event of a malfunction or failure of the Soo Locks.

(b)

Appropriate committees of Congress defined

In this Act, the term appropriate committees of Congress means—

(1)

the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives;

(2)

the Committee on Commerce, Transportation, and Science of the Senate; and

(3)

the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate.

Passed the House of Representatives July 26, 2023.

Kevin F. McCumber,

Clerk.